
Bad men problem: Gareth Ward and Mark Latham leave NSW parliament in unchartered territory
On Tuesday, the parliament will try to deal with two very different cases that share a common consequence: damage to its reputation as an institution.
Despite being a convicted rapist in custody awaiting sentence, Gareth Ward, the MP for Kiama, remains a member of the Legislative Assembly, drawing a base salary of more than $170,000 courtesy of NSW taxpayers.
Labor plans to move a motion to have him expelled when parliament resumes on Tuesday and the opposition has said it will support it.
Expelling Ward will almost certainly lead to more litigation, especially as the government will probably try to call a byelection in his south coast seat soon after.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
But first to backtrack a little.
Most politicians being investigated or facing criminal charges choose to resign, or their parties put the pressure on the MP to draw a line under their faltering political career.
But Ward has toughed it out and continues to claim his innocence, despite being convicted for serious sex offences against two young men. He was suspended and left the Liberal party in 2022 after being charged with sex offences. He then ran as an independent in the 2023 state election and was returned by the voters of Kiama.
Now that he has been convicted, he faces a potential sentence of more than five years.
Under section 13A of the NSW constitution, a person is ineligible to be an MP if they are convicted of an offence punishable by five years or more.
But it's only counted as a conviction once the person has reached the end of the appeals process and has not had their conviction overturned, constitutional expert Prof Anne Twomey says – and Ward has confirmed he plans to appeal the verdict. The appeals process could take years.
The other route is expulsion. The NSW constitution does not give a specific power to expel a member, but Twomey says there is an inherent power for the NSW parliament to expel an MP to protect itself and its proper functioning.
This appears to be where the premier, Chris Minns, is headed – but it is relatively untested territory.
The courts have ruled that expulsion must not be as punishment, but it can be done to protect public confidence in the integrity of the parliament.
If Ward is expelled, a byelection would need to be held to replace him, which only adds to the complications. Would Ward seek an injunction to prevent the byelection while he appeals both the expulsion and the criminal conviction?
Understandably, there are few cases to guide the way – the last time an MP was expelled from the NSW lower house was in 1917.
But what is certain is that unless Ward resigns voluntarily, litigation appears inevitable. The first stop will be the supreme court, followed by a possible high court appeal.
For those who want a deeper dive, Twomey's podcast, Constititional Clarion, explores all the twists and turns that could emerge over coming weeks.
The controversial independent upper house member Mark Latham is also under the microscope but for entirely different reasons.
The former One Nation MP is under scrutiny over his use of privilege within the chamber and his general standard of behaviour, which Labor has been calling out of late.
Has the Minns government suddenly found a new moral rectitude? Or is the premier motivated by more base political considerations? Latham has been working with the opposition and crossbench to block changes to workers compensation legislation that the government dearly wants passed.
In parliament, Minns has called him 'one of the most shameful bigots in NSW' who has an 'odious Twitter account', which he deployed for a 'disgusting homophobic attack' on independent MP Alex Greenwich.
More recently prurient allegations about Latham's personal life have spilled into the public domain due to a relationship breakdown, which have added fuel to the fire of outrage.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
These are the subject of a case seeking a domestic violence order that he is vehemently contesting. As the relationship degenerated, allegations from court filings including leaked texts about female MPs and other unsavoury exchanges have found their way into the public domain.
Latham's behaviour raises questions of respect for the parliament and female MPs, and whether the behaviour is appropriate in any workplace.
Latham allegedly covertly photographed female workmates and shared the images with derogatory commentary. If true, in any other workplace, that would at the least prompt counselling, a warning or possibly dismissal.
Then there is Latham's use of parliamentary privilege. Privilege exists to allow politicians to speak freely without fear of defamation, but Latham arguably pushes its limits.
He is a blunt, borderline-rude interrogator of witnesses before committees.
In the chamber he has used privilege to attack his enemies, such as Greenwich, who won a $140,000 defamation settlement against Latham in 2024, and domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty.
Last month Latham outraged colleagues by talking about Greenwich's medical records, which had been produced as part of a separate case Greenwich has brought against Latham in the NSW civil and administrative tribunal.
But can the upper house actually mete out a punishment or persuade Latham to alter his behaviour? The answer is probably no.
Labor plans to move two motions in the next sitting period, which starts on Tuesday: one relating to a specific breach of privilege and another more general censure.
Labor will allege that Latham breached privilege in relation to certain documents about the former police commissioner Karen Webb and investigations into gifts of gin that were produced on the basis that only parliamentarians could view them.
Labor wants Latham referred to the privileges committee for breaching the order, something he disputes.
The allegations of exposing medical records, taking covert photos and perhaps other actions are likely to be wrapped up into a censure motion condemning his behaviour.
But as for meaningful outcomes, don't hold your breath.
The privileges committee could recommend an apology or perhaps a suspension, but that is rare.
Labor lost control of this powerful committee a month ago after a dispute with the crossbench and the opposition. They combined to cut a Labor member so control of the now seven-member committee is out of Labor's hands.
And what of a censure? It is likely to be little more than a slap on the wrist for Latham, while he enjoys the notoriety and attention that this latest saga will bring.
The problem for the NSW parliament is that its rules to set and enforce appropriate standards of behaviour are hopelessly outdated, its processes are archaic and it has failed to implement many of the recommendations from a report by Liz Broderick completed two years ago.
The federal parliament has moved to establish a standards commission with real teeth to fine or even suspend parliamentarians for poor behaviour outside the chamber. It is still to be tested but it is a start.
Instead, in NSW, we will spend weeks on the immediate crises that will further lower the parliament's standing in the public eye, without dealing with the real problem of cultural change that is sorely needed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier despite lack of majority parliament support
Tasmania's Liberal government has been recommissioned after weeks of political limbo after a snap election that failed to deliver either major party a majority. The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, met with the governor, Barbara Baker, on Wednesday at Government House to formally ask for his minority government to remain. Baker accepted the request after Rockliff told her he expected to gain the confidence of the lower house, the governor said. Rockliff said on Wednesday he would serve as premier for a full four-year term. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Through sensible communication, everyone working together, pragmatism, working together on policies, working together in the best interests of Tasmanians, this is a government and a parliament that will last the full term,' he told reporters after the governor confirmed his appointment. 'What we want to do, by evidenced of today, is get on with the job,.' He said he had taken 'learnings' from the previous parliament which was cut short by a vote of no confidence. 'We want to build on the progress that was made in terms of how parliament works for the betterment of all members of parliament and, of course, that means the betterment of all Tasmanians. And move forward.' In a statement, the governor explained why she appointed Rockliff despite his inability to demonstrate a majority backing in parliament. 'In a hung parliament, where no one clearly holds the confidence of the majority of the House of Assembly, the incumbent has the right to remain in office in order to test the numbers in the House of Assembly and for parliament to have the final say in who should be premier,' Baker said. 'I consider the convention of incumbency applies in the current circumstances. 'I shall reappoint the premier. 'It is better for confidence to be determined inside and not outside the parliament.' Rockliff and his cabinet are set to be sworn in next week, before state parliament returns in a fortnight on 19 August. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The governor said the detailed reasons for her decision would be published on her website later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, Rockliff said he had not secured supply and confidence agreements with key crossbenchers but thought it was 'not necessary' in this instance. The Labor leader, Dean Winter, was still vying for his party to form government, revealing he had stepped up negotiations with crossbenchers, independents in particular, in recent days but ruled out a deal with the Greens. The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. The 19 July election was triggered after Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in forming government is the major parties' backing of a new $1bn stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pauline Hanson makes explosive claim about Anthony Albanese's election win - as she warns her prediction about Australia has come true
Pauline Hanson has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, claiming Labor lacks a genuine mandate to pursue its net zero emissions agenda - because the majority of Australians didn't give the party their first preference at the election. In a fiery exchange with 10 News political reporter Ashleigh Raper, the One Nation leader dismissed the government's legitimacy on climate reform, arguing: that '65 per cent of Australians didn't give Labor their first preference'. 'Doesn't the science and the election results tell us that people don't want us to have this debate anymore,' Raper asked, suggesting Hanson's motion to scrap net zero was not supported by the majority. But Hanson hit back. 'No, you're wrong. When I put up the notice motion on my Facebook page, in less than a day it got 90,000 likes, 9,000 comments and 9,000 shares - and people are interested in it.' Raper then said: 'But does not the election result suggest something different? Labor were put in place with an overwhelming mandate - it was very clear what they would put in force.' But Hanson questioned this. 'Sorry, a mandate - of what? 35 per cent? 65 per cent of Australians did not vote their number one vote to Labor. Are you saying Labor has a mandate? No, they have not.' Labor received 34.56 per cent of first-preference votes in the House of Representatives. However, Australia uses preferential voting, not first-past-the-post, meaning a party can win government even without a majority of first-choice votes, as long as they win enough seats through preferences. In the May 2025 election, Labor achieved a landslide victory, winning 94 of 150 seats in the House of Representatives - far surpassing the 76‑seat threshold needed for majority control. For nearly 30 years, Hanson has built her political brand on a tough stance against immigration. Now, as Australia faces a worsening housing crisis amid record-high migration, she says the nation is finally realising she was right all along. Fresh from doubling One Nation's Senate numbers at the May election, Hanson claims more Australians are aligning with her long-held views. In an interview with 10 News First, the One Nation leader said she feels vindicated in her warnings about the impacts of mass migration, arguing the system is now clearly broken and hurting everyday Australians. 'A lot of people say we should've listened to her years ago,' she said. 'But Australians have now come on board, because now it's impacting them. 'They know the generations coming through possibly will never own their own home.' Ms Hanson said she isn't against immigration, but it has to be done in 'managed way.' 'If we don't wake up to ourselves, we're going to be a third world country, and that's exactly where we're going,' she said. In her controversial 1996 maiden speech to Parliament, Pauline Hanson warned that Australia was in 'danger of being swamped by Asians,' and claimed most Australians wanted the nation's immigration policy radically reviewed. Two decades later, in her first Senate speech in 2016, she argued the country was now at risk of being 'swamped by Muslims who bear a culture and ideology that is incompatible with our own.' The latest federal data shows net overseas migration reached historic highs in 2024, with more than 500,000 arrivals - numbers economists say have intensified pressure on rental markets and home prices. Next year, Australia will increase its near-record number of international student places by 25,000 to 295,000, despite a Reserve Bank report finding that the soaring number of international students is putting pressure on the housing market during a time of high construction costs. In cities absorbing the bulk of new arrivals, such as Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, and increasingly Brisbane, competition for rentals is fierce, sending rents and house prices soaring. While the Albanese government defends migration as critical to economic growth and filling workforce gaps, Hanson argues it's creating deeper divides and resentment. But it's unlikely Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will listen, with Hanson stating her relationship with him is non-existent. She argued policies like Net Zero and high immigration don't reflect the will of the majority. 'I'm not anti-renewables. I put some solar panels on my roof at home this year,' she said. But what she is opposed to is putting 'millions' of solar panels on agricultural land. She has also been vocal in her support of keeping coal-fired power stations open and is pro-nuclear. While critics say Hanson's rhetoric remains inflammatory, she said her party has evolved past being anti-immigration - despite calls to cut immigration by more than 570,000 people from current Labor levels to ease pressure on housing. She credits her expanding reach with younger voters to her animated video series Please Explain, which, among other things, satirises what Hanson portrays as Australia's 'addiction' to rising migration, linking it to housing stress. Many episodes underscore Hanson's core message that unchecked immigration is incompatible with social cohesion and national values. But Hanson said she won't back down, and believes her legacy lies in her conviction to stand up without fear or favour in her quest to deliver a fair go for all Australians. 'People want that from their politicians,' she said.


Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
Sean 'Diddy' Combs 'seeks pardon from Trump'
Why you can trust Sky News Sean "Diddy" Combs has been in contact with Donald Trump about a pardon, a source close to the rapper's legal team has told Sky News' US partner network NBC News. A White House spokesperson said it "will not comment on the existence or nonexistence of any clemency request". On Tuesday, the rapper was denied bail ahead of his sentencing in October, when he could face up to 20 years in prison after he was convicted of prostitution-related offences. The sentence will likely be much shorter than that, however. In July, he was found guilty of two counts of transportation for prostitution - but cleared of more serious charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex-trafficking, which carried potential life sentences. During an interview with news channel Newsmax last Friday, Mr Trump said "they have talked to me about Sean" but did not announce any decision. The president seemed to cast doubt that he would grant a pardon, however. "You know, I was very friendly with him. I got along with him great. And seemed like a nice guy, I didn't know him well," Trump said. "But when I ran for office, he was very hostile." "I don't know," Trump said. "It makes it more - I'm being honest, it makes it more difficult to do." Trump was then asked, "more likely a 'no' for Combs?" Trump responded: "I would say so." 4:43 Combs, who co-founded Bad Boy Records and launched the career of the late Notorious BIG, was for decades a huge figure in pop culture, as well as a Grammy-winning hip-hop artist and business entrepreneur, who presided over an empire ranging from fashion to reality TV. Now, as well as the criminal conviction, he is also facing several civil lawsuits.