I'm a sleep reporter, and these are the budget sheet sets I recommend for dorms: Save up to 57% off on Prime Day
Since it's almost college move-in season, I've been on the hunt for deals on budget sheets for Business Insider readers. When moving into a dorm, you definitely want a set of sheets that are soft and comfortable. Realistically, though, you probably won't be sleeping on a twin XL mattress forever, so you don't need to invest in a super expensive sheet set.
Thankfully, there are two excellent deals on cheap sheets that we love: the Mellanni Iconic Sheet Set and Target Threshold Performance Sheet Set. The Mellanni sheets are up to 53% off for Prime Day, whereas the Threshold sheets are discounted as part of the 40% savings on bedding during the Target Circle Week sale.
For more great deals, check out our Amazon Prime Day hub and our best finds at competing summer sales.
Mellanni sheets are great for hot sleepers. The Mellanni sheet set is the budget pick in our best cooling sheets for hot sleepers guide. While they aren't cool to the touch, they do an excellent job of pulling heat away from the body to fight off night sweats from overheating. I actually bought these sheets for my sister to use in her dorm, since she's a hot sleeper, too.
Threshold's sheets are ridiculously soft. After hearing my colleagues rave about these sheets in our best bed sheets guide, I recently picked up a set for my sofa bed (because, no, my closets of sheets did not include a set for a full bed). The sheets were silky soft after I unboxed them, but got even softer after a wash cycle. I was almost jealous that my friend got to sleep under them when she visited me this summer.
Both sets are available in a variety of colors and patterns. I'm a huge fan of patterned sheets and fun, vibrant colors. Both of these sheet sets come in an array of colors and patterns, so there's a set for everyone. I picked up the Mellanni Oxford Stripe in Hazy Lilac for my sister's dorm room to match Kansas State University's purple and white theme, and I grabbed the Tulip Toss pattern Threshold sheets for a whimsical addition to my sofa bed. If you're more of a neutrals person, there are plenty of options for you, too.
Shopping for more discounts today? Check out our roundup of all of the best Prime Day deals, or browse Amazon's website for the full selection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Bull Market for Economists Is Over. It's an Ominous Sign for the Economy.
The moment it dawned on Thomas Fullagar that his job search was not going well came in April, about six months into the process, when he applied for a position in Manhattan, Kan. The job, at a technology company called CivicPlus, involved relatively straightforward data analysis that he wouldn't strain to do. In fact, he had done much more complicated work while completing his Ph.D. in economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Further improving his odds, he had grown up in Manhattan, the home of Kansas State University, and his mother knew someone at the company, who helped fast-track his application. Yet despite his connections and credentials, he did not get the job. He didn't even get a second interview. 'It was in Manhattan, Kansas — who the heck is applying for this?' Dr. Fullagar, 33, wondered. 'That one was really baffling.' For decades, earning a Ph.D. in economics has been a nearly foolproof path to a lucrative career. Even as bearers of advanced degrees in history, English or anthropology struggled to find gainful employment, the popularity of economics as an undergraduate major created plenty of tenure-track teaching positions, while government agencies snatched up Ph.D. economists in bulk. Those looking for even larger paychecks could turn to tech companies, Wall Street and consulting firms, which bid up the price of economists as if they were a bespoke cryptocurrency. Last year, the average base salary for newly hired economics professors at major research universities was more than $150,000, according to the American Economic Association, and their compensation swelled to about $200,000 once bonuses and summer teaching were included. As recently as the 2023-24 academic year, the employment rate for Ph.D. economists within a few months of graduation was 100 percent, said John Cawley, the chair of the association's Committee on the Job Market, citing the group's surveys. Job satisfaction topped 85 percent. Those glory days seem to be ending. Universities and nonprofits have scaled back hiring amid declining state budgets and federal funding cuts. At the same time, the Trump administration has laid off government economists and frozen hiring for new ones. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fast Company
37 minutes ago
- Fast Company
What content strategy looks like in the age of AI
There's an air of panic in the media world. The specter of AI has been looming large for a couple of years now, but the threat now appears to be solidifying. Publishers are reporting that search traffic is in free fall, and there's overwhelming evidence that AI chatbots give very little in terms of referrals. What to do about 'Google Zero' has gone from a theoretical destination to a reality that the media world must contend with. Of course, panicking is never a good strategy. But pivoting can be, and there's been no shortage of that lately. Both Wired and The Verge announced this week a stronger push into newsletters, one of the more reliable ways to connect directly with readers. When Business Insider recently announced layoffs, it also said it would invest in live events. And even publishers that already charge for subscriptions are doubling down on them: Newsweek will launch new types for both consumers and businesses, and The Guardian now has a new, cheaper tier for readers who want to opt out of personalized ads. While AI may be the impetus behind a lot of these changes, they're all directionally pushing toward building direct relationships with audience members. That is smart, but at a more basic level, they're appealing to human desires that go beyond just getting information—a task AI fulfills very effectively. Offerings like newsletters, memberships, and events give a sense of belonging, encourage reading habits through consistency, and emphasize voice—either that of the brand or the individual writer. Within all this is the beginnings of a post-Google content strategy for media. But really, it's only half a strategy because it only accounts for humans. Much of internet activity in the future will be the result of bots, whether they're hoovering up data to inform AI models or acting as agents on behalf of individual users. Data from TollBit indicates bot crawling is already comparable to what the big (non-AI) search engines do—when everyone has their own AI agent, I would wager it will be the majority. Any forward-looking content strategy needs to take into account both humans and machines. The new organic audience Let's start with the people. A few months ago, I hosted a webinar on the types of content that are most resilient to AI summarization. AI does a great job of summarizing news, but it struggles with voice and unique perspectives. The consequence: If you want good opinion and analysis, you'll need to click through. Visual and interactive content is poorly conveyed by AI. And because AI is well known to hallucinate sometimes, anything that might inform a crucial decision for a reader—like context for health, legal, or financial decisions—will likely motivate readers to check the original source. Certainly, memberships and subscriptions are important mechanisms to build a loyal audience, but they also need to be centered around something readers can't get anywhere else. That usually means narrowing the lens of focus rather than widening it. Niche subjects—even within a more general brand—will typically see higher engagement and more loyalty than general ones. Then there's the stickiness of interactivity. One thing that emerging media platforms like Substack and TikTok do well is encouraging direct conversation between content creators and audience members. But being interactive doesn't always have to be so hands-on: Semi-automated features like polls, quizzes, and games are all effective habit-builders—and cannot be substituted by AI. Rise of the machines If you think about it, there's a kind of a 'well, duh' quality to all the reports that confirm people don't click through to sources when they use AI. (Pew Research just put out another, by the way.) That's because removing the need to click is largely the point. Why go and read a whole bunch of articles when bots can do it for you? But that reveals the other side of the coin: Bots are now doing the searching and the clicking, and that activity is traceable, measurable, and potentially monetizable. In other words, the inevitable rise in bot traffic represents both an unprecedented threat and a massive opportunity. First, there's the obvious idea of charging bots to scrape your site. Putting in paywalled endpoints—where AI bot operators pay a small fee to access content—may work, especially now that Cloudflare is leading the charge in empowering website owners to block bots. However, it greatly depends on the scrapers acting in good faith—and even if they do, it's doubtful if the fee per scrape that publishers charge would ever be enough to build a sustainable business. What could help is winning the next SEO war: AIEO, or artificial intelligence engine optimization. Being one of the primary sources in an AI Overview or a ChatGPT answer might not seem like much of a prize, given the low click-through rates. But if you pair it with both a pay-per-crawl mechanism and a content strategy that focuses on the AI-resilient content types discussed earlier—the ones that have a higher chance of audiences seeking them out—the benefits could end up being more than mere bragging rights. This kind of AI-first content strategy does require a more sophisticated approach. You'd have to make use of the full search and AI toolbox, including things like Google snippets to ensure AI crawlers highlight the most enticing parts of your content without giving the store away, and MCP servers that can ensure bots have direct access to the content you green-light for them. While that can be technically cumbersome, the market is already adapting, with AIEO specialists like Scrunch AI offering one-stop-shop packages that essentially make a bot-friendly copy of your website so that crawlers can feast while humans enjoy your regular site. Smaller, better . . . robot-ier? The truth about the future of media is that the audience, the human audience, will be smaller for pretty much everyone. As more people get their information from AI portals, publishers will need to make the most of the few people who come directly to them. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. Going small can ultimately be part of a healthier brand of journalism, as I argued in my very first column. But the parallel trend is that the bot audience is rising fast, and it undoubtedly will be a dominant force in the way information is distributed. Harnessing that force will be essential for the media. And though there are still a lot of unknowns—the best practices, the legal framework, even the potential rewards—at least it's easy to see what not to do: wait.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Robotaxi to Launch in San Francisco: Reports
Tesla plans to begin robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, according to reports from Business Insider. Bloomberg's Max Chafkin discusses why Tesla's plans fall short of other robotaxi rivals operating in the city. He joins Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on "Bloomberg Tech." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
