
Powell defends $2.5 billion Fed renovation in a point-by-point response to the Trump administration
Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, suggested in a social media post last week that Powell had broken the law by failing to comply with government oversight regulations related to the Fed's ongoing $2.5 billion renovation, which includes the historic marble Marriner S. Eccles Building on the National Mall.
'The President is extremely troubled by your management of the Federal Reserve System,' Vought wrote in the letter he posted to social media last Thursday. 'Instead of attempting to right the Fed's fiscal ship, you have plowed ahead with an ostentatious overhaul of your Washington D.C. headquarters.'
He gave Powell 'seven business days' to respond to the July 10 letter.
Powell said in his response late Thursday that the renovation and its financing have always had careful oversight from the central bank's board and its own watchdog. He added that the Fed is 'not generally subject to the direction' of the National Capital Planning Commission, a body that oversees construction projects for the federal government. Powell said the Fed voluntarily opted to collaborate with the NCPC.
'We have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen since it was first approved by the Board in 2017,' Powell wrote.
Additionally, Powell said upgrades that were reflected in official planning documents submitted to the NCPC in 2021 were later taken out, but the Fed didn't need to resubmit paperwork because they weren't 'substantial.'
The changes were instead 'intended to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases,' Powell wrote. 'The Board does not regard any of these changes as warranting further review.'
In his letter, Powell noted that both buildings needed 'significant structural repairs and other updates… including the removal of asbestos and lead contamination, complete replacement of antiquated systems such as electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, as well as fire detection and -2- suppression systems.'
The letter is similar to a FAQ posted on the Fed's website last week.
Vought is one of several officials in the Trump administration to criticize the rising costs of repair and renovation work on two major buildings in the Fed complex, seemingly as a pretext to justify firing the Fed chair.
Powell, who cannot be removed except 'for cause,' presides over the Fed's monetary policy committee that has been holding interest rates at current levels all year, contrary to President Donald Trump's wishes for lower borrowing costs.
'When you spend $2.5 billion on, really, a renovation, I think it's really disgraceful,' Trump told reporters this week, adding that he believes it is 'sort of' a fireable offense. He clarified on Wednesday morning that it was 'highly unlikely' that he would fire Powell — 'unless he has to leave for fraud.'
Last month, Powell was asked about the central bank's renovation plans during his biannual testimony before Congress and pushed back on the assertion that he has overlooked the project's steep price tag to indulge in upscale design features.
'There's no VPI [sic] dining room. There's no new marble. We took down the old marble while putting it back up,' Powell said. 'There are no new water features. There's no beehives and there's no roof terrace gardens.'
Vought's July 10 letter accused Powell of lying in his testimony. In his response Thursday, Powell clarified that some features, including new water features, had been eliminated in the years since the initial design proposal.
'These changes were intended to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases,' Powell wrote.
He clarified that while there are no 'roof terrace gardens,' a parking lot is being constructed under the building, meaning the ground-level front lawn will serve as a 'roof' for the parking structure. Marble sourced from Georgia would be used in places where the original marble structure was damaged, he said.
Still, the project's cost has increased compared to earlier plans, which estimated it would cost $1.9 billion.
A 2023 Fed budget document attributed some of the additional cost to 'significant increases in raw materials… higher labor costs, and changes in construction schedule expectations which lengthen use of leased space.'
The Fed has previously said materials and equipment for the project have been sourced from 32 states and Washington, D.C.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump files libel lawsuit over Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Epstein 'birthday card' claim
Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch, two Wall Street Journal reporters and the publication's owner, News Corp. The US president has raised claims under federal libel law, court records show. The case was filed in Miami. earlier claimed a letter he allegedly wrote to paedophile was "fake" and the "ass off" Rupert Murdoch, who owns the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). The publication had said Mr Trump wrote the letter as part of a collection Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, planned to give him as a 50th birthday present in 2003. It claimed the message allegedly from Mr Trump featured several lines of typewritten text, concluding with: "May every day be another wonderful secret." The text was framed by what appeared to be a hand-drawn outline of a naked woman, the WSJ claimed. The letter is also said to have featured the signature "Donald". Mr Trump immediately denied writing the letter when the WSJ report was published on Thursday night. "The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein," he wrote on Truth Social. "These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper." Mr Trump ignored questions about Epstein as he signed a cryptocurrency bill at the White House earlier on Friday. The president's lawsuit comes as the US government filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein, who took his own life while awaiting trial in 2019. In a Manhattan federal court filing, the Department of Justice said the criminal cases against Epstein and Maxwell are a matter of public interest, justifying the release of associated grand jury transcripts. Earlier on Friday, Mr Trump said attorney general Pam Bondi had been asked to release the transcripts because of "the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein". The justice department previously said it had around 200 documents relating to Epstein and that the FBI had thousands more. It is unknown how much of this is grand jury testimony - which is typically kept secret under US law. Read more: The president has faced increased scrutiny over his alleged friendship with Epstein since his administration's U-turn on the so-called 'Epstein files'. While running for his second White House term, Mr Trump fuelled the idea there was a "client list" of powerful people had threatened to blackmail and vowed to unseal documents relating to Epstein if he returned to the Oval Office. But after a review of evidence the US government is in possession of, the Justice Department recently determined that no "further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted". This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
United's Cost Discipline Shines as UBS Boosts Estimates
Thomas Wadewitz at UBS saw United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAL) cautious EPS guide as a green flag for Newark's recovery and rising corporate travel, so he boosted his price target to $114 and tweaked EPS forecasts. He now pegs Q4 EPS at $2.90 and FY 26 at $14.25, reflecting tight cost discipline. United held unit costs excluding fuel to just 2.2% growth even after front?loading flight attendant signing bonuses. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with UAL. That efficiency stemmed from strong network operations as capacity climbs five to six percent. United expects unit costs ex fuel to stay near 2.5% in the second half as demand picks up. All eyes are on next week's results from Delta, American, Southwest and JetBlue. How United balances improving demand with cost control will decide if UBS's bullish outlook holds. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Use Crypto To Purchase a Home? 4 Methods and Their Risks
If you're a fan of crypto, perhaps you've been thinking about the various ways to incorporate it into your financial life. Perhaps you've seen headlines claiming crypto mortgages are on the rise as the new way to buy some homes. Learn More: Read Next: However, before you set out to grab your next house with crypto, there are some precautions to keep in mind. Here's what financial experts told GOBankingRates about certain methods and their risks when using crypto to purchase a home. Convert-To-Cash Method Andrew Lokenauth, a money expert from Be Fluent in Finance, said the most straightforward method he's used with clients is converting crypto to cash first. 'I just helped a client last March sell $600,000 in bitcoin for their dream house in the suburbs,' he said. 'The thing is, most sellers still want good old-fashioned dollars, and this approach causes the least headaches with lenders.' Trending Now: Crypto-Backed Loans 'Let me tell you about a client who tried using a crypto-backed loan,' Lokenauth said. 'The market tanked right before closing, and they got hit with a massive margin call — lost about $75,000 in collateral. Not fun explaining that one to their partner.' Smart-Contract Escrows You may also want to take a look at escrow and mortgage opportunities that use crypto in the purchase of a home, but may offer some risk protection. 'It's possible to leverage your crypto for real estate purchases by using smart-contract escrows or stablecoin-pegged mortgages, which automate payments and reduce counterparty risk,' according to Chad Willardson, founder and president of Pacific Capital and City Treasurer of Corona, California. 'Tokenized property platforms allow fractional ownership, softening volatility by spreading exposure across multiple investors.' However, per Willardson, crypto's price swings remain a major risk — buyers should hedge with stablecoins or convert to fiat at closing. Blended Financing According to Willardson, regulatory ambiguity can slow or derail transactions, so work with title companies experienced in digital assets. 'As an alternative, consider blended financing: part traditional mortgage and part crypto loan to balance innovation with stability,' Willardson said. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on Should You Use Crypto To Purchase a Home? 4 Methods and Their Risks