Trump voters say president's tariffs are major red flag for them: new poll
A poll by Politico and Public First conducted in June found that between a quarter and almost half of those who backed Trump in last year's election harbor doubts about various parts of his tariff policies, particularly when it comes to China.
Only half of Trump voters think his tariffs on China will benefit U.S. companies, according to the poll.
This comes as the president has refocused his efforts on trade and bringing industries back to the U.S. Trump recently sent off several contentious tariff letters to other countries, which outlined his threats to put in place major new tariffs.
The poll from mid-June, well before the tariff letters were sent, reveals that Trump may lose some supporters over his policies. While he promised during the 2024 campaign to bring down the cost of living, his trade policies now may rock the global economy and push up inflation.
Roughly one in four Trump voters said in the poll that the tariffs are damaging the ability of the U.S. to negotiate trade deals with other countries. The president's supporters are also evenly split on whether Trump should have the power to impose tariffs, with 44 percent saying he should have Congress 's approval versus 45 percent who say he should have the authority to put in place the levies.
Trump has said that he may put in place yet another round of tariffs on August 1, threatening a 30 percent tariff on goods from Mexico and the European Union. The tariffs, which Trump has claimed will bring in 'big money' to the U.S., are paid by the importer, and many companies pass those costs on to the customer.
Forty-six percent of Trump voters said they back tariffs on China 'even if it increases prices at home.' Meanwhile, 32 percent say they only support tariffs if it doesn't raise prices, and nine percent said they oppose tariffs. Twenty-five percent of Trump voters said the tariffs on China hurt U.S. companies.
However, 55 percent said that while it will be challenging to get a deal with China, they expect that the president 'will be able to do it.' Eighteen percent said it won't be difficult to reach an agreement. Twelve percent said Trump won't be able to get a deal with the second-largest economy in the world.
Among those who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, 47 percent said the same. Eighty-six percent of Harris voters said the tariffs are damaging to the U.S. ability to arrange better trade deals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tucker Carlson rips Trump for 'ignoring America's biggest problem'
Tucker Carlson took to the stage at TPUSA's Student Action Summit in Tampa to call out the Trump administration for grandstanding rather than affecting change. Carlson, 56, made the comments Friday, accusing conservatives of failing to deliver on campaign promises or tackling America's biggest problems. The former Fox host's fervent speech received surprising praise from progressives who flooded the video with positive comments. Carlson honed in on Trump's posturing in the Middle East, as cities like New York and LA have been hung out to dry — all while the US becomes unaffordable for normal families. 'I don't know, it kind feels like you're feeding me appetizers,' an emotional Carlson had told audience members. 'At some point, I want to look around and see a better country. I want to see a country I recognize.' His rant argued that 'If you deny people what they actually want long enough, and instead substitute things that you claim they should want,' the administration should see scrutiny. 'Like, bombing Iran; you know, I'm not for Iran,' Carlson said. 'Or you spend all day telling me that it's so important that boys not play on girls soccer teams, or whatever — I agree. I hate the trans stuff passionately,' Carlson admitted. 'I think you should keep the boys off girls' soccer teams.' He then proclaimed: 'I [just] don't want to see people sleeping on the sidewalk. I don't want to see people ODing on drugs.' He added: 'I want to know where those drugs are coming from. Why can't you stop it? You've got the US military. Don't you have Seal Team Six? What are they doing today? Why are my cities disgusting?' Carlson flat-out asked. 'It smells like weed and halal food. And you're lecturing me about how it's a great moral victory that I kicked the boys off the girls' soccer team? Good. I'm so glad. But let's do the real stuff like making New York livable. And creating an economy where my kids can have kids.' He then brought up the focal point of a brewing civil war between conservatives — the so-called 'Epstein Files', which Trump repeatedly promised to release in full during his campaign. Last Monday, the Justice Department released findings stating that Epstein never even kept a 'client list' and confirmed that he killed himself in jail. The announcement earned harsh criticism from leading MAGA figures including Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Laura Loomer as being not only a coverup but a clear backtrack. Earlier in the day, it was revealed that FBI boss Kash Patel, his deputy Dan Bongino, and Attorney General Pam Bondi were duking it out behind the scenes over the administration's handling of the release of the files. Bondi's widely panned claim was 'too much' for Carlson, he told the conference.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Dose of realism would allow Kyiv to focus on halting Russian advance
While Donald Trump – and other western leaders – are taking their time to catch up with reality, it is obvious that Vladimir Putin has no apparent desire to halt the war in Ukraine. A realistic future military and diplomatic strategy for Kyiv has to accept that fact – and formulate a new approach. The past six months have been dominated by the erroneous assumption that it would be possible for Trump to negotiate a ceasefire, even an armistice. That would be followed by the arrival of an Anglo-French led stabilisation force to secure the future of Ukraine. But Putin has shown no desire to stop attacking. A fresh Russian ground offensive is emerging towards Velykyi Burluk, 50 miles east of Kharkiv, and for now is making some rare gains: three miles in 10 days. More significantly, the cynical bombing of Ukraine's cities by missile and drone is only intensifying, straining Kyiv's air defences and leading to more civilian casualties. A record 728 Shahed drones and 13 missiles were launched on the night of 8 July and the next morning, many at Lutsk in the west, though the bombardment of 597 drones and 26 missiles on Friday night and Saturday morning showed no slackening of violent intent. It will be soon possible for Russia to attack with 1,000 drones in a night, Ukraine believes. In a paper written last month, Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former Ukrainian defence minister, said 'an acceptable armistice may never formally arrive' and that Kyiv should formulate 'a revised theory of victory' – which accepts that the Kremlin considers itself engaged in a forever war against its smaller neighbour. The former minister describes the new approach as 'strategic neutralisation', a permanent and dynamic military effort to ensure that Russia's forces cannot advance and that Moscow becomes 'operationally incapable of disrupting key aspects of Ukrainian strategic, political, economic, and social life'. It accepts that Ukraine cannot retake territories already occupied by Moscow, or attack again into Russia, as happened into Kursk oblast last summer, and instead pursues an active defence. As an example for what might be possible, Zagorodnyuk refers to the situation in the Black Sea. Ukraine, which began the war without a navy, had managed to box in the Russian Black Sea fleet by mid-2023 by successfully sinking and threatening to sink warships with remotely piloted sea drones. The result is the 'functional defeat' of the Russian fleet, a phrase first used by a former British junior defence minister, James Heappey. Kyiv was able to unilaterally reopen a corridor for grain shipments from Odesa and nearby areas in 2023 without having to negotiate a special exemption for such traffic with Russia. One question is whether strategic neutralisation is possible on land. Russia has struggled to gain territory inside Ukraine during 2025, though it has collapsed the Kursk pocket, and its forces incurred casualty rates (killed and wounded) of about 1,100 a day in June – showing that Kyiv can roughly hold the line largely with the help of £300-£370 ($400-$500) first-person view (FPV) drones that it can manufacture in bulk. But the strategy goes further. The military aim in such a plan would be to extend the depth of FPV drone operations to 25, 50 or even 100 miles – to create a zone where it is effectively impossible for Russian forces to mass – and even to walk to the frontline. Rather than create a Korean style demilitarised zone, the effect would be to create a highly militarised zone in which Russian forces could not operate, a de facto border. The already slow rate of Russian advance suggests this approach may be possible, though an important question is what will happen once the last of the US military aid approved by former president Joe Biden tails off. It is also challenged by Russia's expanding volume of missile and drone attacks – which in turn come at a time of growing concern about the amount of available air defence interceptors. A series of ill-judged signals from the US reveal that the Pentagon is worried about the number of Patriot air defence missiles it has available, probably the single most important air defence system used by Ukraine. Weapons deliveries were halted at the end of last month amid fears US stockpiles were low (perhaps at 25% of the desired levels), though Trump has partially relented, sending a symbolic 10 Patriot missiles last week. The US president, finally acknowledging that Putin is stalling, has promised a 'major announcement' on Monday, which may involve extra sanctions on Russia and allowing European countries to buy more weapons for Kyiv. It would make strategic sense if whatever is offered comes with the recognition that Putin is not serious about peace – and gives Ukraine what it needs to neutralise the aggressor.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
EU backs down from trade retaliation as Trump threatens 30pc tariffs
Brussels has backed down at the eleventh hour from plans to impose €21bn (£18bn) retaliatory tariffs on the US after Donald Trump threatened to punish the bloc with 30pc levies. The EU's tariffs on US steel and aluminium exports were due to come into effect from midnight on Monday, but Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, said these will now be put on hold until early August. The reprieve will give negotiators in Brussels more time as they battle to secure a trade agreement with the US. The import tariffs threatened by the US president on Saturday night are three times higher than those imposed on Britain. Ms Von der Leyen said: 'We have always been very clear that we prefer a negotiated solution. This remains the case, and we will use the time that we have now.' Her comments represent a marked shift in tone from the EU, which has been attempting to play hardball with the US president. Writing on Truth Social on Saturday, Mr Trump warned the EU and Mexico they faced higher tariffs from August 1. His announcement came after weeks of negotiations between US officials and major trading partners. In an open letter to Ms Von der Leyen, Mr Trump wrote: 'We have had years to discuss our trading relationship with the European Union, and we have concluded we must move away from these long-term, large, and persistent trade deficits, engendered by your tariff, and non-tariff policies, and trade barriers. 'Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal ... This deficit is a major threat to our economy and, indeed, our national security.' European divide Britain was the first country to independently strike a deal with Washington in May, although most exports are subject to a 10pc tariff. Ms Von der Leyen said the bloc would not implement its list of counter-tariffs and instead stated 'the time is for negotiations'. She also announced a 'political agreement' with Indonesia to conclude with a free trade deal in September. 'When economic uncertainty meets geopolitical volatility, partners like us must come closer together,' she told Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, in a thinly veiled swipe at the US. Leaders across the EU remain divided on whether the bloc should continue to negotiate with the aim of securing an improved deal or opt for a trade framework. Lars Klingbeil, Germany's finance minister, said that 'serious and solution-oriented negotiations' with the Trump administration were still necessary. 'Our hand remains outstretched but we won't accept just anything,' Mr Klingbeil told the Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper. He warned that the EU would have to take 'decisive counter measures' if an agreement with the US could not be reached. Simon Harris, Ireland's foreign affairs minister, told RTE: 'We prefer to do our negotiations around the table. He tends to do his negotiations on Truth Social and he can do it however he wishes … we're continuing to intensively engage.' Emmanuel Macron, the French president, called on the European Commission to 'assert the Union's determination to defend European interests resolutely'. He added that retaliation from the bloc might need to include anti-coercion measures. However, Matteo Salvini, Italy's deputy prime minister, hit out at the EU's negotiation strategy. 'Trump has no reason to attack our country but once again we are paying the price for a German-led Europe,' he said.
