
Why the Federico Chiesa chant is making some Liverpool fans very uncomfortable
Federico, he's here to win.
One chat with Arne Slot and he said 'ciao',
F*** off Juve, I'm a Kopite now…'
Not every thought that spills onto a footballer's social media page comes from a real place, but when Federico Chiesa left Juventus for Liverpool last summer, there was a genuine sense of warmth for at least some of the people he was leaving behind.
Advertisement
He began by thanking fans for 'supporting me in good and the difficult times, and for that I will always be grateful'. Over the previous four years, he had worked with players and coaches 'at the highest level', comparing them to 'family', especially when he struggled. 'You have helped me stand,' he wrote. 'I will always carry with me the joyful memories we shared.'
Chiesa might have had an issue with the club's executives. He did not mention owners or directors directly, but felt the need to address rumours he had requested amendments to his contract, saying he had been 'informed that I would not be part of the project', which left no option but to move on.
The statement is a long way from him telling Italy's most successful club to 'f*** off', as suggested in the song Liverpool fans sing in his honour to the tune of Dean Martin's 'Sway'. Similarly, there is no sense of anyone 'crying in Turin'.
Even so, the Chiesa chant has become a staple of the Anfield songbook. It debuted last season but has become increasingly popular over the intervening months, reaching a zenith last Friday when Chiesa enjoyed his best moment yet in a Liverpool shirt by scoring a crucial goal against Bournemouth.
Very few football chants are meant to be taken literally — Mohamed Salah is a wonderful footballer, but, just for the record, he is not actually an 'Egyptian king' — yet it is hard not to take a chant seriously if it has been crafted without care.
A player signed from any other club could have had a similar song bellowed out in his honour and it would have been fine. But not someone from Juventus, and for very good reason.
May marked the 40th anniversary of the Heysel disaster, when 39 mainly Juventus fans lost their lives at the 1985 European Cup final in Brussels after being crushed by a collapsed wall. One of the main factors in those deaths was a charge by Liverpool supporters from a neighbouring section of a crumbling venue, which investigators subsequently deemed unfit to host a match of such magnitude.
Advertisement
Many in Italy have never forgiven Liverpool for what happened in Belgium that day, and feelings in Turin remain especially raw. There have been efforts from both clubs to improve relations, but the fact Liverpool have not faced Juventus in a competitive fixture in more than 20 years means there have been precious few opportunities to build bridges.
On the most recent occasion, a Champions League quarter-final first leg in 2005, travelling Juventus fans responded to a display on the Kop that spelt out 'friendship' in Italian by turning their backs.
It is not difficult to imagine how Juventus fans may feel on hearing the Chiesa chant. For them, the image of 'crying in Turin' being invoked by fans of the club indelibly associated with the most dreadful event in its history will cut deep.
Liverpool fans know how hurtful crass chants can be. They are routinely subjected to 'victim' taunts by rival supporters, which, while not mentioning the Hillsborough tragedy explicitly, helped create an environment where the authorities who failed so terribly in 1989 were not subjected to the kind of public pressure and legal scrutiny that could have ultimately made every person in Britain safer.
When I hear those 'victim' chants, my heart sinks and I despair at how mindless people can be. But the Chiesa chant also makes me feel deeply uncomfortable.
Many Liverpool supporters insist the Chiesa song has nothing to do with Heysel, and it is surely true that those who created it did not do so in an attempt to goad Juventus over what happened in 1985. Yet nobody has offered up a reasonable explanation for the lyrics being so aggressive, beyond them imbuing the chant with a visceral energy.
Chiesa has emerged as a bit of a cult character at Liverpool. Though he has barely featured, he is likable. He always seems to be smiling and given his minimal impact during a title-winning season, he gave the whiff of a competition winner as he paraded the Premier League trophy around Anfield in May.
His song was sung loudly that day on the concourses of the stadium before it made its way into the stands, almost like a victory chant. Given Liverpool's reduced attacking options presently, there is hope he can do better. At Wembley during the Community Shield, it was one of the loudest songs in the Liverpool end. When he scored the winner against Bournemouth, Anfield erupted, but he had already been serenaded before his strike in the closing minutes. Over the weekend, respected Liverpool fan sites were pushing it on their platforms.
Advertisement
Chiesa, for his part, says he is 'really grateful for the song they are singing', but that does not necessarily mean he knows about its potential implications.
When the journalist and Walk On podcast presenter Tony Evans — who was at that European Cup final in 1985 — wrote critically about the chant yesterday, the pushback online was significant. It seemed typical of a generational divide on the issue among Liverpool fans, between those who lived through Heysel and its immediate legacy and those who didn't.
As the years pass, details are forgotten. In recent times, I feel partly responsible for this. Before the 40th anniversary in May, The Athletic was due to publish a series of articles detailing what happened in Brussels and the impact on both clubs. Shortly before they were due to appear, a car ploughed into a crowd of fans at Liverpool's title parade, leading to the hospitalisation of more than 100 people. Without knowing the condition of the injured, and with emotions so heightened, it felt insensitive to be pushing death in front of readers.
I understand if some think this was the wrong decision. Three months on, I am not sure whether it was the right call, but I would like to revisit the subject this year. It is clear to me that fading memories of Heysel help explain why the Chiesa chant has taken hold without people questioning it, while also offering mitigation when it is suggested it might be malicious.
Whatever the context, it has already given Juventus fans the chance to say it is a battle cry against them. Anti-Juventus songs have never previously featured among the Liverpool fanbase, but now there is one, with the chant being spread via social media.
It is easy to find clips shared by Sky Italia and others, and the replies from Juventus fans saying Liverpool have no shame and their fans are drunken hooligans or animals.
So far, there have not been any newspaper articles on the subject, either in England or Italy, but if Chiesa starts delivering regularly and earns a recall to his national side, it is imaginable that reporters will want to know what has boosted his confidence. The song will almost certainly be subjected to scrutiny.
Advertisement
My concern relates to what this means for the present. The Champions League draw is made next week and I, for one, am hoping that Liverpool avoid Juventus or, indeed, any Italian opponent. Liverpool fans have had well-documented issues against Napoli and Roma in recent years, and there has to be a risk that the Chiesa chant, however it was intended, could effectively serve as a call to arms for hooligan elements who need little encouragement in targeting visitors from Merseyside.
It's a shame because, but for one unnecessary line, it's a great song. Supporters do not like being told what to do or having fun defined for them, certainly not by the club they support or by journalists. Yet it would not take much to amend 'f*** off' with something such as 'later, Juve', or even 'arriverdverci'.
I'm sure there's someone out there with a more creative mind than me who can play with the bit about 'crying in Turin'. It would be a small gesture, but one that would go a long way.
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Play today's puzzle
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commanders sign veteran offensive tackle
The Washington Commanders added more offensive line depth on Tuesday, signing veteran offensive tackle George Fant. NFL insider Jordan Schultz had the news first, which the team later confirmed. Fant, 33, recently worked out for the Commanders. The Commanders fell to 0-2 in the preseason after Monday night's 31-17 loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. While several of Washington's starters did not play, star quarterback Jayden Daniels was among those who played, and he quickly led the Commanders on a four-play, 74-yard drive that ended with a 14-yard touchdown from Daniels. Daniels did not play another snap. Washington's projected offensive tackles are Laremy Tunsil and rookie Josh Conerly Jr. Veteran Andrew Wylie, who is competing with Conerly, started at left tackle for Washington on Monday and played well. In addition to playing tackle, Wylie can also play both guard spots. Fant is a nine-year veteran who has played in 101 career games with 75 starts. Fant spent his first four seasons with the Seattle Seahawks, then three with the New York Jets, one year with the Houston Texans, before returning to Seattle in 2024. He will likely compete with Trent Scott, Bobby Hart, Tyre Phillips and Foster Sarell for one spot. Fant would give Washington an experienced tackle should Tunsil, Conerly, or Wylie go down. This article originally appeared on Commanders Wire: Commanders add OL depth, sign veteran George Fant
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Packers LB Ty'Ron Hopper showing 'ton of improvement' to start Year 2
Among the most improved players at Green Bay Packers training camp in 2025 is second-year linebacker Ty'Ron Hopper, who is more comfortable in the defense and better showcasing his athleticism and physicality at linebacker and on special teams this summer. "Hop's done a really nice job," coach Matt LaFleur said Tuesday. "He's shown a ton of improvement really in every facet of his game, on defense, on we-fense (what the Packers call special teams). Certainly, we always knew he was going to be a physical presence, you could see that going back to his college tape. He's got a better understanding of what is required of him for that position, he's got a great understanding of our defense and he's gone out there and put together a lot of solid performances." Hopper, a third-round pick in 2024, has played 74 preseason snaps and is the team's second-highest graded defensive player at Pro Football Focus. Through two games, Hooper has 10 total tackles, zero missed tackles and a team-high four "stops," or a tackle creating an offensive failure, and he's allowed only one catch in coverage. Among all NFL linebackers with at least 60 snaps played this preseason, Hopper's PFF grade of 86.0 ranks third overall. His 13 special teams snaps have included only four snaps covering punts or kicks, so the opportunities to make impact plays for the third phase have been limited. Against the Colts, Hopper made a standout play when he beat a block at the line of scrimmage and chased down the running back for a loss. Hopper was in on three stops against the run in the preseason opener. The Packers have Quay Walker, Edgerrin Cooper and Isaiah McDuffie locked in as the top three linebackers in Jeff Hafley's 4-3 base defense, but Hopper has made a strong case for being the No. 4 option despite the addition of veteran Isaiah Simmons, who has struggled in preseason games. As a rookie, Hopper played only 18 snaps on defense across three games. Like most young players, he needed a development year, and he's now beginning the jump as a second-year player. This article originally appeared on Packers Wire: Packers LB Ty'Ron Hopper showing 'ton of improvement' to start Year 2
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marseille puts Rabiot and Rowe on transfer list for reported locker room fight
MARSEILLE, France (AP) — Marseille's season is already in turmoil after France midfielder Adrien Rabiot and England Under-21 forward Jonathan Rowe were put on the transfer list Tuesday and told to leave the club for 'unacceptable behavior.' The pair reportedly argued and fought in the locker room after Friday's 1-0 loss to Rennes, which prevailed with a stoppage-time goal despite being down to 10 players in their Ligue 1 season opener. Marseille's move puts doubt into team-building plans for coach Roberto De Zerbi just one week before the 1993 Champions League winner takes part in the draw for this season's competition. 'This decision was taken due to unacceptable behavior in the dressing room after the match against Rennes,' Marseille said in a statement. Rabiot and Rowe have been exiled 'in agreement with the technical staff and in accordance with the club's internal code of conduct,' said the club whose majority owner is American businessman Frank McCourt, the former Los Angeles Dodgers owner. Marseille qualified for the Champions League by finishing runner-up to Paris Saint-Germain in Ligue 1 in De Zerbi's first season at the club. The 30-year-old joined as a free agent last September after his contract expired at Juventus. Weeks earlier, Rowe had moved from English second-tier Norwich on an initial loan deal that was made permanent before this season. The transfer window in Europe closes Sept. 1. ___ AP soccer: