Japan PM laments ‘harsh' election result as upper house control slips
While the ballot does not directly determine whether Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's minority government falls, it heaps pressure on the embattled leader who also lost control of the more powerful lower house in October.
Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and coalition partner Komeito needed 50 seats to retain control of the 248-seat upper chamber in an election where half the seats were up for grabs. They are forecast to secure 32 to 51 seats, the exit poll by public broadcaster NHK showed.
Other broadcasters forecast the ruling coalition would hold 41-43 seats. If the coalition holds less than 46 seats, it would mark its worst result since the coalition was formed in 1999.
That comes on top of its worst showing in 15 years in October's lower house election, a vote which has left Ishiba's administration vulnerable to no-confidence motions and calls from within his own party for leadership change.
Speaking two hours after polls closed to public broadcaster NHK, Ishiba said he 'solemnly' accepted the 'harsh result.'
Asked whether he intended to stay on as prime minister and party leader, he said 'that's right.'
'We are engaged in extremely critical tariff negotiations with the United States…we must never ruin these negotiations. It is only natural to devote our complete dedication and energy to realizing our national interests,' he later told TV Tokyo.
Japan, the world's fourth largest economy, faces a deadline of August 1 to strike a trade deal with the United States or face punishing tariffs in its largest export market.
The main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party is projected to win 18 to 30 seats, from 22 held previously, NHK's exit poll showed.
The far-right Sanseito party, birthed on YouTube a few years ago, has been the surprise package with its 'Japanese First' campaign and warnings about a 'silent invasion' of foreigners. It is forecast to win 10-15 seats in the chamber, up from one held previously, yet it holds only three seats in the lower house.
Opposition parties advocating for tax cuts and tougher immigration policies look set to make gains, the exit polls showed, with rising consumer prices – particularly a jump in the cost of the staple rice – a key issue for voters.
'The LDP was largely playing defense in this election, being on the wrong side of a key voter issue,' said David Boling, a director at consulting firm Eurasia Group.
'Polls show that most households want a cut to the consumption tax to address inflation, something that the LDP opposes. Opposition parties seized on it and hammered that message home.'
The LDP have been urging for fiscal restraint, with one eye on a very jittery government bond market, as investors worry about Japan's ability to refinance the world's largest debt pile.
Sanseito, which first emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, has dragged once-fringe political rhetoric into the mainstream and gained wider support among frustrated voters.
It remains to be seen whether the party can follow the path of other far-right parties with which it has drawn comparisons, such as Germany's AFD and Reform UK.
'I am attending graduate school but there are no Japanese around me. All of them are foreigners,' said Yu Nagai, a 25-year-old student who voted for Sanseito earlier on Sunday.
'When I look at the way compensation and money are spent on foreigners, I think that Japanese people are a bit disrespected,' Nagai said after casting his ballot at a polling station in Tokyo's Shinjuku ward.
Japan, the world's oldest society, saw foreign-born residents hit a record of about 3.8 million last year.
That is still just 3% of the total population, a much smaller fraction than in the United States and Europe, but comes amid a tourism boom that has made foreigners far more visible across the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Smotrich, Netanyahu in crisis after decision on Gaza humanitarian ceasefire
According to the official, if Smotrich didn't receive 'real and concrete' guarantees from the prime minister, the Religious Zionist Party could be "on its way out" of the government. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are in a 'real' crisis and the relations between them are 'very, very tense and complicated,' following the prime minister's decision over the weekend without Smotrich's knowledge to enact 'localized humanitarian ceasefires' in Gaza, an official told The Jerusalem Post on Monday. According to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, if Smotrich did not receive 'real and concrete' guarantees from the prime minister regarding defeating Hamas, Smotrich's Religious Zionist Party could be 'on its way out' of the government. With the coalition currently numbering just 60 MKs following the departure of the two haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties earlier in July, the departure of Smotrich's seven MKs would likely topple the government. At press time on Monday evening, the usually vocal Smotrich had yet to comment publicly on the political tension or on the decision regarding the ceasefires, which the IDF announced early on Sunday morning. The silence was especially notable due to Smotrich's harsh criticism throughout the war against distribution of aid by non-Israeli entities. The RZP leader said in April that he would leave the government if 'even a grain' of aid reached Hamas, and has repeatedly argued that the terrorist group's confiscation of humanitarian aid has enabled it to survive. The silence was also notable in lieu of comments by his fellow party member and National Security Cabinet member, Settlements and National Missions Minister Orit Strock. In an interview on Channel 14 on Sunday evening, Strock said that there was an 'unexplainable' gap between decisions made by the NSC and the reality of what is happening. She said that the ceasefire looked like 'surrender' and that if Netanyahu did not give an adequate explanation 'in deeds, not just words,' there was 'nothing for me to do in the government,' Strock said. Smotrich was 'strongly opposed' to the decision A member of Smotrich's party confirmed on Sunday that he had not been part of the decision regarding the humanitarian ceasefires and had not had prior knowledge of it. He was 'strongly opposed' to the decision, a spokesperson added on Monday in response to a query. The spokesperson added that Smotrich's silence was related to ongoing discussions regarding a potential decision that would 'make it [the silence] clear in hindsight.' The spokesperson said he could not expand further. Smotrich initially scheduled a closed-door meeting of his party for Monday evening to discuss the issue. However, the meeting was postponed due to a security consultation called by the prime minister, the spokesperson confirmed. In a conversation with the Post on Monday afternoon, RZP faction leader MK Ohad Tal said, 'We don't know how to live with a reality of war in Gaza that isn't moving toward decisive victory – while aid continues to be transferred to Hamas on the backs of our soldiers, and we're achieving neither the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages.' Tal continued, 'The next two days will be very critical in determining whether we stay or not. If Bezalel [Smotrich] hears from the prime minister not just a theoretical willingness to defeat Hamas, but a clear, organized work plan backed militarily and diplomatically for victory, then we'll be happy to stay. But if that's not the case, we'll have no choice and will have to go to an election.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Treasury yields jump 6 to 8 bps amid shocking multi-billion outflows
U.S. Treasury yields jump 6 to 8 bps amid shocking multi-billion outflows originally appeared on TheStreet. Stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar have begun influencing yields on the U.S. Treasury bills, as per a working paper published by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) on May 28. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that strive to keep their prices stable by being linked to a fiat currency like the USD or a commodity like gold. USD-pegged stablecoins, which dominate the segment, are mostly backed by U.S. Treasury securities. Considered one of the world's safest investments, these securities are debt instruments issued by the U.S. government to raise money. When you buy one, you're essentially lending money to the government in return for yields. Notably, the USD-pegged stablecoins purchased nearly $40 billion in T-bills in 2024, even eclipsing countries like Japan, Singapore, and Germany. The BIS paper says the surge and dip in the demand for USD-pegged stablecoins have evidently been influencing yields on 3-month Treasury per the empirical analysis based on daily data during January 2021 to March 2025, BIS says an inflow of $3.5 billion into stablecoins is associated with 3-month T-bill yields falling by up to 2-2.25 basis points (bps) within 10 days. Outflows into stablecoins tend to have a quantitatively larger impact on Treasury yields than inflows, the paper highlights. For example, an outflow of the same magnitude from stablecoins is associated with 3-month T-bill yields soaring by 6-8 bps. The paper didn't find the stablecoin flows impacting yields on long-term, say 2-year and 5-year, Treasury instruments. However, there is limited evidence of a spillover effect on the 10-year debt yields. The stablecoin market is worth more than $265 billion at the time of writing; Tether's USDT and Circle's (NYSE: CRCL) USDC are the largest stablecoins. The BIS paper notes that USDT flows impact yields the most, with an average contribution of 70% on T-bill yields. USDC flows come next with a 19% contribution on yields. U.S. Treasury yields jump 6 to 8 bps amid shocking multi-billion outflows first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 28, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
How Trump is bursting the bureaucrats' DC bubble, one agency at a time
A hallmark of President Donald Trump's second term is that he's not just promoting his own policies — he's looking to shake up the American power structure from top to bottom. Step by step, he is undermining or destroying the left's decades-old program to achieve total dominance of government and politics through its control of money and institutions. That's what Trump is up to with his plan to move much of the federal bureaucracy out of the Washington, DC, area and into the rest of the country. Advertisement In doing so, he's infuriating federal bureaucrats leading cushy lives in DC and its suburbs, close to the centers of power — and close to the various contractors and lobby groups that can be expected to offer them well-padded post-retirement jobs. And, as with the other things Trump is doing, this effort is both good politics and good for the country, regardless of the bureaucrats' howls. 'Agencies,' Trump wrote in an April executive order, 'must be where the people are.' Advertisement Thus, the administration is moving much of the Department of Agriculture out to farming areas. About 2,600 out of 4,600 DC-based employees will be relocated to Salt Lake City, Utah; Fort Collins, Colo.; Indianapolis, Ind.; Kansas City, Mo., and Raleigh, NC, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced last week. 'This administration [isn't] interested in supporting staff or even really in the jobs we do,' one underling whined to Politico. 'They are concentrating power and want fewer witnesses to what they are doing,' another charged. Advertisement This is great news for the Republican Party, because the accumulation of federal employees in and around our nation's capital has turned the District of Columbia and its surrounding counties into a one-party state for the Democrats. That has pulled the entire state of Virginia into the Democratic orbit, simply because of the many federal employees and hangers-on voting in its northern counties. Sending them elsewhere will break up that power center, dispersing their votes in state and local elections while letting some air out of the DC bubble. When Trump moved some USDA workers to Kansas City in his first term, it triggered a 'mass exodus' from the department. Advertisement Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Many federal agriculture specialists apparently concluded that quitting their jobs was preferable to living in America. This move is bigger, and if it triggers more departures it will help Trump slash federal payrolls that much faster. If not, though, bureaucrats in their new locations will presumably show more sensitivity to farmers, and shed some of their poisonous inside-the-beltway mentality. The Agriculture Department is just the start: Last week an angry mass letter from National Science Foundation employees railed against the NSF's impending move from Alexandria, Va., to an unknown new location. Overall, Trump wants to move 100,000 federal workers from various agencies out of the DC area. That will do much to solve one of the most widespread complaints about the federal government: It's run by people who live in a bubble. Advertisement Surrounded by upper-middle-class (and richer) professionals, federal workers share similar backgrounds and similar values — including an ugly sense of superiority over those know-nothing rubes out in flyover country. Except, you know, those flyover people do understand things that folks in the bubble don't. Farmers in Kansas know more about farming than DC bureaucrats do, and small-business owners in North Carolina or Nevada know more about their industries than do the bureaucrats at the EPA or the Labor Department. And I suspect that bureaucrats living side by side with those they regulate in North Carolina, or Nevada, or Kansas — sending their kids to local schools, shopping in local markets, eating in local restaurants — won't feel as insulated or superior. Advertisement And that will benefit us all. One of the problems with America's ruling class — beyond its corruption, narrow-mindedness and sheer general incompetence — is its disconnect from, and even contempt for, ordinary Americans. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Columnist James Taranto calls it 'oikophobia,' a Greek term meaning fear or hatred of one's own countrymen. Advertisement Breaking down the insularity is likely to ease that. Consider, too, a federal government with agencies scattered all across the nation is harder to influence. A lobbyist can't just take an Uber from one agency office to another when they're in different time zones, or invite people from multiple offices to the same cocktail party. Dispersing their targets makes life more difficult for the special interests, which can only be a plus. Advertisement Skyrocketing federal spending and unimpressive federal performance is all the proof we need that concentrating the bureaucracy in one metropolitan area hasn't done much for the rest of us. Let's try another approach: Make them live in the country they want to govern. Glenn Harlan Reynolds is a professor of law at the University of Tennessee and founder of the blog.
