
India needs rare earth magnets. One forgotten PSU holds the key
The dimly lit office is in a run down building, with a small signage anyone can easily miss. The 30-square feet reception area has no room for visitors.
Operating under the department of atomic energy, which is headed by the Prime Minister, IREL is today 75 years old. And yet, till about a few months ago, no one would have heard about this 'miniratna'—a category of profitable public sector enterprises with greater financial and operational autonomy.
After decades, the company, formerly known as the Indian Rare Earths Ltd, is experiencing a rare moment of recognition—tasked with mining rare earth minerals, its work is of great importance to the defence establishment, and key to India's quest to accomplish a net zero carbon footprint by 2070.
The minerals the company mines are called 'rare' not because they are scarce but because it is difficult to find economically viable concentrated deposits. Rare earth minerals are used in the making of magnets, critical components in the motors that power electric vehicles and wind turbines. They are also used in lasers, MRI machines, vehicle oxygen sensors, ceramics and paint pigments.
In addition, IREL manufactures rare earth magnets, from a plant in Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh. Turns out, the company is the sole Indian manufacturer of such magnets. And now, there is a global shortage, which is threatening to derail India's electric vehicle (EV) story. China is the leader in making these magnets and a new Chinese policy restricts its exports, a retaliatory measure against the aggressive tariff policies of US President Donald Trump.
By June, India's large automobile companies, such as Maruti Suzuki and Bajaj Auto, said that they had stocks of rare earth magnets that would last until July. On 11 June, Reuters reported that Maruti Suzuki had cut near-term production targets for its maiden EV, e-Vitara, by two-thirds because of rare earth magnet shortages.
As production of EVs is tied to India's net zero emissions target, there are long-term repercussions to such demand-supply mismatch.
Who's running the show?
The Indian government realizes the pivotal role IREL can play.
'IREL is now interacting with several ministries, including mining, commerce, and heavy industries. They are all looking to secure rare earth supplies," Sarada Bhushan Mohanty, the company's director of finance, told Mint. 'All our pending projects are under review for faster execution," he added.
The company has been without a full-time chairman since November 2024 but Mohanty has been picked as the next chief by the public enterprises selection board. His appointment, though, is subject to the approval of the appointment committee of cabinet.
A cost accountant and a management graduate, Mohanty isn't your typical public sector executive. Earlier, he had worked with private sector companies—Tata Steel Long Products and Vedanta. Before joining IREL, three years ago, he also served at the National Aluminium Company Ltd, a state-owned aluminium maker.
'India is among the oldest producers of rare earth elements but a combination of factors held back development of the industry," he said. 'But, given the importance of these minerals to modern technology, a realization set in—there is no other option but to be self-reliant."
If India indeed started early, when and how did IREL lose its way? Its history reads like a roller coaster ride, across seven decades.
Homi Bhabha's baby
India's rare earth exports predated independence, when radioactive material was accidentally discovered in the beach sands of Kerala. In 1909, a German chemist, Herr Schomberg, noticed glittery substances stuck to coir ropes imported from India and established that it was monazite, a reddish-brown phosphate mineral. Monazite was a source of thorium, a slightly radioactive metal, used in making gas mantles in the era that predated electric bulbs.
Subsequently, India started exporting beach sand and its extract to Germany and the UK.
Homi Jehangir Bhabha, often referred to as the father of the Indian nuclear programme, set up Indian Rare Earths Ltd, IREL's predecessor, in 1950. He did so to bolster India's energy security as radioactive thorium had the potential to be used as fuel in nuclear reactors. Back then, the government also decided to stop all exports of rare earth elements.
In fact, policymakers across the world had realized its economic, perhaps geopolitical significance. A year earlier, in 1949, the first deposits of rare earth elements were discovered in the US, in southern California's Clark Mountain Range. When production started in 1952, the US government bought the entire mine's production to stockpile for its future use in electronics and defence applications.
In the first decade of its existence, IREL had a poor run even though it set up its own processing unit and took over other units run by erstwhile British companies. The use of thorium dwindled as gas mantles were replaced by electric bulbs and a by-product of thorium production, RE chloride, a compound with applications in material science, found no takers. This led to huge problems with disposal.
By the mid-60s, a resolve to find customers for RE chloride led to Japanese companies who found the compound useful in their fast growing electronic industry. Subsequently, another rare earth element, Europium, found a use case in television screens.
IREL's prospects blossomed. By the 1970s, the company had expanded capacities and was producing RE chloride and Zircon, a mineral used in the uranium fuel lines of nuclear power plants.
Until the late 1990s, the public sector company continued to mix-and-match its products as per requirements of its overseas customers; the domestic market remained small. Its turnover, in 1999-2000, was ₹214 crore. Exports accounted for 85% of the production.
'Being under the department of atomic energy, IREL was technology focussed and kept modifying its product portfolio to meet customer demand. To that extent, it was highly market centric," said Deependra Singh, who retired as chairman and managing director in November 2024 and oversaw the company's 75th year celebrations.
Activism on the beach
If IREL ended the last century well, its fortunes changed immediately after. After India liberalized its business policies starting in the early 1990s, the private sector was allowed to export rare earth element ores, and their extracts, barring thorium. Several private companies popped up along the coast of Kerala and Odisha, and they mostly exported the raw material—beach sand.
This led to activism in the southern states, especially Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka, where local groups wanted export of sand to be stopped. State governments got involved and mining, subsequently, became more controlled. According to a report published by IREL, this led to the cancellation of several of its mining rights. Stricter environmental laws also meant delays in its processes to obtain the raw material.
Typically, the company leases land patches in beaches or sanded areas for 11 months, either from the state or private owners. It does so after obtaining local clearances and then proceeds to process the sand. With its mobile shifting machines, it extracts what it needs and puts 90% of the sand back into the same area. Usually, as part of the deal, the company also engages in afforestation in the land.
'We always walk a tightrope as Indian environmental laws are stringent," Mohanty said.
But what cooked the public sector company's case was China's increasing domination of the sector towards the end of the century.
China's win
Until China came into the picture, in the late 1980s, the private sector in the US produced more than 90% of the world's rare earth elements.
The Chinese government started subsidising local companies and that made many US-based firms unviable, leading to their closure. A second factor led to the decline of the industry in the US— authorities found contaminated water from the California mines leaking into the soil. This reportedly caused radioactive contamination. Regulations subsequently became more stringent, increasing the cost of operations.
Eventually, aided by Edward Nixon, a brother of President Richard Nixon, the US company, Unocal Corporation, began exporting ore to China in 1997. The Chinese firms, in turn, processed and manufactured the rare earth elements, shipping it back to the US at lower costs.
Over time, China sourced its own ore, thus, controlling the process end-to-end. This led to the closure of US mines.
'China has integrated its rare earth elements industry across the board—from sourcing raw materials to downstream production of rare earth magnets for the user industry," said Mohanty. That led to lower costs and countries around the word found it convenient to just import such components.
By 2005, the equation had flipped: China now processed 90% of rare earth ore and produced 70% of the rare earth elements.
Meanwhile, the cheap availability of finished goods and a toughening socio-political situation in the home market, led to a decline in the production at IREL. A cyclone in Odisha in 2014 also disrupted operations—the company posted a loss of over ₹100 crore in 2015-16, its first loss in over a decade.
Policy moves
It is not the first time that China restricted rare earth elements export. It did so in 2010 which caused a bigger upheaval among user countries like the US and Japan. The US, EU and Japan complained to the World Trade Organization (WTO) saying that China's restrictions were unfair under its rules. On its part, China argued that excessive mining was putting a huge strain on its environment and depleting its own resources. China, however, lost the WTO case and subsequently lifted its export restrictions in 2015.
That jolt may have had repercussions in India, too. In 2016, India's long term planning body, NITI Aayog, drafted its initial policy for electric vehicles. Securing rare earth markets was an essential part of that policy. In particular, in 2017, V.K. Saraswat, a member of NITI Aayog, proposed increased investment and policy support for India's rare earth sector.
'A core committee was formed by NITI Aayog which had representation from IREL, too. To that extent, there was a reasonably good understanding of the problems associated with rare earth elements and in particular, rare earth magnets, within the government," said Deependra Singh.
Indian EV makers, meanwhile, found it convenient to import.
'Though we localized most of our parts, there were some inputs like rare earth magnets, which we couldn't, as there was no ecosystem to make them," Suhas Rajkumar, founder and CEO of electric scooter maker Simple Energy, said. 'Importing from China was not the easiest but quickest alternative."
This month, the Union government announced a ₹1,345 crore subsidy scheme to encourage the manufacturing of rare earth magnets within the country. Though a critical component, the market today is small—the annual consumption of these magnets hovers around 850 tons and is worth ₹350 crore, according to IREL estimates.
Therefore, small and medium size companies could be interested in making them. IREL is expected to play an important role in arranging technology for these manufacturers, and getting the projects off the ground.
Sand to rock
IREL's performance has picked up significantly over the last few years. In 2023-24, the company posted revenue of ₹2,104 crore, growing 11% over the previous year. Net profits jumped 25% to ₹1,012 crore.
During the year, the company started production of permanent magnets at its plant in Vizag. It also started with the production of rare earth metals at the Rare Earth Metal & Titanium Theme Park, Bhopal.
Nonetheless, the company has identified a challenge that could restrict its growth—the Indian ores of rare earth elements have poor concentration of metals, leading to higher recovery costs. This is especially so for metal extracted from sand sources.
IREL has a three pronged solution to the problem. Firstly, it has identified a second source—the hard rocks of Rajasthan. These mines are under development. Secondly, it plans to secure imports from more countries, as China has done. China gets most of its raw material from Myanmar, while Australia is being touted as a source for India. Thirdly, as recommended by Saraswat, IREL plans to help in the recovery of used magnets by recycling. China recycles 80% of its magnets.
But one crucial link, pointed out earlier by Suhas Rajkumar, is still missing. India's ecosystem lacks the technology to make rare earth magnets. And entrepreneurs are absent, too.
'We need companies to come up with the engineering and execution skills; put up facilities to make these magnets," Mohanty said.
In its Odisha factory, IREL is making pilot sized demonstration plants available for entrepreneurs. Additionally, it is also working with the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, a nuclear research and development facility, to shortlist more technologies that could be used for magnet making.
'Half of our problems will be solved if India ties-up for better quality ores, like China did with Myanmar," Mohanty said.
IREL, the forgotten public sector company, finally has a seat at the table. It can consult ministries, policy makers, help other companies get up to speed, and execute India's rare earth mineral strategy, all by itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
9 minutes ago
- Mint
The week in charts: Trump's 25% India tariff, TCS's mass layoffs, oil on the boil
The US has imposed 25% tariffs on Indian exports and threatened penalties for buying oil from Russia. Meanwhile, Tata Consultancy Services has announced plans to lay off staff worldwide, and a new report highlights the struggles of women in India's blue- and grey-collar workforce. What's a little tariff between friends? US President Donald Trump imposed a 25% tariff on "friend" India and additional penalties for buying Russian oil from 1 August even as the two countries negotiate a trade deal. While there is little clarity on the impact of the new tariffs and penalties, the move has for now put India at a disadvantage to other countries that have struck trade deals with the US, with their tariffs ranging from 10-20%. India has so far refused to concede to the US's demand for greater access to its agriculture and dairy sectors. Crude awakening The US's latest threats of secondary sanctions on Russia, or more precisely its energy trade, has led to a sharp rise in oil prices. After hovering around $70 per barrel since the Israel-Iran ceasefire, Brent crude oil prices jumped to nearly $73 per barrel on Wednesday, following Trump's threats. The US also sanctioned 20 entities, including six from India, for petroleum, petroleum products and petrochemical trade with Iran. Even as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) is expected to increase output, policy uncertainties will keep oil prices volatile. TCS's payroll purge 12,000: That's the the number of employees TCS plans to lay off worldwide, as Mint reported. The layoffs, comprising around 2% of its workforce, will mostly affect mid- and senior-level staff. India's largest IT firm said the move was part of its strategy to become a 'future-ready organisation', focusing on AI, tech investment, and workforce realignment. This has sparked worries of similar moves by other IT giants also facing uncertainty in their biggest market, the US. Global economy shows grit Lower-than-expected trade disruptions led to a more optimistic global growth forecast from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) earlier this week. The agency raised its 2025 global growth projection to 3% from 2.8% in April, along with a broader upgrade from the US, EU, China to India. While the IMF cited stronger front-loading of trade, lower effective US tariffs, and improved financial conditions as key drivers in the first half of the year, it also said the risks to projections remained tilted to the downside. We work, we list India's coworking sector is in expansion mode, with Awfis, Smartworks, and IndiQube now listed, and WeWork India expected to go public in August. Riding a post-covid boom, the industry has scaled rapidly, with flexible office supply in top cities expected to rise to 121 million sq ft by FY2027 from 85 million sq ft in FY25, an analysis by showed. As their business models are maturing, they are seeing strong revenue. However, despite strong operational margins, high upfront capital costs and depreciation continue to weigh on their profitability. Tata Motors spends a truckload $4.36 billion: That's the amount for which Tata Motors Ltd will acquire Italian truck and bus maker Iveco, its largest acquisition ever, amid plans to demerge its commercial and passenger vehicle business. The auto company is looking to boost its commercial vehicle business with the acquisition, which is expected to conclude by April-June 2026. For Tata Motors, the commercial vehicles business is the second-largest revenue contributor, with a 17% share in FY25. The company had acquired Jaguar Land Rover in 2008 for $2.3 billion. Giants claw back profit share India's markets are dominated by large firms, with the top 10% by revenue accounting for more than 90% of net profits. This began changing after the pandemic as smaller firms gained ground during a broader recovery. But this comeback is now running out of steam. In FY25, companies outside the top 10% made up 7.3% of aggregate net profit, down from 10.4% in FY23, a Mint analysis of 5,096 BSE-listed firms showed. Still, their performance was better than in pre-covid era, underlining their resilience. Chart of the week: Women's barriers to work Low income, poor work culture and safety fears are among the top reasons why women have shorter tenures in India's blue- and grey-collar jobs, according to a new survey report by the Udaiti Foundation and Quess Corp. Despite the growing numbers of women workers, more than half of respondents said they planned to leave the workforce within a year. Follow our data stories on the In Charts and Plain Facts pages.


Mint
9 minutes ago
- Mint
Best of the Week: Power. Tariffs. Tensions. What's next for global trade?
Key export sectors such as textiles, auto parts, and food products were dealt a rude shock when US President Donald Trump slapped a 25% tariff—along with an additional 'penalty'—on Indian goods starting 7 August. But this isn't just about tariffs. It's about shifting alliances, rising economic nationalism, and a global order that's being reimagined in real time. That's why Mint is bringing together sharp global minds for a timely webinar: Because geoeconomics now drives geopolitics. And understanding this shift could help you make sense of everything from de-risking strategies to India's evolving equation with both the US and China. Can India and the US still find common ground on agriculture, tech, and digital rules? Or has this move reset the clock on 25 years of strategic engagement? Amb. Arun K. Singh, former Indian envoy to the US, with decades of high-stakes diplomatic experience. Ajay Srivastava, trade policy expert and founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). Moderated by Elizabeth Roche, former foreign affairs editor at Mint and now a professor at Jindal School of International Affairs. Register now if you want to decode the new rules of power, trade, and global influence. India's $87 billion export engine to the US just hit a speed bump. US President Donald Trump's call for a 25% tariff on Indian goods has raised eyebrows—and concerns. Textiles, electronics, pharma, even auto parts—everything's in the crosshairs. Is this the return of a full-blown trade war or just political posturing? With over 75% of Indian exports at risk, and key sectors bracing for impact, the stakes are high. Can India negotiate its way out, or will exporters feel the heat? The 25 August trade talks may hold the answers. India's early trade deals? Not exactly blockbuster hits. With partners like ASEAN, Japan, and South Korea, exports stagnated while imports surged. But India has learnt its lessons—and it shows. Recent pacts with the UAE and Australia are already yielding real returns. Now, the India-UK free trade agreement seems to be the boldest step yet. With smart tariff cuts, stronger services play, and mobility provisions, could this be the new blueprint? Is India finally turning the trade tide in its favour? Women are showing up—but not staying on. A new report by Udaiti Foundation and Quess Corp reveals that 52% of women in India's blue- and grey-collar workforce plan to exit within a year. Why? Low pay, poor work culture, safety concerns, and long, unsafe commutes top the list. Even as their numbers double, retention remains weak. What's pushing women out? And more importantly, what will bring them back in—and keep them there? With India's economy leaning on this workforce, creating jobs isn't enough. We need to make them worth staying for. TCS is letting go of 12,000 employees—mainly seniors—this year, citing AI disruption and slower growth. The message? India's IT giants are rebalancing. As clients demand cheaper deals and smarter tech, the people-heavy model is under stress. And TCS isn't alone—Wipro is testing language skills, HCL is trimming freshers. So, is AI really taking over—or is this just a reset for an evolving industry? Either way, tech talent will need more than just code to stay future-ready. Is the great Indian consumption story picking up pace again? Hindustan Unilever thinks so—and the numbers agree. After quarters of sluggish growth, HUL posted a strong 3% volume rise and an 8% jump in profit, riding on tax sops, easing inflation, and a monsoon boost. Urban and rural demand is inching up, new product bets are paying off, and optimism is back at the FMCG bellwether. But can this momentum last? If you've been waiting for signs of revival in India's consumer economy—this might just be it. Indian companies' profit pie is still heavily skewed towards its biggest firms, even though smaller listed firms made strong post-pandemic gains. A Mint analysis of 5,096 firms shows that the top 10% by revenue cornered over 90% of profits in 2024-25—unchanged for two years. While some sectors like textiles and hospitality saw smaller firms thrive, dominance by giants remains strong across others. The revival in mergers and acquisitions suggests the playing field could tilt further. This data-packed story, with rich charts and sector-level insights, examines whether India's small firms are losing ground again in a David vs Goliath battle. In Tiptur, Karnataka, a hen named Kaveri is laying the foundation for a new kind of egg economy. She's part of Akshayakalpa's cage-free, antibiotic-free farm, where eggs are premium, traceable, and sold with a promise of purity. Startups like Eggoz, Henfruit, and Farm Made are trying to turn eggs into branded health products, not just cheap protein. But with fragile supply chains and price-sensitive consumers, can this sunny-side-up revolution scale? Or will it remain a niche, yolk-tinted dream? Nayara Energy, one of India's top fuel retailers, recently had its Microsoft services suspended. Why? Microsoft interpreted EU sanctions against Nayara's Russian shareholder as reason enough to halt emails, team communications, and operations. Though services were restored in two days, the episode exposed a deeper fault line: how dependent critical businesses are on foreign tech firms. As firms increasingly run on cloud tools, this incident shows how easily geopolitics can trigger service cuts, even without clear legal mandates in India. This year's generous monsoon—8% above normal so far—has boosted kharif sowing across India, especially of rice and maize. Nearly 84% of the country has seen normal or excess rainfall, with major gains in states like Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. This has led to a 13% jump in rice planting and 9% in maize, offering hope for stable food prices and a push toward ethanol production. However, farmers are steering away from oilseeds due to poor returns, raising questions about long-term crop diversity. Could the shift towards water-intensive crops and biofuel-linked grains come at the cost of sustainable farming and future food security? This monsoon, cities across India—from Patna and Delhi to Mumbai and Bengaluru—have been brought to their knees by flooding. The reasons are well known: clogged drains, haphazard construction, poor waste management, and chronic underfunding of city infrastructure. The deeper problem? India's municipalities are broke, dependent on state grants, with little ability to raise their own funds or fix core services. Waste-to-energy plants, revamped drainage, and better accounting exist, but require serious investment and planning. Municipal bonds were meant to help, but few cities can even qualify. As flooding becomes an annual urban ritual, the question is no longer why this happens but how long can India's cities survive this cycle of neglect? That's all for this week. I hope you have a pleasant weekend! If you have feedback, want to discuss food, movies and shows or have anything else to say about our journalism, write to me at or reply to this email. You can also write to feedback@
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
US Army helicopter crash that killed 67 people in Washington was facing technical issues, NTSB finds
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with examining major accidents, held hearings from Wednesday to Friday, with rigorous questioning of experts and various other parties including regulators and air traffic controllers read more Jennifer Homendy, chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks during a briefing about the mid-air crash between American Airlines flight 5342 and a military helicopter in Washington, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. File Image / AFP An investigative hearing into a deadly mid-air collision of a US Army helicopter and a passenger plane that killed 67 people in Washington has revealed a discrepancy in the chopper's altitude displays. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with examining major accidents, held hearings from Wednesday to Friday, with rigorous questioning of experts and various other parties including regulators and air traffic controllers. There were no survivors in the January 29 mid-air collision involving the Sikorsky Black Hawk military helicopter and a Bombardier CRJ700 operated by a subsidiary of American Airlines. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The passenger plane from Wichita, Kansas was coming in to land at Reagan National Airport – just a few miles from the White House – when the Army helicopter on a training flight collided with it. After examining flight recorder data, the NTSB first reported a discrepancy in the helicopter's altitude readings on February 14. As part of the investigation, tests were conducted with three of the same helicopter models – Sikorsky Black Hawk Lima – belonging to the same battalion. The findings revealed this week showed differences between the altitude indicated by the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter on the aircraft. Investigator Marie Moler noted that the altimeters 'showed an 80- to 130-foot (24- to 40-meter) difference in flight' although the differences were within 20 to 55 feet in a controlled test environment. 'Once the helicopter rotors were turning and producing lift and thrust, the altimeter readings lowered significantly and stayed lower throughout the flights,' Moler said. NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy called the discrepancy significant, calling for more investigation. 'I am concerned. There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was,' Homendy said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A 100-foot difference is significant' in this case, she added. In the Potomac River area where the collision occurred, helicopters are required to stay below 200 feet, officials said during the hearings. President Donald Trump was quick to blame diversity hiring policies for the accident although no evidence has emerged that they were responsible. Federal Aviation Agency air traffic control specialist Clark Allen told the hearing there was sufficient supervisory staff present in the control tower that night. The collision was the first major plane crash in the United States since 2009 when 49 people were killed near Buffalo, New York.