FBI finds 2,400 new documents linked to JFK assassination
FBI finds 2,400 new documents linked to JFK assassination The bureau found 2,400 newly inventoried, digitized records previously unassociated with the investigation.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
JFK's grandson slams Trump's order to release assassination files
Jack Schlossberg, grandson of former US President John F. Kennedy, criticized Trump for ordering the release of classified files on JFK's assassination.
unbranded - Newsworthy
What did the CIA know about Lee Harvey Oswald, and when did they know it?
The answers may lie in 2,400 documents newly linked to the 1963 assassination of former President John F. Kennedy in Dallas after a records review conducted by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The FBI search was prompted by President Donald Trump's push to release details about one of the nation's most notorious and hotly debated crimes, including formerly classified intelligence and law enforcement files.
"The question for me is not whether the CIA was complicit, but whether the CIA was negligent," said Gerald Posner, author of "Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK." Posner, who believes Oswald acted alone, said it would be "a big story" if the records reveal the CIA knew more than it let on about the gunman believed solely responsible for the assassination.
One other glaring question, however, is: Why are these records only coming to light now, 62 years later?
The FBI said Tuesday it conducted the records review after Trump's executive order in January calling for declassification of records related to the assassination of the nation's 35th president.
"More than 50 years after the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the Federal Government has not released to the public all of its records related to those events," the White House release stated. "It is in the national interest to finally release all records related to these assassinations without delay."
Trump's order also called for the nation's security agencies to come up with plans to release documents related to the 1968 assassinations of civil rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, the former president's brother and a presidential candidate, but has allowed more time for those.
Polls show skepticism remains about lone assassin theory
The Justice Department and other federal government entities have reaffirmed conclusions that Oswald was solely responsible for the killing of the former president. However, polls have shown many Americans believe Kennedy's death was part of a wider conspiracy, and Posner said details remain lacking about what the Central Intelligence Agency knew about Oswald's visits to Mexico City, including the Soviet embassy there, six weeks before the assassination.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's choice to lead the Health and Human Services Department and the son of Robert Kennedy and nephew of John F. Kennedy, has expressed belief that the CIA was involved in his uncle's death, an allegation denied by the agency. Kennedy Jr. has also said he believes his father was killed by multiple gunmen, contradicting official accounts.
The newly linked documents aren't likely to support conspiracy theories about Oswald's role as anything more than a lone-wolf gunman, historians say.
"I suspect that we won't get anything too dramatic in the releases, or anything that fundamentally overturns our understanding of what occurred in Dallas," said Fredrik Logevall, a professor of history at Harvard University in Boston. Logevall said he was prepared to be surprised.
Fascination has swirled for decades around the killing of one of the nation's most storied leaders, unspooling vast material for film, literature, historical accounts and pop culture. Kennedy was fatally shot as his presidential motorcade rolled through downtown Dallas, and Oswald, arrested soon after, was himself fatally shot by nightclub owner Jack Ruby on live television while being transferred to a county jail two days later.
Not everyone is happy about the declassification of records related to the assassination. Jack Schlossberg, Kennedy's grandson, issued a statement decrying Trump's executive order.
'The truth is a lot sadder than the myth — a tragedy that didn't need to happen," he wrote in a since-deleted post. "Not part of an inevitable grand scheme. Declassification is using JFK as a political prop, when he's not here to punch back . . . There's nothing heroic about it.'
Whatever the files contain, they aren't likely to settle any debates, said Alice L. George, author of "The Assassination of John F. Kennedy: Political Trauma and American Memory."
"I can't imagine any document that would convince (conspiracy theorists) that Oswald acted alone," George said. "Particularly among people who are really invested in that way of thinking. It's going to probably leave them in the same place where they are now."
Contributing: Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules
This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump moved to sever California's EPA waivers by signing a series of joint resolutions Thursday, rolling back the Golden State's strict truck and auto emissions policies. The president's signing of joint resolutions under the Congressional Review Act reverses the Biden administration's approval of California's Advanced Clean Trucks rule. That earlier rule called for requiring 75% of Class 8 trucks sold in the state to be zero-emissions vehicles by 2035. Another resolution also prevents the state's low-nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions rule for heavy-duty trucks from being implemented, per a statement by the president. The NOx rule intended to regulate emissions from manufacturers by cutting heavy-duty NOx emissions by 90% and overhaul engine testing procedures. The Trump administration has described his predecessor's environmental policies as overreach and unjustified mandates. Trump said the congressional moves he signed further restrict California from implementing a similar policy in the future. "Under the Congressional Review Act, the EPA cannot approve any future waivers that are 'substantially the same' as those disapproved in the joint resolutions," Trump said in a statement. "Accordingly, the joint resolutions prohibit the EPA from approving future waivers for California that would impose California's policy goals across the entire country and violate fundamental constitutional principles of federalism, ending the electric vehicle mandate for good," the statement said. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared the federal measures illegal and moved to sue the federal government, seeking to pursue the state's zero-emission vehicle policy. Newsom signed an executive order on Thursday for the state to continue regulation requiring that 100% of sales of new vehicles be zero emission by 2035 for cars, pickup trucks and drayage trucks and by 2045 for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Trucking leaders applauded Trump for the measures. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association said the news was a big win for both men and women behind the wheel. 'Our 150,000 small-business members have been saying it all along—electric trucks just aren't a realistic option right now. They're too expensive, the charging infrastructure isn't there,' OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in an emailed press release to Trucking Dive. Industry advocates, including the American Trucking Associations and the Washington Trucking Associations, also warned that electric truck technology and charging infrastructure were not caught up to accommodate California's ambitious EV policies. 'We've done our part to reduce carbon emissions while keeping America's economy moving,' ATA President and CEO Chris Spear said in a press release. 'But what we need is federal leadership to set realistic and achievable national emissions standards. And today brings us one step closer toward that goal,' he added. Werner Enterprises truck driver Gina Jones shared a similar sentiment, speaking as part of the signing ceremony at the White House. 'We cannot allow one state's regulations to disrupt our entire nation's supply chain,' Jones said. 'Allowing California to do so would have [negatively] impacted the hundreds of thousands of truck drivers who deliver critical goods across the country each and every day.' Recommended Reading Congress revokes Advanced Clean Trucks waiver, creating ambiguity for refuse fleets Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
19 minutes ago
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citizens of Augusta prepare ahead for ‘No King's' protest
AUGUSTA, Ga (WJBF) – Protestors will be waving their flags and signs in opposition to the Trump administration. This is just one of more than 1,000 protestors that are expected to happen on Flag Day across the country; there is also a protest planned in Aiken. People joined together before the protest to make their flags and signs. Krista Gentry, Communication Lead for Indivisible CSRA, said, 'A lot of the people in the community are really upset about what is going on, on a national level in our country and they're scared, and they want to come out and show that they're not okay with what's going on and want to see changes.' The name 'No King's' came from the 50501-organization dismissing the idea of a 'king' ruling the United States, advocating for democracy. Organizers say the protests are purposefully happening on the Army's 250th birthday, Flag Day and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. 'We just want to draw attention away from that and to communities. We don't want this authoritarian feeling celebration happening for one person in Washington D.C. I think it's crossing a dangerous line with the use of the military,' said Gentry. 1,400 people are already signed up to attend the protest in Augusta with the potential for more to show up. 'It's actually really, really encouraging and is instilling my faith again in humanity and our country. The community here is so supportive, and I think they really care about what's going on and they want to make their voices heard,' Gentry said. Organizers say this will be a nonviolent protest and anyone who does not follow that will be asked to leave. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
