AI gives stocks a lift, dollar mixed tracking Fed, tariffs
NEW YORK (AFP)Investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence helped lift Wall Street Thursday as Microsoft surfed a tech wave to pass $4 trillion in market value even as traders weighed Federal Reserve rates caution.US tariffs and a Fed decision Wednesday to hold rates steady as inflation stays stubbornly high in the United States could not dampen down the bulls piling into tech.Shares of Microsoft vaulted around five percent after it reported $27.2 billion in quarterly profits as it touted massive investments in AI, joining fellow AI star Nvidia in leaping the $4 trillion value barrier.About 25 minutes into trading, the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index was up 1.3 percent at 21,396.04 while the S&P 500 and the Dow touted more modest gains with both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq above their all-time closing highs.Europe was unable to match its US peers -- London barely in the green and eurozone indices Paris and Frankfurt slightly off two hours from the close.Ahead of US jobs data Friday, focus was on company earnings, with Microsoft and Facebook owner Meta posting better-than-expected earnings, the latter seeing its shares soar 12 percent.With US rates on pause for now, "often, that might have been enough to send traders scurrying for cover -- but strong earnings results from some of the leading US tech companies have kept sentiment strong, allowing markets to make new gains this morning," said Steve Clayton, head of equity funds at Hargreaves Lansdown.The latest developments on the tariffs front saw US President Donald Trump announce a deal that sees 15 percent levies on South Korean goods and a commitment from Seoul to invest $350 billion in the United States.The president Thursday said his sweeping tariffs were making the US "great & rich again".Earlier, he revealed India would face 25-percent tolls, coupled with an unspecified penalty over New Delhi's purchases of Russian weapons and energy.Traders are keeping tabs on talks with other countries that are yet to sign deals with Washington ahead of Trump's self-imposed Friday deadline.After a broadly negative session on Wednesday on Wall Street, Asian markets struggled.Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Seoul, Manila, Wellington and Jakarta closed lower, while Tokyo, Mumbai and Bangkok climbed.
The yen retreated against the dollar after the Bank of Japan decided against hiking interest rates, while lifting economic growth and inflation costs.
Stock Markets
Continue full coverage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Tesla's brand loyalty collapsed after Musk backed Trump, data shows
Tesla for years had more repeat U.S. customers than any other major automotive brand but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility shared exclusively with Reuters. The data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 states. That industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee. The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers. Tesla's U.S. loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May, the most recent month the S&P data is available, putting it back above the industry average and about the same as Toyota but behind Chevrolet and Ford. S&P analyst Tom Libby called it "unprecedented" to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. "I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time," he said. Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. The timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. "If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla," said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar. Tesla's aging model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales. On an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out "the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people," but also said there were "several weeks of lost production" when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y. Musk on the April call said that "absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand." Tesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined 8% in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33% over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly fierce. Musk's increased political activism was "very bad timing" for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and "what can be done to repair the brand damage." LOYALTY NOSEDIVE Tesla remains the U.S. electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human drivers. Customer loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is 'much more expensive' to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby. S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyzes vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and models. From the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60% of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60% during the period, and only once. CUSTOMER DEFECTIONS S&P's data also examines another aspect of the automotive market: Which brands and models are taking customers away from others, and which ones are losing them? Until recently, Tesla was in a different stratosphere than other automotive brands on this metric. For the four years prior to July 2024, Tesla, on average, acquired nearly five new households for every one it lost to another brand. No other brand from a major automaker was even close: Hyundai's luxury Genesis brand was the next best, acquiring on average 2.8 households for every one it lost, followed by Kia and Hyundai, which acquired on average 1.5 and 1.4 households, respectively, for every one they lost. Ford, Toyota and Honda lost more households on average than they gained during that period. Tesla's average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024 along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data. 'The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing,' Libby said. Brands that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data show. Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he isn't concerned about Tesla's long-term earnings because he expects enormous profits from its plans to operate robotaxis and license self-driving technology to other automakers. Tesla launched a small test of robotaxis in Austin in June, giving rides to hand-picked fans and Internet personalities but the service isn't available to the general public. If Tesla succeeds in expanding the technology, Mulberry said, 'there's a case to be made that Tesla doesn't need to sell cars and trucks anymore.' (Reporting by Chris Kirkham in Los Angeles. Editing by Brian Thevenot and Michael Learmonth.)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Forget TACO trades and meme stocks, this rally is no illusion
Are stocks ignoring reality? Or gorging on empty calories of 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) trading – or getting bloated from frothy meme stocks? Bears believe that since world stocks' rally quickly reversed 2025's early-year correction. The reality is way simpler: forward-looking stocks pre-priced a worst-case tariff scenario in the spring that never arrived. A better-than-feared world is now taking shape. In any bull market, that is all stocks need to rally. Stocks move most on surprises – and US President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff debacle was a doozy of a negative surprise. You know the fears that followed, you have heard them for months. A huge retaliatory trade war engulfing the entire world. Recession roiling the globe. Hot inflation galloping again as tariffs turbocharge import prices and muck up supply chains. A reworking of long-held alliances and perhaps even the world order. Bad, bad, bad. The initial panic was fully understandable, given the proposed tariffs' stunning (and stupid) scope, as I detailed before. And how hard it would be to know what would happen since tariffs are always negative – governmentally picking winners and losers, discouraging investment, interrupting trade flows and worse. Some threatened tariff rates were prohibitive. Stocks had to pre-price that potential awful impact. Particularly US stocks. Tariffs always hurt the imposer the most, as I've said here before, because the imposer citizens ultimately pay them. Moreover, Mr Trump's vacillating sparked sweeping American uncertainty. But reality has proven far better than feared. Through late July, the US collected only about 42 per cent of worst-case scenario tariff estimates, based on import volumes. Why? Many tariffs are easily evaded, as I explained in June. Firms continue to transship through other countries that have lower tariff rates. They find loopholes – legal and illegal. Meanwhile, US Customs and Border Protection simply hasn't enough staff to inspect all shipments. Goods slip through. Yes, Mr Trump wants to hire 10,000 customs and border agents. Good luck. During his first term, a Department of Homeland Security report found hiring 5,000 qualified personnel is likely to require interviewing 750,000 candidates, based on hiring and attrition rates. And this is after the administration laid off many workers. What qualified workers will want that role and risk? Also, while we are far from the '90 deals in 90 days' Mr Trump promised, new trade agreements have emerged. They aren't great and leave tariffs much higher than a year ago. That is objectively bad. But not as bad as those lousy post-April 2 expectations. Less bad than feared is always bullish. Yes, America's deals with the UK and China were flimsy. But Japan and EU deals yielded lower tariff rates than feared. Vietnam, too. Don't misunderstand – these deals include abundant phoney baloney, like the US 'investment commitments' other countries supposedly made. Japan's $550 billion plan is mostly a lending facility with only 1 per cent to 2 per cent of funds deployed as direct American investment – if they ever are. China's 2018 investment pledges wildly under-delivered. The EU is already openly contradicting White House statements about its supposed US investment plan. Yet again, the totality is less bad than previous draconian fears, step by step – an OK for stocks. Retaliation? Little to speak of after China's initial tit-for-tat, which flipped to fizzle fast. Instead, non-US nations seem invested more in stimulating their own economies and freeing trade with other nations outside America. The UK signed a free trade agreement with India in May. It lowers tariffs and eases trade barriers. Now, the EU is working on doing similarly. Other talks are under way, spurred by Mr Trump's protectionist threats. Those pluses counteract some of his tariff turmoil. Further, the tariff-induced supply chain chaos some feared is nowhere to be found. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Global Supply Chain Pressure Index is at zero – exactly in line with the historical average since 1997. The number of ships entering US ports is in line with the median for the last four years. Ships anchored outside US ports have increased slightly but are a far cry from 2022's crazy back-ups. Hence, markets rebounded – rationally and justifiably. They see economies weathering the tariff terror and corporate earnings expectations climbing. US stocks lagging other countries in 2025 shows you tariffs are still worse for America than other countries. US stocks are up 9.4 per cent through July 28 versus 19.8 per cent for the rest of the developed world. Yes, the US regained some ground since the lows. But that is all about bouncing bigger after falling more. The hunt for froth, TACO trades or other explanations is unnecessary narrative creation conjuring biased takes. Tariffs are bad. Period. But as I told you, they are hard to implement and would likely not be as bad as expected. You are seeing that now – and that's bullish.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Forget TACO trades and meme stocks, this stock rally is no illusion
Are stocks ignoring reality? Or gorging on empty calories of 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) trading – or getting bloated from frothy meme stocks? Bears believe that since world stocks' rally quickly reversed 2025's early-year correction. The reality is way simpler: forward-looking stocks pre-priced a worst-case tariff scenario in the spring that never arrived. A better-than-feared world is now taking shape. In any bull market, that is all stocks need to rally. Stocks move most on surprises – and US President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff debacle was a doozy of a negative surprise. You know the fears that followed, you have heard them for months. A huge retaliatory trade war engulfing the entire world. Recession roiling the globe. Hot inflation galloping again as tariffs turbocharge import prices and muck up supply chains. A reworking of long-held alliances and perhaps even the world order. Bad, bad, bad. The initial panic was fully understandable, given the proposed tariffs' stunning (and stupid) scope, as I detailed before. And how hard it would be to know what would happen since tariffs are always negative – governmentally picking winners and losers, discouraging investment, interrupting trade flows and worse. Some threatened tariff rates were prohibitive. Stocks had to pre-price that potential awful impact. Particularly US stocks. Tariffs always hurt the imposer the most, as I've said here before, because the imposer citizens ultimately pay them. Moreover, Mr Trump's vacillating sparked sweeping American uncertainty. But reality has proven far better than feared. Through late July, the US collected only about 42 per cent of worst-case scenario tariff estimates, based on import volumes. Why? Many tariffs are easily evaded, as I explained in June. Firms continue to transship through other countries that have lower tariff rates. They find loopholes – legal and illegal. Meanwhile, US Customs and Border Protection simply hasn't enough staff to inspect all shipments. Goods slip through. Yes, Mr Trump wants to hire 10,000 customs and border agents. Good luck. During his first term, a Department of Homeland Security report found hiring 5,000 qualified personnel is likely to require interviewing 750,000 candidates, based on hiring and attrition rates. And this is after the administration laid off many workers. What qualified workers will want that role and risk? Also, while we are far from the '90 deals in 90 days' Mr Trump promised, new trade agreements have emerged. They aren't great and leave tariffs much higher than a year ago. That is objectively bad. But not as bad as those lousy post-April 2 expectations. Less bad than feared is always bullish. Yes, America's deals with the UK and China were flimsy. But Japan and EU deals yielded lower tariff rates than feared. Vietnam, too. Don't misunderstand – these deals include abundant phoney baloney, like the US 'investment commitments' other countries supposedly made. Japan's $550 billion plan is mostly a lending facility with only 1 per cent to 2 per cent of funds deployed as direct American investment – if they ever are. China's 2018 investment pledges wildly under-delivered. The EU is already openly contradicting White House statements about its supposed US investment plan. Yet again, the totality is less bad than previous draconian fears, step by step – an OK for stocks. Retaliation? Little to speak of after China's initial tit-for-tat, which flipped to fizzle fast. Instead, non-US nations seem invested more in stimulating their own economies and freeing trade with other nations outside America. The UK signed a free trade agreement with India in May. It lowers tariffs and eases trade barriers. Now, the EU is working on doing similarly. Other talks are under way, spurred by Mr Trump's protectionist threats. Those pluses counteract some of his tariff turmoil. Further, the tariff-induced supply chain chaos some feared is nowhere to be found. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Global Supply Chain Pressure Index is at zero – exactly in line with the historical average since 1997. The number of ships entering US ports is in line with the median for the last four years. Ships anchored outside US ports have increased slightly but are a far cry from 2022's crazy back-ups. Hence, markets rebounded – rationally and justifiably. They see economies weathering the tariff terror and corporate earnings expectations climbing. US stocks lagging other countries in 2025 shows you tariffs are still worse for America than other countries. US stocks are up 9.4 per cent through July 28 versus 19.8 per cent for the rest of the developed world. Yes, the US regained some ground since the lows. But that is all about bouncing bigger after falling more. The hunt for froth, TACO trades or other explanations is unnecessary narrative creation conjuring biased takes. Tariffs are bad. Period. But as I told you, they are hard to implement and would likely not be as bad as expected. You are seeing that now – and that's bullish.
