Japan PM to meet Bessent on Friday, Yomiuri says
A separate Yomiuri report said European Union leaders will visit Ishiba later this month to sign an "alliance" advocating global free trade, seeking multilateral ties as U.S. tariffs add to trade risks.
Bessent is set to travel to Japan to attend the U.S. national day at the World Expo 2025 in Osaka, scheduled for July 19, skipping a concurrent Group of 20 finance officials meeting in South Africa, U.S. Treasury said last week.
Bessent would lead the U.S. delegation, which will also include Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer and Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, according to the White House.
Japan's top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is also expected to meet with Bessent, Yomiuri added, citing an unnamed government source. Despite seven U.S. visits since April, Akazawa has yet to secure a trade agreement with Washington.
Reuters has not independently confirmed these planned meetings during Bessent's Japan trip.
This would mark the first high-level meeting between Tokyo and Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump last week sent a letter to Japan raising tariffs on Japanese imports to 25% from August 1.
Separately, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa will meet Ishiba in Tokyo around July 23 and launch a "competitiveness alliance" scheme, Yomiuri reported.
The EU, facing 30% tariffs, has accused the U.S. of resisting efforts to strike a trade deal and warned of countermeasures.
The new EU-Japan framework will note their commitment to "a stable, predictable, rules-based, free and fair economic order" to counter Trump's tariffs and China's rare earth export restrictions, Yomiuri said, citing draft statements.
The statement could also mention EU-Japan tie-ups in areas such as rare earth and battery supply chains, natural gas investments, defense industry dialogues and satellites, the newspaper added.
The U.S. and EU officials' Japan visits come at a sensitive time for Ishiba with his ruling coalition seen losing its majority in Sunday's upper house election, according to recent polls.
Having already lost the lower house majority in October, a second electoral defeat could significantly undermine Ishiba's political standing while potentially strengthening opposition parties that advocate for tax cuts and looser monetary policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Putin has just discovered the scale of his latest miscalculation
President Donald Trump has finally lost patience with Vladimir Putin. Having promised a 'major' announcement on Russia, Trump has now confirmed that the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Europe for use in Ukraine and threatened 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Russia's trade partners. Trump would only provide Russia with an off-ramp if Putin agreed to a ceasefire in Ukraine within 50 days. The announcement should put to bed any remaining speculation that the president was prepared to unilaterally surrender Ukraine to Russia. These concerns reached a fever pitch after his disastrous February Oval Office meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky and subsequent temporary moratorium on intelligence sharing and arms deliveries to Ukraine. Since Kyiv repaired trust with the Trump administration by agreeing to a 30-day ceasefire in Jeddah on March 11, the White House has viewed Russia as the primary obstacle to peace. Initially, Trump evidently believed that he could steer Russia towards peace through constructive dialogue. He regularly called Putin, and his envoy Steve Witkoff expressed openness to legitimising Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory. But Putin treated these conciliatory gestures as displays of weakness and decided to escalate the war. Russia's record-setting drone and missile barrages on Ukrainian cities reflected Putin's confidence in his impunity and in Trump's unwillingness to escalate. Much like his underestimation of Ukrainian resolve and Western military assistance after his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin's bombast has been caught cold. Trump's new measures do not satisfy all of Ukraine's expectations, but have the potential to deal serious harm to Russia's war machine and faltering economy. As Joe Biden's administration had only provided Ukraine with a small number of ATACM long-range missiles, these stocks were reportedly depleted by late January. Ukraine has been forced to largely rely on its drone innovations to strike targets deep inside Russian territory and its June 1 Operation Spiderweb attack on Russian strategic bombers was a signature triumph. While new US missiles will not unilaterally change the course of the war, they could broaden Ukraine's ability to strike Russian military and economic infrastructure. Even without additional US support, reports suggest that Ukraine was recently able to strike a major gas pipeline in Langepas in Russia's Tyumen Oblast that supplies military facilities in Chelyabinsk, Orenburg and Sverdlovsk. With more US aid, Ukraine's possibilities grow significantly. Much depends on the nature of the technology that the US is willing to export. Ukraine hopes that Trump will approve the delivery of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), a newly minted upgrade on ATACMs that is compatible with Himars systems. The PrSM has a strike radius of approximately 500km which is significantly higher than the 300km range for ATACMs. As the PrSM has not been authorised for delivery even to close Nato allies, F-16 compatible JASSM-ER missiles are more plausible options for Ukraine. These missiles can strike targets up to 925 km away and could fulfil Trump's braggadocio about approving strikes on Moscow. Even if he settles simply for more ATACMs, he will signal to Putin that he is no longer afraid of the Kremlin's nuclear bluff. Trump's secondary tariffs on Russia's main trade partners may be difficult to enforce without undermining other aspects of his economic agenda. Imposing tariffs on the United Arab Emirates, a key financial hub for Russian business elites, for example, might compromise the investment influx pledged during Trump's May trip to Abu Dhabi. These tariffs would also risk an escalation spiral in the US trade war with China and derail final-hurdle trade negotiations with India. As Russia has already largely decoupled itself from Western-dominated financial networks, the short-term economic repercussions for US trade partners in the developing world may be worse than for Russia itself. Nonetheless, any new tariffs will restrict Russia's import supply chains and compound rising inflation. If they are paired with new sectoral and individual sanctions, the damage to Russia's war economy could be profound. At the June 2025 St Petersburg Economic Forum, Russian Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov signalled a recession might be imminent. That risk has just jumped significantly. Trump has finally realised that Putin can only be stopped by intensifying economic and military pressure on his war machine. This realisation might not quickly end the war, but will be a relief to Ukrainians facing Russia's daily bombardments.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Carney says US-Canada trade deal likely to include some tariffs
Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada may have to accept some tariffs as part of a trade deal with the United States. "There's not a lot of evidence right now" that the Trump administration would be willing to completely give up on the levies in any agreement, he said on Tuesday, as reported by CBC News. Speaking to journalists ahead of a cabinet meeting in Ottawa, the prime minister said in French that all of Trump's trade negotiations have thus far included tariffs. Last week, US President Donald Trump announced he would impose a new 35% duty on Canadian goods starting on 1 August. Canada and the US have been in a trade war since Trump took office in January, with Trump imposing both targeted tariffs on to Canada and global levies that have been painful on certain Canadian sectors. Canada imposed its own counter measures in response. Carney did not say on Tuesday if he was willing to accept the levies in any deal with the US. At the G7 summit in mid-June, he said that he would only sign an agreement "that's in Canada's best interest".He also indicated that he would be willing to impose further counter-tariffs if Ottawa and Washington could not strike a deal. In addition to the latest threatened 35% tariff on Canada - an increase from the current 25%, which includes significant exemptions - Trump has imposed a global 50% tariff on aluminium and steel imports, and a 25% tariff on all cars and trucks not built in the US president also recently announced a 50% tariff on copper imports, scheduled to take effect next sells about three-quarters of its goods to the US, and is an auto manufacturing hub and a major supplier of metals, making the US tariffs especially damaging to those much of the cross-border trade between the US, Canada and Mexico is exempt from additional levies under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (Cusma).US media have reported that the agreement remains in place for now. A recent report from the Royal Bank of Canada stated that Canada's exports to the US fell since April, but compliance with Cusma has risen. Around 91% of Canadian exports to the US crossed the border duty-free, the bank said, citing data from the US Census Bureau.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Kremlin mocks Trump's 50-day deadline – and ‘unfazed' Putin ‘may demand MORE Ukrainian territory over sanctions threat'
THE Kremlin has mocked Trump's 50-day deadline to strike a peace deal - and may demand even more Ukrainian territory instead of laying down arms. Putin will keep terrorising Ukrainian civilians during the seven-week period, sources said, apparently unfazed by America's threat of sanctions and decision to arm Ukraine with billions of dollars worth of long-range weapons. 5 5 5 Trump on Monday vowed to slap brutal 100 percent tariffs on Russia if Moscow did not reach a peace agreement with Ukraine within 50 days. Dismissing the President's ultimatum, Russian Foreign Minister said: "We of course want to understand what is behind this statement - 50 days. "It used to be 24 hours, it used to be 100 days, we have been through all of this and we really want to understand what motivates the President of the United States." Lavrov suggested Trump's move was simply driven by "indecent pressure from the European Union". Sources familiar with the internal workings of the Kremlin said that Putin would not end the war under pressure from the west, and believes the economy is strong enough to weather any additional economic measures. He also believes his military has the upper hand on the battlefield - and will be able to deal with the extra "top-of-the-line' long-range weapons Trump intends to supply. A source said: "Appetite comes with eating," meaning he is likely to continue grabbing land until the war has stopped. Explaining the dictator's thinking, another said: "Putin thinks no one has seriously engaged with him on the details of peace in Ukraine - including the Americans - so he will continue until he gets what he wants." Despite several telephone calls between Trump and Putin, and diplomatic visits to Russia, Putin feels there have not been detailed discussions towards a peace plan, the source said. They added: "Putin values the relationship with Trump and had good discussions with [Steve] Witkoff, but the interests of Russia come above all else." Trump shipping long-range missiles to Ukraine will change face of war' after 'p****d' Don's patience with Putin runs out Meanwhile, former Russian President Dmiitry Medvedev made a jibe on X: "Trump issue a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. "Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care." It was also reported by The Financial Times and The Washington Post that Trump encouraged Ukraine's President Zelensky during a phone call to strike deeper inside Russia in order to crank up the pressure on Putin. He apparently asked whether Ukraine could "hit Moscow" in order to "make Putin feel the pain of war", according to anonymous sources cited by the papers. Zelensky's answer was swift and direct: 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' However, the White House denied Trump was calling for escalation, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt telling Newsweek: "President Trump was merely asking a question, not encouraging further killing. "He's working tirelessly to stop the killing and end this war." 5 5 Putin's indifference was evident just hours after Trump issued the ultimatumwhen he unleashed a fresh devastating blitz on Ukrainian cities from Kharkiv to Zaporizhzhia and Sumy. In Sumy Oblast, Russian drones injured six people, including a 19-year-old student and 14-year-old girl, when they struck a university. A separate missile strike in Shostka wounded another teen and damaged a medical facility. Trump gave a surprise interview to the BBC on Monday night, when he said he was "disappointed but not done with" Putin. He also repeated his new-found backing for Nato and spoke of his respect for The King and Sir Keir Starmer ahead of his September state visit to the UK. Trump - for the first time - opened up about his difficulty trusting Putin, who has stalled four US attempts to end the 40 months Ukraine bloodbath. The President said: 'I thought I had a deal four times. 'I'm not done with him I'm disappointed in him. We thought we had a deal done four time the you go home and find he just attacked a nursing home or something in Kyiv… 'And so what the hell was that all about.' Trump, who once branded Nato 'obsolete,' told the BBC his view has changed. 'No. I think NATO is now becoming the opposite of that,' he said, because members were 'paying their own bills.' What have experts said of Trump's sending long-range weapons to Ukraine? by Sayan Bose, Foreign News Reporter DONALD Trump sending long-range weapons to Ukraine could be a game-changer for the war by helping halt Vladimir Putin's nightly blitzes, experts said. Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a decorated British Army commander, said the shipment of these long-range missiles would have profound "psychological and physical effects" on Ukraine. Mr de Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: "These weapons can strike Moscow - over 400 miles from the border. That allows the Ukrainians to strike drone factory production and ammunition sites, and others. "So this will have both psychological as well as physical effects. "People in Moscow will realise that they potentially could be targeted. "And when you also add to it the American bombings on Iranian sites that were supposed to be impregnable, it shows that American missile and drone technology rather superior to the Russian air defence system." The former army chief said these weapons will put real pressure on Russia, adding: "The metric has now changed and Trump's decision could make a huge difference." Ex-military intelligence officer Colonel Philip Ingram told The Sun how these long-range weapons could help strike Russian missile and drone launchpads - the ones that are used to launch nightly attacks on Ukraine. He said: "The Ukrainians are already attacking to hit Russian military logistics, defence industry bases. "And with these sophisticated weapons, they will have increased capability of doing so. "It will impact the ability of the Russians to prosecute these increasingly large drone and rocket attacks on a nightly basis. "And then that's the best way for the Ukrainians to stop it."
