logo
JP Morgan's Europe chief leaves London for New York

JP Morgan's Europe chief leaves London for New York

Telegraph4 hours ago

The head of JP Morgan's European operations is set to quit London and move to New York as the UK capital battles an exodus of talent and wealth.
Filippo Gori plans to relocate to the US after living in London for less than a year. He moved to Britain from Hong Kong in the middle of last year after being appointed chief executive of JP Morgan's Europe, Middle East and Africa business last May.
The Italian banker's decision to move to New York will see him join a growing list of bankers, investors and business leaders who have announced plans to leave Britain in the wake of Labour's election last year.
Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs' vice chairman, left London earlier this year for Milan, in one of the most high-profile exits from the UK's financial centre. He decided to relocate after Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, scrapped non-dom status and changed inheritance tax rules for foreign trusts.
The billionaire property investors Ian and Richard Livingstone have also moved from London to Monaco in the wake of the tax raid, while steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal is also preparing to leave the UK.
A source close to Mr Gori said his decision to leave London was not related to Labour's tax hikes but reflected his role as co-head of JP Morgan's global banking business, a position he holds alongside his European role.
Doug Petno, the other global banking co-head, is already based in New York and a source close to the bank said it was 'mutually agreed' that it 'makes sense' for Mr Gori to be based in the same city.
He will be expected to spend at least half of his time in the Europe, Middle East, and Africa region and will travel to London regularly.
London's fading lustre
Regardless of the motives, Mr Gori's relocation is likely to fuel concerns that London is losing its status as a global financial hub.
As well as suffering an exodus of talent, the London Stock Exchange has seen a steady stream of businesses quit the market to move to New York and has struggled to attract new listings.
Mr Gori will be the latest executive to oversee a British bank from the US. C.S. Venkatakrishnan, Barclays' chief executive, splits his time between New York and the bank's Canary Wharf headquarters. Sir Mark Tucker, HSBC chairman, manages operations from his home in New York.
Prior to moving to London, Mr Gori spent more than a decade in Hong Kong, where his family still live.
His relocation to New York comes as JP Morgan's top executives are vying for the chance to succeed Jamie Dimon, the bank's long-time chief executive. Marianne Lake, a Briton, is one of the frontrunners in the race, as is Mr Petno.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leonard Lauder, philanthropist who globalized family cosmetic business, dies at age 92
Leonard Lauder, philanthropist who globalized family cosmetic business, dies at age 92

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Leonard Lauder, philanthropist who globalized family cosmetic business, dies at age 92

Leonard Lauder, a renowned philanthropist who expanded the family cosmetics business into a worldwide empire, has died at the age of 92. Estee Lauders Cos. announced the news in a release on Sunday and said he died on Saturday surrounded by family. Lauder, the oldest son of Estee and Joseph H. Lauder, who founded the company in 1946, formally joined the New York business in 1958. Over more than six decades, Lauder played a key role in transforming the business from a handful of products sold under a single brand in U.S. stores to a multi-brand global giant. He had held the title of chairman emeritus at the time of his death. Estee Lauder's products are sold in roughly 150 countries and territories under brand names including Clinique and Aveda, according to the company's latest annual report. The company generated sales of nearly $16 billion in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the filing said. Estee Lauder went public in 1995, but members of Lauder family still have about 84% of the voting power of common stock, according to the latest annual filing. Lauder served as president of The Estée Lauder Cos. from 1972 to 1995 and as CEO from 1982 through 1999. He was named chairman in 1995 and served in that role through June 2009. Under his stewardship, Lauder created the company's first research and development laboratory, brought in professional management at every level, and was the impetus behind The Estée Lauder Cos.' international expansion, helping to spearhead the company's sales and profits exponentially, according to the company. Lauder led the launch of many brands including Aramis, Clinique, and Lab Series, among others. Until his death, he remained deeply involved in the company's acquisition strategy, including the acquisitions of such brands as Aveda, Bobbi Brown, Jo Malone London and MAC, the company said. During his years as chairman emeritus, Lauder was closely involved in the business and day-to-day operations and was a constant fixture at its global headquarters in New York and at its stores around the world until the time of his death, the company said. 'Throughout his life, my father worked tirelessly to build and transform the beauty industry, pioneering many of the innovations, trends, and best practices that are foundational to the industry today,' said William P. Lauder, son and chair of the board at The Estée Lauder Companies in a statement. 'He was the most charitable man I have ever known, believing that art and education belonged to everyone, and championing the fight against diseases such as Alzheimer's and breast cancer. ' Lauder was a longtime patron of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and, in 2013, pledged his 78-piece collection of Cubist art to the museum in the largest single philanthropic gift in the museum's history. He later added five major works to that pledged gift, the company said. In concert with his Cubist collection donation, he helped establish the Leonard A. Lauder Research Center for Modern Art at the Met to support a program of fellowships, focused exhibitions, and public lectures. He also was the Whitney Museum of American Art's chairman emeritus and a trustee from 1977 to 2011. Lauder was married to Evelyn H. Lauder, who had been the senior corporate vice president at the cosmetic company and the founder of the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, from 1959 until she passed away in 2011. On Jan. 1, 2015, Lauder married Judy Glickman Lauder, a philanthropist and internationally recognized photographer. Lauder was born in 1933 in New York City. He was a graduate of the Bronx High School of Science, the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, and the Officer Candidate School of the United States Navy. Lauder studied at Columbia University's graduate school of business. He served as a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy and as a Navy reservist, for which the U.S. Navy Supply Corps Foundation later recognized him with its Distinguished Alumni Award. In addition to his wife and son William, Lauder is survived by his other son Gary M. Lauder and wife, Laura Lauder; five grandchildren, two great-grandchildren, many stepchildren and step grandchildren, as well as his brother, Ronald S. Lauder, and wife, Jo Carole Lauder, and their daughters, Aerin Lauder and Jane Lauder.

Lobbyist claims that New York anti-plastic bill would harm people of color called ‘misleading'
Lobbyist claims that New York anti-plastic bill would harm people of color called ‘misleading'

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Lobbyist claims that New York anti-plastic bill would harm people of color called ‘misleading'

The oil and petrochemical lobby is attempting to fend off a New York state proposal to slash plastic waste by arguing that it will disproportionately burden people of color, advocates and assembly sources say, despite widespread evidence that the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks to Black and brown communities. In New York state, advocates are fighting to pass a wide-ranging bill to reduce plastic packaging by 30% in 12 years while dramatically boosting recycling rates and phasing certain toxic compounds out of packaging. The packaging reduction and recycling infrastructure bill would place a fee on large businesses that distribute plastic packaging, with revenue benefiting taxpayers – a scheme called extended producer responsibility. The proposal, which must be taken up this week in order to pass, passed the senate last month for the second year in a row, with backing from nearly every Democrat. But it is facing staunch opposition from some business interests and the American Chemistry Council, a lobbying group representing big oil companies and chemical manufacturers such as DuPont. Efforts to push back on the bill have reportedly cost more than $2m. In recent weeks, advocates and assembly staff told the Guardian, lobbyists have focused on the assembly's influential Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic, and Asian American legislative caucus, arguing that the proposed legislation will raise food prices, thereby harming communities of color who are more likely to rely on food assistance programs. The efforts to kill the plastic legislation are 'plainly racist', said state assembly member Claire Valdez, who represents part of Queens in New York City and backs the original bill. 'These companies just want to be able to continue pushing their product on exploited and under-resourced communities without consequence,' she told the Guardian. The tactic, first covered by the Albany Times-Union, has prompted ire from bill advocates. In a letter to the state assembly in support of the bill, New York religious leaders said this 'corporate narrative' is 'not only false; it is also deeply insulting'. 'It is an immoral and manipulative tactic for these corporate interests to use communities of color as pawns to preserve their bottom lines,' the letter says. 'By focusing their efforts on lobbying the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic, and Asian American Legislative Caucus, they are attempting to create division and fear where none should exist.' Another letter, sent jointly by the NAACP New York State Conference and Consumer Reports, said: 'We are aware that representatives of the petrochemical and packaging industries have been meeting with members of the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian Legislative Caucus in an attempt to discredit this bill and promote a weaker alternative. They claim that this legislation will raise prices for everyday New Yorkers. These claims are misleading and lack data to support them.' Garbage incinerators, on which the bill attempts to reduce reliance by boosting recycling, are often located in communities of color, where they emit toxic pollutants supporters of the legislation say. And plastic production, which also creates dangerous air emissions, also disproportionately harms the health of Black and brown Americans. Reached for comment, Freeman Klopott, spokesperson for the American Chemistry Council in New York, said the proposed legislation 'is not the answer to New York's waste problem'. 'ACC has joined a broad coalition that have worked closely with many legislators on both sides of the aisle to highlight more effective, equitable ways to reduce packaging waste,' Klopott said. The ACC did not respond to questions about lobbyists targeting lawmakers who are people of color in efforts to oppose the bill. Business interest groups opposing the bill have denied that any intentions they have are racially motivated. Industry interests point to a York University study which found the original bill would raise prices by over $700 per household annually. But bill advocates note that report was produced by a group that is funded by the plastic lobby. They say there is no credible evidence that the policy would increase consumer prices. One 2022 report from Columbia University found that such programs result in only very small price increases, while a 2020 report funded by Oregon's environment department found that extended producer responsibility bills did not raise prices in Canadian provinces. In recent weeks, a handful of New York Democratic lawmakers, most of whom are members of the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian legislative caucus, have thrown their support behind a competing, weaker bill, which is supported by business interests. It, too, would create an extended producer responsibility program, but forgo some of the more progressive elements of the original legislation such as the ratcheting down of plastic that businesses can use and the mandates placed on recycled content levels. Petrochemical interests have previously argued that plastic reduction efforts would harm people of color and poor communities. A lobbying group representing plastic bag manufacturers in 2014 funded New York's Black Leadership Action Coalition, whose founder argued that those backing a fee on plastic bags had 'BEEN HAD' and 'BEEN HOODWINKED.' As Minnesota environmentalists worked last year to overturn a policy preventing municipalities from banning plastic bags, some trade groups argued the repeal would place a burden on low-income communities of color, advocates told the Guardian. And last year, the International Council of Chemical Associations commissioned a report that said production caps would require disproportionately harm low-income people by raising product prices. But at a press conference in Albany this month, advocates for the original plastic reduction bill said that passing the policy would benefit Black and brown Americans by helping to tamp down on toxic petrochemical processing. 'How many more of us have to die because of these polluters,' asked Sharon Lavigne, founder of the Louisiana grassroots organization Rise St James. 'They're sacrificing us to make a profit.' Sarahana Shrestha, an assemblymember representing a south-eastern New York district, who supports the original legislation, said the industry's 'fear tactic' is working on some lawmakers who may be less familiar with the legislation. 'Lawmakers are always scared that a policy could have unforeseen consequences for their constituents,' she said, adding that the opposition's strategy has focused on stopping the bill from being put up for a vote. New York's assembly has until Tuesday to vote on the proposed bills, which if passed would head to the governor's desk for final approval.

WSL to expand to 14 teams in league overhaul - but women's top flight WILL keep relegation amid concern it could be scrapped
WSL to expand to 14 teams in league overhaul - but women's top flight WILL keep relegation amid concern it could be scrapped

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

WSL to expand to 14 teams in league overhaul - but women's top flight WILL keep relegation amid concern it could be scrapped

The Women's Super League (WSL) will expand to 14 teams starting from the 2026/27 season, with relegation retained following widespread concern over initial reports it might be scrapped. The WSL has featured 12 teams since the 2019/20 season, but clubs have now voted to admit two additional sides at the end of the 2025/26 campaign – subject to approval by the FA board. The top two teams from WSL2 (formerly the Women's Championship) will earn automatic promotion next season. The team finishing bottom of the WSL will face a play-off against the third-placed WSL2 side for a place in the top-flight. And then from the 2027/28 season onwards, the 14th-placed WSL team will be automatically relegated and replaced by the WSL2 champions. A promotion/relegation play-off will also be introduced between the 13th-placed WSL team and the WSL2 runners-up to determine the final spot in the top division. The top three WSL teams will continue to qualify for the Women's Champions League while there are no other changes to the format of the leagues – with a double round-robin also being retained. The second tier will continue as a 12-team league with additional promotion opportunities to fill the extra vacancies yet to be decided by the FA, who runs the rest of the women's pyramid. Nikki Doucet, CEO of WSL Football – the governing body overseeing the top two tiers of the women's game in England – said: 'Over the past few months, WSL Football has led a thorough and robust, consultative process backed by research and analysis which explored multiple options that could drive the game forward and help it reach its potential. 'Our priority was to find a route that would benefit the whole women's game pyramid, and we believe this next evolution of women's professional football will raise minimum standards, create distinction and incentivise investment across the board. 'Subject to the approval from The FA Board, expanding the BWSL to 14 teams will stimulate movement between leagues and through the pyramid which increases opportunities. The introduction of a promotion/relegation playoff creates distinction for the women's game and introduces a high-profile, high stakes match.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store