Tinder parent Match cuts 13% of workforce, forecasts revenue above estimates
May 8 (Reuters) - Match Group on Thursday forecast second-quarter revenue above Wall Street estimates and said it would reduce 13% of its workforce to cut costs, as the Tinder parent plows ahead with its business revamp plan.
The layoffs are the first major structural change at Match since new CEO Spencer Rascoff took the helm in February and was tasked with tackling a slowdown in user engagement.
The online dating industry has hit a rough patch as persistent inflation and a lack of innovative features prompted consumers to move away from dating apps such as Tinder and Bumble.
In response, Match and Bumble have been refining their applications and introducing artificial intelligence features such as AI-enabled discovery to make it easier for users to improve their dating outcomes.
Match, which also owns dating apps Hinge and OkCupid, has introduced features such as "double date" and Game Game, which was a voice-based experience that allowed users to practice flirting with an AI date, to better cater to Gen-Z audiences.
The double-date feature, which allows users to team up with a friend and match with other pairs, is resonating with its younger audience, with 90% double-date profiles from users under 29, CEO Rascoff said.
Its revenue per paid user increased to $19.07 from $18.87 a year ago.
For the second quarter, the company forecast revenue between $850 and $860 million, above analysts' average estimates of $846.7 million, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Match is also testing new features to boost its security and verification programs and has seen a more than 15% reduction in bad actor reports.
For the quarter ended March 31, the company's revenue declined by 3% to $831 million, beating estimates of $827.5 million.
Rival Bumble on Wednesday reported a more than 7% fall in first-quarter revenue, but met market estimates. (Reporting by Kritika Lamba in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
In-depth: iQOO, Poco outpaced parents in India. Can sub-brands continue this momentum?
NEW DELHI: iQOO and Poco have proven beneficial for their parents, Vivo and Xiaomi , helping penetrate deeper into online channels and certain demographics in the last two to three years. However, a broader market stagnation, demand saturation in urban regions, and flailing online channel sales have impacted nearly all brands, with Vivo being the only outlier. iQOO, launched in 2020, and Poco, launched in 2018, have a targeted portfolio of smartphones, backed by retail strategies, that cater to niche demographies such as Gen-Z and gamers, discouraging competition with the parent brand. Vivo primarily operates as an offline-focused brand, selling smartphones at all price points. In contrast, iQOO began as an online-first brand, targeting the mid-premium gaming segment. Xiaomi commenced as an online-centric brand, but it has an omnichannel presence today, and utilises Poco to cater to entry-level online consumers seeking a balance of hardware-to-price performance. 'We're seeing sub-brands outperform their parent brands recently, and that's largely because they are growing from a lower base. But it's not just about scale, it's also about sharper focus. While the parent brands have broader portfolios aimed at multiple price tiers and consumer types, sub-brands are more targeted,' Shubham Nimkar, analyst at Counterpoint Research , told ETTelecom . The market tracker's data shows that Poco's shipments grew strongly at 38% year-on-year in 2023, but moderated to 11% year-on-year in 2024. iQOO's volumes were, however, down by 34% year-on-year in 2023, but rose by 69% compared to the previous year in 2024. Today, both brands cumulatively hold less than 10% market share. In the January-March 2025 quarter, iQOO had a 5% share, while Poco's share stood at 2% Research data. Historically, Poco and iQOO had achieved a peak market share of 4% and 2% in Q2 2022 and Q3 2022, respectively. The latest data from the market tracker then implies that both sub-brands have not been able to take a substantial slice of the volume pie despite the market size primarily hovering between 150-155 million units in the last two years. The International Data Corporation's ( IDC ) findings paint a more striking picture. Poco's volume share declined from 5.9% in Q1 2024 to just 4.3% in Q1 2025. During the same period, iQOO's share fell from 2.8% to 2.3%. Poco declined to comment on ETTelecom's queries. 'At iQOO, our focus remains sharp on the ₹20,000 to ₹40,000 smartphone segment—where we cater to youth, young professionals, and heavy multitaskers,' Nipun Marya, CEO, iQOO India, told ETTelecom , adding that the brand has launched a variety of smartphones, including the iQOO Neo 10R, iQOO Neo 10, and iQOO Z10, to bring flagship-grade devices to the mass market. 'As we move through 2025, we are doubling down on performance, building smartphones that are optimised for intensive tasks like faster AI image generation, video editing, rendering, running multiple apps simultaneously, and handling office-grade productivity tools,' Marya said. Mainline expansion crucial for future growth? With that said, analysts and mainline retailers cautioned that both sub-brands should extensively revamp their marketing and retail strategies to grow substantially in the coming quarters. "Having operated in the Indian smartphone market for a considerable period, both sub-brands are well-positioned for growth in the coming quarters."Upasana Joshi, principle analyst (smartphones, wearables and smart home research) for South Asia, IDC, told ETTelecom. 'Both iQOO and POCO have proven beneficial to their respective parent companies. Poco, now diversified into offline channels, is a strong contender in the entry-level segment, but needs more marketing efforts to expand further. Meanwhile, iQOO requires increased offline presence and offerings in the low-to-mid price segments,' she added. IDC estimates that iQOO has an average selling price (ASP) of $220-240 (~₹18,800-20,500), compared to Poco's $115 (~₹9,800) in India. Kailash Lakhyani, founder chairman of the All India Mobile Retailers Association (AIMRA) & founder member of Organized Retailers Association (ORA), told ETTelecom that Poco and iQOO are not providing sufficient handset stocks to mainline retailers, thereby impacting buyers. 'They are not bothered whether these stocks are selling through aggregators to the gray market and then to smaller retailers, ultimately reaching consumers,' Lakhyani said. 'Their primary aim is to compete with other online-centric brands such as Motorola, Samsung M & F Series, Vivo T series, and Oppo K series,' he added. Delhi-based AIMRA represents 1.5 lakh mainline retailers, while ORA counts 20 members. They allege that Poco and iQOO's business practices are causing losses to the national exchequer. Reshuffle in top 5 brands Meanwhile, a separate story is playing out among the top five brands. IDC found that Xiaomi's shipments (excluding Poco) fell by 42% year-on-year, pushing it to the sixth rank in India in Q1 2025, with a market share of 7.8%. First-ranked Vivo's shipments grew by 14.6% year-on-year, holding a 19.7% share. 'Xiaomi's reduced shipments stemmed from a combination of issues, including internal management changes, difficulties within their offline sales channels, a strategic reorganisation of their product portfolio that led to a leaner offering concentrated at the low end and hindered their expansion into mid-to-high price segments, and intense competition from rival brands,' Joshi said. Counterpoint's Nimkar said that Xiaomi's shipments in the March 2025 quarter were weighed down by elevated inventory levels, with several of its key smartphones logging lower-than-expected sales, which prompted the brand to take a cautious approach by clearing its stock rather than pushing shipments into channels. Per Counterpoint, Xiaomi had a peak share of 23% in Q1 2022, but has been losing ground to rivals since then, particularly Samsung and Vivo, which continue to retain their market leadership. 'Vivo's growth in the Indian smartphone market over the past three quarters can be attributed to its balanced product portfolio, consistent innovation in areas such as camera, battery, and fast charging, and its strong presence in the mainline retail channel,' he said of Vivo. According to Counterpoint, Vivo is well-positioned to continue its momentum across all price segments, with a particular push in the premium segment through the expansion of the X and V-series models.
Mint
4 days ago
- Mint
Hurun India spotlight: Meet Mrunal Panchal, 26-year-old influencer founder with 5.5 million Instagram followers
Candere and Hurun India on Wednesday released a list of womenleaders and wealth creators who are significantly impactingkeysectorsofthe Indian economy. The list includes outstandingwomen in different categories suchas professionals, first-generation wealth creators, next-generation leaders, investors, philanthropists, young women leaders, artists, most followed influencer founders, and most followed celebrity investors. 'The 2025 Candere Hurun India Women Leaders List celebrates India's youngest women making waves across diverse fields. Leading the pack is 26-year-old Mrunal Panchal, the youngesthonouree, whose inclusion underscores a bold truth: age is no barrier to impact,' the company said in a statement. Mrunal Panchal is a beauty content creator turned entrepreneur. She is the founder of a start-up, Mrucha Beauty. With over 5.5 million followers on Instagram, Mrunal tops Candere and Hurun India's list of leading women influencer founders. From viral makeup reels to beauty entrepreneurship, Mrunal Panchal, popularly known as Mrunu, has seamlessly blended content with commerce. In November 2024, she launched Mrucha Beauty, a brand rooted in bold individuality and inclusivity. With millions of social media followers and ₹ 2 crore in sales within five months, her shift from influencer to founder has been trailblazing. Mrucha's vivid lipsticks resonate with Gen Z, celebrating self-expression and diversity. More than just cosmetics, Mrucha is a creative community. Mrunal's journey proves that passion with purpose can redefine the beauty industry. SanjayRaghuraman,ManagingDirectorofCandere, said: 'AtCandere,we celebrate the spirit of today's woman — self-made, driven, and defining success on her own terms. Our association with the 2025 Candere Hurun India Women Leaders List is atributeto womenwhoarereshapingIndia'seconomic andculturalnarrativewith purpose and perseverance. Just as our jewellery is designed to empower women in their everyday lives — balancing ambition with elegance — this initiative honours those who leadwithresilience, creativity and impact. It's a celebration of substance, style, and strength.'
NDTV
5 days ago
- NDTV
Why Tinder Added A New Height Filter To Cut Men Down To Size, And What Indian Women Say
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Tinder has launched a premium feature allowing height preferences for matches. The feature serves as a suggestion rather than a strict filter for users. Critics say the feature may reinforce outdated beauty standards. What makes a perfect couple? Shared values? Yeah. Shared understanding of the future? Sure. But what if we told you, for some, it's that perfect height difference? Yes, you read that right. For some, height is a criterion that seems really important when finding a partner. Understanding this, Tinder, the dating app, has recently launched a new feature that lets you filter your matches by height. The Controversy Tinder has recently introduced a new global premium feature (only for paid users) that allows users to indicate a preferred height range for potential matches. This feature, instead of being a strict filter, works more as a suggestion for the algorithm rather than an absolute restriction. Oh God. They added a height filter. by u/Extra_Barracudaaaa in Tinder The controversy around this feature reached new heights when a Reddit user pointed it out. Since then, while some have found the idea intriguing, others have raised concerns-particularly on social media. Critics argue that it could disadvantage shorter men and taller women. The trial has sparked a debate over whether such preference-based features reinforce societal biases in dating. Tinder isn't the first app to implement this feature either. It already exists on Hinge and OkCupid-both also owned by the same parent company, Match Group. We analysed the Reddit post, and it seems like people had a lot of (not go good) things to say about this feature. "I have dated many below-average height men, I don't care but it is a turn off when you see they lied about their height, seems insecure, and like he is ready to lie to avoid what he thinks might be my deal breakers instead of showing who he really is, so I can really take seriously how he presents to be," a user said. "I 1000 per cent wouldn't have met my wife if this filter existed, I'm short (5'5') and definitely would have been filtered out immediately just by even a basic filter for 5' 7' + (slightly below average height and over)," another user commented. "Yup, I'm already cooked from being 5'3 without the height filter but now it's here I'm fried," someone else wrote. "This is a great update, all the short men will uninstall Tinder after getting no matches which means Tinder gets less money from their biggest customers," a user said. Is India Ready For A Height Filter? For some women, men misrepresenting their height on dating apps has become a widespread issue. In fact, last year, a new trend came up, where some women even turned to AI tools like ChatGPT to check whether men were being truthful about their height. View this post on Instagram A post shared by HITS 96.1 (@hits961) That said, let's address some uncomfortable realities. On average, women show a strong preference for taller partners - more so than men who prioritise dating shorter women. Research (yes, studies like this exist) on height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner is about 8 inches (21 cm) taller, while men prefer a height difference of around 3 inches (8 cm). Another study revealed that 13.5% of men prefer dating women shorter than themselves, whereas nearly half (48.9%) of women exclusively seek taller partners. According to Psychology Today, this preference is deeply rooted in societal stereotypes. Tall men are often associated with traditional notions of masculinity. When picturing a stereotypical "man," one might envision someone bearded, tall, and possessing a deep voice. While not all men fit this mould, taller men tend to align more with these expectations, which many women find appealing. Of course, these perceptions aren't universally true, and reinforcing such stereotypes isn't ideal. However, data suggests that these biases persist-and dating apps seem to be capitalising on them. What Women Say Riya Das, a 27-year-old working professional from Noida who often uses dating apps to find matches, shares with NDTV her thoughts about the new feature. "Even though I am someone who is shallow enough to look at a guy's height, ideally I shouldn't. This filter will only make people more shallow and guys more insecure. It'll also make people miss out on potentially great matches," says Riya. Anusha Sharma, another single woman from Hyderabad who found her match on a dating app, says, "I feel the height feature on Tinder is pretty dissatisfying. Moreover, where the world is heading towards normalising skin colour and promoting body positivity, this new feature creates a reverse effect on people. It takes us back to the time when people were judged based on physical looks." She says that to find love, one doesn't need to compare height, weight, or skin colour. All that matters is emotional compatibility-the rest tends to fall in place on its own. "If the app really wants to let people connect intentionally, they should focus more on creating prompts that spark the user's intellect more than physical looks," she adds. 'It Was Created To Make Sure People Connect More Intentionally' NDTV reached out to Tinder to understand why this feature was added. A Tinder spokesperson shares, "We're always listening to what matters most to our Tinder users - and testing the paid height preference is a great example of how we're building with urgency, clarity, and focus. This is part of a broader effort to help people connect more intentionally on Tinder. Our new product principles guide every decision, and this one speaks directly to a few: prioritising user outcomes, moving fast, and learning quickly. Not every test becomes a permanent feature, but every test helps us learn how we can deliver smarter, more relevant experiences and push the category forward." This feature comes just a few days after Spencer Rascoff, the CEO of Match Group, shared in a LinkedIn post that: "At Tinder, we are rethinking not just what we build but how we build it. Over the past few months, I've connected with teams across the company, reviewed product feedback, and listened closely to the people who use our app every day." It seems like Tinder updated this feature by listening to what people want in their relationships... a good height difference.
