logo
Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory

The Guardian2 days ago
The New South Wales parliament has a problem with men behaving badly. But more to the point, it seems to have an inability to deal with it.
On Tuesday, the parliament will try to deal with two very different cases that share a common consequence: damage to its reputation as an institution.
Despite being a convicted rapist in custody awaiting sentence, Gareth Ward, the MP for Kiama, remains a member of the Legislative Assembly, drawing a base salary of more than $170,000 courtesy of NSW taxpayers.
Labor plans to move a motion to have him expelled when parliament resumes on Tuesday and the opposition has said it will support it.
Expelling Ward will almost certainly lead to more litigation, especially as the government will probably try to call a byelection in his south coast seat soon after.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
But first to backtrack a little.
Most politicians being investigated or facing criminal charges choose to resign, or their parties put the pressure on the MP to draw a line under their faltering political career.
But Ward has toughed it out and continues to claim his innocence, despite being convicted for serious sex offences against two young men. He was suspended and left the Liberal party in 2022 after being charged with sex offences. He then ran as an independent in the 2023 state election and was returned by the voters of Kiama.
Now that he has been convicted, he faces a potential sentence of more than five years.
Under section 13A of the NSW constitution, a person is ineligible to be an MP if they are convicted of an offence punishable by five years or more.
But it's only counted as a conviction once the person has reached the end of the appeals process and has not had their conviction overturned, constitutional expert Prof Anne Twomey says – and Ward has confirmed he plans to appeal the verdict. The appeals process could take years.
The other route is expulsion. The NSW constitution does not give a specific power to expel a member, but Twomey says there is an inherent power for the NSW parliament to expel an MP to protect itself and its proper functioning.
This appears to be where the premier, Chris Minns, is headed – but it is relatively untested territory.
The courts have ruled that expulsion must not be as punishment, but it can be done to protect public confidence in the integrity of the parliament.
If Ward is expelled, a byelection would need to be held to replace him, which only adds to the complications. Would Ward seek an injunction to prevent the byelection while he appeals both the expulsion and the criminal conviction?
Understandably, there are few cases to guide the way – the last time an MP was expelled from the NSW lower house was in 1917.
But what is certain is that unless Ward resigns voluntarily, litigation appears inevitable. The first stop will be the supreme court, followed by a possible high court appeal.
For those who want a deeper dive, Twomey's podcast, Constititional Clarion, explores all the twists and turns that could emerge over coming weeks.
The controversial independent upper house member Mark Latham is also under the microscope but for entirely different reasons.
The former One Nation MP is under scrutiny over his use of privilege within the chamber and his general standard of behaviour, which Labor has been calling out of late.
Has the Minns government suddenly found a new moral rectitude? Or is the premier motivated by more base political considerations? Latham has been working with the opposition and crossbench to block changes to workers compensation legislation that the government dearly wants passed.
In parliament, Minns has called him 'one of the most shameful bigots in NSW' who has an 'odious Twitter account', which he deployed for a 'disgusting homophobic attack' on independent MP Alex Greenwich.
More recently prurient allegations about Latham's personal life have spilled into the public domain due to a relationship breakdown, which have added fuel to the fire of outrage.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
These are the subject of a case seeking a domestic violence order that he is vehemently contesting. As the relationship degenerated, allegations from court filings including leaked texts about female MPs and other unsavoury exchanges have found their way into the public domain.
Latham's behaviour raises questions of respect for the parliament and female MPs, and whether the behaviour is appropriate in any workplace.
Latham allegedly covertly photographed female workmates and shared the images with derogatory commentary. If true, in any other workplace, that would at the least prompt counselling, a warning or possibly dismissal.
Then there is Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. Privilege exists to allow politicians to speak freely without fear of defamation, but Latham arguably pushes its limits.
He is a blunt, borderline-rude interrogator of witnesses before committees.
In the chamber he has used privilege to attack his enemies, such as Greenwich, who won a $140,000 defamation settlement against Latham in 2024, and domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty.
Last month Latham outraged colleagues by talking about Greenwich's medical records, which had been produced as part of a separate case Greenwich has brought against Latham in the NSW civil and administrative tribunal.
But can the upper house actually mete out a punishment or persuade Latham to alter his behaviour? The answer is probably no.
Labor plans to move two motions in the next sitting period, which starts on Tuesday: one relating to a specific breach of privilege and another more general censure.
Labor will allege that Latham breached privilege in relation to certain documents about the former police commissioner Karen Webb and investigations into gifts of gin that were produced on the basis that only parliamentarians could view them.
Labor wants Latham referred to the privileges committee for breaching the order, something he disputes.
The allegations of exposing medical records, taking covert photos and perhaps other actions are likely to be wrapped up into a censure motion condemning his behaviour.
But as for meaningful outcomes, don't hold your breath.
The privileges committee could recommend an apology or perhaps a suspension, but that is rare.
Labor lost control of this powerful committee a month ago after a dispute with the crossbench and the opposition. They combined to cut a Labor member so control of the now seven-member committee is out of Labor's hands.
And what of a censure? It is likely to be little more than a slap on the wrist for Latham, while he enjoys the notoriety and attention that this latest saga will bring.
The problem for the NSW parliament is that its rules to set and enforce appropriate standards of behaviour are hopelessly outdated, its processes are archaic and it has failed to implement many of the recommendations from a report by Liz Broderick completed two years ago.
The federal parliament has moved to establish a standards commission with real teeth to fine or even suspend parliamentarians for poor behaviour outside the chamber. It is still to be tested but it is a start.
Instead, in NSW, we will spend weeks on the immediate crises that will further lower the parliament's standing in the public eye, without dealing with the real problem of cultural change that is sorely needed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dan Sheehan handed four-match ban for dangerous clear-out on Tom Lynagh that went unpunished
Dan Sheehan handed four-match ban for dangerous clear-out on Tom Lynagh that went unpunished

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Dan Sheehan handed four-match ban for dangerous clear-out on Tom Lynagh that went unpunished

Dan Sheehan, the British and Irish Lions hooker, has been banned for four matches after a dangerous clear-out on Australia fly-half Tom Lynagh that went unpunished by the officials during the third Test. According to a press release issued on Monday morning by World Rugby, Sheehan did not accept that foul play had occurred nor that the offence warranted a citing. This extended his eventual ban, though it will be reduced by a week if the 27-year-old completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, widely known as 'tackle school'. Sheehan, who appeared to hit Lynagh in the head with his elbow during the first half of the Lions' 22-12 loss on Saturday, was collared with charging into a ruck or a maul and a panel found his actions to be reckless. Tom Lynagh flattened by elbow to the head. #AUSvBIL — Jobson Growthe (@electricBAU) August 2, 2025 The committee also found that he made head contact with Lynagh, who subsequently left the field and did not return, and that Sheehan's actions 'amounted to a high degree of danger and that no mitigation applied'. There was minimal reaction to the clear-out from any players at the time, with Lynagh even staying on the field long enough to kick a penalty goal, which might have spared Sheehan from greater scrutiny. Michael Lynagh, the former Wallabies fly-half and father of Tom, has used his X account to repost several questions of how the officials missed Sheehan's actions at the time. One of them derided the situation as 'utterly insane'. Another, from Jack Quigley, said: 'So, just to be clear: This TMO will stop the game to check literally EVERYTHING except Dan Sheehan's hit that took Lynagh out. What are we doing here.' Had referee Nika Amushakeli been alerted to Sheehan's actions, it is highly likely that a card would have resulted. Even though 20-minute red cards were in play during the series, allowing teams to replace the offending player after that amount of time, the bunker official would have had scope to send off Sheehan permanently. Sheehan will now miss Leinster's pre-season game against Cardiff as well as their first two matches of the United Rugby Championship campaign against Stormers and Sharks. Provided that he completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, he will be available to face Munster on October 18.

We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?
We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?

The number of people who joined a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday exceeded everyone's expectations. But just how many braved the rainy weather to urge the Australian government to do more to pressure Israel to stop the death and destruction in Gaza? That's been a sticking point. New South Wales police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000. A spokesperson for rally organisers the Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Here's what we know. Just after 5pm on Sunday, the acting deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna said police estimated 90,000 people took part – far more than the 50,000 organisers expected. He said it was the largest protest he and the assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson had seen in their time in the force. Johnson also said it was the 'most perilous' in his '35 years of policing'. However organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000. 'It's even bigger than my wildest dreams,' one of the main protest organisers, Josh Lees, said while at the front of the march at the midway point. Lees later said a number of people had come up with a similar figure after crunching the numbers based on widely shared aerial footage. Dr Aldo Raineri, a senior CQUniversity lecturer and expert in crowd safety management, estimated the figure to be significantly higher than what police suggested. Guardian Australia shared drone footage with Raineri that showed the crowd just north of the bridge's midway point, extending back to Wynyard station and Lang Park, where the march began. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The distance from Wynyard station up to where protesters began to be turned back is approximately 2.5km. The roadway along the bridge is 30 metres wide. Based on these dimensions and what appeared to be an occupancy of three or four people per square metre, he estimated between 225,000 and 300,000 people attended. However, he noted 'these figures are really rough, given the variation in density'. Organisers said there were still people at Lang Park, who had not yet started to march, when police sent a message telling protesters to turn back. Lees said many who had gone to Sunday's protest felt it was on par with past major protests they had been to, including the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003, which saw demonstrators march through the CBD, and the walk for reconciliation march in 2000 which went across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. According to the National Museum of Australia, about 250,000 people walked across the bridge in a continuous stream lasting nearly six hours during the reconciliation march. NMA called it the 'largest political demonstration ever held in Australia'. In 2003, police estimated more than 200,000 took part in the anti-Iraq war rally, while organisers put the total at about 300,000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. The paper said it was 'thought to be the biggest in the country's history'. In 2023, an estimated 50,000 people took part in a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride. Chris Nash, who attended Sunday's march, said it 'felt much bigger' than the 2000 reconciliation march he also attended. 'That was much more spaced out,' he said. The former NSW premier Bob Carr marched at the head of the pro-Palestine protest across the bridge. He was the premier during the reconciliation march in 2000. Asked how the crowd sizes compared, he said: 'All that matters was that it was a big, beautiful success. A success with cheerful police cooperation and good-natured people motivated by the horror of Israel's actions in Gaza.' At about 3pm on Sunday, NSW police sent out a mass text message throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end of the bridge. Police sent a second mass text message saying they had consulted with the organisers and were turning everyone around. 'We could not get those people, the number, the significant size of that crowd off that northern egress route without risking crowd crush. We could not allow those numbers to then egress into the northern side, into those train stations without, again, that real risk of crowd crush,' McKenna told reporters. He said there were 1,000 police facilitating the protest. Raineri said allowing the crowd to amass without effective transport to disperse them would have been unsafe. He said the police went about this the right way by using mass text messages and consultating with protesters. However, Legal Observers NSW said the 'confusing and unplanned' directions from police were dangerous and could have caused a crowd crush. 'Police had not adequately planned for the initial route to North Sydney and there did not appear to be a plan if crowd numbers exceeded expectations and made entering and leaving North Sydney difficult,' the group's report on the protest said.

Disturbing moment cop is filmed pushing over a woman from behind - as it is revealed what allegedly sparked the response
Disturbing moment cop is filmed pushing over a woman from behind - as it is revealed what allegedly sparked the response

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Disturbing moment cop is filmed pushing over a woman from behind - as it is revealed what allegedly sparked the response

A uniformed police officer has been filmed pushing a woman in the back, who then appeared to hit her head on a metal bollard. The incident unfolded outside a school on Majara Street in Bungendore, 40km east of Canberra, about 2.50pm on July 22. Officers were called after a boy had allegedly threatened another boy and then thrown a rock through a woman's car window, smashing it. The woman got out of her damaged car before she was threatened and chased by a 15-year-old boy and a 32-year-old woman known to him, police allege. The boy was then arrested which prompted the 32-year-old woman to get aggressive towards officers, who warned her about her alleged behaviour at the time. As officers bundled the boy into a police car, the 32-year-old woman allegedly went back to the car owner and threatened her again. A senior constable then returned and intervened. Footage recorded at the the scene showed an officer approaching the woman as she argued before he pushed her. The officer then told her to get up and hauled her back from the roadside as she appeared to writhe in pain. The NSW Police Force told Daily Mail Australia it is aware of the footage. 'Police are reviewing footage circulating on social media about an incident involving a NSW Police officer on Majara Street, Bungendore, about 2.50pm, on Tuesday 22 July 2025,' a spokeswoman said. Police said a boy and a woman were taken to Queanbeyan Police Station and charged over the alleged incident. The boy was charged with stalk or intimidate intending fear of physical harm, contravening prohibition or restriction of an apprehended violence order (AVO), and destroy or damage property. He was granted conditional bail, to appear at a children's court on August, 11, 2025. The woman was charged with hindering or resisting a police officer in the execution of duty, and two counts of stalk or intimidate intending fear of physical harm. She was also granted conditional bail to appear in Queanbeyan Local Court on August 11, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store