
VS, the Left conscience keeper
CPM
or as a popular leader who rose to the position of chief minister despite facing significant challenges from his own party.
More importantly, he was someone who championed a new kind of Left politics in the era of economic liberalisation and proved that an alternative politics, rooted in people's issues, was not only necessary but entirely possible.
VS recognised early on that the communist party had to evolve to stay relevant. His politics became an amalgam of concerns such as feminism, environmentalism, land rights and equity. Despite being a prominent leader, VS didn't become a mass figure like EMS Nambudiripad and A K Gopalan until the late 1990s.
His life can be divided into distinct stages, each shaped by the turbulence of his political career.
In his early years, VS was an uncompromising militant communist activist. He was part of the Punnapra-Vayalar uprising,
Kerala
's only armed struggle by communist party, when he went underground, courted arrest and endured torture. These early struggles were common to the generation that laid the foundation of the communist party in the state.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World
Topgentlemen.com
Undo
W
hen the first Communist govt came into being in 1957 and the split that led to CPM's formation in 1964, VS donned key leadership roles. Until 1996, he remained a disciplined, uncompromising organisational man. His political style was radical, often militant, which is why he chose to be with the CPM while numerous leaders he previously associated with stayed with CPI, seen back then more as a centrist organisation.
VS's legacy can be compared to that of P Krishna Pillai. Like Pillai, VS stood apart — a lone tusker, as we often said. EMS was a tall leader, under whose shadow many leaders preferred to stay but VS was distinct. What I have observed is that at each of the party meetings involving EMS and VS, they always sat seats apart and never near each other. It was perhaps due to their own distinct opinions on issues.
In 1996, the state committee selected VS as the CM candidate, which was approved by the central leadership.
But he lost from Mararikkulam, a result many of us believe was engineered by sections within the party. Despite the setback, the turning point in VS's public image had arrived. The man who had operated within the party's rigid structures began to reinvent himself.
He started addressing people's issues — women's rights, environmental degradation and agrarian distress — with new intensity. His campaign to preserve Kerala's paddy fields — protesting the shift to cash crops like coconut — was visionary.
Looking back, many of his warnings have proved accurate. But this transformation earned him the label of a 'revisionist' within the party.
As opposition leader after the 2001 defeat, VS delivered a performance unparalleled in modern Kerala politics. He brought critical issues to the assembly — rape cases, land encroachments, environmental destruction — and toured the state relentlessly, rain or shine. For many environmental activists, he became the final hope, someone who would listen, take notes and act.
VS also mastered the new media landscape. He became a favourite of the press, regularly engaging with television journalists and presenting his version of a rejuvenated Left agenda. His popularity soared. In 2006, as chief minister, VS stayed true to his convictions. From removing encroachments on MG Road in Kochi to taking on illegal plantations in Munnar — even when it meant challenging CPI offices — he never backed down.
His boldness stood in sharp contrast to then state secretary Pinarayi Vijayan, who increasingly aligned with corporate interests.
Though he withdrew from public life due to age-related ailments, VS's influence remained. The continued resistance to projects like K-Rail can be traced back to his groundwork. As chief minister, he ensured that public support remained at the heart of governance, making him one of Kerala's most loved leaders.
The chant "Kanne Karale VS-ey" was more than a slogan — it was a people's tribute.
But there was disillusionment too. Between 2011 and 2016, VS contemplated leaving the party several times. He was deeply troubled by what he saw as rightward shifts under Vijayan. "The party is moving away from its communist roots," he would say. Although age stopped him from forming a new party, the idea of an alternative Left never left him.
VS's life is not just the story of a political leader but of a relentless fighter who kept reinventing himself to stay true to the people. He stood firm when the party faltered, listened when others silenced and led when leadership mattered most.
(Writer is a poet and a Left fellow traveller)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rahul Gandhi's 'vote theft' claim an afterthought, says EC
NEW DELHI: Election Commission of India on Thursday said leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi 's allegations of "vote theft" during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka appear to be an afterthought, given that Congress neither filed a single appeal with election officials after publication of the state's final electoral roll in Jan 2024 nor did it challenge the results in state high court through an election petition. Talking to reporters in Parliament complex, Rahul claimed that Congress has "concrete 100% proof" of "cheating in an LS seat" in Karnataka and warned that "if you (EC) think you are going to get away with this... you are mistaken... we are going to come for you". The Congress MP said opposition would ensure that EC is held accountable. Dismissing his charges as "baseless" in a statement, EC said: "It is highly unfortunate that rather than filing an election petition as per section 80 of Representation of the People (RP)Act, 1951, or if filed, awaiting verdict of HC, he has not only made baseless allegations but also chosen to threaten EC, which is a constitutional body." With his allegations coming more than a year after the LS polls result, EC said it was wondering why "such baseless and threatening claims were being made against it and the CEC, and that too now." It added that the losing Congress candidates did not file a single election petition to challenge the result, despite Representation of the People Act, 1951 allowing this within 45 days of declaration of result. Others, however, did file 10 election petitions in HC. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Countering Rahul's "unwarranted threatening statements", the Karnataka chief electoral officer (CEO) on X said copies of the draft and final electoral roll for the state's 224 assembly seats were provided to recognised parties, including Congress, on Oct 27, 2023, and Jan 22, 2024, respectively. Between publication of the draft and final roll, around 9.2 lakh claims and objections were received and settled across 34 districts. Neither Congress nor any other entity avail the two-stage appeal option available under Representation of the People Act, 1951, the post said. Meanwhile, backing RJD functionary Tejashwi Yadav suggested possibility of boycotting Bihar elections over the special revision of electoral rolls issue, Congress' K C Venugopal said a political party's biggest weapon in a democracy is the voters' list and if that is compromised, with names being deleted and lists not being clean, then you are challenging democracy. "Let there not be an election and there be one party. Let Election Commission rule that. That is what Yadav meant by his comment about boycotting," Venugopal said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Karnataka smart meter case: Court orders registration of complaint against minister George, officials
Bengaluru: The simmering controversy over the tendering process of smart meters in Karnataka took an interesting turn with the special court for elected representatives on Wednesday directing enforcement agencies to register a private complaint report (PCR) against energy minister KJ George and others. Based on a complaint filed by BJP functionaries CN Ashwath Narayan, SR Vishwanath, and Dheeraj Muniraj, special court judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat directed officials to submit a status report on the complaint filed with the Lokayukta in April 2025 pertaining to the same issue, besides registering a PCR. The complaint also named additional chief secretary (energy) Gaurav Gupta, previous Bescom MD Mahantesh Bilagi, and Bescom technical director SG Ramesh as accused in the case. The complainants alleged that all the accused did not comply with the tender rules while rolling out the smart meter tender. "A tender was floated in Sept 2024 to provide smart meter services, and it was allotted to one of the bidders, a Davanagere-based shell company. Rather than floating separate tenders for each of the Escoms (electricity supply companies), tenders were floated only for Bescom. The entire process not only violated provisions under the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, but also went against the guidelines laid down by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission," the complaint read. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Pieces of Clothing Older Women should Avoid Learn More Undo by Taboola by Taboola You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Seeking the special court's intervention, the complainants sought registration of an FIR under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhit and the Prevention of Corruption Act. BJP legislators have been hitting out at the state govt and accusing George, who also holds the position of Bescom chairman, of misappropriation in the smart meter tender ever since the issue snowballed into a major controversy during the budget session of legislature. Nothing illegal: George Reacting sharply to the development, the minister retorted: "Is there a court order? If so, give a copy to me and I will react to that." Hitting out at the BJP, he added: "There is a group comprising Ashwath Narayan and others. They have already filed a petition in the high court and have also complained to the governor. Now, a case has also been filed in the people's representatives court. There is nothing illegal and the tender process has been done according to the law. I'm ready to explain everything if needed. Rather than indulging in hit-and-run methods, let them produce documents to the court and our advocates will also argue. Eventually, I will bow to whatever the court orders." BJP demands George's ouster BJP legislator CN Ashwath Narayan on Thursday demanded the dismissal of energy minister KJ George. "There is no malice — this is in public interest," he said, alleging that contracts were given to blacklisted firms, regulations were flouted, and inflated rates were imposed. Narayan questioned whether George would resign, before urging chief minister Siddaramaiah to act immediately to uphold justice and govt accountability


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Offer officers Rs 2k incentive for ‘spl drives': EC to Bengal
Kolkata/New Delhi: Election Commission on Thursday directed Bengal govt to increase wages of booth level officers (BLOs) and their supervisors and mentioned an incentive of Rs 2,000 for them for "special drives". The reference to the "special drive" was not elaborated. The commission's short letter comes in the backdrop of Trinamool raising its pitch on the special intensive revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar. TMC has already moved Supreme Court against the exercise. The EC letter — seeking to revise wages that were fixed in 2015 — said BLOs should be given Rs 12,000 annual remuneration and their supervisors Rs 18,000, adding that Rs 2,000 be earmarked for BLOs for "special summary revision (SSR)/special revision (SR) or any other special drive". You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata TMC MP Mahua Moitra, in her SLP in SC, expressed apprehension that the SIR exercise would be replicated in Bengal from Aug 2025, "for which instructions have already been given to EROs". Bengal goes to polls in 2026. TMC also raised the issue in Parliament. TMC's leader in Rajya Sabha Derek O'Brien posted on X: "They will run away from discussing issues like SIR and the targeting of Bengal. The govt does not want Parliament to run." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nvidia's AI Strategy Is Clear - But Is Wall Street Paying Attention? Seeking Alpha Read More Undo Trinamool, in a statement on X, said: "This is not a 'special intensive revision'. This is a special disenfranchisement drive. On July 22: 11,484 untraceable voters. On July 23: 1,00,000 untraceable voters. This is an 8X spike in just 24 hours. Until 88.1% coverage, there were 35 lakh deletions. Now, at 98% coverage: there are 56 lakh deletions. 21 lakh voters have been culled from the last 77 lakh surveyed. What magic formula is EC using?" Bengal BJP has demanded a Bihar-like SIR in Bengal to purge out "Rohingya and infiltrators". TMC questioned this narrative and said in a statement: "Today, BJP screams about 'illegal Bangladeshi migrants' on voter rolls. Two simple questions arise: Who controls India's borders? It's the ministry of home affairs. If illegal infiltration has occurred, that is a direct admission of failure on their part. Who is the governing party today? It's the Narendra Modi-led govt. If the electoral rolls are allegedly flooded with illegals on his watch, should the PM not consider vacating his own chair?"