
Stray dogs: Why the canine conundrum?
While the debate over attacks by stray dogs and what to do about it rages, there is equal venting and angst on the treatment being meted out to the animals, particularly in metros. Sharma, for instance, has filed a police case against the society members for cruelty. 'They are forbidden by law to touch the other two dogs,' she says, adding that not just her but many children and the society guards for whom the dogs provided much-needed company felt the loss as acutely. 'As long as they are not harming someone, why should we focus on getting rid of them?'It is a question many are asking in light of the recent Bombay High Court judgment that imposes a penalty on those feeding stray dogs outside houses in Nagpur. Nearly 1,500 feeders held a silent protest against the decision at Mumbai's Shivaji Park on October 30. Their major objection is that the onus is being put on feeders instead of the local civic bodies to improve sterilisation programmes for better population control. Dog feeders, say animal experts, should not be the ones to shoulder the blame.'Feeders are doing a great service as the street dogs become more accessible to animal welfare organisations and municipal authorities to catch for sterilisation and also for re-vaccinations against rabies. Blaming feeders doesn't make sense. You say 'stop feeding dogs' and they will just disappear into thin air? It may work the other way. A dog that is well-fed is likely to be more at ease than a hungry dog. There needs to be a balance between human interest and the welfare of street dogs at large,' says Abodh Aras, CEO, The Welfare of Stray Dogs, Mumbai.advertisementThose who are fighting against feeding strays say that there should be someone to take responsibility for the dogs should they attack another person or pet dog. 'I am an animal lover myself,' says 35-year-old Sonali Batra, a homemaker from Pune. 'But I don't feed dogs outside because I cannot take responsibility for them.' Most feeders, however, are unwilling to take the responsibility. For example, Vanya Jha, a Bhopal-based lawyer who regularly feeds strays, says, 'I would help in treatment if there is a dog bite but not as an obligation, unless the stray has been fully adopted by me, in which case it would not be a stray. In any case, strays are usually fed not by just one person or family, so one person cannot be expected to take up such a responsibility.'advertisementLegally, everyone has the right to provide food and care for starving animals. In 2021, the Delhi High Court held that '...animals have a right to live with respect and dignity'. The court further declared that 'it shall be the duty and responsibility of the RWA (residents' welfare association) or municipal corporation and all government authorities, including enforcement authorities like police, to provide all assistance and ensure that no hindrance is caused to the caregivers or feeders of community animals'. The Supreme Court also upheld the judgment in its May 19, 2022, order.In 2014, the apex court had also ruled that any restriction on the feeding of community animals or their removal or any cruelty inflicted on them would be in direct violation of their right to live with dignity. Yet, feeders often find themselves and the dogs they look after at the receiving end of the stick. 'I have been abused and yelled at publicly by male members in the society for feeding the dogs. I have been threatened that if the dog harms anyone, they will beat me up. But I stand my ground against such bullies. These are the same people who will berate others for harming the society and then will burst firecrackers and litter the streets with toxic waste that is far more harmful than a dog,' says 28-year-old Aditi Chaturvedi, an MBA student in Noida who feeds nine stray dogs outside her PG accommodation.advertisementThose who have been working with stray dogs, such as Kartick Satyanarayan, executive member of Delhi-based NGO Friendicoes, say the solution cannot be found if the responsibility is to be put only on feeders. 'If we find ourselves living next to someone we dislike, do we constantly go and harass them till they move away? The answer is to coexist and find ways to do so,' he says. The first thing to really consider, Satyanarayan adds, is the fact that India has one of the most successful stray dog control programmes in the world.'Municipalities and NGOs work to sterilise dogs, which has reduced the number on the streets already. These dogs are also vaccinated and by law are returned to the place they were taken from,' he says. In Delhi, for example, the municipal corporation has an app where you can request a local dog to be sterilised and even track its surgery and date of release data. Roughly 40,000 dogs are being sterilised annually in south Delhi alone. 'The idea is not to kill off the entire feral dog population but to ensure there is no population explosion,' says Satyanarayan.advertisementA population explosion?In 2021, the State of Pet Homelessness Index data for India estimated the country has around 62 million stray dogs, with 77 per cent saying they see a stray dog at least once a week. This is a dog-to-human ratio of nearly five dogs for 100 people, which is still above the World Organization for Animal Health-recommended three dogs for 100 people. Figures tabled in the Lok Sabha this year were more conservative, pegging the number of homeless dogs in the country at 17.1 million. They also noted an all-India decline of 10 per cent from 2012 to 2019.The decrease was the sharpest in Uttar Pradesh where numbers reduced by half from 4.2 million in 2012 to 2.1 million in 2019. The highest rise was in Karnataka, followed by Rajasthan. In the livestock census in 2019, Manipur and Dadra & Nagar Haveli were declared stray dog-free. 'Dogs don't live for very long on the streets—about six years on average—because it is the survival of the fittest and older dogs get pushed out or don't get enough food. Pups, too, rarely make it to adulthood, with only one or two in every litter surviving. So, it is a mistaken belief that we are facing a street dog population explosion,' says Satyanarayan.Experts say it is important that states where the sterilisation programme isn't yielding enough results step up their efforts for better population control. These include Odisha, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Kerala and the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, where numbers rose between 2012 and 2019, according to the same Lok Sabha report. 'Wherever animal birth control rules are implemented, you won't have issues of stray dogs attacking humans. There has to be a consistent sterilisation programme that breaks the whole pack code behaviour,' says Aras.The Animal Welfare Board of India, the central government's apex body on animal welfare, has written to all states asking them to comply with rules by having an active sterilisation programme in place. 'When dogs are unsterilised, fights between them may occur, and rarely, a human may get caught in the middle. An effective sterilisation programme helps prevent such situations. Since territories are not left vacant, new dogs cannot enter. Over time, as the dogs die natural deaths, their numbers dwindle. The dog population becomes stable, non-breeding, non-aggressive and rabies-free, and it gradually decreases over time,' says Meet Ashar, manager of cruelty response projects, PETA India.Sterilisation also helps dismantle the alpha dog mentality of a pack as hormones that drive males to compete over a female or territory are no longer present. 'Sterilised, vaccinated, and well-fed and cared-for community dogs also prevent unsterilised, unvaccinated and unfamiliar dogs from entering their territory. This stabilises the community dog population of the neighbourhood,' adds Ashar.But sterilising street dogs is not always an easy task. Catching them remains a challenge for many municipalities as dogs run away or attack strangers. 'Sometimes, it is dog lovers who resist the animals being taken for neutering. They want to know where the dog is being taken and when it would be back. More awareness is needed to tell people that it's best for the future of stray dogs that they are neutered,' says Dr Umesh Bhaskar, a veterinarian with Navodaya, the agency neutering dogs in Bhopal municipal limits.The Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, state that after neutering, the dogs must be released in the same place from where they were taken. But some municipalities have faced threats from societies when it was time to return the dogs. 'We have to fight to collect the dogs and sometimes we have to fight to release them because not everyone wants them back. The country is divided over street dogs and this love-hate divide often gets in the way of our work,' says a Delhi municipality member.In some cities, civic bodies have realised that working with feeders leads to better results. Mumbai is one such example where feeders help capture the dogs and ensure that all dogs under their care are vaccinated and sterilised. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), in turn, has set aside Rs 4 crore for its sterilisation budget in 2022-2023 and feeders say the process has always been smooth.'Everyone sees stray dogs as a nuisance and wants them to be taken away from their premises. Coexistence is important; dogs are a part of our ecosystem. The population of stray dogs needs to be brought to a figure that is well accepted by the human population of the region, to pre-empt any conflict. If stray dogs live in healthy and sanitary conditions and don't suffer from ailments and illnesses, the conflict and problems are reduced,' says Dr Kalimpasha Pathan, general manager at the BMC's veterinary health department. As of September this year, the municipal body has sterilised 386,347 dogs and is planning to start a programme that is expected to see 100,000 rabies vaccinations in a year.With around 20,000 deaths annually, India accounts for 36 per cent of the world's rabies deaths, according to the World Health Organization. And dog bites cause almost all cases of rabies in the country. However, according to the Union ministry of health and family welfare, India has recorded a drop of over 60 per cent in the number of rabies deaths year on year from 2011 to 2018 (except 2017). Now, a mandatory shot is given to all stray dogs that are brought in for sterilisation.Coexisting with straysThe data tabled by the Union minister for fisheries and animal husbandry in the Lok Sabha this year shows stray dog bites across India have reduced to 1.7 million in 2021 from 7.3 million in 2019. However, 1.45 million cases have already been reported from January 1 to July 22, 2022, indicating that the sharp drop in 2021 might have been due to Covid restrictions and fewer people out on the streets. But even at 1.45 million bites over six months, the figure this year may still be less than the 7.3 million cases in 2019. And sterilisation doesn't rule out all chances of a dog biting.Experts say biting or attacking is a dog's defence mechanism and while a sterilised dog won't attack unprovoked, it will defend itself if faced with a threat. The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, defines acts that amount to cruelty to animals and makes them punishable. These include 'beating, kicking, killing, mutilating or otherwise torturing any animal so as to cause them unnecessary pain or suffering'. 'Mischief by killing or maiming' an animal also violates Sections 428 and 429 of the Indian Penal Code.One of the ways to reduce people's antagonism towards street dogs is to focus on what they do for us, say experts. Besides valuable companionship to many, dogs also help keep spaces safe at night. They are also our biological cleansers of trash, rats and other pests.An example of coexistence is Sunil Kuttam and the 45-odd dogs he looks after in Delhi's Kalkaji Extension area. All the dogs are vaccinated and the respective RWAs have their certificates. Kuttam and his team help introduce new maids, drivers and couriers to the dogs to help build confidence and trust between both canine and human. If there is an aggressive dog, medicines to reduce anxiety and aggression are mixed into its food.It is also important for people to know that the number of stray dog bites is not as much as believed and neither are strays becoming more aggressive. According to General Hospital, Ernakulam, Kerala, companion dogs, not strays, were the cause of 75.6 per cent of the bite cases in a six-month period in 2015. 'Eating meat and being fed do not make a dog aggressive. It is an absolute myth. On the contrary, a well-fed dog is likely to be more trusting and less aggressive,' says Satyanarayan.The BMC is working towards countering misapprehensions through education programmes in municipal schools with plans to introduce them in private schools. 'Touching a dog that you don't know, picking up puppies with a mother around, throwing a stone, touching the animal while it is eating and pulling its tail should be avoided. If a dog is chasing, don't run. You need to make children aware. Often, societies say that dogs may bite, so we shouldn't have them. I try to make them aware on how not to get bitten,' says Aras.In developed countries, street dog populations are controlled not just through sterilisation programmes but also by providing homeless animals shelters and parks. The Noida Authority is taking some lessons from the US and is planning to build 18 shelter homes for dogs in the city with the help of RWAs. Run by the RWAs, they will provide a place for homeless dogs to stay and be treated for illness. There is also a dog park being built in Sector 135.It is important that we find a balance between dog lovers and those who are yet to be comfortable with them. Those with dog phobias say their fears should also be respected. 'I went through a horrible situation with a gang of dogs as a child. I cannot be near dogs without feeling very sick. I am not saying kill street dogs but at least leave areas where a person can be without having to face them,' says 19-year-old Mumbai-based student Akshay Narain.Dog experts say that this can be done if feeding is done in only one part of the society so that the dogs' area is confined to that space. Multiple feeders in the same society with multiple locations trains dogs to roam the entire society instead of a part of it.Street dogs are valuable to many, even as they are frightening to others. Sensitisation on the value of dogs and how to behave around them, sterilisation to control numbers and pack aggressiveness and feeding homeless dogs in planned public spaces can serve as the foundation of such a balance.—With Rahul Naronha, Rohit Parihar and Manish DixitSubscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bombay High Court orders SIT probe into custodial death of Dalit law student
In the custodial death case of Somnath Suryawanshi, the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra Director General of Police (DGP) to set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) within one week. The court orally passed the order on August 14, 2025. A Division Bench comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh observed that the Inquiry Committee earlier appointed by the Maharashtra Government will be dissolved, and all documents related to the 35-year-old Dalit law student Suryawanshi's custodial death will now be handed over to the new SIT. 'If the petitioner, Vijayabai Venkata Suryawanshi, has any objections to the members of the SIT, she may register them before the court,' the Bench observed. Advocate Hitendra Gandhi representing Ms. Suryawanshi, told The Hindu, 'The High Court's direction to constitute a SIT in the custodial death case of Somnath Suryawanshi is a significant step forward, we hope the SIT will conduct a fair and thorough investigation to deliver justice that has long been denied. This order restores faith that the truth cannot be buried, and accountability will have to follow.' On July 4, 2025, the court directed the Parbhani police to register a First Information Report (FIR) within a week, noting prima facie evidence of custodial torture and violation of fundamental rights. The Bench passed the interim order in response to a petition filed by Mr. Suryawanshi's 61-year-old mother, Vijayabai Vyankat Suryawanshi. The petitioner alleged that her son was subjected to brutal torture during his illegal detention following a protest in Parbhani on December 11, 2024, and that authorities subsequently attempted to cover up his death as a cardiac incident. Mr. Suryawanshi, a final-year law student and a member of a Scheduled Caste family from Latur, was reportedly arrested while filming a protest against the desecration of a replica of the Constitution near a statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. The petition alleged that despite the peaceful nature of the demonstration, he and several others were picked up during an indiscriminate police crackdown, subjected to custodial assault, and denied timely medical attention. On July 30, 2025, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition filed by the Maharashtra government challenging a Bombay High Court order directing the police to register a FIR. Mr. Suryawanshi, a final-year law student and a member of a Scheduled Caste family from Latur, was reportedly arrested while filming a protest against the desecration of a replica of the Constitution near a statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. The petition alleged that despite the peaceful nature of the demonstration, he and several others were picked up during an indiscriminate police crackdown, subjected to custodial assault, and denied timely medical attention. The petition stated, 'In the videos, it could be seen that Somnath was carrying the book of the Constitution of India and recording the incident in the protest. His arrest was illegal and then he was subjected to inhuman atrocities. He as well as other persons were produced before the Magistrate on 12.12.2024. The others were also subjected to brutality and their injuries were visible, swollen, however, they were afraid to speak to the Magistrate due to the threats those were given.' It further said that the Court had granted police custody of two days. 'Further brutal assault was given to Somnath. His situation worsened when he was again produced before the Magistrate on 14.12.2024. Thereafter, his custody was transferred to Magisterial custody. Around 6.49 a.m. suddenly Somnath died on 15.12.2024, while in judicial custody,' the petition read. It was further submitted that police claimed Mr. Suryawanshi had complained of chest pain prior to his death. The petitioner also alleged that on reaching Parbhani, she was taken by Police Officer Ashok Ghorband to the Inspector General of Police, where she was informed that Somnath's brothers could be offered police jobs and was advised to perform the last rites in Latur instead of Parbhani. She further claimed she was offered ₹50 lakh to refrain from filing a complaint. She declined, demanding that her son's death be acknowledged as custodial murder and not classified as death by natural causes. The court noted that the post-mortem, conducted by a seven-member medical team, had recorded 24 visible injuries and concluded that the cause of death was 'shock following multiple injuries'. A judicial inquiry under Section 196 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) also reportedly found gross human rights violations and directly linked the death to custodial assault. 'This Court cannot remain a mute spectator when constitutional rights of a person in custody are prima facie violated,' the Bench observed, criticising the State for failing to register a cognisable offence despite substantial evidence from the post-mortem, inquest report, and the magistrate's findings. The Bench further questioned the delay by the CID in acting on the findings and expressed concern over the credibility of the internal inquiry, which bypassed the autopsy doctors and instead sought a second opinion from J.J. Hospital, Mumbai. The court directed that an FIR be registered based on the petitioner's complaint dated December 18, 2024, and that the investigation be handed over to a Deputy Superintendent of Police. The prior order restraining CID officer D.B. Talpe from submitting a final report has been vacated following this direction.


Hans India
39 minutes ago
- Hans India
MP: Four of Gujarat musical troupe killed, 11 injured in Shivpuri road accident
Shivpuri: Four people died and 11 others were injured in a tragic road accident in Shivpuri district of Madhya Pradesh on Saturday morning. All were members of a Gujarat-based music group returning from Varanasi after performing at the Kashi Vishwanath Temple. The accident occurred on National Highway-27, under the jurisdiction of Survaya police station, when their Traveller van collided head-on with a loaded truck coming from the opposite direction. Speaking to IANS, Arvind Chari, Survaya police station incharge said, "All the victims hailed from Mehsana and Surendranagar districts of Gujarat." The officer added that one person died on the spot while three others succumbed to their injuries at the hospital. As many as 11 others were injured, including one of the drivers, whose condition is stated to be critical. Preliminary investigations suggest that the van driver may have dozed off at the wheel, having reportedly left Varanasi at around 5 A.M. without rest. The accident took place at around 6:30 A.M., nearly 30 kilometres from the district headquarters. The driver lost control of the vehicle, which hit the central divider and veered into the opposite lane before crashing into an oncoming truck with tremendous force. The impact was so severe that several passengers were thrown from their seats, the officer said. A total of 17 people were travelling in the van at the time of the accident. The deceased have been identified as Hardik Dave (40), the lead singer of the group; Raja Thakur (28); Ankit Thakur (22); and Rajpal Solanki (60). The music troupe used to tour for devotional performances across northern India. The injured, including Mohit Rawal, Ashish Vyas, Narendra Nayak, Chetan Kumar, Harshad Goswami, Mohlik, Rishikesh, Arvind and others were rushed to a government hospital in Shivpuri. As news of the accident spread, family members were informed and administrative officials arrived at the hospital to oversee medical care and offer support. Police have launched a formal investigation into the cause of the crash.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Madhya Pradesh shocker: London-based doctor, family attacked in Bhind; constable removed from post for instigating assault
NEW DELHI: A London-based NRI family was attacked in Bhind district of Madhya Pradesh, sparking anger among members of the Sikh community and prompting police action against a local constable accused of instigating the assault. Dr Vikramjit Singh, originally from Ashoknagar and now settled in the UK, had arrived at his in-laws' house in Fatehpur village near Gohad after two and a half years, along with his wife Rajveer Kaur, son Rohanpreet Singh, and daughter Ravneet Kaur. On Thursday evening, while the family was buying fruits on Station Road in Gohad, they got into an altercation with constable Kuldeep Kushwaha, who was in plain clothes. According to the family, the constable used abusive language, filmed their car, and grew angry when asked to reveal his identity. 'When I refused to let him make a video of my car and family, he called others and asked them to come with weapons,' Singh told police officers. The family left in their car but was allegedly intercepted near a dhaba between Station Road and Fatehpur village. A group of men armed with sticks attacked the vehicle, shattering its windows. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mystical Forest Vase: Hot Sale topgadgetlife Shop Now Undo Rohanpreet suffered facial injuries, while Ravneet's hand was hurt in the assault. The incident was captured on video, which surfaced on Friday. Singh later complained to the Gohad police, but said he was pressured to hush up the case. At the station, the SHO allegedly remarked that he could have run over the constable. Singh countered that his car was fitted with cameras and the footage was recorded. The family has also complained to the Indian Embassy in London. Following protests by the Sikh community, who accused Kushwaha of plotting the attack, Bhind SP Asit Yadav removed the constable from duty and line-attached him. 'Attackers are being identified and action will be taken,' officials said. Local MLA Keshav Desai also reached the spot and extended support to the Sikh community, pointing out that there had been earlier complaints against the constable. Dozens of community members gathered at the police station demanding registration of an FIR against the constable. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !