
EU-China summit exposes deepening tensions – DW – 07/25/2025
Chinese President Xi Jinping met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing at a tense bilateral summit, making no headway on geopolitical disputes and only modest advances on trade and climate change.
While EU leaders raised concerns over China's export surplus flooding European markets with cheap goods, and Beijing allegedly providing support for Russia's war in Ukraine, Chinese officials denied responsibility for these challenges and instead called for a deepening of the partnership.
"As our cooperation has deepened, so have imbalances," von der Leyen told Xi during their meeting, describing EU-China trade imbalances as having reached "an inflection point" where China must "come forward with real solutions."
But Xi told von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa that "there are no fundamental conflicts of interest or geopolitical contradictions' between the two sides and urged the bloc to "properly handle differences and frictions."
"It is hoped that the European side will keep the trade and investment market open and refrain from using restrictive economic and trade tools," Xi said, according to a Chinese version of a press release published by China's Foreign Ministry.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Despite the apparent discrepancy over trade and the Ukraine war, the two sides found common ground on climate change, releasing a joint statement that reaffirmed their commitment to deepen cooperation on green transition.
They have also agreed to establish what von der Leyen described as an "upgraded export supply mechanism" aimed at fast-tracking licenses for rare earth materials — over which China dominates global supply and has recently tightened export controls.
Still, the summit is unlikely to shift the trajectory of EU-China tensions in the long run, said Abigael Vasselier, head of the foreign relations team at the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a think tank, during an online media briefing.
"Europe needs to be ready for a long-term struggle and probably needs to rethink its China strategy at this stage," she said.
In the run-up to the summit, EU-China relations hit rock bottomamid trade friction and geopolitical grievances.
Earlier this month, the bloc included Chinese banks and companies for the first time in a new sanctions package against Russia for its attack on Ukraine.
Beijing then threatened to respond with necessary steps to counter Europe's move that "seriously harmed the trade, economic and financial ties."
Revived hawkish rhetoric towards China was evident in a recent speech by von der Leyen, in which she accused China of "de-facto enabling Russia's war economy."
At a press conference following the summit, the European leader once again urged China to use its influence to "make sure that Russia is coming seriously to the negotiation table."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy, an affiliated scholar at the Free University of Brussels, said the message the EU sends to China was "clear and consistent" once again at the summit.
"What Europe needs to do is to hold its ground and try to stay as coherent as possible … so that we do not allow China to divide and undermine the unity that we have," she told DW.
Prior to the summit, many in Brussels were surprised by reports of an unexpectedly frank remark made by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who allegedly told the EU's top diplomat that it would not be in Beijing's interest to see a Russian loss in Ukraine.
Wang Guochen, a China economy assistant research fellow at Taiwan's Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER), said these recent interactions have escalated tensions and the summit once again "confirmed that China-EU relations are unlikely to improve."
During his speech at the summit, China's Xi mentioned a "win-win situation" multiple times to invite the EU to "jointly promote an equal and orderly world multipolarization and inclusive economic globalization."
Grzegorz Stec, head of the Brussels office at MERICS, told DW prior to the summit that Beijing's goal is to "erode the EU's de-risking and trade defense strategies and keep the market open for as long as possible."
China is currently dealing with overcapacity against a backdrop of limited domestic consumption and 33 consecutive months of deflation as of June.
"China is producing too much and it needs those goods to go somewhere. That's what makes access to Europe still relevant and important," Stec told DW.
By limiting the summit's deliverables to rare earth-related agreements, China appears to be leveraging its export restrictions on critical minerals to pressure the EU into scaling back, or even lifting, tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese electric vehicles.
Under Beijing's new regulations, exporters of rare earth elements and magnets must obtain a license for every shipment and submit documentation detailing how the materials will be used.
And although the summit produced an agreement on an "upgraded export supply mechanism," it likely fell short of European businesses' expectations of easing the stringent export controls.
Even though the summit ended with few meaningful outcomes, it may still be seen as a positive result from Beijing's perspective, given the worsening transatlantic relationship.
Just a day before the meeting, EU diplomats told reporters that the bloc was moving towards a trade deal with Washington that would impose a broad 15% tariff on EU goods — avoiding a previously proposed 30% rate.
Still, a growing number of EU member states, including Germany, are reportedly considering invoking wide-ranging "anti-coercion" measures if a deal cannot be reached by August 1.
"China could demonstrate that it is committed to pursuing cooperation and project itself as a solution provider, as a peace supporter in a turbulent world," Ferenczy said.
"This is the language the Chinese side often uses both internationally and domestically — that China and the EU are meant for positive cooperation," she added.
But not everyone sees Beijing as having the upper hand after the summit.
"From my perspective, Beijing actually lost out here," said Wang, the China economy researcher. "With US-EU relations being strained … Beijing still didn't succeed in winning over Europe."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local Germany
an hour ago
- Local Germany
What we know so far about the EU-US trade deal
The stakes were high with a looming August 1st deadline and $1.9 trillion transatlantic trading relationship on the line. Many European businesses will breathe a sigh of relief after the leaders agreed the 27-country bloc will face a baseline levy of 15 percent instead of a threatened 30 percent -- but the deal will not satisfy everyone. Here is what we know so far: What did the EU-US agree? Both sides confirmed there will be a 15-percent across-the-board rate on a majority of EU goods -- the same level secured by Japan this month -- with bilateral tariff exemptions on some products. The deal will bring relief for the bloc's auto sector, employing around 13 million people -- and hit by Trump with 25-percent tariffs, on top of a pre-existing 2.5 percent. "Obviously, it is good news for the car industry. So Germany will be happy. And all the EU members with auto supply chains, they go from 27.5 to 15 percent," said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute For International Economics. A 15-percent levy will remain "costly" for German automakers, "but it is manageable", said trade geopolitics expert Elvire Fabry at the Jacques Delors Institute. While 15 percent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods -- averaging 4.8 percent -- it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 percent imposed by Trump since April. Advertisement The EU also committed to buy $750 billion of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the United States -- split equally over three years -- to replace Russian energy sources. And it will pour $600 billion more in additional investments in the United States. Trump said EU countries -- which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within NATO -- would be purchasing "hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of military equipment". Are there exemptions? Von der Leyen said the 15-percent rate applied across most sectors, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals -- a critical export for Ireland, which the bloc has sought to protect. Trump in April launched probes that could lead to significantly steeper tariffs on the two key sectors, warning this month he could slap 200-percent levies on drugs. Brussels and Washington agreed a bilateral tariff exemption for key goods including aircraft, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products and critical raw materials, von der Leyen said. The EU currently faces 50-percent tariffs on its steel exports to the United States, but von der Leyen said a compromise on the metal had been reached with Trump. Advertisement "Between us, tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place," she said. It is understood that European steel would be hit with 50-percent levies only after a certain amount of the metal arrived in the United States, but no details were initially provided on the mechanism. What happens next? The deal needs to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors will meet first thing Monday morning for a debrief from the European Commission. And there are still technical talks to come, since the agreement needs to be fully fleshed out. Von der Leyen described the deal as a "framework" agreement. "Details have to be sorted out, and that will happen over the next weeks," she said. In particular, she said there has yet to be a final decision on alcohol, critical since France and The Netherlands have been pushing for carve-outs for wine and beer respectively. "This is something which has to be sorted out in the next days," von der Leyen said.


Local Germany
2 hours ago
- Local Germany
German Chancellor Merz welcomes EU trade deal with US
"We have thus managed to preserve our fundamental interests, even if I would have wished for more relief in transatlantic trade," he said in a statement released soon after the deal was announced. The agreement sets 15-percent tariffs on most exports from the European bloc. The United States is Germany's main trading partner. Advertisement Merz said he was particularly relieved for the car industry, which before Sunday's accord was facing tariffs of 27.5 percent. In addition to cars, Germany's chemical and machinery industries are particularly dependent on exports to the United States. And Germany's powerful BDI federation of industrial groups said the accord would have "considerable negative repercussions" and sent "a fatal signal to the closely interdependent economy on both sides of the Atlantic". Germany's chemical trade association VCI said the accord left rates "too high". "When one expects a hurricane, you rejoice at a simple storm," it said in a statement. "An escalation was avoided, but the cost is high for both sides." The country's BGA exporters association called it a "painful compromise" that creates an "existential threat" for many companies. Clemens Faust, head of the prestigious IFO economic institute, said the agreement represented a "humiliation for the EU that reflects the imbalance in power". There are still many details in the accord that need to be ironed out, and the Chancellor expressed his "full support" for the European Commission "for the negotiations that will now begin". German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said the agreement was "a good thing as a first step. "We will now assess the outcome of the negotiations and its impact on the economy and employment in Germany," he added. READ ALSO: Impact of US tariffs varies across European Union


Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Europe Hopes For 'No Surprises' As US Weighs Force Withdrawals
After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defence spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent. Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe. That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down. However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch. "We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall". "I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said. While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence. "There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast." When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days. "There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity. "Certainly no panic or doom and gloom." The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. "I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP. "But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations." Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine. Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases. The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term. "The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank. "So the question of timing really does matter." Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war. "It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said. He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan. While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president. Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes. "It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat. "But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage."