Millions of students face interest restart as court blocks SAVE loan plan
The Education Department said the primary reason it restarted interest was because it sought to comply with a federal court injunction from July 2024 that blocked the full implementation of the SAVE plan . The injunction from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is what placed borrowers in an indefinite period of forbearance, which postpones their payments.
That was done so the federal government could figure out how to transition millions of people out of the program , later ruled to be illegal by the same court in February 2024. 'For years, the Biden Administration used so-called "loan forgiveness" promises to win votes, but federal courts repeatedly ruled that those actions were unlawful,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. 'Since day one of the Trump Administration, we've focused on strengthening the student loan portfolio and simplifying repayment to better serve borrowers,' she added.
Guidance from the Education Department in January estimated that SAVE plan enrollees won't have to actually start paying servicers until December 2025. Mike Pierce, the executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, called the policy pivot by the Trump administration a 'betrayal' and attacked McMahon. 'Instead of fixing the broken student loan system, Secretary McMahon is choosing to drown millions of people in unnecessary interest charges and blaming unrelated court cases for her own mismanagement,' Pierce told ABC News in a statement. The Student Borrower Protection Center's mission is to reduce the federal student debt burden on Americans, which has swelled to over $1.6 trillion. Student debt is more difficult to get rid of than other types of debt, as it cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
More than a decade before championing student loan forgiveness as president, Joe Biden as a senator voted for a 2005 law that made it even harder for Americans to wipe out their education loans through the bankruptcy process. Pierce said the Trump administration's latest move, though framed as a way to end the debt crisis, will only exacerbate the problem. 'Every day we hear from borrowers waiting on hold with their servicer for hours, begging the government to let them out of this forbearance and help them get back on track -- instead McMahon is choosing to jack up the cost of their student debt without giving them a way out,' he said. 'These are teachers, nurses and retail workers who trusted the government's word, only to get sucker-punched by bills that will now cost them hundreds more every month,' Pierce added.
The SAVE plan that is now being wound down was introduced by Biden in August 2023 after the Supreme Court ruled that his prior student loan forgiveness plan was unconstitutional. That program would have canceled $20,000 in loans for Pell Grant recipients and $10,000 for non Pell-Grant recipients. Forgiveness also would have only been reserved for people making less than $125,000 per year. The SAVE plan still aimed to cancel debt, though enrolled borrowers were required to make consistent payments for a maximum of 25 years to get their loan slate wiped clean, regardless of the amount borrowed.
The interest restart for SAVE borrowers comes less than a week after President Donald Trump signed the Big Beautiful Bill into law. That law, Trump's signature domestic policy agenda for his second term, includes a provision that radically reduces the number of student loan repayment plans borrowers can use. Before the law's passage, there were about 12 different programs to choose from.
Now there are just two: a standard repayment plan and a new income-driven repayment plan called Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP). Under RAP, borrowers' monthly payments will be set as a share of their income. For instance, if someone makes between $10,000 and $20,000, they would be obligated to pay 1 percent of that toward their loans. At the higher end of the scale people with incomes of $100,000 or more would have to pay 10 percent. In May, economist Jason Delisle, a nonresident senior fellow at the Urban Institute, put together his best estimate of what a single-person household would end up paying every month. Delisle compared the Big Beautiful Bill's approach to the income-based repayment plan passed under former President Barack Obama. People making $30,000 all the way up to $70,000 would actually pay less each month under the GOP plan, according to Delisle. The only groups who would have to pay more are those bring in no income, those who make $20,000 a year and people who earn upwards of $100,000.
The standard repayment plan under the Big Beautiful Bill does not take income into account, rather it sets fixed monthly payments based on the size of the loan balance. Larger balances are also given longer time periods to pay off. For example, a collection of federal student loans worth less than $25,000 can be paid off in 10 years, while a loans exceeding $100,000 can be paid over a period of 25 years, according to the text of the law. Students who took out loans before July 1, 2026, will still have access to the myriad of repayment plans. The new changes Republicans passed will only affect people who take out loans after that date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Animal shelters across US seeing rise in 'owner surrenders'
Another troubling sign of economic strain: more Americans are giving up their pets. Animal shelters across the US are seeing a rise in 'owner surrenders,' as families hand over dogs and cats they can no longer afford to keep. Volunteers say it's often an early warning sign of deeper financial distress. 'There are times when the economy has taken a dip or we've had a lot of job layoffs,' Melissa Knicely, a staffer at North Carolina shelter, told CNN . When that happens, '100 percent' there will be a jump in pets given up. Knicely's shelter has seen a 43 percent spike in surrenders this year — with most families saying they simply couldn't afford to keep their pets. They're not alone. Several rescues across the country have reported similar issues. Risa Weinstock, president of the Animal Care Centers of New York City, said her organization has stopped accepting new animals because they're over capacity. 'We're in the business to care for animals that come to us, and we want to help people with their pets,' she told NBC News . 'But when we have 1,000 animals to care for and a capacity to house them that doesn't meet that need, we're in a bit of a difficult situation.' Dog and cat ownership has become significantly more expensive in recent years, with the price of food and veterinary care climbing steeply. Porter County Animal Shelter, an adoption center in Indiana, estimates that dog owners spend between $20 and $60 a month on food alone. Annual costs — including beds, collars, medical treatments, grooming, and other basics — can total any additional $925 to $2,900, depending on the dog's breed and size, they estimate. The increasing pet prices are also coming while Americans continue to struggle with their own day-to-day bills. Food prices have soared since 2020 as restaurants, grocery stores, and suppliers scrambled to rebuild supply chains after pandemic shutdowns. Now, with tariff campaigns, heightened interest rates , growing geopolitical uncertainty, and new price rises, consumers are starting to feel their wallets getting stretched further. Last month, the Labor Department said that prices rose 2.7 percent — the largest increase since February — breaking a months-long streak of slowing inflation. And Americans are increasingly taking out consumer debt to pay for those higher prices. Still, a majority of economic indicators point to a robust economy. Unemployment claims fell again last week, and the latest jobs report showed that Americans are working and earning more than before. Those figures have helped reassure Wall Street investors, who continue to pour money into the economy on hopes that US consumers will keep spending. But for many households, the gap between those promising macroeconomic signals and the realities of rising costs feels impossible to ignore.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Higher US tariffs part of the price Europe was willing to pay for its security and arms for Ukraine
France's prime minister described it as a 'dark day' for the European Union, a 'submission' to U.S. tariff demands. Commentators said EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen's handshake with President Donald Trump amounted to capitulation. The trouble is, Europe depends mightily on the United States, and not just for trade. Mirroring Trump, Von der Leyen gushed that the arrangement she endorsed over the weekend to set U.S. tariff levels on most European exports to 15%, which is 10% higher than currently, was 'huge.' Her staff texted reporters insisting that the pact, which starts to enter force on Friday, is the 'biggest trade deal ever.' A month after NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte ingratiated himself with Trump by referring to him as 'daddy,' the Europeans had again conceded that swallowing the costs and praising an unpredictable president is more palatable than losing America. 'It's not only about the trade. It's about security. It's about Ukraine. It's about current geopolitical volatility. I cannot go into all the details,' EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič told reporters Monday. 'I can assure you it was not only about the trade,' he insisted, a day after 'the deal' was sealed in an hour-long meeting once Trump finished playing a round of golf with his son at the course he owns in Scotland. The state of Europe's security dependency Indeed, Europe depends on the U.S. for its security and that security is anything but a game, especially since Russia invaded Ukraine. U.S. allies are convinced that, should he win, President Vladimir Putin is likely to take aim at one of them next. So high are these fears that European countries are buying U.S. weapons to help Ukraine to defend itself. Some are prepared to send their own air defense systems and replace them with U.S. equipment, once it can be delivered. 'We're going to be sending now military equipment and other equipment to NATO, and they'll be doing what they want, but I guess it's for the most part working with Ukraine,' Trump said Sunday, sounding ambivalent about America's role in the alliance. The Europeans also are wary about a U.S. troop drawdown, which the Pentagon is expected to announce by October. Around 84,000 U.S. personnel are based in Europe, and they guarantee NATO's deterrent effect against an adversary like Russia. At the same time, Trump is slapping duties on America's own NATO partners, ostensibly due to concerns about U.S. security interests, using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a logic that seems absurd from across the Atlantic. Weaning Europe off foreign suppliers 'The EU is in a difficult situation because we're very dependent on the U.S. for security,' said Niclas Poitiers at the Bruegel research institution in Brussels. 'Ukraine is a very big part of that, but also generally our defense is underwritten by NATO.' 'I think there was not a big willingness to pick a major fight, which is the one (the EU) might have needed with the U.S.' to better position itself on trade, Poitiers told The Associated Press about key reasons for von der Leyen to accept the tariff demands. Part of the agreement involves a commitment to buy American oil and gas. Over the course of the Russia-Ukraine war, now in its fourth year, most of the EU has slashed its dependence on unreliable energy supplies from Russia, but Hungary and Slovakia still have not. 'Purchases of U.S. energy products will diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security. We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of U.S. LNG, oil and nuclear fuels,' von der Leyen said in Scotland on Sunday. In essence, as Europe slowly weans itself off Russian energy it is also struggling to end its reliance on the United States for its security. The Trump administration has warned its priorities now lie elsewhere, in Asia, the Middle East and on its own borders. That was why European allies agreed at NATO's summit last month to spend hundreds of billions of dollars more on defense over the next decade. Primarily for their own security, but also to keep America among their ranks. The diplomacy involved was not always elegant. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a private text message to Trump, which the U.S. leader promptly posted on social media. Rutte brushed off questions about potential embarrassment or concern that Trump had aired it, saying: 'I have absolutely no trouble or problem with that because there's nothing in it which had to stay secret.' A price Europe feels it must pay Von der Leyen did not appear obsequious in her meeting with Trump. She often stared at the floor or smiled politely. She did not rebut Trump when he said that only America is sending aid to Gaza. The EU is world's biggest supplier of aid to the Palestinians. With Trump's threat of 30% tariffs hanging over European exports — whether real or brinksmanship is hard to say — and facing the prospect of a full-blown trade dispute while Europe's biggest war in decades rages, 15% may have been a cheap price to pay. 'In terms of the economic impact on the EU economy itself, it will be negative,' Poitiers said. 'But it's not something that is on a comparable magnitude like the energy crisis after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, or even COVID.' 'This is a negative shock for our economy, but it is something that's very manageable,' he said. It remains an open question as to how long this entente will last. ___
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
S&P, Nasdaq futures edge up amid earnings, UnitedHealth pressures Dow
July 29 (Reuters) - S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures ticked higher on Tuesday as investors assessed earnings reports from some of the top U.S. companies, while Dow futures lost some steam following a gloomy outlook from heavyweight UnitedHealth. At 06:50 a.m. ET, S&P 500 E-minis were up 17.75 points, or 0.28%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 110.75 points, or 0.47%. Dow E-minis rose 0.04%, but the gains were capped as healthcare conglomerate UnitedHealth (UNH.N), opens new tab dropped 4.7% in premarket trading following a disappointing profit forecast. Meanwhile, out of 168 S&P 500 companies that have reported, nearly 80% have beaten earnings expectations, according to Friday's LSEG data. But caution lingers, as some of Wall Street's giants feel the sting of U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. United Parcel Service (UPS.N), opens new tab became the latest victim of the tariffs, falling 4% after the delivery company reported lower-than-expected second-quarter profit. On Monday, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq scored fresh record closes amid volatile trading, buoyed by a U.S.-EU trade deal that halved tariffs to 15% and stoked hopes of further global agreements ahead of Trump's looming August 1 deadline. The President has also floated a potential "world tariff" of 15-20% for non-negotiating countries. U.S. and Chinese officials on Tuesday kicked off a second day of high-stakes talks in Stockholm, aiming to cool tensions and avert a deepening trade war between the world's two largest economies. Negotiators are eyeing a possible 90-day extension to the fragile tariff truce brokered in May. Earnings from tech heavyweights Meta (META.O), opens new tab, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab are scheduled for later this week, which could test Wall Street's record run. "The easiest gains (on Wall St) have now happened, and any further rise is likely to happen much more slowly," said Thomas Mathews, head of Markets at Capital Economics. "The narrowness of the rally means it may depend especially heavily on "big tech" profit results continuing to paint a positive picture." Spotify (SPOT.N), opens new tab tumbled 6.5% after the company forecast third-quarter profit below estimates. The U.S. central bank is set to begin its two-day policy meeting later in the day. While the Fed is expected to leave rates unchanged on Wednesday, traders will closely analyze policymakers' remarks to gauge the timing of future moves. According to the CME FedWatch tool, markets are pricing in a 61.7% chance of a rate cut in September. The meetings come amid the White House's campaign on the central bank to lower borrowing costs, including Trump's persistent criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell and occasional suggestions to remove him from his position. Investors are now focused on the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) and consumer confidence reports for more clues on the U.S. economy, which continues to show signs of labor market strength—even as some inflationary pressures from tariffs begin to surface. Analysts urge patience, as they await more data before sounding any alarms. Among other earnings-related moves, Cadence Design (CDNS.O), opens new tab jumped 7.7% in premarket trading after the chip design software provider raised its annual sales and profit forecast.
