logo
If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?

If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?

Irish Times01-07-2025
The Government has opted to reject suggestions from various quarters, including
some of its own
, that it should establish a fund to allow Irish savers to finance the development of affordable housing for sale. Instead, it's going to entice international investors to do so. It will just be housing for rent, not sale, and it won't be affordable for most.
Oblivious to the contradictory position of luring landlords while simultaneously persisting with the fantasy of being parties that support home ownership, Government policy is engineering a decline in people owning their own homes, and a commensurate rise in numbers renting. Hundreds of thousands of households will become poorer, and
a small cohort of landlords will become a lot wealthier
.
Is this private rental sector into which more and more households are going to be corralled even fit for purpose?
One issue is the fact that there is no deposit protection scheme in Ireland, despite the issue of deposits consistently being the second most common reason for disputes between landlords and tenants. These are schemes run
in other countries
by private companies or state agencies into which tenants pay their deposits, instead of handing them over to their landlord. The scheme then returns the deposit at the end of the tenancy, if all is well in the interim. Complaints of landlords not returning deposits to tenants drop significantly under such schemes.
READ MORE
There were
474 applications
to the
Residential Tenancies Board
to resolve disputes about deposit retention in the first three months of 2025 alone. There has been a provision in Irish legislation for the establishment of such a scheme for a decade, but the section of the
Residential Tenancies (Amendment) Act 2015
has never been commenced. Last February, People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy introduced a Bill to force the Government to establish the scheme. Nothing has happened since.
There is also no definition of rent in Irish legislation to say what is included or not included under it. This lack of clarity facilitates large landlords in levying – according to recent media reports – up to an extra €200 per month for the use and upkeep of common areas. Common areas are places that tenants do not occupy exclusively and have no control over. In the US, large landlord Greystar (which is also present here) is facing a a class-action lawsuit after the
Federal Trade Commission accused the company of imposing hidden 'junk' fees
, which it denies. The FTC's lawsuit states that the fees 'make it impossible to actually rent from Greystar for the advertised prices'. It accuses the commission of over-reach. Such additional charges allows for circumvention of rent caps.
Regardless of recent Government bluster about increasing security for tenants during the reform of Rent Pressure Zones, the fact remains that tenants of a 'small landlord' can face eviction for essentially spurious reasons such as
the probably unprovable 'personal hardship
' of the landlord, or because a member of the landlord's family might need the property.
The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise
Most renters in Ireland live a very legally precarious existence, regardless of how good their landlord is. Ireland is an outlier in this regard, compared to many countries with an established rental sector. Rent inflation in Ireland is
39 per cent higher than the European average
, and housing costs in general are more than double this average when utility bills are factored in. Those hardest hit by affordability issues also include better-off renters.
According to the
Economic and Social Research Institute
(ESRI), in 2023 'middle-to-higher-income renters in Ireland are more likely to face high housing costs than their European counterparts'. Fourteen per cent of the richest Irish renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, versus 3 per cent on average elsewhere. Sixteen per cent of the next-wealthiest renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent compared to 9 per cent on average elsewhere.
The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise. High rents will then attract international investment, which will then build apartments for rent, which will then reduce rents across the board.
Ignoring for a moment the significant pain that will be inflicted on all tenants while enacting this strategy of building housing that
the majority of renters do not want
, recent research from
Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies
found that the benefits of the construction of new apartments for rent does not find its way down to help those who need affordable rents. Given previous rent inflation, it is highly unlikely rents will fall here in any meaningful way, if at all.
On the regulatory front, local authorities are charged with inspecting private rented sector accommodation to ensure it is safe and compliant with regulations. They each have a target to inspect 25 per cent of the private rented dwellings in their area. In 2023, just nine out of 31 local authorities hit that target (Meath achieved 45 per cent), and nine failed to meet it. Galway City Council managed to inspect less than 3 per cent of the private rented stock in its area. In 2023,
23 local authorities reported
that more than 90 per cent of inspected dwellings were found to be non-compliant with the required standards.
There are other concerns: tenancies being misrepresented as less secure licence agreements; landlords wilfully ignoring legal requirements
including having to provide their names
to tenants; and investigations that take years by an under-resourced RTB.
The fact is that whether renting from the Government's white knights – international investors – or the traditional small landlord, there are serious issues with the private rented sector that need to be addressed before the State can legitimately expect people to willingly rent a home instead of owning one.
The minuscule proportion of Government politicians who rent (in a country where one in five people in the population generally are in the private rental sector) tells its own story. If more politicians don't choose to rent long-term, why do they believe so many of us should?
Dr Lorcan Sirr is senior lecturer in housing at the Technological University Dublin
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sligo online player scoops over one million euro in EuroMillions draw
Sligo online player scoops over one million euro in EuroMillions draw

Irish Independent

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Sligo online player scoops over one million euro in EuroMillions draw

The winning normal play ticket was bought on 19th July. The winning raffle ticket number was: I-SLF-56168. The National Lottery has confirmed that a notification and an email has been sent to the Sligo online player. The winner is advised to make contact with the National Lottery prize claims team on 1800 666 222 or email claims@ to arrange the collection of the prize. Friday night's EuroMillions draw featured an extra special 'Ireland Only' Raffle event, with a guaranteed €1,005,000 prize for one player. As with every EuroMillions draw, ten players win €5,000 with their unique raffle ticket number, and among them one fortunate winner from Sligo has had an additional €1,000,000 added to their prize, making them the 16th National Lottery millionaire of the 2025 with a total prize worth €1,005,000. While there was no winner of the EuroMillions jackpot worth €166,241,768, in total over 67,000 players won prizes in the EuroMillions & EuroMillions Plus draws, including the online player in Sligo who won the EuroMillions Ireland Only Raffle prize of €1,005,000. Darragh O'Dwyer, spokesperson for The National Lottery, said: 'What a night for our players! We've got a brand-new millionaire in Sligo thanks to the Ireland Only Raffle. That's €1.5 million in top tier prizes heading to two counties in one night. We're absolutely thrilled and can't wait to meet our latest winners including Ireland's newest millionaire.'

Italian regulator slaps €1m fine on Shein's Dublin-based European online company
Italian regulator slaps €1m fine on Shein's Dublin-based European online company

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Italian regulator slaps €1m fine on Shein's Dublin-based European online company

Italy's competition authority (AGCM) imposed a €1m fine on China-founded online fast fashion retailer Shein on Monday for misleading customers about the environmental impact of its products. It is Shein's second financial sanction by a European competition authority in little more than a month, after France fined the company €40m on July 3 over fake discounts and misleading environmental claims. The Italian fine was imposed on Infinite Styles Services Co. Limited, a Dublin-based company that operates Shein's website in Europe, following an investigation by AGCM launched last September. In a statement, Shein said it has cooperated fully with AGCM and took immediate action to address the concerns raised. AGCM said the environmental sustainability and social responsibility messages on Shein's website "were sometimes vague, generic, and/or overly emphatic, and in other cases omitted and misleading." Shein's claims on circular system design and product recyclability "were found to be false or at the very least confusing", and the green credentials of its 'evoluSHEIN by design' collection were overstated, the regulator said. Shein promotes the 'evoluSHEIN by design' collection as clothes made using more sustainable and responsible manufacturing. AGCM said consumers could be misled to think that the collection was made with materials that are fully recyclable, "a fact that, considering the fibres used and currently existing recycling systems, is untrue". Shein, in its statement, said: "We have strengthened our internal review processes and improved our website to ensure that all environmental claims are clear, verifiable, and compliant with regulations." AGCM also took issue with Shein's "vague and generic" commitments to cut greenhouse emissions by 25% by 2030 and to net zero by 2050, noting that Shein's emissions increased in 2023 and 2024. The Italian regulator said its overall assessment was influenced by an "increased duty of care" falling on Shein, "because it operates in a highly polluting sector and with highly polluting methods". AGCM is in charge of consumer protection as well as competition.

Italian regulator hits Shein with €1m greenwashing fine
Italian regulator hits Shein with €1m greenwashing fine

RTÉ News​

time5 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Italian regulator hits Shein with €1m greenwashing fine

Italy's competition authority has imposed a €1 million fine on China-founded online fast fashion retailer Shein for misleading customers about the environmental impact of its products. It is Shein's second financial sanction by a European competition authority in little more than a month, after France fined the company €40 million on 3 July over fake discounts and misleading environmental claims. The Italian fine was imposed on Infinite Styles Services Co Limited, a Dublin-based company that operates Shein's website in Europe, following an investigation by AGCM launched last September. In a statement, Shein said it has cooperated fully with AGCM and took immediate action to address the concerns raised. AGCM said the environmental sustainability and social responsibility messages on Shein's website "were sometimes vague, generic, and/or overly emphatic, and in other cases omitted and misleading." Shein's claims on circular system design and product recyclability "were found to be false or at the very least confusing", and the green credentials of its 'evoluSHEIN by design' collection were overstated, the regulator said. Shein promotes the 'evoluSHEIN by design' collection as clothes made using more sustainable and responsible manufacturing. AGCM said consumers could be misled to think that the collection was made with materials that are fully recyclable, "a fact that, considering the fibres used and currently existing recycling systems, is untrue". Shein, in its statement, said: "We have strengthened our internal review processes and improved our website to ensure that all environmental claims are clear, verifiable, and compliant with regulations." AGCM also took issue with Shein's "vague and generic" commitments to cut greenhouse emissions by 25% by 2030 and to net zero by 2050, noting that Shein's emissions increased in 2023 and 2024. The Italian regulator said its overall assessment was influenced by an "increased duty of care" falling on Shein," because it operates in a highly polluting sector and with highly polluting methods".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store