
Contra Guys: Beyond Meat is still beyond investable
Three years ago, I took a look at Beyond Meat BYND-Q, the industry leader that made headlines for its meat-free burgers and helped kick off a plant-based frenzy. Back then, the ticker was trading around US$23, down roughly 90 per cent from its all-time high of US$240. As a contrarian investor interested in turnarounds, the name had caught my eye, but I quickly found it was not for me.
What had gone wrong? In a nutshell, investors had overpaid. After Beyond Meat's initial public offering in 2019, the stock was full of hype and hope. The venture was going to revolutionize the way people eat, disrupt the food industry and slash the environmental impact associated with meat-heavy diets. This story drove shares to astonishing highs, and the market appeared to believe nothing could derail the company.
Unfortunately, between 2019 and 2022, the corporation went off the tracks. The hype evaporated, dilution undercut existing owners, and debt piled up. Top-line growth, new product launches and partnerships with the likes of McDonald's were not enough to offset the massive bottom-line losses. Then, following the pandemic, supply chain issues and inflation cut into the business while rising interest rates took the possibility of more cheap debt off the table. Analysts started to focus on Beyond Meat's growing competition, slowing sales and margin compression.
All told, three years ago the situation did not look good for Beyond Meat. Though the shares were well off their all-time highs and some argued it was a well-priced turnaround candidate, from our vantage, it was crying 'value trap' as its growth prospects waned and its balance sheet weakened.
Has the situation improved since 2022?
No. Unfortunately, it is worse. The stock has dropped another 90 per cent since May 2022. Operating performance has sagged and financial performance has been terrible.
While the global consumption of plant-based meat substitutes has nearly tripled since 2018 according to Statista, growth has slowed in recent years, and the product category has not lived up to its lofty expectations. Competition is a major reason for this. The organization's market share has slipped from around 13 per cent in 2021 to 11 per cent in 2024, a report from Imarc Group said.
Not only has competition hurt BYND, but its prices are high versus both traditional vegetarian and meat products. Even if plant-based meat substitutes were cost-competitive, it is likely certain consumer segments would still prefer a real meat product or a traditional vegetarian product over the plant-based alternatives that try to mimic meat.
As for the financial statements, the company's top line fell from US$464.7-million in 2021 to US$326.5-million in 2024, and this trend has persisted into 2025. The bottom line rang in at a loss of US$160.3-million in 2024. Beyond Meat has yet to produce an annualized operating income this decade, and is burning cash like there is no tomorrow.
All this cash flow and income statement pressure has battered its already bludgeoned balance sheet. Cash on hand dropped from US$733.3-million in 2021 to US$102.1-million in the latest quarter, accounts payable exceeded accounts receivable, and total assets have fallen by more than half. Though the asset side of the balance sheet has contracted, the liabilities have not, and the debt load is basically unchanged – currently, US$1.1-billion. These trends have turned Beyond Meat into a negative-equity enterprise.
The debt load deserves a bit of attention here, and a dive into the numbers is worthwhile. On the one hand, most of the debt is in a convertible senior note due in March 2027. This means BYND has roughly two years before it faces a debt maturity cliff. The debt was also issued in 2021 when rates were low. This means the interest rate on the debt rang in at a rather unbelievable 0.34 per cent last quarter.
This low interest rate represents a double-edged sword, however. If the company can successfully turn over its debt before maturity in 2027, it is likely the interest rate will go up significantly. A recently announced US$100-million financing agreement with another lender, for example, has a 12-per-cent interest rate. If Beyond Meat's existing debt pile is refinanced anywhere close to this rate, the enterprise will be in deep trouble.
Contra Guys: How could Warren Buffett's successor set himself apart? Dividends
Contra Guys: Here's our playbook for navigating extreme market volatility
In addition to the balance-sheet weakness, the company is facing a variety of headwinds. In the latest quarter, volumes tumbled 11.2 per cent, and brand visibility appears to be waning. The CEO noted some grocery store chains are moving their products from high-visibility refrigerated aisles to less-visible frozen aisles. The company is also locked in an arbitration process with a former co-manufacturer, which is racking up expensive legal fees. These factors, plus global tariff uncertainty and decreasing volumes, forced the executive team to suspend activities in China and withdraw its outlook for the current year.
From this vantage point, BYND still looks like a classic value trap and illustrates how hard it can be to execute a corporate turnaround. The shares look cheap, especially versus where they have traded historically, but the business is in decline, is losing a lot of money, and has a huge debt load.
It is possible someone will swoop in and buy the business, but it is more likely the C-suite will issue a going concern warning, announce it is entering bankruptcy or dilute its owners into oblivion. Three years later, Beyond Meat continues to look beyond investable.
Philip MacKellar is the general manager at Contra the Heard Investment Newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Chewy Stock Was Diving This Week
A badly received quarterly earnings report was the major news item exerting gravity on Chewy (NYSE: CHWY) stock over the past few days. As a result, according to data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, the company's share price had slumped by almost 15% week-to-date as of Thursday evening. Investors didn't like the latest milk bone That sell-off happened even though Chewy actually topped analyst estimates for revenue and profitability, albeit not by vast amounts. In its first quarter, the company managed to grow its net sales by more than 8% year over year to $3.1 billion, while its non- GAAP (adjusted) net income improved at a slightly higher rate to just under $149 million ($0.35 per share). Analysts had collectively been modeling a bit below $3.1 billion on the top line and $0.32 per share for adjusted profitability. While those aren't bad numbers at first glance, Chewy is an expensive stock to own; even after the post-earnings sell-off it was trading at a rich forward P/E of almost 36. For more than a few investors, that's awfully pricey for a company posting single-digit percentage improvements, and at thin profit margins to boot. Tepid reactions Meanwhile, as analysts tracking a stock often do, several pundits following Chewy adjusted their takes on the stock. Most of these adjusters raised their price targets, but there were several less bullish updates, too. One was published by Mizuho 's David Bellinger, who now feels Chewy is worth $44 per share, down from his previous $47. He maintained his neutral recommendation on the stock. It's hard to ignore how pricey this stock is at the moment, and to some degree that's a shame. Chewy has been posting good results from its Autoship program lately, a feature that still has plenty of potential to boost valuable recurring revenue. I'm not necessarily hot on this stock, but there might be some upside to it if it can post more convincing quarterly earnings beats. Should you invest $1,000 in Chewy right now? Before you buy stock in Chewy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Chewy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025


Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Shares of D-Wave Quantum Are Sinking This Week
Since last Friday, shares of D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) fell nearly 15% as of the market close on Thursday. The stock also traded lower on Friday. While the quantum computing sector experienced some good news this week, D-Wave also announced an at-the-market (ATM) stock offering to potentially raise new capital. A potentially dilutive event D-Wave's ATM offering is with several brokerages and investment banks and will allow the company from time to time to conduct the "issuance and sale" of common stock for up to $400 million. The word issuance indicates that new shares could be offered to raise capital, which would be dilutive to existing shareholders. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission( SEC), D-Wave also said that cash balances on hand as of March 31 are enough "to fund the company to profitability." D-Wave plans to use any potential proceeds for general corporate purposes, including funding capital expenditures (capex), acquiring new companies, or expanding the business, as well as for general working capital purposes. The news is disappointing because it comes during a week when Nvidia 's CEO Jensen Huang praised quantum computing. "We are within reach of being able to apply quantum computing in areas that can solve some interesting problems in the coming years," he said. Few CEOs can move the market, but Huang is one of them, being one of the most influential people in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector. Other quantum computing stocks jumped this week. What a run it's been Shareholders never like to see dilutive capital raises, but with D-Wave trading at an extremely high valuation, this is often when management will try and bring in additional capital to fund growth. Either way, it's been an incredible run. D-Wave's stock is up 1,268% over the last year and currently trades at 191 times forward sales. While D-Wave appears to be making real progress toward eventually mass producing quantum computers, it's very difficult to buy stocks at these kinds of meteoric valuations. I wouldn't recommend anything more than a small, speculative position at this time. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025


CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Public service shrinks by nearly 10,000, with tax, immigration hit the hardest
Canada Revenue Agency national headquarters is shown in Ottawa on June 28, 2024. (Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press) OTTAWA — The federal public service shed almost 10,000 people last year, with the Canada Revenue Agency and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada losing the most employees. The last time the public service contracted was in 2015, when the number of people employed dropped just slightly from 257,138 to 257,034. The number of public servants employed by the federal government fell from 367,772 to 357,965 over the last year. The CRA lost 6,656 employees between 2024 and 2025, dropping from 59,155 to 52,499. The size of the Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada workforce fell from 13,092 to 11,148, a loss of 1,944 employees. The Public Health Agency of Canada lost 879 employees, Shared Services Canada dropped 608 employees, Health Canada lost 559 and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency lost 453. Some departments and agencies saw their workforces expand over the past year. The RCMP hired another 911 public servants, Elections Canada hired another 479, National Defence hired an extra 381 and Global Affairs Canada took on another 218. The data does not include employees on leave without pay, locals employed outside of Canada, RCMP regular force and civilian members, Canadian Armed Forces members, employees of the National Capital Commission and those who work for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Most of those who lost their jobs were 'term' employees — people hired for a limited period of time. Between 2024 and 2025, the public service lost almost 8,000 term employees. The government also dropped almost 3,000 casual employees — people who can't be employed by any one government department or agency for more than 90 days — and 1,750 students. The number of permanent federal public service employees increased by about 2,700 last year. More than three-quarters of the people who left the federal public service last year were under the age of 35. Of those who lost their jobs, 4,413 were between the ages of 25 and 29, another 3,354 were between the ages of 20 and 24, 563 were aged 30 to 34 and 246 were under 20. Lori Turnbull, a professor of political science at Dalhousie University, said it's not surprising that most of the positions eliminated were term positions — short-term positions that don't have to be renewed. 'These contract positions are often vehicles for entry into the public service,' Turnbull said. David McLaughlin, executive editor of Canadian Government Executive Media and former president and CEO of the Institute on Governance, said term employees and younger staffers are the easiest people for governments to cut. 'If you're paying people out, they don't require big packages, so they are the easiest, cheapest employees to let go,' he said. But by dropping younger employees whose careers are just beginning, he said, the government risks missing out on the kind of cultural change and innovation the public service badly needs. 'You run the longer-term risk by letting go younger people who may be dedicating their careers and to public service,' he said. 'You are simply reinforcing the older sub-performers that may exist in the public service. 'I would not recommend this as an approach to resolving public service spending.' The government spent $43.3 billion on public servants' salaries in 2023-24, according to the parliamentary budget officer. It spent a $65.3 billion on all employee compensation, including pensions, overtime and bonuses. PBO data also indicates that, in 2023, the average salary for a full-time public servant was $98,153. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat said it could not provide an average salary for public servants for 2024 or 2025. Public service employees have been braced for layoffs since the previous Liberal government launched efforts to refocus federal spending in 2023. In the 2024 budget, the previous government said it expected the public service population to decline by around 5,000 full-time positions over the subsequent four years. It also said that, starting on April 1, 2025, departments and agencies would be required to cover a portion of increased operating costs with existing resources. Prime Minister Mark Carney has vowed to cap, not cut, the federal public service, though his government has given little indication of what that might entail. The prime minister also has promised to launch a 'comprehensive' review of government spending with the aim of increasing its productivity. Hundreds of workers in the Canada Revenue Agency, Employment and Social Development Canada and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada have been laid off recently. Those organizations also saw their numbers increase during the pandemic years. Turnbull said that, with the pandemic over and immigration numbers being scaled down, the federal government sees this downsizing as 'logical.' McLaughlin, meanwhile, warned that downsizing only offers 'episodic savings' and wondered whether service delivery can keep up with demand. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press