
‘Era of uncontested US dominance over'
Speaking to graduates at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, Vance said that US leaders had assumed after the Cold War that 'American primacy' was assured. 'Nor did we believe any foreign nation could possibly rise to compete with the United States of America,' he stated.
Vance said that following the end of the Cold War, America enjoyed a mostly unchallenged command of the air, sea, space and cyberspace.
The vice president warned that the global landscape has shifted. 'The era of uncontested US dominance is over. Today we face serious threats in China, Russia, and other nations determined to beat us in every single domain – from spectrum, to lower Earth orbit, to our supply chains and even our communication infrastructure,' he said.
During the post-Cold War period, Washington began focusing on 'soft power' and 'meddling in foreign country affairs,' even when they had 'very little to do with core American interests,' Vance said, adding that the administration of President Donald Trump would be ending this 'decades-old approach to foreign policy.'
Washington now aims to put an end to 'undefined missions' and 'open-ended conflicts,' he said.
Trump has indicated his desire to help bring an end to both the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and the conflict in Ukraine. The United States has been the primary military sponsor of both West Jerusalem and Kiev during both conflicts.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has set the US president's plan to relocate the Palestinians of Gaza to surrounding countries as a precondition for ending the war. Trump has previously expressed his ambition to invest in the enclave and transform it into a resort after the hostilities conclude.
The current US administration has also been pushing for a diplomatic resolution of the Ukraine conflict, and slowing its long-time military support for Kiev. Additionally, Trump has moved to recoup funds spent on the aid through a joint mineral exploitation deal signed with Ukraine, but did not provide Kiev with formal security guarantees.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump says one in four chance Putin meeting will fail
US President Donald Trump has estimated that his upcoming meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin has a 25% chance of failing. The summit, which will take place on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, is expected to focus mainly on pursuing a settlement to the Ukraine conflict. When asked during an interview with Fox News Radio on Thursday whether the meeting has a chance of failing, Trump replied: 'Yeah, 25%.' 'This meeting sets up the second meeting, but there is a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting,' he said. The president said he hoped the talks would pave the way for a subsequent meeting between Putin and Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky. A hypothetical second meeting would be 'extremely important' as it would likely be central to talks about making a peace deal involving land swaps, Trump argued. Earlier this week, Trump hinted that any potential solution to the Ukraine conflict would involve territorial exchanges. 'There will be some land swapping going on,' he said at a Q&A session in Washington on Monday. Moscow previously indicated that it had received an 'acceptable offer' from Washington through US special envoy Steve Witkoff during his talks with Putin last week. Witkoff's visit was 'productive' and laid the groundwork for the Alaska summit, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday. Putin has said that the Trump administration is making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' in Ukraine. Washington is also working to 'create the long-term conditions of peace between our countries and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,' the Russian president said at a meeting with senior officials on Thursday.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Tara Reade: Without Zelensky, peace has a chance
In 1867, the Russian empire sold Alaska to the US for $7.2 million. Perhaps the location of the upcoming summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin is a nod and a wink to such a great deal? Maybe Putin will like Alaska so much he will have seller's remorse? Trump promised America a golden age coming that included ending the US involvement in Ukraine. No more US taxpayer money, no more weapons to Ukraine. No more escalation towards a nuclear war. Finally, that campaign promise looks to be coming to fruition with the upcoming summit to be held between the two superpower presidents, Trump and Putin, in Alaska. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky publicly dismissed Trump's peace plans. The last time Zelensky protested a movement towards peace he had European leaders rallying behind him. This time proves more tricky for the illegitimate president of Ukraine with his people protesting forced conscriptions and the bloody losses of men and women for a war feeding the EU and Washington. Zelensky's firing of an anti-corruption team triggered the latest uprising as he still will not hold elections. In short, Zelensky's time is done and he will need to flee, along with his corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs, to the nearest European villa haven or face the possible fate of many unpopular dictators – death. Trump has many reasons for wanting this peace summit with Putin to be a success. First, he is by all accounts, ducking hits by his base about not releasing the Epstein files. The MAGA base is loyal but practical, and if the economy does not improve and foreign wars continue, they will turn their back on the Republican Party, not just Trump. Also, the Ukraine conflict represents Biden and the old guard. Trump has repeatedly said, 'This is NOT my war.' Trump has a certain respect for Putin. However, as time passes and old hawks like senator Lindsay Graham salivate for more blood and death, Trump's goal of being the 'peace president' moves farther out of reach. The American people are over Ukraine, they are sick of American foreign adventures on taxpayer money that have left America's infrastructure and morale in tatters. Trump is trying to undo decades of lies about wars and domestic policy now revealed to the public. The American distrust in media is at an all-time high due to the years of lies about wars, Covid, and domestic issues. This culminates in collective cynicism while social media allows for examinations of truths. The cultural divide and frustrations in America are deeply felt but the main concern for Americans is the ability to get access to affordable food, housing, and medical care. All of this has been in crisis especially since the Biden regime drove the US economy into the ground raising the debt ceiling and focusing on endless wars. The economic allure of Russia and America having positive productive trade is not lost on Trump and his leadership. Russia has risen above sanctions with a strong economy, and BRICS has been growing stronger. The attempts to isolate Russia have failed, while the collective West has remained under the thumb of past US hawks. This has brought the near collapse of some of the Western European economies. Trump at his heart is a businessman interested in economic competition rather than war. His current administration is a mix of old guard neocon hawks and anti-war doves. This curious mixture with strong influences from Israel means Trump's foreign policy still somewhat aligns with Biden's and Obama's – and that is a comparison he wishes to distance himself from. Both the US and Russia know that Ukraine employs terrorist tactics, killing civilians and targeting journalists, which is problematic to any signed legal agreements. There is also the fact that Moscow does not consider Zelensky a legitimate president since his term ran out and he canceled elections. How legal would any peace agreements signed with him be? Perhaps the answer will come from the US president in the form of guarantees of no more weapons or funding to Ukraine, but these would have to involve binding commitments – unlike earlier empty promises of no eastward NATO expansion. Ultimately, Zelensky is less than inconsequential to the future of global politics – he is a liability to the West. The real end to this proxy war between the US/NATO and Russia will be decided between Trump and Putin. It will likely start with broad brush strokes of a peace agreement, with details, boundaries and consequences laid out later in bureaucratic form. There will be posturing, but also economic and trade deals made. Perhaps a joint mission in space could be one positive outcome? The lifting of sanctions and putting an end to the Russophobia campaign fueled by Obama and Biden? A more positive approach to disarmament of nuclear weapons? While Putin might not buy back Alaska for Russia, there may be some movement to final peace in regards to Ukraine. If the EU falls into line with the US to drop this proxy war, stop supplying weapons, and not allow Ukraine into NATO, then real peace does have some hope. The world may even have a chance of having a new golden age, rather than a future of nuclear ash.


Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Declassified emails expose Obama intel chief's role in Russiagate hoax
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified new documents revealing that former President Barack Obama's administration 'manufactured' intelligence to create the 2016 Trump-Russia collusion narrative and push the Russiagate probe. The top-secret correspondence, released on Wednesday, shows former DNI James Clapper directing intelligence chiefs to 'compromise on normal' procedures to rush a politicized 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), despite concerns from then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Mike Rogers. On December 22, 2016, Rogers warned Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey, and then-CIA Director John Brennan that the NSA lacked 'sufficient access' to all the intelligence and had not had 'enough time' to be 'absolutely confident' in its assessment of Russian involvement in the election. Hours later, Clapper dismissed the call for more time, writing that 'more time is not negotiable.' He stressed it was 'essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page, and are all supportive of the report – in the highest tradition of 'that's OUR story, and we're sticking' to it.'' Clapper added: 'This is one project that has to be a team sport.' The exchange took place shortly after a meeting between Obama, Clapper, Brennan, and other senior officials, during which Obama ordered a report detailing 'the tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.' 🚨Newly declassified Top Secret emails sent on December 22, 2016 complying with President Obama's order to create the manufactured January 2017 ICA about Russia expose how DNI James Clapper demanded the IC fall in line behind the Russia Hoax. Clapper admits that it was a "team… Clapper's response to Rogers came just hours before the report's authors delivered their first draft to US intelligence leaders. 'The decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,' Gabbard said. Her earlier declassified releases alleged that Hillary Clinton, Trump's 2016 election rival, and her operatives – backed by George Soros-linked groups – helped engineer the Trump-Russia narrative and expected the FBI to advance it. Moscow has denied interfering in US elections. The Russiagate scandal severely strained US-Russia relations, resulting in sanctions, asset seizures, and a breakdown in diplomatic engagement. Trump has said all those behind the hoax should pay a 'big price' for what he called a deliberate attempt to sabotage his presidency.