logo
Youngest lottery winner sells her glam £3m mansion at massively reduced price

Youngest lottery winner sells her glam £3m mansion at massively reduced price

Daily Mirror9 hours ago

Lauren Keene, 24, won a £3million property in an Omaze prize draw last December, but after just six months, she has decided to sell the luxury home for £500,000 less than its value
Lauren Keene made headlines last December when she became the youngest ever winner of a multi-million-pound Omaze prize draw, landing a breathtaking £3million mansion on the Wirral Peninsula, along with a £250,000 cash bonus.
But just six months later, the full-time nanny from Gloucester has decided to part ways with the luxury home, putting it on the market for £2.5million - half a million pounds below its estimated value.

The modern, six-bedroom property sits in a stunning elevated location on the edge of the rocky sandstone outcrop overlooking the Irish Sea, with panoramic views, a wraparound terrace, and an outdoor heated pool.

Described in its Rightmove listing as 'striking' and 'something truly special', the house blends contemporary architecture with natural beauty and is just a short stroll from Caldy Beach. However, the dream home has proved impractical.
Lauren, 24, who bought the winning ticket for just £20, initially said she and her partner, software engineer Ryan Mitchell, were considering moving into the mansion.
At the time, she was living with her father, Daniel Keene, in a modest two-bedroom flat near Gloucester. The Omaze win, which she celebrated with a McDonald's meal, seemed to be a complete life transformation.
'Only last week we were looking at houses we thought we could never afford,' she said after the win. 'Now our first property is a £3million mansion. It's crazy to think we'll never have a mortgage. It's life-changing.'

However, the couple quickly realised that the distance - nearly 200 miles from Gloucester - and the cost of maintaining such a large property made living there unrealistic. They only spent a few nights in the home before deciding to sell.
Lauren's dad, Daniel, 46, who works as a kitchen and bathroom fitter, explained the reasoning behind her decision. 'It is a lovely house, but the associated costs are significant,' he told the Mail Online. 'For example, although the pool is heated, it's outdoors and not thermally protected, so the heat escapes very quickly. Keeping it warm in the winter would cost a fortune. They've turned it off for now, but we braved it during our visit—and I can tell you that water is very cold.'
Daniel added that Lauren and Ryan are now buying a more modest, semi-detached property in their hometown of Gloucester, using their savings and some of the Omaze cash prize to put down roots closer to family and work. He hinted that the move is imminent, though Lauren is still living at home for now. 'Every week she tells me she's moving out, and every week she's still here,' he laughed. 'But what's important is that she's happy and doing what's right for her. And in both cases, she is.'

He added: 'I'm sure when they do move in, I'll be asked to fit the new bathroom and kitchen. And it'll be a pleasure.'
Though Lauren is selling the house, the £250,000 cash prize and the proceeds from the eventual sale will ensure financial security and a strong start to homeownership for the young couple.

Reflecting on her win at the time, Lauren said: 'Winning this house has transformed our lives forever. Whatever we decide to do long-term, we're made for life now.'
Under Omaze rules, winners are not required to keep the properties for any set period and are free to rent them out, sell them, or move in. Many winners opt to cash in rather than maintain the often palatial homes.
Lauren's decision to sell isn't unusual. Of the 14 previous Omaze UK house draw winners, only three have decided to stay in their prize properties long-term. Several others have cited similar challenges, including costly maintenance and distance from loved ones.

In 2023, June Smith, a widow who won a £4.5million Cornish mansion, put the home up for sale so she could help her children and grandchildren financially. Others, like Lauren, have chosen to use their winnings to build a more sustainable life closer to home.
One of the few winners who did keep their Omaze home is finance analyst Becca Pott, 32, who was living in a small flat in east London when she won a £3.5 million, five-bedroom house near Ascot in February 2022. After initially planning to stay for just the summer, she and her husband Ben decided to make it their permanent home, raising their daughter Ava in the luxury build.
She told The Sunday Times: "We always knew we were going to move in and enjoy it for at least that first summer, just to experience living in a place like this as a family, but after a few weeks we realised we didn't want to leave so decided we should keep it."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Youngest lottery winner sells her glam £3m mansion at massively reduced price
Youngest lottery winner sells her glam £3m mansion at massively reduced price

Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Youngest lottery winner sells her glam £3m mansion at massively reduced price

Lauren Keene, 24, won a £3million property in an Omaze prize draw last December, but after just six months, she has decided to sell the luxury home for £500,000 less than its value Lauren Keene made headlines last December when she became the youngest ever winner of a multi-million-pound Omaze prize draw, landing a breathtaking £3million mansion on the Wirral Peninsula, along with a £250,000 cash bonus. But just six months later, the full-time nanny from Gloucester has decided to part ways with the luxury home, putting it on the market for £2.5million - half a million pounds below its estimated value. ‌ The modern, six-bedroom property sits in a stunning elevated location on the edge of the rocky sandstone outcrop overlooking the Irish Sea, with panoramic views, a wraparound terrace, and an outdoor heated pool. ‌ Described in its Rightmove listing as 'striking' and 'something truly special', the house blends contemporary architecture with natural beauty and is just a short stroll from Caldy Beach. However, the dream home has proved impractical. Lauren, 24, who bought the winning ticket for just £20, initially said she and her partner, software engineer Ryan Mitchell, were considering moving into the mansion. At the time, she was living with her father, Daniel Keene, in a modest two-bedroom flat near Gloucester. The Omaze win, which she celebrated with a McDonald's meal, seemed to be a complete life transformation. 'Only last week we were looking at houses we thought we could never afford,' she said after the win. 'Now our first property is a £3million mansion. It's crazy to think we'll never have a mortgage. It's life-changing.' ‌ However, the couple quickly realised that the distance - nearly 200 miles from Gloucester - and the cost of maintaining such a large property made living there unrealistic. They only spent a few nights in the home before deciding to sell. Lauren's dad, Daniel, 46, who works as a kitchen and bathroom fitter, explained the reasoning behind her decision. 'It is a lovely house, but the associated costs are significant,' he told the Mail Online. 'For example, although the pool is heated, it's outdoors and not thermally protected, so the heat escapes very quickly. Keeping it warm in the winter would cost a fortune. They've turned it off for now, but we braved it during our visit—and I can tell you that water is very cold.' Daniel added that Lauren and Ryan are now buying a more modest, semi-detached property in their hometown of Gloucester, using their savings and some of the Omaze cash prize to put down roots closer to family and work. He hinted that the move is imminent, though Lauren is still living at home for now. 'Every week she tells me she's moving out, and every week she's still here,' he laughed. 'But what's important is that she's happy and doing what's right for her. And in both cases, she is.' ‌ He added: 'I'm sure when they do move in, I'll be asked to fit the new bathroom and kitchen. And it'll be a pleasure.' Though Lauren is selling the house, the £250,000 cash prize and the proceeds from the eventual sale will ensure financial security and a strong start to homeownership for the young couple. ‌ Reflecting on her win at the time, Lauren said: 'Winning this house has transformed our lives forever. Whatever we decide to do long-term, we're made for life now.' Under Omaze rules, winners are not required to keep the properties for any set period and are free to rent them out, sell them, or move in. Many winners opt to cash in rather than maintain the often palatial homes. Lauren's decision to sell isn't unusual. Of the 14 previous Omaze UK house draw winners, only three have decided to stay in their prize properties long-term. Several others have cited similar challenges, including costly maintenance and distance from loved ones. ‌ In 2023, June Smith, a widow who won a £4.5million Cornish mansion, put the home up for sale so she could help her children and grandchildren financially. Others, like Lauren, have chosen to use their winnings to build a more sustainable life closer to home. One of the few winners who did keep their Omaze home is finance analyst Becca Pott, 32, who was living in a small flat in east London when she won a £3.5 million, five-bedroom house near Ascot in February 2022. After initially planning to stay for just the summer, she and her husband Ben decided to make it their permanent home, raising their daughter Ava in the luxury build. She told The Sunday Times: "We always knew we were going to move in and enjoy it for at least that first summer, just to experience living in a place like this as a family, but after a few weeks we realised we didn't want to leave so decided we should keep it."

McDonald's giving away Chicken McNuggets for free this month – but there's a catch
McDonald's giving away Chicken McNuggets for free this month – but there's a catch

Scottish Sun

time13 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

McDonald's giving away Chicken McNuggets for free this month – but there's a catch

Revellers will need to sign up for a premium service to bag the nuggets GOLDEN NUGGET McDonald's giving away Chicken McNuggets for free this month – but there's a catch Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MCDONALD'S are giving out free Chicken McNuggets this month - but there's a catch. Fast food fans better hurry up and place a delivery if they want the free nuggets. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Diners can get their hands on six free Chicken McNuggets this month Credit: Alamy McDonald's is offering diners six free Chicken McNuggets following its recent partnership with delivery outfit Deliveroo. "Thanks to our new partnership with Deliveroo Plus, you can get six Chicken McNuggets for free this month," the fast food chain wrote in an Instagram post. "Until the 15th of June, customers spending £15 or more [UK] or €20 [IRE] when ordering through Deliveroo will also receive a portion of six Chicken McNuggets, at no extra cost! "It's just one of the ways we're offering fantastic value to our McDonald's fans this summer." However, revellers will need a Deliveroo Plus subscription and must order between 11am and 5am daily. But hurry - the offer expires June 15. RETURN HIKE Elsewhere, research by The Sun has found that some of the returning items at McDonald's have shot up in price since they were last on menus. The Toffee Apple Pie costed £1.99 when last on sale in 2023, but is now £2.09 - 10p more expensive. The Cheesy McCrispy costed £5.99 as a single item when last on sale, in January, but is now priced at £6.69 - 70p more. Pint prices on the rise and Maccies axes beloved item Meanwhile, the Halloumi Fries have gone up in price by 20p since they were last on menus. A pack of four is now £2.99 compared to £2.79 last May while a larger pack is now £7.59, up from £7.39. How to save money at McDonald's Research by The Sun found a Big Mac meal can be up to 30% cheaper at restaurants just two miles apart from each other. You can pick up a Big Mac and fries for just £2.99 at any time by filling in a feedback survey found on McDonald's receipts. The receipt should come with a 12-digit code which you can enter into the Food for Thought website alongside your submitted survey. You'll then receive a five-digit code which is your voucher for the £2.99 offer. There are some deals and offers you can only get if you have the My McDonald's app, so it's worth signing up to get money off your meals. The MyMcDonald's app can be downloaded on iPhone and Android phones and is quick to set up. You can also bag freebies and discounts on your birthday if you're a My McDonald's app user.

Businessman accused of 'increasing the size of his home in every direction' without permission by council
Businessman accused of 'increasing the size of his home in every direction' without permission by council

Daily Mail​

time19 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Businessman accused of 'increasing the size of his home in every direction' without permission by council

A businessman who increased the size of his home in every direction without planning permission, and to the fury of some neighbours, has declared: 'I don't understand what I've done wrong!' Mohammed Rahman extended to the front, the rear and side, and even built a structure at the end of his long back garden with one local saying: 'It looks like a little house.' But he failed to acknowledge what he had done wrong until planners warned him it was an 'illegal build' which had caused 'significant stress to some residents' in Elmdon, near Solihull, West Midlands. One officer told him: 'You can't extend your property in every direction without seeking the proper permission.' Mr Rahman, understood to be in his 30s, was forced to submit a retrospective planning application which was finally given the green light last week (May 21) by Solihull Council. The semi-detached house, which is white washed with imposing dark grey full length windows and doors and has a loft conversion, contrasts to the more traditional redbrick properties surrounding it. Whilst the building works to the home has been completed, double glazing is still to be fitted and internal decoration completed. Mr Rahman, speaking by phone to MailOnline, said: 'I own the house and it is very nice but I am not living there yet. 'I have extended it and workmen are still there but I don't understand what I've done wrong!' He claimed he had no objections from neighbours, insisting: 'There is no problem, no issue.' He described himself as a 'business owner' who has a 'few retail shops.' An elderly neighbour complained the house was 'too big' and had another building in the rear garden which 'looks like a little house.' The man said: 'I don't know the owner because he hasn't;t moved in yet but there has been a lot of work going on there for a long time. 'It doesn't bother me too much, as long as he has the proper planning permission which I believe has now been given.' Another local said the house 'looks out of place in the street' in Old Lode Lane, saying: 'It sticks out like a sore thumb!' One commented: 'Looking on the planning portal, the previously accepted application looks nothing like the building standing now. 'It's huge and looks like it could be a future HMO (house in multiple occupation). 'The owner was forced to put in a retrospective application or face having to rip it down.' Yet another remarked: 'It seems to be one rule for the well off and another for the rest of us. 'In this case, there have been several objections by concerned residents due to a variety of reasons, the main one being the property standing out like a sore thumb. 'How on earth the planning dept allowed floor to ceiling windows is beyond me!' One said: 'If you review the history in this case, somethings doesn't quite add up as to how the supposed 'fair and impartial' council allowed this to be pushed through. 'Quite obviously the applicant has disregarded the process, and retrospectively sought approval. Can we all do the same, or is it one rule for one?' Others complained about the Juliet balconies to the front and rear. The property has divided residents with some commenting on social media that they liked it. A supporter said: 'I think the owners done a great job. Looks amazing. Best house on the street. Well done!' Another urged: 'Why can't we just be happy for the owner! Who's designed a 'Grand Design' as Kevin McCloud would say. 'We should respect the decision from the planning committee.' In March Mr Rahman resubmitted a retrospective application for a single storey front and rear extension, two storey side extension, alterations to front fenestration (arrangement of windows), addition of render to the property and a detached outbuilding to the rear. It came after Mark Andrews, Solihull Council 's head of planning, design and engagement, had issued a notice to refuse the original application in January. Committee members, at a meeting in May, were told officers had concerns the roof of the ground floor was going to be used as a balcony but the applicant was now proposing a Juliette balcony with no plans to use it as a balcony. With that issue overcome, planners approved the extension on officers' recommended. During the meeting Councillor Richard Long - ward councillor for Elmdon - said: 'I'm speaking against the application based on concerns expressed by residents. 'Planning applications related to this property have been a long running matter. 'The drip drip changes and apparent ignoring of previous planning refusal has caused significant stress to some residents, as highlighted by their objections. 'There is a lack of confidence any restriction imposed will be enforced.' And he added residents were unhappy council officers were recommending approval on 'what appears minor changes.' During the debate, the chairman Councillor Bob Grinsell said: ' live in a house that has got both a balcony and Juliette balcony, so I do understand the situation. 'If a local resident was to see any changes (it being used as a balcony) I would suggest they get hold of you, Councillor Long, and you contact planning enforcement - they will enforce the matter. 'Can I reiterate the reasoning for refusal under delegated powers was purely the potential usage over the flat roof (as a balcony) which would overlook and give a loss of privacy to neighbouring residents. When the vote was taken councillors unanimously voted in favour of approval.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store