Cabinet mulls holding rural polls by July-end, awaits court nod on quotas
1
2
3
Hyderabad: In an informal cabinet meeting on Monday, it was decided in principle to go for panchayat, MPTC and ZPTC elections before the end of July, but only after an aggressive outreach on govt's welfare programmes.
The govt is counting on Rythu Bharosa, jobs to youth and women-centric schemes to pay dividends in rural polls. The govt is waiting for resolution of the case on BC reservations in the high court to move ahead on polls.
Sources said that elections may also be pushed to early August in order to give govt time to reach out to voters to showcase its welfare programmes. The cabinet will take a formal call after discussing it with Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, AICC in-charge Meenakshi Natarajan, and other senior leaders, sources said.
After the cabinet approval, the State Election Commission (SEC) would be informed that the state govt was ready to provide police security, employees needed for poll duties and other logistics. As per the Panchayat Raj Act, state govt approval to extend all logistics is mandatory for the SEC to conduct elections.
Sources said the meeting also decided that it was essential to get the message out to voters about the Congress govt's sincerity on welfare programmes and that it was "not implementing promises with an eye on polls".
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Confidence packed. Wrinkles left behind.
Philips Garment Steamers
Book Now
Undo
In the backdrop of two ministers, D Anasuya and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy, earlier announcing in public that election notification was expected by month-end, the CM cautioned cabinet colleagues not to talk about panchayat election dates when a case on reservations was pending in HC and also reminded them that it was for the SEC to announce poll schedule.
"Commenting on elections when the case is in court will send wrong signals to the judiciary, SEC, and give ammunition to a sharp opposition to claim before the people that it is an 'election-centric Rythu Bharosa'," he is reported to have said.
Sources said the CM did not express his ire on any of the ministers for speaking out of turn, and instead gave a strong message that he wanted to work in coordination and cooperation with all ministers and party leaders.
The meeting was confident that the court will decide in favour of the govt on extending reservations to BCs in local bodies based on the caste survey conducted by the state govt.
The CM and ministers were of the unanimous view that the Congress will field candidates by implementing its poll promise of 42% quota to BCs in local bodies even if the case was not in govt's favour.
The CM and TPCC chief have been receiving a large number of representations on rural polls, with one section batting for MPTC and ZPTC elections followed by panchayat polls, while others seeking panchayat polls first followed by the other two categories.
Hyderabad: In an informal cabinet meeting on Monday, it was decided in principle to go for panchayat, MPTC and ZPTC elections before the end of July, but only after an aggressive outreach on govt's welfare programmes.
The govt is counting on Rythu Bharosa, jobs to youth and women-centric schemes to pay dividends in rural polls. The govt is waiting for resolution of the case on BC reservations in the high court to move ahead on polls.
Sources said that elections may also be pushed to early August in order to give govt time to reach out to voters to showcase its welfare programmes. The cabinet will take a formal call after discussing it with Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee president B Mahesh Kumar Goud, AICC in-charge Meenakshi Natarajan, and other senior leaders, sources said.
After the cabinet approval, the State Election Commission (SEC) would be informed that the state govt was ready to provide police security, employees needed for poll duties and other logistics. As per the Panchayat Raj Act, state govt approval to extend all logistics is mandatory for the SEC to conduct elections.
Sources said the meeting also decided that it was essential to get the message out to voters about the Congress govt's sincerity on welfare programmes and that it was "not implementing promises with an eye on polls".
In the backdrop of two ministers, D Anasuya and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy, earlier announcing in public that election notification was expected by month-end, the CM cautioned cabinet colleagues not to talk about panchayat election dates when a case on reservations was pending in HC and also reminded them that it was for the SEC to announce poll schedule.
"Commenting on elections when the case is in court will send wrong signals to the judiciary, SEC, and give ammunition to a sharp opposition to claim before the people that it is an 'election-centric Rythu Bharosa'," he is reported to have said.
Sources said the CM did not express his ire on any of the ministers for speaking out of turn, and instead gave a strong message that he wanted to work in coordination and cooperation with all ministers and party leaders.
The meeting was confident that the court will decide in favour of the govt on extending reservations to BCs in local bodies based on the caste survey conducted by the state govt.
The CM and ministers were of the unanimous view that the Congress will field candidates by implementing its poll promise of 42% quota to BCs in local bodies even if the case was not in govt's favour.
The CM and TPCC chief have been receiving a large number of representations on rural polls, with one section batting for MPTC and ZPTC elections followed by panchayat polls, while others seeking panchayat polls first followed by the other two categories.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress says open to alliance in UP but also focused on rebuilding its strength on ground
Congress is in the middle of a month-long organisation-building campaign across all 75 districts in Uttar Pradesh (UP) to strengthen its grassroots presence, and the party is hopeful of striking a 'respectful and suitable' alliance to take on the BJP in the 2027 assembly polls. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the Congress-Samajwadi Party alliance delivered a strong performance—the Congress winning six of the 17 seats it contested and the SP bagging 37 seats—reducing the BJP's tally from 62 to 33 in UP, the most populous state in the country. Perhaps that is why Congress general secretary and Uttar Pradesh in-charge Avinash Pande told PTI that while the party is focused on rebuilding its grassroots presence across the state, it would, in all likelihood, look to enter into a 'respectable and suitable alliance' under the INDIA bloc to take on the BJP in the next round of elections.' For the moment, however, Mr. Pande said, the party in the middle of "Sangathan Srijan" (organisation building) campaign across all 75 districts in UP is also gearing up for the panchayat polls, which would be held in 2026, a year ahead of the 2027 polls. Mr. Pande, who is on a seven-day tour of the state, meeting district-level leaders and workers to assess progress and energise the cadre, said a 100-day programme has been launched to drive the effort, with trained professionals overseeing implementation as the Congress is eyeing the panchayat polls to increase its rural penetration in UP. In the 2022 state polls, the two parties had contested separately. While SP improved its count from 47 to 111 seats, Congress was reduced to just two. "Talking about the alliance, the INDIA bloc is very much in existence, but as you know, an alliance of the regional parties and us (Congress) as a national party came together to give a strong opposition to the BJP. So, we are strengthening our organisation and because of that we will come together as a strong alliance," Mr. Pande told PTI. "We are trying to build our party stronger so that in case if we have a respectable and suitable alliance at the time of elections to defeat the BJP, then we should be in a good position to give a befitting result," he added. On the rise of regional parties like the SP and BSP and the BJP's current dominance, Pande said, 'I must tell you that regional parties came much, much later than the Congress, which was giving good governance to the people in Uttar Pradesh right from the freedom and after the formation of the state." "At present, we are focused on organisation rebuilding of the party in Uttar Pradesh, not just for contesting the elections alone but also doing a lot of other works which are directly related to the cause of the people and the welfare of the state." Mr. Pande also hit out at the BJP government, accusing it of autocratic functioning and sidelining the democratic role of the opposition. 'One thing that everybody can see is that the government is biased and trying to violate the Constitution by taking autocratic decisions. You can see all the decisions are being taken by suppressing the opposition, which is not being accorded due respect,' he said. He added, 'Obviously it is the government which is responsible to carry people's liking and welfare. They should take care of people's welfare—whether it is for infrastructure, education, employment or inflation. Congress is performing its responsibility as Opposition with full ability and best intentions.' On the organisational front, the senior Congress leader said the party's "Sangathan Srijan" campaign aims to rebuild its structure at five levels—state, district, block, mandal, and booth—following a resolution passed at the AICC plenary session. 'This is being undertaken in a phased manner under the leadership of the Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee and the guidance of the party's central leadership,' he said. On Congress' relevance in UP today, Mr. Pande said, 'I must tell you that Congress is the country's oldest party which played a role in the freedom struggle. It has always been very relevant and ideologically very close to the psyche of the common Indian,' he added. 'The Congress in UP is trying to restructure itself from the state level to the booth level,' he added. 'There is a visible sense of enthusiasm among the party workers, and I am confident Congress will perform well in the 2026 panchayat elections, the 2027 assembly elections, and the 2029 general elections. We aim to regain public trust and serve the people of Uttar Pradesh in line with their expectations,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Congress is holding emergency briefings on security after Minnesota shootings
Members of Congress will attend emergency briefings this week after the murder of a Minnesota state lawmaker brought renewed fears - and stoked existing partisan tensions - over the security of federal lawmakers when in Washington and at home. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The suspect in the attack had dozens of federal lawmakers listed in his writings, in addition to the state lawmakers and others he allegedly targeted. The man is accused of shooting and killing former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs and wounding another lawmaker and his wife at their home. The shootings come after credible threats to members of Congress have more than doubled in the last decade, the troubling tally of an era that has been marked by a string of violent attacks against lawmakers and their families. In 2011, Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords was shot and wounded at an event in her Arizona district. In 2017, Republican Rep. Steve Scalise was shot and wounded as he practiced for a congressional baseball game with other GOP lawmakers near Washington. In 2022, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul was attacked in his home by a man who broke into their San Francisco home. And in 2024, two different men tried to assassinate Donald Trump during his presidential campaign. All four survived, some with serious injuries. But those attacks, among others and many close calls for members of both parties, have rattled lawmakers and raised recurring questions about whether they have enough security - and whether they can ever be truly safe in their jobs. "I don't have a solution to this problem right now," said Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith, a friend of Hortman's who received increased security after the attack. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "I just see so clearly that this current state of play is not sustainable." Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy said lawmakers are "clearly at the point where we have to adjust the options available to us." The U.S. Capitol Police's threat assessment section investigated 9,474 "concerning statements and direct threats" against members of Congress last year, the highest number since 2021, the year that the Capitol was attacked by Trump's supporters after he tried to overturn his 2020 presidential election defeat. In 2017, there were 3,939 investigated threats, the Capitol Police said. While members of Congress may be high-profile, they do have some resources available that might not be available to state and local lawmakers, said Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who was a member of the South Dakota state Senate for 10 years before he was the state's governor. In the state legislature, "it just wasn't feasible all the time" to have increased security, Rounds said. As threats have increased, members of Congress have had access to new funding to add security at their personal homes. But it is unclear how many have used it and whether there is enough money to keep lawmakers truly safe. "Resources should not be the reason that a U.S. senator or congressman gets killed," Murphy said. Instead of bringing lawmakers together, the Minnesota shootings have created new internal tensions. Smith on Monday confronted one of her fellow senators, Utah Republican Mike Lee, for a series of posts on X over the weekend. One mocked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat who ran for vice president last year. Another post said of the murders, "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way." Friends and former colleagues interviewed by The Associated Press described Vance Luther Boelter, the man accused of assassinating Hortman and her husband, as a devout Christian who attended an evangelical church and went to campaign rallies for Trump. Records show Boelter registered to vote as a Republican while living in Oklahoma in 2004 before moving to Minnesota, where voters don't list party affiliation. Smith talked to Lee outside a GOP conference meeting as soon as she arrived in Washington on Monday. "I would say he seemed surprised to be confronted," she told reporters afterward. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer also called out Lee's posts on the Senate floor, saying that for him to "fan the flames of division with falsities, while the killer was still on the loose, is deeply irresponsible. He should take his posts down and immediately apologise to the families of the victims." Lee's office did not respond to a request for comment. Lawmakers were already on edge before the shootings, which came less than two days after Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla was forcibly removed from a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in California. Officers restrained Padilla and put him on the ground. Angry Democratic senators immediately took to the Senate floor Thursday afternoon to denounce Padilla's treatment. "What was really hard for me to see was that a member of this body was driven to his knees and made to kneel before authorities," said New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. "This is a test. This is a crossroads." At the briefing Tuesday, Senate Democrats say they plan to ask security officials, as well as Republican leadership, about Padilla's removal from the press conference as well as their protection against outside threats. "I certainly hope to hear leadership responding in a profound way," said New Mexico Sen. Ben Ray Lujan, a Democrat. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., who said she had been informed that her name was also on the suspect's list, said she wanted to hear recommendations at the briefing on how to improve security. "And we can take those recommendations," Baldwin said. "But I think, both with the president and his administration and with members of Congress, that we need to bring the temperature down. There's no place for political violence ever. And the rhetoric - words matter."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Senate expected to pass crypto bill without addressing Trump's investments
The Senate is expected to approve legislation Tuesday that would regulate a form of cryptocurrency known as stablecoins, the first of what is expected to be a wave of crypto legislation from Congress that the industry hopes will bolster its legitimacy and reassure consumers. The fast-moving legislation, which will be sent to the House for potential revisions, comes on the heels of a 2024 campaign cycle where the crypto industry ranked among the top political spenders in the country, underscoring its growing influence in Washington and beyond. Eighteen Democratic senators have shown support for the legislation as it has advanced, siding with the Republican majority in the 53-47 Senate. If passed, it would become the second major bipartisan bill to advance through the Senate this year, following the Laken Riley Act on immigration enforcement in January. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Still, most Democrats oppose the bill. They have raised concerns that the measure does little to address President Donald Trump 's personal financial interests in the crypto space. "We weren't able to include certainly everything we would have wanted, but it was a good bipartisan effort," said Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., on Monday. She added, "This is an unregulated area that will now be regulated." Live Events Known as the GENIUS Act , the bill would establish guardrails and consumer protections for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. The acronym stands for "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins." Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories It's expected to pass Tuesday, since it only requires a simple majority vote - and it already cleared its biggest procedural hurdle last week in a 68-30 vote. But the bill has faced more resistance than initially expected. There is a provision in the bill that bans members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins. But that prohibition does not extend to the president and his family, even as Trump builds a crypto empire from the White House. Trump hosted a private dinner last month at his golf club with top investors in a Trump-branded meme coin. His family holds a large stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto project that provides yet another avenue where investors are buying in and enriching the president's relatives. World Liberty has launched its own stablecoin, USD1. The administration is broadly supportive of crypto's growth and its integration into the economy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week said the legislation could help push the U.S. stablecoin market beyond $2 trillion by the end of 2028. Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase - the nation's largest crypto exchange and a major advocate for the bill - has met with Trump and praised his early moves on crypto. This past weekend, Coinbase was among the more prominent brands that sponsored a parade in Washington commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary - an event that coincided with Trump's 79th birthday. But the crypto industry emphasizes that they view the legislative effort as bipartisan, pointing to champions on each side of the aisle. "The GENIUS Act will be the most significant digital assets legislation ever to pass the U.S. Senate," Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., said ahead of a key vote last week. "It's the product of months of bipartisan work." The bill did hit one rough patch in early May, when a bloc of Senate Democrats who had previously supported the bill reversed course and voted to block it from advancing. That prompted new negotiations involving Senate Republicans, Democrats and the White House, which ultimately produced the compromise version expected to win passage Tuesday. "There were many, many changes that were made. And ultimately, it's a much better deal because we were all at the table," Alsobrooks said. Still, the bill leaves unresolved concerns over presidential conflicts of interest - an issue that remains a source of tension within the Democratic caucus. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has been among the most outspoken as the ranking member on the Senate Banking Committee, warning that the bill creates a "super highway" for Trump corruption. She has also warned that the bill would allow major technology companies, such as Amazon and Meta, to launch their own stablecoins. If the stablecoin legislation passes the Senate on Tuesday, it still faces several hurdles before reaching the president's desk. It must clear the narrowly held Republican majority in the House, where lawmakers may try to attach a broader market structure bill - sweeping legislation that could make passage through the Senate more difficult. Trump has said he wants stablecoin legislation on his desk before Congress breaks for its August recess, now just under 50 days away.
