logo
Australians are choosing foods that contribute to leading causes of disease. Why?

Australians are choosing foods that contribute to leading causes of disease. Why?

SBS Australia02-06-2025
Processed food is being consumed at higher rates than health guidelines recommend. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas New research suggests the cost of living is driving up poor diets in Australia.
Poor diet is among the top causes of disease in Australia.
Meanwhile, millions of tonnes of edible food are thrown away each year. Just under one in 20 Australians are making dietary choices that are consistent with Australian dietary guidelines. According to CSIRO's latest Food System Horizons report, Australians are experiencing diseases due to unhealthy diets despite a relative abundance of safe, high-quality food. Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that the local value of Australian fruit production (excluding wine grapes) was $6.3 billion in 2022-23, with 2.7 million tonnes sold the same year. Similarly, the local value of vegetable production was $5.8 billion, with 3.6 million tonnes sold. As a result of large quantities of fresh food remaining unused, 33 million tonnes of organic waste are generated each year. The CSIRO's report estimates that Australia's production, distribution and consumption of food is worth $800 billion and employs around 3.5 million people. But researchers say it's not delivering for everyone, and that lack of affordable and nutritious food is a leading cause of disease in the nation.
Larelle McMillan, research director of CSIRO's agriculture and food sustainability program, said the cost of food and health issues is "hitting Australians hard". She said a lack of choice is partially responsible for this situation. "Health-related epidemics and issues are often interpreted as an acceptable consequence of personal choice," she told SBS News. "However, there are elements to that personal choice that can lead us away from healthy food."
In particular, the cost of healthy food (like fruit and vegetables) compared to processed ones can make a nutritious diet out of reach for Australians on a smaller budget. People living in regional and remote areas are more likely to see higher prices at the checkout and have fewer options available, which could influence their food choices. According to the report, 6 per cent of those in regional areas only have access to a single food retailer, and that figure rises over five times to 34 per cent for residents in remote areas.
These factors are contributing to a vast number of Australians not getting enough nutrition in their diet, which is leading to health consequences, the report says. Less than 5 per cent of Australians are eating enough fruits and vegetables as recommended in the federal government's Australian dietary guidelines. In comparison, twice as much non-essential or "discretionary food" like biscuits and processed meat is being consumed. A lack of nutrition in one's diet can contribute to risks such as obesity, among other health issues. Dietary risk is one of the leading factors contributing to disease burden in the country, according to data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
While cost is a driving factor in food insecurity, convenience also plays a role in how consumers choose to shop in the modern age.
Lilly Lim-Camacho, a principal research scientist at CSIRO, explained that convenience can drive our habits when it comes to what we buy for our meals. "When it comes to purchasing food, buying fresh food to prepare yourself isn't as convenient when compared to other things," she told SBS News. "In addition, it can be seen as expensive, not only because of the increased cost but the increased time that goes into preparing food." The environments we are exposed to when buying food also play a part, as people can be swayed by marketing, she added.
The CSIRO report highlights that fast food outlets are heavily concentrated in areas of socio-economic disadvantage and around schools, which could be driving poor dietary patterns among these groups. "For example, children's exposure to fast food advertisements can affect what they want to eat afterwards," she said. The report added that people who are living with socio-economic disadvantage within regional and remote areas faced the biggest harms of food insecurity.
Australian food relief charities that assist people in accessing affordable and nutritious food say the cost of living remains a major barrier to healthy eating. At the same time, millions of tonnes go to landfills each year, according to Foodbank Australia. "Australia wastes over 7.6 million tonnes of perfectly edible food a year," the charity's chief operating officer, Sarah Pennell, told SBS News. "We want to see more of that good surplus food diverted to charities like Foodbank rather than landfill. With the right incentives and infrastructure, we can dramatically reduce waste and boost food relief efforts."
Food charity Second Bite's CEO, Daniel Moorfield, told SBS News they rescue around 25 million kilograms of food each year, which is equivalent to 50 million meals. But there is more they could do with support. "We strongly support the National Food Donation Tax Incentive, which encourages more businesses to donate surplus food rather than waste it, helping to feed more Australians in need," he said. "This straightforward policy can help deliver millions of healthy meals to Australians in need, improving food security and nutrition while advancing our national food waste reduction goals."
One way to encourage people to make healthy choices, according to the CSIRO, is a levy on unhealthy foods and sugar-sweetened beverages, adds the report. The World Health Organization encouraged a similar tax on sugary drinks in 2022. Pennell said such a levy would need to be considered in the light of its impact on low-income households. "We would support well-thought-out policies that improve dietary health and fund food relief efforts – but only if they don't make life harder for those already struggling to afford the basics."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Huge change': ASX falls as CSL announces new business plan
‘Huge change': ASX falls as CSL announces new business plan

News.com.au

time44 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Huge change': ASX falls as CSL announces new business plan

Australia's sharemarket snapped a six-day winning streak after pharmaceutical giant CSL had its worst day of trading on record after announcing a disappointing earnings update. The ASX 200 index dropped 63.10 points or 0.70 per cent to 8,896.20 while the broader All Ordinaries fell 59.70 points or 0.65 per cent to 9,173.80 The Australian dollar slipped 0.14 per cent to 64.85 US cents. Seven of the 11 sectors ended higher but a slump in the healthcare sector led to the market downturn. Healthcare stocks fell 8.73 per cent, led by CSL shares which slumped 16.89 to $225.50 its biggest ever one day fall, despite reporting underlying profits were up 14 per cent to $3.3bn. This was a fall of around $21bn in market cap. Shares plunged in the healthcare giant after it announced it would cut 3000 global roles costing $770m initially before helping the business save $500m-$550m over three years. CSL also announced its intention to demerge its influenza prevention vaccines-focused unit known as Seqirus into a separate ASX-listed business in 2026. It will also combine the commercial and medical operations of its core blood plasma and iron deficiency businesses into one unit. eToro market analyst Josh Gilbert said while the restructuring comes with a sizeable one off cost, the move is expected to sharpen the group's focus on its high-growth plasma and kidney care business. 'For investors, the view here is that CSL is trying to create a clearer business structure and improve investor returns. However, markets hate uncertainty, and this shake-up brings plenty of it,' he said. 'These are huge changes that come with execution risk, and in my view, the market will react poorly to the news short term.' Australia's second-biggest company BHP jumped 1.57 per cent to $42.12 after the business delivered its latest financial update. The company reported underlying profits of $US10.2bn ($A15.7bn), a 26 per cent fall compared with last year. Revenues came in at $US51.3bn ($A79bn), an 8 per cent fall in 2024. Despite falls in revenue and earnings, chief executive Mike Henry called the results 'a strong performance'. 'FY25 was another strong year for BHP, marked by record production, continued sector-leading margins and disciplined capital allocation,' he said. 'Safety remains our highest priority and we achieved year-on-year improvements across key metrics.' Shares in iron ore rivals Rio Tinto and Fortescue were down 0.22 and 0.15 per cent respectively. Financials were a brighter spot, with all four banks gaining. CBA added 0.51 per cent to $171.05, Westpac gained 0.65 per cent to $37.31, NAB jumped 0.77 per cent to $40.54 and ANZ finished 0.61 per cent higher to $32.77. In company news, Seek was one of strongest performers on the ASX 200 after it announced an increase in revenue despite fewer job ads, leading to a 7.99 per cent bounce to $27.72. Australia's largest manufacturer and distributor of 4x4 accessories ARB shares marched 8.55 per cent higher to $39.49 after the business told the market sales revenue was up 5.3 per cent to $729.9m, while net profits after tax were down 5 per cent to $97.5m. Judo Capital also eked out a gain of 0.29 per cent to $1.75 after full-year profits were up 24 per cent to $86.4m, on the back of a lift to its all important net interest margin. Reliance Worldwide shares fell 6.74 per cent to $4.29 despite the business announcing sales were up 5.5 per cent and reported net earnings after tax jumped 13.5 per cent to $US125m ($192m).

Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra
Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra

Australia has pressed Nauru for more detail about a claimed billion-dollar investment agreement that it has signed with a mysterious Chinese company, as federal government officials scramble to ensure the Pacific nation is not breaching a landmark treaty it signed with Australia just nine months ago. Last week, Nauru's government announced that its foreign minister, Lionel Aingimea, had signed a "phase 1 investment project proposal … valued at approximately AU$1 billion" with a Chinese company called the "China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation (CRRDC)". But the ABC has not been able to track down any information about the company, and Pacific analysts say that scale of investment doesn't seem plausible for Nauru, which has a population of just 12,000. Late last year, Australia signed a sweeping new treaty with Nauru, promising to provide ongoing budget and security support in return for effective veto power of decisions on national security. The pacific minister, Pat Conroy, said that Australian officials were checking that Nauru wasn't contemplating any investments which might breach the agreement. "That is a really important treaty for us that helps position us as the security partner of choice of Nauru." Article 5 of the treaty says Australia needs to "mutually agree" with any security arrangements Nauru makes, including on maritime security, defence, policing, border protection, cyber security, and some critical infrastructure. In its statement, Nauru said that the Phase 1 proposal would focus on "developing key sectors in Nauru", including "renewable energy, the phosphate industry, marine fisheries and sea infrastructure, water resource and environmental system, modern agriculture systems, eco-tourism, green transport system, health and cultural exchange platforms". It also said a "scoping team" from the company would come to Nauru in October to develop a "road up" for the investments. But Nauru's government hasn't provided any information beyond that statement. The ABC contacted Nauru on Tuesday to seek a response to Mr Conroy's comments, but it didn't immediately reply. The assistant minister for the Pacific, Nita Green, travelled to Nauru this week to open a Commonwealth Bank branch — delivering on an Australian government commitment under the treaty to ensure the Pacific nation wasn't left without a bank in the wake of Bendigo's withdrawal. But it is not clear if she raised the proposed investment in her meeting with Mr Aingimea and Nauru's president, David Adeang. One Australian government source, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said there were "zero detail" available on the proposed deal, and they doubted it would ever transpire. Graeme Smith from the Australian National University also told the ABC that the proposal was "highly unlikely" to bring in a billion dollars to Nauru because its economy simply wasn't large enough to sustain such an investment. "I would put it up there with Manly winning the premiership this year." Dr Smith said it was possible that the announcement was "theatre" intended to impress voters ahead of a parliamentary election due next month. He said while the company's name echoed an important slogan within China, there "appears to be no record whatsoever of this company" anywhere in public documents. The ABC has also been unable to find any public statement from the CRRDC, or any definitive proof that the company exists. A search for the company's name — China Rural Revitalisation Development Corporation — on China's top commercial inquiry platform, Tianyancha, returned zero results. The company also doesn't seem to exist in other parts of the internet, with no website or any social media accounts immediately identifiable. There are a few companies with very similar names to China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation, including the China Rural Revitalisation Development Group Limited, and China Rural Revitalisation Development Centre. The former, China Rural Revitalisation Development Group Limited, was a private company opened in Hong Kong this February by a mainland Chinese national, Ling Rui. Hong Kong Business registration documents show that the ownership was transferred to another Chinese national, Wan Pengcheng, two months later after its establishment. The latter is a major domestic entity under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, mainly dealing with domestic developments in rural China. But the ABC has not been able to verify whether any of these companies are connected at all. Mr Conroy stressed on Tuesday afternoon that Australia wasn't opposed to foreign countries, including China, investing in Pacific. "We call on every country in the world to be an economic partner and development partner in the Pacific, we think other countries should be doing their fair share and investing in the Pacific," he said. "But what we've been very clear (on), is that every country in the world should respect the views of the Pacific Islands Forum, the leaders consensus, which is that security should be provided by countries within the PIF." The ABC has asked the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) for more details about the representations it has made to Nauru, or whether it has gleaned more information about the proposal, but it has yet to responded.

WA government to ban mobile phones from childcare centres after review into industry
WA government to ban mobile phones from childcare centres after review into industry

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

WA government to ban mobile phones from childcare centres after review into industry

Mobile phones will be banned in Western Australia childcare centres and more money provided for safety checks after a snap one-month review into the state's sector found compliance issues are on the rise. The review was ordered by Early Childhood and Education Minister Sabine Winton last month following reports a Melbourne childcare worker had been charged with more than 70 offences, including sexual assault and producing child abuse material Ms Winton confirmed on Tuesday the state government would move to ban all personal devices in centres across WA, including those that have a camera, like smart watches and iPads, "as fast as [it] can". "This move is in line with strong responses from states such as South Australia and Victoria, and recognises that these devices can pose a risk to the safety of children," she said. "I need to work with the union and our sector partners to make sure that there are no unintended consequences." She said "reasonable adjustments" could be made for workers who have caring responsibilities and might require access to a device. "We as parents need to know that children are safe in those settings and that is my number one priority through this work I've done," she said. "I need to not only assure parents right across Western Australia that child safety is the government's number one priority, but it's the number one priority of our sector partners, and that's why I called the snap review." The review was conducted by the state's Education and Care Regulatory Unit (ECRU), the body which overseas and applies regulations in WA's childcare sector. This was in addition to The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority's (ACECQA) review of child safety arrangements under the National Quality Framework. Authorities made five recommendations following the WA probe. These include increasing training for early childhood educators, requiring providers to improve their approach to child safety and to urgently progress the Education and Care Services National Law Application Bill 2025 through parliament. Ms Winton said in addition to supporting all the recommendations "subject to ongoing national and state work", the government will inject $1.1 million to bolster the capacity of ECRU for compliance checks at centres. "It's a 10 per cent uplift in the total cost that ECRU have right now, and so I'm very confident that this is immediate funding that ECRU can have to step up the important role that they play," she said. The report however found compliance issues have increased in the past year in WA's early childcare services — up 14 per cent in 2024-25 from the previous financial year, which it suggests is likely a result of growth in the number of services operating. "There are actually now more services in place than there ever have been … when you get more compliance notifications, it actually means ECRU are doing their job, and I don't apologise for that," Ms Winton said. United Worker's Union WA branch secretary Carolyn Smith described the ban on mobile phones from the workplace as a "measured and sensible" response. "Unfortunately we know that personal devices have been involved in some of the really, really awful things we've seen in the last few months in early education," she said. "Many providers already have that ban. Ms Smith said the additional funding from the state government was also welcome. "We absolutely welcome extra money to the regulator," she said. "We need the regulator out in centres checking that centres are doing the right things and holding them to account." Opposition spokesperson for Early Childhood Liam Staltari said he welcomed review's findings. "We will support any measure that makes our centres safer, makes our children safer, gives confidence to parents and gives respect and certainty to the amazing childcare workers and educators who give their all every day," he said. "We did note with some concern, the review shows that WA lags the national average for the proportion of centres that meet the national quality standard benchmark. "We'll work in support of any measures that lift that because again, all sides of politics can work together to make our centres safer." Ms Winton also signed off on — along with all other Australian education ministers — stronger, mandatory child safety measures back in June. The changes, which come into effect from September, include mandatory 24-hour reporting of any allegations, complaints or incidents of physical or sexual abuse, as well as stronger protections around digital technology use.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store