LCCI rejects 37AA, describes it as ‘black law'
LCCI President Mian Abuzar Shad, Vice President Shahid Nazir Chaudhry, former Presidents Mian Anjum Nisar, Muhammad Ali Mian, representatives of various trade and industrial associations spoke on the occasion.
LCCI President Mian Abuzar Shad said that Clause 37AA empowers tax authorities to arrest any taxpayer merely on suspicion of tax fraud, even without concrete evidence. This clause is nothing less than a sword hanging over the heads of the entire business community.
He said that prior to this clause the definition of tax fraud had already been broadened extensively, encompassing a wide range of actions, from minor accounting mistakes to misinterpretation of law. The new clause now grants excessive and unchecked powers to FBR officers, enabling harassment and potential abuse.
The LCCI President said that business community has unanimously rejected this clause and are calling for its complete withdrawal. Such sweeping powers not only violate basic principles of justice but also infringe upon the constitutional rights of taxpayers. It will scare off investors and damage the trust that businesses have in the system.
Mian Abuzar Shad said that reputations of the businesses are at stake and arresting company officers, especially on mere suspicion, would bring serious disrepute and operational disruptions to large enterprises.
He said that following country-wide backlash, the government made a minor amendment to Section 37AA saying that arrest can only occur if there is a tax loss exceeding Rs50 million and upon the approval of a three-member committee. However, LCCI firmly rejected this amendment as well.
'Even with the amendment, the law remains draconian. The fact that arrest powers can be exercised without concrete evidence or judicial oversight is unacceptable,' Mian Abuzar Shad added.
LCCI Vice President Shahid Nazir Chaudhry said we have always advocated for business-friendly policies. But laws like Section 37AA will only create new challenges for an already struggling economy. Entrepreneurs will be discouraged and investment will decline further.
Former Presidents Mian Anjum Nisar and Muhammad Ali Mian urged the government to immediately withdraw Clause 37AA saying that unless business leaders are given breathing space, Pakistan will not be able to achieve the ambitious economic goals outlined in the budget.
They said that the government has set a GDP growth target of 4.2% and an export target of $35.3 billion but laws like these will make such goals impossible to achieve,' they warned.
All the representatives of trade and industrial associations unanimously and forcefully reject Section 37AA. The participants of the Press Conference said that we are not criminals. We are the backbone of the economy. This clause must be rolled back immediately so that we can focus on reviving Pakistan's economy instead of defending ourselves against unjust and arbitrary harassment.'
They said that the LCCI's powerful stand reflects growing unrest in Pakistan's business circles over heavy-handed and impractical taxation policies. If the government truly wants economic revival, it must abandon such oppressive clauses and create a trust-based tax environment.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
35 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
CJP-Aurangzeb huddle stirs the pot
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is interviewed during the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting at the IMF and World Bank's 2024 annual Spring Meetings in Washington. PHOTO: REUTERS In a rare turn of events, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi and Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb have met face-to-face, stirring debate in legal circles about the propriety of such an engagement. The meeting between the judiciary's top office and the government's economic helm underscored the need for "coordinated efforts" between the judiciary and the executive to uphold the rule of law and safeguard citizens' rights. The unusual interaction, held without the Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Awan present, was accompanied by an official photograph and press release, a move many lawyers believe was "uncalled for" and fraught with optics that blur the fine line between the judiciary and the executive. The meeting underscored the importance of coordinated efforts between the judiciary and the executive in upholding the rule of law and safeguarding citizens' fundamental rights. Some insiders point out that CJP Afridi and Aurangzeb are also former college fellows, stressing that the meeting should be viewed in that light. Nonetheless, for many lawyers, such engagements are "against judicial norms", particularly when the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), which operates under the finance ministry, is one of the largest litigants before the Supreme Court. FBR disputes in spotlight Meanwhile, concerns are already high over the functioning of Alternate Dispute Resolution Committees (ADRCs) — bodies working under the FBR's administrative control to resolve tax-related matters, especially those involving state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Just last month, a bench headed by CJP Afridi ordered a stay on proceedings in all cases pending before ADRCs. The court also flagged concerns over how ADRC members were appointed, directing the FBR to seek input from all stakeholders before finalising the appointment framework. The matter will be heard again on September 8. One lawyer representing an SOE argued that the ADRC mechanism had proven "destructive" for such enterprises. "They are being crushed with taxation and have no remedy against the ADRC," he said, alleging that billions of rupees in taxes had been forcibly recovered in June, without legally required notices, to meet revenue targets. "All profit-making SOEs are being destroyed," he added, while another counsel argued that the ADRCs must operate independently and free from FBR influence to have credibility. Judicial independence worries Since the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, legal experts have expressed unease over what they see as growing executive dominance over the judiciary. Even tax lawyers complain that higher courts were offering little relief to individuals aggrieved by FBR orders. The Sindh High Court, for instance, has reportedly delivered hundreds of judgments in the FBR's favour. At the SC, judges with expertise in revenue law are often not assigned to such matters. Against this backdrop, the optics of the CJP meeting the finance minister have unsettled some lawyers, who fear it may send the wrong signal to business stakeholders whose cases are awaiting adjudication in the apex court. They argue that the country's top judge should avoid creating any perception that the judiciary and executive are "on the same page" when it comes to revenue collection. However, it is also pertinent to mention that CJP Afridi has shown a willingness to engage across the political spectrum. In recent weeks, he has also met with PTI leader Omar Ayub and Barrister Gohar.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Workers' body alleges corruption in SESSI and WWBS
The Workers' Solidarity Committee (WSC) — a coalition of labour, human rights, and social organisations alongside progressive intellectuals — has strongly condemned what it described as an "assault on workers' rights," the legitimisation of lawlessness through the Sindh Labour Code. WSC alleged large-scale corruption within key social protection institutions, the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (SESSI) and Sindh Workers Welfare Board (WWBS). Speaking at a press conference at the Karachi Press Club, prominent activists including Anees Haroon (National Commission on Human Rights), Dr Riaz Shaikh (SZABIST), Nasir Mansoor (NTUF), Gul Shar (Watan Dost Mazdoor Federation), Liaqat Sahi (Democratic Workers Union), Razzaq Memon (Port Workers Union), Qazi Khizar (HRCP), Tahir Khan (PFUJ), Zehra Khan (HBWWF), and labour leader Comrade Usman Baloch, accused the Sindh Labour Dept of shielding factory owners while failing to enforce labour laws. They claimed that the WWBS - which manages over Rs50 billion in workers' funds - has been run on an ad-hoc basis for months, violated procurement rules, purchased an expensive Clifton office inaccessible to workers, and misused billions on poorly executed repairs, non-mandated insurance schemes, and unapproved projects such as a Rs3 billion e-bike programme. They demanded full investigation into WWBS expenditures and reconstitution of its board, permanent appointments in all social protection institutions, registration of at least 3 million workers in SESSI per court orders.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SHC issues contempt notices to FBR officials in Nomi Ansari case
Listen to article The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Tuesday issued contempt notices to senior Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officials in a case filed by fashion designer Nomi Ansari, directing the advocate general and prosecutor general of Sindh to prosecute them. A two-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, fixed August 20 for framing charges against Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue Zahid Masood, Commissioner Rizwan Memon and Assistant Commissioner Sehrish Javed. Ansari moved the court after his name was placed on the Passport Control List (PCL) on June 9 despite an earlier SHC order suspending proceedings in a tax fraud case against him and seeking reasons from the Inland Revenue Department for registering it. He was later also placed on the Exit Control List (ECL), preventing him from travelling to Dubai and representing Pakistan at a fashion show in the United States on July 9. The bench expressed displeasure that instead of complying with court directives, the FBR had gone ahead with registering a criminal case. The CJ noted that superior courts had laid down the procedure for criminal proceedings in tax matters and observed it was "too late" for the revenue body to file a counter-affidavit. FBR counsel Zahid Ibrahim sought time to submit a reply, but the bench said the officials and the federal government had failed to satisfy the court over their actions and proceeded to initiate contempt proceedings.
