
Storm brews over Nationwide chief executive's pay package worth up to £7m
But outside Westminster's warm embrace, a storm has been brewing. A 43% increase to Crosbie's maximum pay package, worth up to £7m per year, is due to be rubber-stamped without a binding vote by members, effectively sidelining any opposition at Nationwide's annual shareholder meeting on Friday. It has prompted outrage among campaigners who say it is the latest sign that the 140-year-old building society is losing its way.
Those critics believe Nationwide, which was founded in 1884 in south London as the Southern Co-operative Permanent Building Society, has deviated from its roots.
Although owned by its members, it bought Virgin Money for £2.9bn last year without asking for their approval and critics claim it is centralising power at the top while diluting the voice of its members.
But the industry is backing Crosbie, recognising the 55-year-old former TSB boss's role in pulling the sector into the political limelight.
'The truth is that mutuals have often been seen as niche: a 'nice to have but not essential',' says Peter Hunt, the founder of UK-based mutuals consultancy Mutuo.
Now industry bosses are hosted at No 10 summer garden parties and asked to join a government-run Mutual and Cooperative Sector Business Council. This autumn, ministers will launch a consultation on how to double the size of the sector, in line with Labour's manifesto pledge. This kind of state-level attention, Hunt says, 'has moved the dial'.
It is a sign that the sector has finally recovered from a wave of demutualisations in the 1990s that turned the likes of Abbey National, Bradford & Bingley, Halifax and Northern Rock into shareholder-owned banks. It was a blow to the UK's building societies movement, which traces its history back to Birmingham in 1775 when a group of friends, desperate to get on the housing ladder, pooled their resources to buy land and building materials.
But by the time the 2008 financial crisis erupted, most demutualised firms were either acquired or nationalised through state bailouts. It left survivors such as Nationwide proud of how their simpler, more risk-averse business models, focused on savings and home loans, survived the financial implosion.
Seventeen years later, Nationwide is the jewel in the sector's crown, with 17 million members and £368bn in assets. It is the second largest mortgage provider behind Lloyds, with a 12.5% share of the market. 'Nationwide is a domestically systemic banking institution,' the Building Societies Association (BSA) chief executive, Robin Fieth, says. 'It gives scale and importance to the whole of our sector.'
But some believe Nationwide's growth has come at the expense of its democratic roots. While building societies centre on the idea of 'one member, one vote', there has been 'a boiling frog problem', according to James Sherwin-Smith, a longtime Nationwide customer who has campaigned to join the board as a voice for members.
He says Nationwide has been 'debasing … member rights … despite all the lovely positive PR that Nationwide puts out about having your say, and that they're a beacon for mutual good. When I scratch the surface of that, I do not find substance.'
Fury erupted last year over Nationwide's decision to not hold a member vote over its takeover of Virgin Money, while the takeover target's own shareholders had a say. But there are other longstanding issues, including Nationwide's use of 'quick vote' options, which make it easier to back the board's recommendations rather than cast individual or dissenting votes at its annual general meeting.
There are also concerns that Nationwide has retained online-only AGMs, even after Covid lockdowns were lifted, in a move that risks disenfranchising members without internet access. Meanwhile, some members say it can be difficult to get a resolution or election on the ballot, requiring 250 to 500 endorsements from members, whose contact details can be a challenge to access due to data rules. Their signatures only qualify under strict conditions and can be disqualified if their balances or loans fall below a certain level – £100 or £200 in most cases – over the preceding two years.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Edwin Fisher of the Building Societies Members Association says that while Nationwide is the biggest of the mutuals sector, it is also the 'most controversial, and has, in our opinion, the lowest standards of corporate governance'.
'They regularly churn out the line that members are the owners, but we all know that members have no say in anything,' Fisher adds, noting that if the UK faced another wave of demutualisation, Nationwide 'would be ripe' to exit.
Nationwide has not expressed any intention of demutualising. But its board says banker-level pay is necessary if it hopes to compete with the likes of Lloyds and NatWest.
Fisher says members only want Nationwide to compete with banks on size, but not on pay or purpose. Furthermore, Nationwide's operations are far less complex than most banks: Crosbie does not have to manage an investment bank or international operations, nor relationships with shareholders. Even after the Virgin Money takeover, it remains a much simpler operation focused on mortgages.
But Hunt says it would be inappropriate to measure Crosbie and her pay against bosses at much smaller building societies. 'She's the Lionel Messi of British building societies,' he said. 'And she could play for any of the banks, so this is how they keep her in the Nationwide shirt.'
The problem for democratically minded members is that the Building Societies Act may not be fit for Nationwide's size. It means that, unlike its listed bank rivals, Nationwide is not required to hold binding votes on new pay proposals, like the one that could hand Crosbie up to £7m. While it could volunteer to hold a binding vote, Nationwide has refused.
When asked whether the Building Societies Association would support reforming the act, Fieth said 'it's not a measure we'd oppose' but admitted it was not 'No 1 on our shopping list'.
Hunt also questioned whether members were 'equipped' to have a binding say on pay. 'If I was a member of Nationwide, how would I be equipped to know what any executive should get paid? How would I know? Just because I didn't like the number? If you had a vote on MPs' pay, I guarantee you the vast majority of the public will want them to [be paid] less,' he said. (The basic salary for an MP is £93,904.)
Fieth echoed that argument, saying some members 'found it difficult' to relate to the sums involved. 'When you've got a balance sheet that's £300bn, most people can't compute that at all.'
He said members should still be asking questions, but needed to keep long-term performance and innovation in mind. 'Henry Ford said that if you'd asked people what they wanted at the beginning of the 20th century, they'd have said faster horses.'
Sherwin-Smith said it was the board's burden to keep members informed. 'They should educate people and let them [hold a binding] vote, but to say you're too stupid to have a say is the wrong attitude.'
Nationwide declined the Guardian's interview requests, but said it regularly engages with a panel of 6,500 members and surveys 500,000 members each year. It also said members have a chance to vote to re-elect board directors every year.
'From the extensive engagement that we have with our members, we cannot see any evidence that our leading customer service, support for first-time buyers, growing market shares and record member financial value is in any way controversial,' Nationwide said.
It previously said pay proposals although advisory, 'always received overwhelming member support' and that Nationwide's strong performance was driven in part by its ability to 'attract, retain and motivate talented leaders.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protests outside hotel caused by fake rumours online
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences. Archie Mitchell, Nicole Wootton-Cane & David Maddox Wednesday 23 July 2025 22:46 BST Flares thrown during protest outside Essex Hotel Protesters gathered at an empty hotel in London's financial district following false online rumours that it was being used to house migrants from the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. The Home Office confirmed the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf is earmarked for migrants at £81 per night, but clarified that asylum seekers are not being moved from the Bell Hotel, which has been the scene of violent protests. Far-right activist Tommy Robinson and Reform MP Lee Anderson were among those who spread misinformation, with Mr Anderson attending the protest and warning of an 'influx of illegal migrants'. Violent disorder at the Bell Hotel in Epping led to 10 arrests, injuries to a police officer, and attacks on security guards, sparked by an asylum seeker being charged with sexual assault. Charities criticised politicians for spreading misinformation and stoking division, while Angela Rayner warned of potential summer riots, a view criticised by Michael Gove. In full


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer set to unleash billions of investment into UK as he signs India trade deal
Sir Keir Starmer is set to sign one of his landmark trade deal with India prime minister Narendra Modi which has already unleashed billions of investment in the UK. The signing of the trade deal with India after years of negotiation marks a triumph for Sir Keir who has also achieved a Brexit reset agreement with the EU and a deal with Donald Trump to tackle the US president's new tariffs. It comes as the India prime minister visits the UK on a trip aimed to build relations between the two countries. According to the government, the deal which was agreed in May, has already resulted in £6 billion in investment for the British economy. The prime minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15 per cent to 3 per cent, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation which is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: "Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. "We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK." The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Meanwhile, 26 British companies have secured new business in India. Airbus & Rolls-Royce will soon begin delivering Airbus aircraft – with over half powered by Rolls-Royce engines – to major Indian airlines as part of around £5 billion worth of contracts recently agreed. These orders will help sustain hundreds of jobs across their respective sites in Filton, Broughton and Derby. A total of 18 firms have confirmed new investment including Zerowatt Energy, AI powered energy intelligence platform is setting up its Global HQ in Leicester. The firm will invest £10m and create 50 new jobs across Leicester, Manchester, Edinburgh and London over the next three years. Among the other businesses to benefit are Carbon Clean, a UK-based leader in carbon capture, with projected UK export contributions of £83 million over the next five years, has invested £7.6 million in a Global Innovation Centre in Mumbai. The deal will unlock 250 jobs across London, Glasgow and Huddersfield as well as 100 jobs in Mumbai. AI and data services company, DCube AI, is investing £5 million in the UK, unlocking 50 jobs across Manchester and London in the next three years to strength its technology offering to UK customers. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will "reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits". He added: "The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business." The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible "because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives". He added: "Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. "But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute." Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be "high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet"


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Militant doctors' leader once compared Brexit to rape and alleged murder to Jesus
The militant Corbynista leader of the British Medical Association once compared Brexit to rape – and an alleged murderer to Jesus, the Mail can reveal. Dr Tom Dolphin, 46, boss of the union at the centre of the junior doctors' walkouts, has been a political campaigner for more than a decade. At the height of the UK-EU negotiations in 2019, he criticised comments by Tory grandee Sir Iain Duncan Smith, who had said Theresa May 's request for a Brexit delay was 'as close to a national humiliation as I've seen'. Dr Dolphin, who was a Labour Party activist and member under Jeremy Corbyn, commented on the remarks on social media, saying: 'This reminds me of the surveys on 'What do you fear most?', where men say 'Humiliation' and women say 'Rape/assault'. 'It is high privilege to be able to conflate embarrassment with actual harm, and those who are not at personal risk from Brexit don't get how scared some are.' It has also emerged that he compared Luigi Mangione, who was arrested in December over the shooting of UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson in New York, to Jesus. Appearing to praise the alleged murderer, Dr Dolphin shared a photograph of Mangione in an orange jumpsuit surrounded by police and likened it to Greek painter El Greco's 1579 The Disrobing Of Christ just before his crucifixion. Dr Dolphin wrote: 'This dramatic scene was the authorities trying to show what happens when one man stands up against the rich and powerful. 'I don't think this was how the NYPD [New York City Police Department] were anticipating it would look. Perhaps El Greco's piece should be retitled 'Christ's Perp Walk To The Praetorium'.' He added: 'To be clear, Mangione is alleged to have used violence to further his cause, and Jesus (as recorded in The Bible) did quite the opposite. I was just struck by the visual imagery.' The tweets come despite Dr Dolphin telling junior doctors in 2023 that 'the Right-wing press are at it again' and urged members to 'lock down your social media because these [redacted] are sniffing round again'. Dr Dolphin was elected as BMA council chairman last month, having been a member of it since 2012. He works as an anaesthetic consultant in London. Conservative health spokesman Stuart Andrew said: 'These remarks are deeply troubling and inappropriate. To liken a man charged with murder to Jesus, and to compare Brexit to rape, is offensive and deeply disturbing.' Resident, formerly junior, doctors in England will go on strike this week with the BMA saying the Government failed to make an offer to 'meet the scale' of challenges felt by medics. The union is demanding a 29.2 per cent pay rise. In September, BMA members voted to accept a government pay deal worth 22.3per cent on average over two years. A BMA spokesman said: 'Dr Dolphin was not trivialising the serious impact of sexual violence but instead drawing an analogy to emphasise how individuals who are not personally affected by a major event – such as Brexit – may struggle to understand the fear or harm it can cause others.