logo
Bahrain HIMARS Order Boosts Gulf Arab's Formidable Rocket Arsenals

Bahrain HIMARS Order Boosts Gulf Arab's Formidable Rocket Arsenals

Forbes3 hours ago
The small island kingdom of Bahrain has become the latest country to order the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System from the United States. When completed, the delivery of the HIMARS to Manama will augment an already impressive array of multiple rocket launch systems in the military arsenals of the Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf.
The Bahraini government requested at least four HIMARS along with associated equipment in a deal valued at $500 million, the State Department's Defense Security Cooperation Agency disclosed in a press release on Thursday.
The HIMARS is compatible with various American-made rockets and can even fire the MGM-140 ATACMS tactical ballistic missile. Its high mobility, dubbed a 'shoot-and-scoot capability' by manufacturer Lockheed Martin, enables it to fire guided rockets at a target in rapid succession and swiftly relocate and reload within minutes, markedly increasing its chances of evading retaliatory fire.
The U.S. deployed HIMARS in support of the counteroffensive against the Islamic State group in Mosul in 2016-17, firing hundreds of rockets from a safe distance. More recently, in 2023, the U.S. deployed the HIMARS to Syria, significantly bolstering fire support for the modest U.S. troop deployment there. Ukraine has also successfully used the HIMARS in combat since Russia's full-scale 2022 invasion.
Acquisition of even a few HIMARS is significant for such a small, albeit wealthy, country like Bahrain, especially considering it was little over a year ago since Manama ordered 50 M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks.
The HIMARS isn't the first system of its kind Bahrain has acquired. It previously bought that system's predecessor, the M270, in the early 1990s, and ordered upgrades for nine of them as recently as 2022. Additionally, Manama purchased at least four SR-5s, one of the export versions of the PHL-11 capable of carrying 122mm or 220mm rockets or one ballistic or anti-ship missile, from China in 2015, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute's arms transfer database.
More broadly, many of the Arab Gulf states, the other five members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, possess diversified arsenals of MLRS acquired over the years, with two exceptions, Kuwait and Oman, which are only known to operate one type each. Kuwait acquired 300mm BM-30 Smerch systems in the mid-1990s from Russia. The SIPRI database indicates Oman acquired six 120mm Type 90 systems from China in the early 2000s.
The small peninsular country of Qatar acquired 18 Astros II systems from Brazil in 1992, again according to the SIPRI records. Much more recently, in 2017, it paraded SY-400 systems from China through the streets of its capital, Doha. The SY-400 can carry either two Chinese-made BP-12A short-range ballistic missiles or 12 300mm rockets.
However, these MLRS arsenals pale in comparison to regional heavyweights Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have large, diversified MLRS with even more on order.
Saudi Arabia ordered and acquired the Astros II in the late 1980s, per SIPRI. It also bought at least 10 30-barrel 220mm TOS-1s from Russia in 2017, which can hurl thermobaric warheads.
Riyadh diversified this arsenal further with a 2022 order of K239 Chunmoo from South Korea. The modern MLRS can fire small guided and unguided rockets, tactical missiles, and even anti-ship ballistic missiles.
But the UAE undoubtedly has both the largest, most diversified, and unique arsenal among the Arab Gulf states, and arguably anywhere in the world.
Abu Dhabi already acquired the K239 in 2021 and the HIMARS over a decade ago. On top of that, it also purchased the SR-5s from China in the late 2010s.
Much earlier purchases included the 122mm Firos from Italy in the late 1980s and Russia's Smerch in the second half of the 1990s.
But what really makes the UAE's MLRS arsenal stand out, amongst both the region and the rest of the world, is undoubtedly its Jobaria multiple cradle launcher, which it unveiled in 2013.
Essentially, the Jobaria consists of four launchers mounted on a single 10-wheel semitrailer towed by a powerful U.S.-made Oshkosh M1070 Heavy Equipment Transporter. These launchers can each fire sixty 122mm T-122 Sakarya rockets developed by Turkey's Roketsan.
Jobaria is the largest rocket system worldwide by total number of tubes, a whopping 240!
Despite its enormous size, it requires only a fraction of the military personnel of other Emirati launchers.
'This piece of equipment consists of just one vehicle which is manned by a crew of three, but can generate the same firepower as the UAE's traditional rocket battery made up of six vehicles manned by 30 operators,' noted a book on the Emirati armed forces.
The Jobaria even has a Guinness World Record for its enormous number of tubes.
That is the regional backdrop of Bahrain's HIMARS order. Thursday's DSCA press release affirmed, as those releases invariably do, that Manama's latest acquisition won't 'alter the basic military balance in the region.'
With the neighborhood already bristling with all kinds of MLRS, that will no doubt be the case.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Rocket Lab (RKLB) Stock Is Falling Today
Why Rocket Lab (RKLB) Stock Is Falling Today

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Rocket Lab (RKLB) Stock Is Falling Today

What Happened? Shares of aerospace and defense company Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB) fell 8.8% in the afternoon session after investors took some profits off the table as markets awaited signals on future monetary policy from the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole symposium later in the week. The downturn in the market was largely attributed to a significant sell-off in megacap tech and chipmaker shares. Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Broadcom all saw notable drops, dragging down the VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Other major tech-related companies like Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Netflix were also under pressure. A key reason for this trend is that much of the recent market gains have been concentrated in the "AI trade," which includes these large technology and semiconductor companies. So this could also mean that some investors are locking in some gains ahead of more definitive feedback from the Fed. The shares closed the day at $40.91, down 9% from previous close. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Rocket Lab? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. What Is The Market Telling Us Rocket Lab's shares are extremely volatile and have had 74 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 7 days ago when the stock gained 4.9% on the news that an in-line inflation report fueled hopes for interest rate cuts and the U.S. and China agreed to extend their tariff truce. The Consumer Price Index (CPI), a key measure of inflation, came in largely as expected, holding steady at 2.7% year-over-year. This reading boosted investor optimism that the Federal Reserve will have room to lower interest rates at its next meeting, which could reduce borrowing costs for companies and consumers. Adding to the positive sentiment, the U.S. and China extended their tariff truce for another 90 days. This development alleviates concerns about renewed trade tensions, which is a significant relief for industrial companies reliant on global supply chains and international sales. Together, these events create a favorable outlook for economic growth, benefiting cyclical sectors like industrials. Rocket Lab is up 63.9% since the beginning of the year, but at $40.92 per share, it is still trading 20.4% below its 52-week high of $51.39 from July 2025. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US Eyes Non-Governance Role in Intel
US Eyes Non-Governance Role in Intel

Bloomberg

time7 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

US Eyes Non-Governance Role in Intel

00:00 Is this a good thing for Intel? It's a life saver. They were on an unclear path before the government decided to renegotiate its deal. Let's not forget that the U.S. government already had a deal with Intel. It's we're going to give you $6 billion and we're going to get a colored profit share down the line. What this administration is doing is just renegotiating the deal. It's saying that's not good enough. We want to take an equity stake. And by the way, Intel is different because part of this deal is a big Department of Defense component. Let's not forget, we're we're going to want Intel to manufacture chips for our F-35 and other important weapons systems. So the government has a different type of relationship, for instance, than it does with TSMC, where we're just talking about making chips for data centers. So the government renegotiated the deal and now when it's done that it's not a coincidence that Lee Boutin can go to his friend, his son, and say, okay, this is the time for SoftBank to invest as well and maybe line up some arm demand for those 14 chips down the line. I'm so interested in the ARM architecture side of this. How do you see these working hand in hand going forward? How more cemented could a relationship become? Well, clearly, it could be part of the deal. And more importantly for Intel, as of a week ago, they had no customers for a for the 14 architecture. And they said they may not even proceed with it. Now, they might have one lined up. Let's not forget, the Department of Defense is a customer that's now more likely to be lined up for that, and then they can go and talk to the other companies. And even if the government doesn't have it doesn't go ahead and twist some arms, let's not forget. And Nvidia has committed half a trillion dollars of investment in the US. So can the government now can President Trump call Jensen Huang and say, Hey, this is part of how I want to see the investment play out. I need for you to be a customer of 14. That's not inconceivable at this point. And again, remember, this is national security. So the rules of the game change. Once we say this is national security, the rules of the game are often blurred by frenemy lines. Gil And what's so interesting is Masa has had a long term relationship with the CEO of In Video. Of course, Jensen Huang. But also in some ways wants to build a competing architecture in some ways. What's the take on NVIDIA in terms of A.I. chips? Could he do that with Intel's help? It's one way for him to participate in an even more broad fashion in the growth of AI, which he's doing now. He he regrets selling in video when he did. He's buying some of it back, but he's also making a set of other investments in air infrastructure. Let's not forget, Stargate is probably the the flag bearer of of his effort combining with open A.I. and Oracle to build again at least $100 billion worth of datacentre capacity. And for that it would make sense to diversify and not only buy in video chips. Now that's going to take a while. And Nvidia not only has a lead, but continues to extend its lead every year. But it does make sense for for him and for other companies to try to diversify away from in video. What's interesting is how a lot, Nic, the commerce secretary had said, look, we will be we confirm that we're looking at taking an equity stake, didn't say how much, but it wouldn't be with a governance role. Now, more broadly, how are you starting to analyze companies that are getting closer and closer to the US government and how much well, is it interference or is it positive help that is being led by a US government here? Well, the U.S. government has an ability to to make to give preferential treatment to some of these companies to to change the rules of the road. And it wants equity participation when it does that. And again, it's not doing it broadly. It's doing it when it's a matter of national security. Let's not forget, it's already very involved with Nvidia. It's limiting their chip sales to China. It's already very involved with open air. This may be quiet, but it's pretty safe to assume the Department of Defense gets briefs from open air very frequently about where the models are. So the government is involved because it's national security. In Intel's case, it's a matter of if this is this century's nuclear arsenal, we need somebody to make the shell casings domestically. We have. We can't have a Taiwanese company and a Korean company make our shell casings for our nuclear arsenal. So in Intel's case, it's a much deeper involvement. And I wouldn't be surprised if there are if there is input into where the investments go, what the governance is, even if it's not explicit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store