Malaysia to raise Palestinian plight with Trump at Asean Summit, says Tok Mat
He stressed that while the invitation extended to Trump was part of Malaysia's duty as Asean chair, the summit would provide a crucial platform to deliver a unified Asean position on the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
'The invitation to President Trump is an obligation as the host of the Asean-US Summit.
'He has accepted, and I believe we should meet face to face so all Asean member states, all countries can make their positions clear,' Mohamad told the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday (Aug 19).
Hasan Karim (PH-Pasir Gudang) had asked if Malaysia would 'roll out the red carpet for a US President whose hands are stained with the blood of innocent Gazans in this genocidal war.'
Mohamad added that Malaysia is considering using the opening chairman's statement to highlight the bloc's concern and to press Washington to act responsibly in helping to resolve the situation in Gaza.
'We want to emphasise through the Asean Chairman's Statement during the summit's opening that the United States, as a major power, must shoulder its responsibility so that the situation in Gaza can be resolved,' he said.
Mohamad pointed to Asean's recent joint statement condemning the atrocities against Palestinians as an example of regional unity.
'We should not mix matters up – this is a multilateral engagement.
'We will continue to carry our bilateral relations separately, but in Asean, we have already achieved consensus with a joint statement expressing deep regret over the cruelty inflicted on the people of Palestine.
'Besides, we are confident that the United States, especially Trump, also wants to see this Israeli brutality brought to an end,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Putin suggested Moscow for Zelensky summit
Geneva was also suggested as a venue, with Switzerland offering Vladimir Putin immunity for Ukraine peace talks despite ICC charges. (AFP pic) KYIV : Vladimir Putin proposed holding a peace summit with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky in Moscow, according to three sources familiar with a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Russia's leader. The discussion between Trump and Putin came during high-stakes talks in Washington between Trump, Zelensky and several European leaders that back Ukraine in its fighting against Russia's invasion. 'Putin mentioned Moscow' during their call on Monday, one of the sources told AFP, adding that Zelensky had said 'no' in response. A diplomatic source close to the discussions said that European leaders had told Trump that Putin's proposal 'did not seem like a good idea.' After the summit in the White House on Monday that included the German, French, Finnish, Italian and UK leaders, Trump said a next step to stopping the fighting, now in its fourth year, would be a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelensky. The Ukrainian leader has said repeatedly in recent weeks that he is prepared to sit down with Putin to end the Russian invasion, which has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. Putin told Trump during the call on Monday that he was open to the 'idea' of direct talks with Ukraine, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said, according to state media. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said Tuesday that any meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents would have to be prepared 'very thoroughly.' Switzerland, meanwhile, had said earlier that it would grant Putin immunity if he came to the country for talks on peace in Ukraine, despite the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant. Trump met with Putin last week in the northern US state of Alaska, ending a years-long Western policy of isolating Putin. The US leader walked away from the meeting without any guarantees of peace from the Russian president.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Explainer-Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama. (Reporting by Jack Queen, editing by Ross Colvin and Rosalba O'Brien)
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump
Members of the National Guard patrol after U.S. President Donald Trump deployed the force and ordered an increased presence of federal law enforcement to assist in crime prevention, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno (Reuters) -Hundreds of additional National Guard troops are headed to Washington, D.C., from half a dozen Republican-led states, bolstering President Donald Trump's aggressive move to flood the city with soldiers and federal agents in what he says is an effort to fight violent crime. The Republican governors of Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee agreed to deploy troops to Washington, days after the Republican governors of West Virginia, South Carolina, and Ohio also did so at the Trump administration's request. Trump has characterized Washington as overrun with violence and homelessness, a description local officials have rejected. Federal and city statistics show violent crime rates have dropped sharply since a spike in 2023, though the city's murder rate remains higher than most other big U.S. cities. Trump announced on August 11 he had ordered 800 Guard troops to the city and temporarily taken control of the city's police department, an extraordinary exercise of presidential power over the U.S. capital. The federal government also dispatched agents from numerous agencies, including the FBI, to patrol the city's streets. Following a legal challenge filed by the city's attorney general, the administration negotiated a deal with Mayor Muriel Bowser to keep Police Chief Pamela Smith in charge of the department's operations. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry said he had approved the deployment of about 135 Guard soldiers to Washington, while Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves said he had ordered 200 soldiers to the capital. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has also deployed 160 Guard troops to the city, according to local media reports. "Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it," Reeves said in a statement. In total, the six Republican states have announced deployments of more than 1,100 Guard troops to Washington. TESTING LIMITS Guard soldiers, most of whom have civilian jobs and serve part-time, often respond to natural disasters and other emergencies. While the National Guard in Washington reports to the president, governors typically control the Guard in their own states. Trump tested that authority in June, when he ordered thousands of National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles as protests over his administration's immigration raids flared up. The deployment came despite opposition from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. A federal judge in San Francisco is weighing whether Trump's actions in Los Angeles were illegal, after California sued the administration. Federal law generally forbids the use of the military in law enforcement, but there are exceptions, including for National Guard troops that are under state command, such as California's. In 2020, during Trump's first administration, the White House requested Guard troops from numerous states to help restore order in Washington in the wake of racial justice protests. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr said the National Guard remained under state command and was used to protect federal buildings and personnel. Even so, Barr said their duties would include controlling crowds, temporarily detaining people, and conducting "cursory" searches, activities usually associated with police. Critics said the 2020 experience in Washington potentially opened the way for the president to use armed troops against civilians. Trump has suggested he could target additional Democrat-led cities, though he would likely face more legal obstacles than in Washington, where the federal government still has broad oversight under the law. A White House official said on Tuesday that Guard troops in Washington may carry arms but were not making arrests. Instead, the soldiers are protecting federal property and providing "a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests." Some 465 arrests have been made in the 12 days since the Trump administration's operations began, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Tuesday, an average of 39 arrests a day. The city's Metropolitan Police Department arrested an average of 61 adults and juveniles per day in 2024, according to city statistics. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; Additional reporting by Tom Hals; Editing by Frank McGurty and Rod Nickel)
