Mahmoud Abbas appoints Hussein al-Sheikh as deputy
One of the issues that was bothering the Arab and Western leaders was to find a successor to Palestinian Authority (PA) chairman Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas is frail in terms of his age at 89 and also as a weak leader of (PA) and of Fatah, the dominant faction in the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO).
The PLO excludes Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, who are fighting Israel in Gaza. The Western and Arab leaders who have been looking to set up a post-truce authority in Gaza, did not find Abbas to be the credible leader who can find acceptance among the Palestinians in Gaza and in the West Bank. Abbas has been under pressure to nominate a successor.
On Saturday, Abbas has named Hussein al-Sheikh as vice-president of PLO and he is now seen as a successor to Abbas. Al-Sheikh is a Fatah veteran and he has been assisting Abbas since 2007 as the head of the General Authority for Civic Affairs. He was made the secretary-general of the PLO's Executive Committee in 2022.
According to reports he has been the coordinator with Israel on security matters, and he is trusted by Israelis. During his imprisonment from 1978 and 1980s in Israel, Al-Sheikh had learnt Hebrew and that gives him an advantage in dealing with the Israelis. He is 64, and father of four daughters and two sons.
Expectedly, Hamas did not accept the nomination of Al-Sheikh as the vice-president of PLO, and therefore as leader of Palestinians. Senior Hamas official Bassem Naim said of Al-Sheikh's appointment, 'The Palestinian people are not a herd to have imposed upon them leaders with dubious history who have tied their present and future to the occupation. Legitimacy is held by the Palestinian people. The guardianship over our people is long gone.'
This would mean that despite the odds, Hamas will continue to contest for the leadership of the Palestinians. Hamas had won the majority in the 2006 elections.
The Palestinian news agency, WAFA, reported that during the 32nd session of the PLO when Al-Sheikh was named the vice-president, Abbas had promised a 'comprehensive dialogue' involving all Palestinian factions 'to achieve reconciliation and reinforce national unity'. Abbas had, according to WAFA, told the committee about 'upcoming political efforts aimed at halting the ongoing Israeli aggression and war of genocide in Gaza Strip.' The 'political efforts' include Palestinian governance over Gaza and the total withdrawal of Israel as a 'step towards launching a political process to end the occupation and realise an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.'
The attempts to find a successor to Abbas occur 'as there are many things the Palestinian situation requires,' according to analyst Aref Jaffal, director of the Al-Marsad Election Monitoring Centre. The question is whether the arrangement will pass muster. Jaffal says, 'The Palestinian political system is already miserable, so I believe that all these arrangements are a prelude to creating a successor to Abbas.'
Egypt and Qatar, which are engaged in negotiations to find a post-truce arrangement in Gaza, want to exclude Hamas from the governance system in Gaza, and the Western powers too want the same thing.
The need was to find a successor to Abbas who has the energy to deal with the responsibility of negotiations, which are going to be long-drawn and quite slow and frustrating. Al-Sheikh could be the man because he has been dealing with the Israelis for quite some time now.
It is a difficult task and as Abbas has indicated the different factions of PLO have to be united. If the PLO is divided, then it becomes easier for Hamas to assert itself. The inner tussle for Palestinian leadership Is indeed the big challenge for the Palestinians. At the same time, it indicates the fierce democratic politics in the PLO and among the Palestinians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK sanctions must target roots of settler violence - starting with Smotrich and Ben Gvir
In Israel, there is an infamous metaphor known as "mowing the grass". Like many other terms used by the state, it is a horrific and dehumanising phrase that refers to Israel's longstanding practice of regular, short, sharp bombardments of Gaza in order to 'keep Palestinians in their place'. It's used openly by Israeli politicians and military figures who see Palestinian civilians either as collateral damage, or as part of the "lawn" themselves. Nowadays, it feels a bit dated, considering how Israel's current genocide in Gaza dwarfs the bombardments that preceded it. The grass is no longer mowed; now it's scorched earth. But last week, when the UK government issued a new round of settler sanctions for three individuals and four entities in the occupied West Bank, I thought not of lawns, but of weeds. These sanctions are trimming the branches instead of digging out the roots. It's the same thing I thought when piecemeal sanctions packages were announced last year, in February, May and October. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Sanctioning a few individuals and entities won't even begin to scratch the surface - not while extremist senior Israeli ministers are calling for an unprecedented expansion of illegal settlements. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are the grand architects of the current wave of illegal settlement expansion. Sanctions must target them to begin to affect change, not just an unhinged interviewee on the latest Louis Theroux documentary. And even then, that would simply be the first step. More than half a century of illegal occupation will not miraculously end with a change of Israeli government. Pervasive violence Sanctions must target the architects because of how pervasive settlement violence is. Last month, I took a delegation of British MPs to the West Bank so they could see the day-to-day realities of occupation - from refugee camp clearances in Tulkarm in the north, all the way down to settler violence in the villages of Masafer Yatta in the south. There are countless emotions I could recall: the shock of being spat at in Jerusalem for wearing a crucifix, the fear of being pulled over at gunpoint in Hebron, and the awe-inspiring bravery, hope and tenacity that Palestinian refugees in Tulkarm showed, even as they spoke of being displaced from the refugee camps where their families had lived since the Nakba. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war I could talk at length about all these experiences, but most chilling of all was simply the degree to which settlers and soldiers seemed to work in collaboration; the total air of impunity with which settlers swaggered around, perversely relishing the task of dispossessing indigenous people. The first such example we witnessed was in Susiya, a Palestinian village in Masafer Yatta that was expropriated by Israel in 1986, its Palestinian residents expelled. Today, only a small community of steadfast Palestinians remain there. Settler terrorism: Palestinians are becoming prisoners in their own homeland Read More » Our delegation in Susiya was surrounded by illegal Israeli settlers wearing militia-style body armour, and armed to the teeth with assault rifles and clubs. They were clearly there to intimidate. Two Israeli soldiers arrived at the scene and began laughing and joking with the settlers. It wasn't just that they were unconcerned with what the settlers were doing; they appeared to be actively enjoying the show. As they stood side-by-side - casually wielding their weapons, and wearing camouflage Kevlar jackets adorned with Israeli flags - it was suddenly very clear how blurred the lines of power and authority were. Distinguishing between settler violence and state violence feels like semantics in such a situation. We saw this impunity again in Hebron, as we were having lunch with a Palestinian human rights defender on his patio, bordered by metal fences with security cameras. Their usefulness was proven immediately, when two settlers came up to the fence and started shouting at our host: 'How much is your house?' When he said it wasn't for sale, they replied: 'It doesn't matter, we're going to buy it anyway.' They went on to insult Islam, and said that all Arabs needed to leave. Asked why, they simply replied: 'Because God gave us this land.' Metres away, Israeli soldiers looked on listlessly. Digging out the roots This is by no means an exhaustive account, even for the short week or so that I was there. In Jerusalem, I saw a settler strolling around the crowded market streets, surrounded by his children, while holding his assault rifle casually, pointed down in their direction. I contemplated how strange it was to encounter someone who clearly gains such satisfaction from provoking fear in others, and thought about what might be said from a sociological perspective about a society that produces so many people of this disposition. These settlers are pawns in a grand political vision that repudiates morality while laying claim to it But targeting each settler individually is not going to make any real difference. It is precisely such light-touch approaches that have enabled a settler-colonial, apartheid system to persist for more than half a century. Settlers can act this way only because they are emboldened by the extremist rhetoric of their leaders and the actions of soldiers. It is in this collaboration that the beating heart of the settler-colonial, apartheid system lies. Each time Ben Gvir storms Al-Aqsa compound with his settlers, each time Smotrich calls for a Palestinian village to be 'erased', it's fuel for extremist settlers as they cultivate their burning hatred of Palestinians. These settlers are pawns in a grand political vision that repudiates morality while laying claim to it. Instead of piecemeal sanctions, the only solution is to tackle the problem at its source; to dig out the roots, and sanction the ministers responsible for orchestrating this nightmare. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
TRENDS participates in an international symposium on BRICS green development strategies
1 June 2025 15:20 ABU DHABI (ALETIHAD)TRENDS Research & Advisory took part in the BRICS Think Tank International Symposium, held in Beijing under the theme 'Green BRICS, Golden Future.'The symposium was hosted by the China Council for BRICS Think Tank Cooperation (CCBTC), and organised by the National Academy of Development and Strategy (NADS), Renmin University of China. It aimed to facilitate knowledge exchange, strengthen partnerships among BRICS think tanks, and accelerate the transition toward low-carbon event addressed key topics including green development pathways, cross-border green cooperation, green technology and standards, and sustainable market collaboration. It highlighted how BRICS countries are responding to global climate change and environmental challenges by adopting innovative green development strategies, advancing policy reforms, and enhancing international cooperation. Pathways to Green DevelopmentAbdulla Al-Khaja, a researcher at TRENDS Research & Advisory, contributed a research paper during the first session titled 'Pathways to Green Development.' He emphasised that green development is no longer a choice between economic growth and environmental preservation, but a foundational pillar for long-term economic resilience and geopolitical stability. Al-Khaja noted that the BRICS offers unique value through diverse developmental experiences that can help shape a more inclusive global ecosystem. UAE Energy Strategy 2050Al-Khaja highlighted that green development in the UAE has become a comprehensive strategic direction. The UAE Energy Strategy 2050 aims to increase the share of clean energy to 50% by mid-century, while reducing energy demand by 40%. These efforts align with the country's Hydrogen Strategy and the National Framework for a Circular Economy, coordinated through the National Committee on Sustainable Development Goals, which includes representatives from 17 ministries and agencies to ensure implementation of the UN 2030 pointed out that a recent milestone in this direction was the launch of a one-gigawatt renewable energy facility developed by Masdar, designed to provide sustainable clean energy. This project is not only a response to the challenges of intermittent renewable energy supply, but also a tangible demonstration that green growth is becoming a reality. Strengthening Strategic AutonomyAl-Khaja noted that the UAE's commitment extends beyond national borders. The country's accession to BRICS in 2024 reflects a strategic vision aligned with emerging economies' efforts to reshape global governance. Despite its economic strength, the UAE recognises the importance of building alternative development and financial frameworks, deepening South-South cooperation, and reinforcing strategic autonomy amid shifting global power added that this vision was reflected in the BRICS+ Summit in Kazan, which underscored the importance of building partnerships and consensus in a multipolar world.A key example of such cooperation is the $2.8 billion investment agreement between Masdar and China's Silk Road Fund, aimed at deploying renewable energy solutions across Belt and Road Initiative economies. Think Tanks and DevelopmentAl-Khaja concluded by stressing the pivotal role of BRICS think tanks in advancing green development. Through constructive dialogue, diversified knowledge partnerships, the localisation of climate technologies, and enhanced regional coordination, these institutions contribute to shaping resilient and sustainable future. Al-Khaja underscored that green development is not just a framework for environmental sustainability: it is also a test of collective capacity to manage complexity and foster cross-border innovation. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
'I came to get a sack of flour … a sardine tin or anything,' : Aid site attack witnesses
Mahmoud Ismael was one of the desperate Palestinian aid seekers who gathered outside the GHF- run Rafah aid distribution point before Israeli quadcopters and tanks fired on them. He had walked miles on crutches to get there. 'I came to get a sack of flour … a sardine tin or anything,' he told AFP. 'There is no food in my house, and I can't get food for my children,' he said. Sameh Hamuda walked from Gaza City and spent the night with relatives in a tent near Rafah before heading to the aid point. 'They began distributing aid, but suddenly quadcopter drones opened fire on the people, and tanks started shooting heavily. Several people were killed right in front of me,' he told the AFP news agency. 'I ran and survived. Death follows you as long as you're in Gaza.' " I don't understand why they call people to the aid centres and then open fire on them,' he said. 'What are we supposed to do?' Abdullah Barbakh said.
