logo
Kensington Palace Addresses Kate Middleton Style Controversy in Rare Statement amid Backlash

Kensington Palace Addresses Kate Middleton Style Controversy in Rare Statement amid Backlash

Yahoo11-02-2025

Kate Middleton's office is clarifying the official policy for releasing details her clothing following recent backlash over new palace guidance.
After more than a week's discussion about the Princess of Wales' clothing and whether they will change their formal policy on sharing her fashion details, Kensington Palace released a rare statement.
It came in the wake of a Sunday Times story titled "Princess of Wales: Focus on my work not my wardrobe," on Feb. 1 in which a royal source was quoted saying Kate "wants the focus to be on the really important issues, the people and the causes she is spotlighting."
On Tuesday, Kensington Palace issued a statement to PEOPLE saying, 'Over the last week, I have received numerous questions about a story regarding The Princess of Wales's clothing and how Kensington Palace shares information about her outfits.
'To clarify, the comments that appeared in the article were from me, not The Princess of Wales," the statement continued. "The comments that were reported should not be directly attributed to The Princess of Wales. To be clear, there has been no change in our approach to sharing information about Her Royal Highness's clothing.'
Related: Kate Middleton's Work Wardrobe: What's the Palace Policy on Releasing Details About Her Outfits?
It is true that for many years, the palace has not always issued news of what Kate is wearing. And online sleuths, led famously by the site What Kate Wore, enjoyed tracking them down and sourcing where they, or similar outfits, could be bought.
The full quote in The Sunday Times story said, 'There is an absolute feeling that [the public work] is not about what the princess is wearing.
Related: Kate Middleton Is 'More Relevant Than Ever,' Says Designer: 'She Is Not a Movie Star...One of a Kind'
"She wants the focus to be on the really important issues, the people and the causes she is spotlighting," the story continues. "There will always be an appreciation of what the princess is wearing from some of the public and she gets that. But do we need to be officially always saying what she is wearing? No. The style is there but it's about the substance.'
Having stepped back from public duties for most of 2024 due to her cancer treatment — which she finished in September last year, announcing in January that she is in remission — Princess Kate has been gradually returning to work but with new priorities and seemingly a new look. She has stepped out several times in the last 10 days.
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
There is every likelihood that details will be released at significant family and cultural moments such as on tours or when she is helping host visiting heads of state.
The initial story in the Sunday Times came two days after Princess Kate, 43, stepped out in South Wales to visit a Tŷ Hafan children's hospice, coinciding with the announcement that she's taking on its patronage (like Princess Diana), and touring a family run-textiles manufacturer, aligning with her interest in the industry.
It's notable that Princess Kate's team did not share the fashion credits for what she wore to the Royal Marsden Hospital in London on Jan. 14, her first solo royal engagement in over a year after she announced in March 2024 that she was undergoing treatment for cancer.
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Disney star Christy Carlson Romano reveals shocking details about nearly losing her eye after being shot in face
Former Disney star Christy Carlson Romano reveals shocking details about nearly losing her eye after being shot in face

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

Former Disney star Christy Carlson Romano reveals shocking details about nearly losing her eye after being shot in face

Christy Carlson Romano is speaking out about nearly losing an eye after she was shot in the face four months ago. During an appearance on the upcoming June 10 episode of the 'Not a Damn Chance!' podcast, via a sneak peek by People magazine, the 41-year-old former Disney star recalled the terrifying incident while she was shooting clay pigeons with her husband, Brendan Rooney, for his birthday. Asked how it happened, Romano explained she was not 'at liberty to say specifics,' according to People. The actress previously revealed on Instagram that she was 'hit in five places,' including below her eye. Romano shared details for the first time about what transpired. 'It's a birdshot that got sprayed in my direction by another party, and essentially it was within 200 feet, which means really fast and hot,' she told hosts Neen Williams and Frankland Lee. 'They weren't malicious,' Romano clarified. 'It wasn't aggravated assault. It's what happened.' The 'Even Stevens' star then emphasized the importance of gun safety and described her initial response. 4 Christy Carlson Romano sits in the hospital after being shot in the face at a party in February, 2025. 'I feel very out of body about it. … It's pretty wild,' she said. 'I'm shocked, and what goes through my head immediately is, 'Oh that's dope, I just got shot.' And then I go, 'Oh now I'm gonna die,'' she said. 'I take a knee. My husband witnessed it and was like, 'Hey are you hit?' because I didn't scream. I didn't do anything. I was just out of body.' Romano recalled she had a knee-jerk reaction upon being shot that stemmed from her time on the third season of the FOX reality TV series 'Special Forces: World's Toughest Test.' 4 The actress previously revealed on Instagram that she was 'hit in five places,' including below her eye. Christy Carlson Romano/Instagram In the show, celebrity contestants take on grueling military exercises and challenges under the direction of ex-Special Forces operatives. Romano explained that the contestants were trained to give a thumbs-up to let their fellow cast members know that they were OK during the series' perilous challenges. The 'Kim Possible' alum recalled that, out of habit, she gave Rooney a thumbs-up immediately after she was shot. 'He was like, 'Oh, you're good.' And I was like, 'No I'm hit.' He goes, 'Oh s—,'' Romano recalled of her husband's reaction. She remembered that Rooney rushed to her aid and had to restrain himself from retaliating against the other party. 4 Christy Carlson Romano and Hillary Duff in a scene from 'Cadet Kelly.' ©Disney Channel/Courtesy Everett Collection 'So, he's running to me and making sure I'm OK, and he's fighting the urge to hurt the person … but he's been practicing stoicism recently, and there was something in him,' Romano recalled. 'He was immediately into action mode, evaluating me and ran to get the car. 'I felt this huge rush that I'd never felt before where I was starting to get really woozy. I think it was shock.' Romano told the hosts she didn't experience any pain initially and described the thoughts that were running through her head, including her fears her children might be affected. The actress shares daughters Isabella, 7, and Sofia, 5, with Rooney. 'I was covered in blood from my forehead … and I said three things. I was like, 'Am I gonna die? Who's gonna take care of the girls? Is my career over?'' she recalled. Romano explained that she came close to being blinded or killed. 'If my head would've been tilted in any other direction, I would have been blind in my right eye. Or if I had turned my head, I could have gotten hit in a softer side of my skull, and I would have potentially been dead,' Romano said. 'It's still in my eye,' she said of the pellets from the shotgun. 'I have a fragment still in my forehead, and I have a fragment still behind my eye, which is 1 millimeter away from blinding me.' Romano previously explained on Instagram that the lead fragment behind her eye had to remain in her face because removing it could leave her blind. 4 Christy Carlson Roman poses for a picture during a family trip to Disneyland in May 2025. Christy Carlson Romano/Instagram The shot fragment lodged in her skull will also remain in place because doctors said it will expedite her healing process. During her podcast interview, Romano told hosts she put on a brave face at first and was making jokes about her medical crisis after she arrived at the hospital. 'In retrospect, I was trying to be funny and not cry because I wanted the people around me to feel more calm so that they could take better care of me,' Romano said. The former Broadway star admitted that it has been difficult to accept she is a 'gunshot survivor.' Clay pigeon shooting is an outdoor sport in which upside-down circular disks made of limestone and pitch used as targets are propelled into the air by machines called traps. Shooters use shotguns, with each shot projecting hundreds of small lead balls to hit the clay pigeons. The sport is typically not considered dangerous as long as safety measures are follow.

‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses
‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses

Los Angeles Times

time9 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

‘Good Night, and Good Luck' CNN live broadcast brings George Clooney's play to the masses

Saturday afternoon out west and evening back east, as citizens faced off against ICE agents in the streets of Los Angeles, 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' George Clooney's 2005 dramatic film tribute to CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow, became a Major Television Event, broadcast live from Manhattan's Winter Garden Theater, by CNN and Max. That it was made available free to anyone with an internet connection, via the CNN website, was a nice gesture to theater fans, Clooney stans and anyone interested to see how a movie about television translates into a play about television. The broadcast is being ballyhooed as historic, the first time a play has been aired live from Broadway. And while there is no arguing with that fact, performances of plays have been recorded onstage before, and are being so now. It's a great practice; I wish it were done more often. At the moment, is streaming recent productions of Cole Porter's 'Kiss Me, Kate!,' the Bob Dylan-scored 'Girl From the North Country,' David Henry Hwang's 'Yellow Face' and the Pulitzer Prize-winning mental health rock musical 'Next to Normal.' Britain's National Theater at Home subscription service offers a wealth of classical and modern plays, including Andrew Scott's one-man 'Vanya,' as hot a ticket in New York this spring as Clooney's play. And the archives run deep; that a trip to YouTube can deliver you Richard Burton's 'Hamlet' or 'Sunday in the Park With George' with Mandy Patinkin and Bernadette Peters is a gift not to be overlooked. Clooney, with co-star Anthony Edwards, had earlier been behind a live broadcast of 'Ambush,' the fourth season opener of 'ER' as a throwback to the particular seat-of-your-pants, walking-on-a-wire energy of 1950s television. (It was performed twice, once for the east and once for the west coast.) That it earned an audience of 42.71 million, breaking a couple of records in the bargain, suggests that, from a commercial perspective, it was not at all a bad idea. (Reviews were mixed, but critics don't know everything.) Like that episode, the 'live' element of Saturday's broadcast, was essentially a stunt, though one that ensured, at least, that no post-production editing has been applied, and that if anyone blew a line, or the house was invaded by heckling MAGA hats, or simply disrupted by audience members who regarded the enormous price they paid for a ticket as a license to chatter through the show, it would presumably have been part of the broadcast. None of that happened — but, it could have! (Clooney did stumble over 'simple,' but that's all I caught.) And, it offered the groundlings at home the chance to see a much-discussed, well-reviewed production only a relatively few were able to see in person — which I applaud on principal and enjoyed in practice — and which will very probably not come again, not counting the next day's final performance. The film, directed by Clooney and co-written with Grant Heslov (who co-wrote the stage version as well), featured the actor as producer and ally Fred W. Friendly to David Strathairn's memorable Murrow. Here, a more aggressive Clooney takes the Murrow role, while Glenn Fleshler plays Friendly. Released during the second term of the Bush administration, the movie was a meditation on the state of things through the prism of 1954 (and a famous framing speech from 1958 about the possibilities and potential failures of television), the fear-fueled demagoguery of Wisconsin Sen. Joseph McCarthy, and Murrow's determination to take him on. (The 1954 'See It Now' episode, 'A Report on Sen. Joseph McCarthy,' helped bring about his end.) As in the film, McCarthy is represented entirely through projected film clips, echoing the way that Murrow impeached the senator with his own words. It's a combination of political and backstage drama — with a soupcon of office romance, represented by the secretly married Wershbas (Ilana Glazer and Carter Hudson) — even more hermetically set within the confines of CBS News than was the film. It felt relevant in 2005, before the influence of network news was dissolved in the acid of the internet and an administration began assaulting the legitimate press with threats and lawsuits; but the play's discussions of habeas corpus, due process, self-censoring media and the both-sides-ism that seems increasingly to afflict modern media feel queasily contemporary. 'I simply cannot accept that there are, on every story two equal and logical sides to an argument,' says Clooney's Murrow to his boss, William F. Paley (an excellent Paul Gross, from the great 'Slings & Arrows'). As was shown here, Murrow offered McCarthy equal time on 'See It Now' — which he hosted alongside the celebrity-focused 'Person to Person,' represented by an interview with Liberace — but it proved largely a rope for the senator to hang himself. Though modern stage productions, with their computer-controlled modular parts, can replicate the rhythms and scene changes of a film, there are obvious differences between a movie, where camera angles and editing drive the story. It's an illusion of life, stitched together from bits and pieces. A stage play proceeds in real time and offers a single view (differing, of course, depending on where one sits), within which you direct your attention as you will. What illusions it offers are, as it were, stage magic. It's choreographed, like a dance, which actors must repeat night after night, putting feeling into lines they may speak to one another, but send out to the farthest corners of the theater. Clooney, whose furrowed brow is a good match for Murrow's, did not attempt to imitate him, or perhaps did within the limits of theatrical delivery; he was serious and effective in the role if not achieving the quiet perfection of Strathairn's performance. Scott Pask's set was an ingenious moving modular arrangement of office spaces, backed by a control room, highlighted or darkened as needs be; a raised platform stage left supported the jazz group and vocalist, which, as in the movie, performed songs whose lyrics at times commented slyly on the action. Though television squashed the production into two dimensions, the broadcast nevertheless felt real and exciting; director David Comer let the camera play on the players, rather than trying for a cinematic effect through an excess of close-ups and cutaways. While the play generally followed the lines of the film, there was some rearrangement of scenes, reassignment of dialogue — it was a streamlined cast — and interpolations to make a point, or more directly pitch to 2025. New York news anchor Don Hollenbeck (Clark Gregg, very moving in the only role with an emotional arc) described feeling 'hijacked … as if all the reasonable people went to Europe and left us behind,' getting a big reaction. One character wondered about opening 'the door to news with a dash of commentary — what happens when it isn't Edward R. Murrow minding the store?' A rapid montage of clips tracking the decay of TV news and politics — including Obama's tan suit kerfuffle and the barring of AP for not bowing to Trump's Gulf of America edit and ending with Elon Musk's notorious straight-arm gesture, looking like nothing so much as a Nazi salute — was flown into Clooney's final speech. Last but not least, there is the audience, your stand-ins at the Winter Garden Theatre, which laughed at the jokes and applauded the big speeches, transcribed from Murrow's own. And then, the curtain call, to remind you that whatever came before, the actors are fine, drinking in your appreciation and sending you out happy and exhilarated and perhaps full of hope. A CNN roundtable followed to bring you back to Earth.

Richard Burgheim, a Founding Editor of PEOPLE, Dies at 91: 'A True Friend and Mentor'
Richard Burgheim, a Founding Editor of PEOPLE, Dies at 91: 'A True Friend and Mentor'

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Richard Burgheim, a Founding Editor of PEOPLE, Dies at 91: 'A True Friend and Mentor'

Richard Burgheim, a founder editor of PEOPLE, has died at age 91 The pioneering journalist was tapped to serve as a Senior Editor for the then-soon-to-be-launched PEOPLE years ago "The best thing about him was that he recognized and developed talent wherever he found it," a former PEOPLE staffer rememberedRichard Burgheim, a founder editor of PEOPLE, has died. He was 91. The pioneering journalist and St. Louis native died on Sunday, June 1, at Weill Cornell, according to an online obituary. Burgheim began his career in journalism at Harvard University, where he served as sports editor of The Harvard Crimson, the Ivy League university's student newspaper, as well as the campus stringer for the Associated Press. He went on to become a writer for TIME magazine, where he worked for many years, and was later tapped by Richard B. Stolley, a Managing Editor, to serve as a Senior Editor for the then-soon-to-be-launched PEOPLE years ago. PEOPLE first hit newsstands in March 1974. In the decades since, PEOPLE has grown to become the iconic brand it is known as today — expanding from a newsstand-only publication to now include digital news coverage and social media coverage, as well as a new app, among other ventures. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Remembering Burgheim, Claudia Dowling, a former PEOPLE Senior Writer, said, "I owe my career to him." "The best thing about him was that he recognized and developed talent wherever he found it, whether in a copy clerk like me or a secretary," she continued. Andy Abrahams, a former PEOPLE Editorial Manager, met Burgheim as a fact checker at Time Inc.'s TV Cable Week magazine. He recalled, "Dick wanted us to know that we were important in the process, no matter what our station was at the magazine. He had a natural gift for striking the right tone in a story, with a keen eye towards writing and editing for a mass audience with humor and grace." The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! "He was smart, funny, barked like a seal when he laughed and was a true friend and mentor," added Cutler Durkee, a former PEOPLE Executive Editor. Burgheim is survived by his wife, Ricki Fulman. Donations can be made in his honor to the New York Public Library. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store