logo
In Delhi and New York, Hindu right wing lines up against NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani

In Delhi and New York, Hindu right wing lines up against NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani

Straits Times4 days ago
NEW YORK – Two days before New York City Democrats went to the polls to select their mayoral nominee in June, a plane flew over the Statue of Liberty trailing a banner attacking the race's front-runner Zohran Mamdani.
'Save NYC from global intifada,' it read in letters five feet high. 'Reject Mamdani.'
The banner, seemingly aimed at the city's Jewish voters, touched on the campaign's most charged foreign policy issue:
Mr Mamdani's criticism of Israel . But the group behind it wasn't Jewish or Israeli. Its members are Indian American Hindus, who accuse Mr Mamdani of pushing an anti-Hindu and anti-Indian agenda.
For years, Mr Mamdani has assailed the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a populist whose political ideology inextricably links nationalism with Hinduism at the expense of the country's Muslim minority.
Mr Mamdani called the prime minister a 'war criminal' in May. Previously, he lobbied to stop Mr Modi from visiting New York, and demanded that a state assembly member return campaign contributions from Indian Americans whom he characterised as 'Hindu fascists'.
While campaigning for the state assembly in 2020, Mr Mamdani attended a demonstration in Times Square at which a group protesting the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of a one-time mosque in India chanted, 'Who are Hindus? Bastards!'
Mr Mamdani has never publicly condemned those remarks, and his campaign initially declined to comment when asked about them, among other matters. Later in the video, Mr Mamdani says he is there to fight for an India that is 'pluralistic' and 'where everyone can belong regardless of their religion'.
After this story's publication, Ms Zara Rahim, a senior campaign adviser, said in a statement that Mr Mamdani 'rejects rhetoric targeting Hindus' and attended the 2020 protest to 'stand against right-wing nationalism' in India. She added that Mr Mamdani's mother is Hindu, and that the religion 'is a meaningful part of Zohran's life'.
Now, Mamdani is within striking distance of becoming the city's first Muslim and first person of South Asian heritage to become mayor, and he finds himself
on the receiving end of attacks by an army of Mr Modi supporters , both in India and the United States.
The efforts reveal how sectarian politics in Delhi can affect an election in New York. In India, attacks on Mr Mamdani blare from pro-Modi news outlets across millions of TVs and smartphones. In the United States, Indian American groups, some with direct ties to Mr Modi and his governing Bharatiya Janata Party, are taking a more subtle approach – raising money for Mr Mamdani's opponents.
'There were simultaneous campaigns by India-based Hindu nationalists and U.S.-based Hindu groups, pushing the idea that he would be an anti-Hindu candidate,' said Mr Raqib Naik, director of the Center for the Study of Organized Hate, a watchdog group that tracks Islamophobia online.
Despite such attacks, Mr Mamdani has found passionate support among many South Asians in New York. Younger, working-class, Muslim and liberal South Asians including Hindus are energised by the possibility that New York could have its first South Asian mayor, even if some Indian Americans think his views are anti-Hindu. Mr Mamdani won by large margins in some neighbourhoods with sizeable South Asian populations, and he captured 52 per cent of all first-choice votes cast in majority-Asian neighbourhoods.
New York City's roughly 447,064 South Asian residents are an important pool of voters, but they are hardly a monolithic bloc, and it is hard to predict the effect some degree of Hindu opposition might have on Mr Mamdani's electoral chances. (Between 2023 and 2024, the Pew Research Center estimated that Hindus make up 2 per cent of New York's metropolitan population, and other survey data places the number of Hindu adherents in the city at close to 80,000.)
New York is America's largest city and financial capital, affording its mayor an outsize role on the world stage. As Mr Mamdani prepares for the general election and tries to reassure moderate Democrats that he is a viable contender, he is also facing the ire of a party machine a world away.
One of Mr Mamdani's main criticisms of Mr Modi concerns his role in 2002 as leader of the Indian state of Gujarat during sectarian riots. Mr Modi has been accused of failing to slow or stop violence that left hundreds dead, most of them Muslims. In the aftermath, Mr Modi faced sanctions by the United States and at one point was denied a visa to visit.
Backlash to Mr Mamdani's remarks has come from the top in India. A BJP national spokesperson Sanju Verma recently called Mamdani a 'Hinduphobic bigot' and 'a rabid liar'.
The BJP's talking points have been amplified to a global audience by a network of pro-Modi outlets and influencers.
One anchor at a pro-Modi television network recently called Mr Mamdani a 'part-time revolutionary, full-time Modi baiter'. Another announcer said Mr Mamdani associated 'with Pakistani lobbyists in the United States', suggesting that the candidate would promote the interests of India's longtime rival.
According to data reviewed by The New York Times and compiled by The Center for the Study of Organized Hate, in the weeks between June 13 and June 30, more than 600 posts criticising Mr Mamdani were uploaded to X from known right-wing accounts in India and global profiles associated with Hindu nationalism, some with hundreds of thousands of followers.
Professor Rohit Chopra of Santa Clara University, who studies Hindu nationalism, said Mr Mamdani's Muslim identity and sharp criticism of Mr Modi have been enough to 'discredit him among Indian Americans while also being played to maximum effect for political capital within India'.
His parents' backgrounds have provided additional ammunition for the Hindu right. Mr Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda, but his father is from Gujarat, Mr Modi's home state, where hundreds of people, many of them Muslim, were killed in riots in 2002. His mother, filmmaker Mira Nair, is a doyenne of India's progressive left.
In the United States, the distrust of Mr Mamdani among some Hindus has motivated on-the-ground political action, and those efforts have been supercharged by diaspora groups' close ties to Mr Modi and his party.
The Gujarati Samaj of New York, an Indian cultural centre in Queens with about 4,000 members, exemplifies the U.S. groups that are in close contact with Mr Modi and are actively supporting Mr Mamdani's opponents.
Samaj members visited Mr Modi in India in February and remain 'in touch' with him, speaking to him 'directly', the group's president Harshad Patel said. In July, members held a fundraiser for Mayor Eric Adams, the incumbent running against Mr Mamdani as an independent. In 2023, Mr Adams shared a stage with Mr Modi at the UN's International Yoga Day.
Mr Satya Dosapati, the founder of the Indian Americans for Cuomo PAC, which paid for the aerial banner over the Statue of Liberty, previously led protests against the University of Pennsylvania when Mr Modi was dropped as a speaker there in 2013.
The Hindu American Foundation, whose members maintain relationships with the Indian government and which is the largest Hindu advocacy organization in the United States, was cofounded by Dr Mihir Meghani, who wrote a Hindu nationalist essay adopted by the BJP.
The foundation has not taken a public position on Mr Mamdani's campaign, but its director Suhag Shukla attacked Mr Mamdani in an online post as 'an entitled, dilettante' and said in a statement that he has used 'demonising rhetoric' against Hindus. Other former and current leaders of the foundation have also criticised the candidate online.
Mr Mamdani, now running in a general election and seeking a broader base of support, said recently that he would 'discourage' using the controversial phrase 'globalise the intifada,' which inspired the banner over the Statue of Liberty. Many see the statement as a call for violence.
The question remains whether Mr Mamdani will similarly temper his criticism of Mr Modi as November's vote approaches. He declined a request to be interviewed for this article.
Since the clip of Mr Mamdani calling the prime minister a war criminal went viral among Hindu voters, Mr Mamdani has been less vocal about Indian politics. NYTIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India shifts to damage control after Trump ramps up threats
India shifts to damage control after Trump ramps up threats

Straits Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

India shifts to damage control after Trump ramps up threats

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox NEW DELHI - India is racing to contain the economic fallout from President Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, which has left officials in New Delhi feeling shocked, jilted and unsure of how to respond. Mr Trump's harsh language - calling India's economy 'dead,' its tariff barriers 'obnoxious' and its people indifferent to the plight of Ukrainians - has been akin to a verbal slap in the face, according to an official in New Delhi said, who asked not to be identified as the discussions are private. Officials have no template to deal with these kinds of public assaults, the person said, adding that the latest turn of events has put a strain on India's relationship with the US. Mr Trump said on Aug 5 he will increase the 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the US 'substantially over the next 24 hours', citing the Asian nation's high barriers to trade and its purchases of Russian oil. India was 'fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, I'm not going to be happy,' Mr Trump told CNBC. India's government is now bracing for higher tariffs and seeking to limit the possible economic damage. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been urging Indians to buy more local goods to offset any slump in global demand. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is discussing ways to help exporters who would be hardest hit, such as in the gems and jewellery and textile sectors. And officials say they will continue to seek back-channel talks to help ease the tensions. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 25-minute delay on East-West MRT Line between Boon Lay and Buona Vista due to track point fault Singapore Finding hidden vapes: Inside ICA's mission to uncover contraband at land checkpoints Singapore Sorting recyclables by material could boost low domestic recycling rate: Observers Singapore SM Lee receives Australia's highest civilian honour for advancing bilateral ties Asia Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan India has been a target of Mr Trump for weeks now because of its economic ties with Russia. The US president has given Mr Vladimir Putin until Aug 8 to reach a truce with Ukraine, and wants to ramp up the pressure by targeting energy purchases from countries like India and China that are helping to keep Russia's economy afloat. Mr Modi's government is so far holding its ground, saying it is being unreasonably targeted by the US for its ties to Russia – its biggest supplier of oil and military equipment. Officials have signalled they would not instruct refiners to halt Russian crude purchases. For months, Indian trade officials had been negotiating with the Trump administration on a deal that both sides said was close to being finalised, with a tariff rate possibly below 20 per cent. The US president's tone appeared to change in July, when he threatened India with higher duties alongside others in the Brics bloc of nations for what he said was the group's anti-US stance. He then followed up several days later with warnings about financial penalties on countries like India for buying oil from Russia. India has been buying Russian crude at a rate of about 1.7 million barrels a day so far in 2025, all of it from seaborne imports, while China has purchased an average of about 2 million barrels, comprising both seaborne imports and oil transported via an inland pipeline. To offset the tariff hikes, officials in New Delhi are now considering expediting an export promotion plan, first outlined in the February budget, which set aside 22.5 billion rupees (S$329 million) to support exporters. The budgeted amount may be increased to help businesses offset potential losses resulting from greater competition with regional rivals, who have secured lower tariff rates of around 15 per cent to 20 per cent, a person familiar with the matter said. The discussions are still ongoing and the government has not made any decision on what kind of support it will provide, the person said. India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Ministry of Finance did not immediately respond to emails seeking further information. New Delhi is also weighing easing some dairy market access rules for the US in order to placate Mr Trump, officials familiar with the matter said. The government is discussing whether it can allow limited imports of some dairy products, such as cheese not made in India and condensed milk with clear labelling of the animal feed used in manufacturing, they said. India maintains tariffs of as high as 60 per cent on dairy products to protect its local industry and enforces strict rules to ensure imported dairy goods are not from cattle fed with animal-based products in order to adhere to religious sensitivities. Any easing of restrictions in the dairy sector would represent a significant concession by India, which did not grant the UK any similar market access in a recently concluded free trade agreement. Economists estimate that a 25 per cent tariff could cut India's gross domestic product growth by 0.3 percentage point. Mr Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC Holdings, said an additional penalty would curb growth further, resulting in lower capital inflows and investment. An internal assessment by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry shows that a 25 per cent tariff would impact about 10 per cent of India's exports in the July-to-September period. Mr Modi's rivals have criticised his previously friendly relationship with Mr Trump and called him out for his silence on the US leader's comments. 'We are receiving threats – that there will be more than 25 per cent tariffs and we are being told that we should not buy oil from Russia. This friendship has turned out to be expensive,' Mr Jairam Ramesh, a senior leader in the main opposition Indian National Congress, told reporters on Aug 5. Mr Trump's actions will push India to react, although it is unlikely to retaliate and will more likely seek further talks with the US, said Ms Indrani Bagchi, chief executive officer at Ananta Centre, a Delhi-based research group. 'My sense is the government will contain this and will not take this forward, will not escalate,' she said. India will want to continue the trade deal negotiations in spite of Trump's 'personal anger,' she said. The US president likely wants to have Mr Modi call him and 'fold in the way that other countries have', she said. 'That is not India's style.' BLOOMBERG

Russia says its forces control village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region
Russia says its forces control village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Russia says its forces control village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox MOSCOW - Russian forces pressing their slow advance through eastern Ukraine have captured the village of Sichneve in east-central Dnipropetrovsk region, the Russian Defence Ministry said on Tuesday. Russian forces have for months been pushing westward along sections of the 1,000-km (620-mile) front line, capturing new villages nearly on a daily basis, mainly in Donetsk region. Ukraine's military says its forces are holding their frontline positions and on Monday issued a pointed denial that its troops were surrounded in Pokrovsk, a logistics hub in Donetsk region under heavy attack for months. Russian forces now hold about 20% of Ukraine's territory since invading their smaller neighbour in February 2022 and have formally annexed four regions -- Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Moscow says it has full control of Luhansk region and holds parts of the others, plus Crimea, a peninsula it seized in 2014. Authorities in Kyiv made no mention of Moscow's latest announcement of a captured village in Dnipropetrovsk region and for weeks have denied that Russian forces have entered the region. Reuters could not independently confirm the battlefield report. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Finding hidden vapes: Inside ICA's mission to uncover contraband at land checkpoints Singapore Delays on East-West MRT Line between Boon Lay and Buona Vista due to track point fault Singapore Sorting recyclables by material could boost low domestic recycling rate: Observers Asia Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street The General Staff of Ukraine's military said Ukrainian forces continued action to contain Russian forces that have been trying to move closer to Pokrovsk, once a city of 60,000 residents and site of Ukraine's only colliery producing coking coal. "At the same time, some sources are disseminating information suggesting that our units are surrounded in Pokrovsk," it said in an evening report. "This is absolutely not true." Ukraine's top commander, Oleksandr Syrskyi, writing on Facebook, said Russian forces were trying to advance along the entire length of the front line. He said Ukrainian forces were facing the toughest fighting near Pokrovsk and two other areas of Donetsk region. But he added Kyiv's troops had "achieved successes" in Sumy region on Ukraine's northern border, where Russian forces had secured a foothold in recent months. He also said they continued to fight in Russia's Kursk region, where Kyiv staged a mass incursion a year ago. Russia said it had expelled all Ukrainian troops from Kursk in April. REUTERS

Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress
Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control Congress

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Illinois Governor JB Pritzker attends a news conference held by Texas Democratic lawmakers after leaving the state to deny Republicans the quorum needed to redraw Texas' 38 congressional districts, in Aurora, Illinois, U.S. August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Tom Krawczyk The escalating political fight over the Texas congressional map is spreading across other states across the country, triggering an unprecedented mid-decade redistricting arms race with the balance of power in Washington at stake. At President Donald Trump's urging, Texas Republicans have proposed new congressional districts aimed at flipping five Democrat-held U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, further skewing what is already considered a deeply partisan map in that state. In response, Democratic governors elsewhere - most notably Gavin Newsom of California, the only state with more congressional districts than Texas - have threatened to retaliate by mounting their own redistricting efforts. "Donald Trump is a cheater, and so is Governor Greg Abbott," JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, told reporters on Tuesday. Standing alongside him were several of the Democratic lawmakers from Texas who fled their home state on Monday to deny Republicans a quorum and prevent a vote on the proposed new map. "As far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table," Pritzker said. Democrats need to flip only three Republican-held seats to retake the majority in the 435-seat House next year, so even modest gains for either party via redistricting could prove decisive. If Democrats win the House, they could stymie much of Trump's legislative agenda and pursue multiple investigations into his administration. The practice of partisan gerrymandering - manipulating district lines to benefit one party over another - has a long tradition in the United States, but the advent of powerful software and sophisticated voter data has allowed mapmakers to drill down to individual streets and neighborhoods. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading Redistricting typically occurs every 10 years to incorporate the U.S. Census count. Trump has broken with that convention by openly pushing Texas Republicans to pursue a rare mid-decade redistricting for partisan gain, even though the existing map, which Republicans drew just four years ago, resulted in the party winning 25 of the state's 38 seats. "I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats," Trump told CNBC on Tuesday, referring to the 2024 presidential election. Trump has encouraged other Republican states to follow suit. A senior White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters last week the administration believes as many as five states could redraw their maps, including Florida, where Governor Ron DeSantis has expressed a willingness to take such a step. DEMOCRATS VOW TO FIGHT BACK Ohio Republicans will draw a new map ahead of the November 2026 election that could flip at least two Democratic seats. In Missouri, where Democrats hold two of the state's seven seats, some Republican lawmakers have had preliminary conversations about a new map, according to a source familiar with the matter. Other Republican-controlled states that could in theory use redistricting to target Democrats include Kansas, Kentucky and New Hampshire. Democrats, meanwhile, face some legal hurdles in their biggest states. In California, where redistricting is overseen by an independent commission, voters would likely have to approve giving Democratic lawmakers the power to draw a new map. Newsom said on Monday he would put the issue before voters this autumn if Texas moves forward. Experts say a Democratic-drawn map could easily target five Republican incumbents, even though Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 seats. New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on Monday that she would not "fight with my hand tied behind my back." Even so, any new map in her state would require voters to approve a constitutional amendment, and that process cannot take place before 2026. In Illinois, where Pritzker and the Democratic-controlled legislature have no restraints, Democrats already hold 14 of the state's 17 U.S. House seats, leaving them without much room to maneuver. THREATS TO TEXAS DEMOCRATS Meanwhile, in Texas, the Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said on Tuesday he would seek court orders declaring that any Democratic lawmakers who failed to return by Friday will lose their seats. Democrats have dismissed that threat as empty. David Froomkin, a law professor at the University of Houston, said he did not believe judges would buy the argument that lawmakers had created vacancies by leaving the state in protest. "Courts have generally taken the view that a legislator has surrendered their seat when they have chosen to surrender their seat," he said. "Here, they're not intending to vacate their offices – they're exercising their offices by trying to prevent the passage of legislation they find troubling." Paxton's threat follows warrants issued by the Republican Speaker of the Texas House, Dustin Burrows, for authorities to bring the absent lawmakers back to the statehouse for a vote. Abbott has ordered state law enforcement to help find them. But the Democrats have all left the state, putting them beyond the reach of any state agency. Trump told reporters late on Tuesday that the FBI 'may have' to get involved in forcing Democrats back to Texas. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store