
Waitrose rules out buying American beef and chicken as supermarket vows to 'stand with British farmers' following US trade deal
Waitrose has ruled out buying American beef and chicken amid fears the country could be flooded with foreign meat following Starmer's US trade deal.
The supermarket giant made the commitment to 'stand with British farmers' after Sir Keir agreed to cut tariffs on US beef imports.
Pete Navarro, Donald Trump's trade counsellor, last week branded European food standards a 'phoney tool used to suppress what is very fine American agricultural product'.
The comments come despite fears there will be a watering down of food safety standards to allow products such as hormone-treated beef or chlorinated chicken into British stores - though the UK Government insists this will not be the case.
British and US officials agreed to a deal that gives American farmers a quota to import 13,000 tonnes of beef that meets UK welfare standards.
But supermarket bosses have expressed hesitation, pledging to maintain commitments to source products like beef from British cattle.
Jake Pickering, head of agriculture at Waitrose, said today: 'We want to reassure Waitrose customers that we will never compromise on our number-one animal welfare standards or our long-standing commitment to British farming.
'All of our own-brand fresh beef, lamb, chicken, pork, eggs and fresh milk are sourced from British farmers to high welfare standards – and we have raised the bar for customers with the Better Chicken Commitment and introduction of our new welfare labelling.
Sir Keir addressing staff at a Jaguar Land Rover car manufacturing plant in the West Midlands following the confirmation of his trade deal with US President Donald Trump
The UK Government has been clear that controversial hormone-treated beef, linked to issues like early puberty in children and cancers, won't be included in the deal
Waitrose has ruled out buying American beef and chicken amid fears the country could be flooded with the foreign meat following Starmer's US trade deal
'We're standing shoulder-to-shoulder with our farmers and backing better standards.'
Tesco has also vowed not to source beef from the US, maintaining its policy of sourcing 100 per cent of the product from the UK and Ireland.
Chief executive Ken Murphy said: 'We're not planning to change it.'
Aldi and Co-op also gave their thoughts - saying respectively they would continue to source their 'core' range of meat from British farms, and remain committed to sourcing 100 per cent British fresh and frozen meat.
As it stands, thousands of tonnes of American beef is on its way to the UK, with the agreement set to see enough meat shipped to serve one medium steak to every adult in the country - 13,000 tonnes in total.
The UK Government has insisted controversial hormone-treated beef—common in US supermarkets—won't be part of the deal.
These cattle are injected with growth hormones to speed up muscle growth and reduce the time to slaughter, making production faster and cheaper.
But the practice has been linked to concerns such as early puberty in children and increased cancer risk in consumers.
Brooke Rollins said she would like to see the UK and US more aligned on food standards regulations, during a visit to London following the new trade agreement between the two countries (file image)
US secretary of agriculture Brooke Rollins said the new trade deal 'is going to exponentially increase our beef exports' to the UK
However, Sir Keir insisted there will be no weakening of UK food standards on imports, meaning US-style chlorinated chickens will remain illegal in the UK
Hormone-grown beef has been banned in the UK since 1989 after the EU declared it unsafe.
Similarly, chicken 'cleaned' with chlorine, another of the Government's 'red line' products, will remain prohibited.
However, experts have warned that border checks designed to catch beef-sellers trying to sneak such meat into the country may not be strong enough.
About 80 per cent of all beef produced in the US comes from animals fed growth boosting hormones, according to the United States Cattlemen's Association.
These hormones result in more meat per animal and an overall more profitable enterprise for the producer.
But Brooke Rollins, Donald Trump's agricultural secretary, has insisted American meat is safe and good enough to be sold in Britain today.
She added she would like to see the UK and US more aligned on food standards regulations, during a visit to London following the new trade agreement between the two countries.
Ms Rollins said she was 'proud' of US producers and suggested the US market is starting to move away from hormone-treated beef.
The new US-UK trade deal helps overturn or reduce many of the tariffs Mr Trump unleashed on so-called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, 2025
UK ministers said there will be no downgrade in British food standards, which have been a significant barrier to entry for US-reared meat, and have insisted imports of hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken would remain illegal (file image)
'We have decades of research that show that the beef produced in America whether it is hormone or hormone-free is entirely safe and we believe it is one of the crown jewels of our American agricultural industry,' she said.
She added that only 5 per cent of US chicken is treated with chlorine.
'I think that is a narrative in your country that perhaps we have not done a good enough job pushing back on, so I think that's an important myth to dispel,' she continued.
Agriculture is a key part of the deal, announced by Mr Starmer and Mr Trump last week, which sees tariffs reduced on US products including beef and ethanol in return for moves that help British cars and steel.
As the first country to sign a deal of this sort with the US, Sir Keir called it a 'fantastic, historic' day, as he joined the Oval Office news conference via phone.
However, the Tories have accused him of 'shafting Britain' and allowing the UK to be steamrolled by Trump's team.
The results of the deal are likely to be far-reaching, saving jobs in the beleaguered car and steel industries but offering US farmers far greater access to UK markets on meat and ethanol.
Despite the health concerns, the new reciprocal market access on beef is being presented as a win-win for both countries, with UK farmers being given a quota for 13,000 metric tonnes.
US secretary of agriculture Brooke Rollins said at the Oval Office press conference that this deal 'is going to exponentially increase our beef exports'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
All pupils in families on universal credit to be entitled to free school meals
Currently, households in England on universal credit must earn below £7,400 a year (after tax and not including benefits) to qualify for free school meals. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the expansion was 'a truly historic moment for our country' (Ben Birchall/PA) But the Government has announced that every pupil whose household is on universal credit will have a new entitlement to free school lunches from the start of the 2026/27 academic year. The move comes after campaigners and education leaders have called for free school meals to be extended to all children whose families are on universal credit to ease pressures on young people living in poverty. Nearly 2.1 million pupils – almost one in four of all pupils (24.6%) – in England were eligible for free school meals in January 2024. The DfE has said more than half-a-million more children are expected to benefit from a free meal every school day as a result of the expansion, and nearly £500 will be put back into parents' pockets every year. It suggested that the expansion will lift 100,000 children across England completely out of poverty. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'Feeding more children every day, for free, is one of the biggest interventions we can make to put more money in parents' pockets, tackle the stain of poverty, and set children up to learn. 'This expansion is a truly historic moment for our country, helping families who need it most and delivering our Plan for Change to give every child, no matter their background, the same chance to succeed.' The DfE is due to release data on Thursday morning showing the number of state school pupils in England who are eligible for free school meals. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'It is the moral mission of this government to tackle the stain of child poverty, and today this government takes a giant step towards ending it with targeted support that puts money back in parents' pockets. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the intervention would help the Government 'deliver excellence everywhere, for every child' (Yui Mok/PA) 'From free school meals to free breakfast clubs, breaking the cycle of child poverty is at the heart of our Plan for Change to cut the unfair link between background and success. 'We believe that background shouldn't mean destiny. Today's historic step will help us to deliver excellence everywhere, for every child and give more young people the chance to get on in life.' The Government's child poverty taskforce is due to publish its 10-year strategy later this year. Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust social mobility charity, said: 'This is a significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom. 'Children can't learn effectively when hungry, so this announcement not only helps to tackle the effects of child poverty, but will also likely help improve education outcomes for disadvantaged young people. 'Giving free school meals to all families who are eligible for universal credit is also easier for parents to understand, so has the potential to increase take-up rates.' Kate Anstey, head of education policy at the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) charity, said: 'This is fantastic news and a game-changer for children and families. 'At last, more kids will get the food they need to learn and thrive and millions of parents struggling to make ends meet will get a bit of breathing space. 'We hope this is a sign of what's to come in autumn's child poverty strategy, with government taking more action to meet its manifesto commitment to reduce child poverty in the UK.' Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'There's some detail to be worked through on exactly how this transition will work and we look forward to talking with the Government about that. 'But, certainly, expanding free school meal eligibility in this way is absolutely the right thing to do.' Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'We join families and schools across England in welcoming this necessary and overdue first step in expanding free school meals eligibility. 'The existing threshold had been unchanged since 2018, meaning hundreds of thousands of children in poverty were missing out on the nutrition they need to thrive.' But he added that many children in families who just miss out on being eligible for universal credit will also 'miss out on a hot, healthy school meal'. Mr Kebede said: 'Ensuring that a free school meal is available to all children is the next urgent step that must be taken.' The Liberal Democrats said the change was a 'victory for thousands of passionate campaigners' but was 'only a first step' towards helping children in poverty. The party's education spokeswoman Munira Wilson MP said: 'Liberal Democrats have been pushing hard for this crucial change for years. It's a victory for thousands of passionate campaigners that the Government has finally listened.' She added: 'To end the cost-of-learning crisis, the Government needs to commit to auto-enrolling eligible children for free school meals, lifting the two-child benefit cap, and capping uniform costs to truly change the lives of children in poverty. We'll hold their feet to the fire to make sure today's change is just a start.'


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center
A judge on Wednesday barred a major U.S. private prison operator from housing immigrants facing possible deportation in a shuttered Kansas City area detention center unless it can get a permit from frustrated city officials. Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant agreed after a packed hearing to grant the city of Leavenworth's request for a temporary restraining order against CoreCivic, one of the nation's largest private prison operators. CoreCivic had claimed in legal filings that halting the opening of the 1,033-bed facility on the northwest outskirts of the Kansas City area would cost it $4.2 million in revenue each month. City officials said they anticipated the arrival of detainees apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was imminent under a Trump administration crackdown on illegal immigration. Leavenworth isn't the first city where controversy has surrounded the reopening of a private prison as an ICE detention facility. In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka sued the state's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his recent arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility in that state, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Scott Peterson, the city manager for Leavenworth, said he didn't know if the case in Kansas marked the first time a municipality had prevailed in court. 'I would point out that maybe the reason we have seen some success here today is this is not about immigration,' Peterson said. 'This is not about private prisons. This is about land use.' In late 2021, CoreCivic stopped housing pretrial detainees for the U.S. Marshals Service in the Leavenworth facility after then-President Joe Biden called on the Justice Department to curb the use of private prisons. In the months leading up to the closure, the American Civil Liberties Union and federal public defenders urged the White House to speed up the closure, citing inmate rights violations there along with stabbings, suicides and even one homicide. But with President Donald Trump pushing for mass deportations under a wide-ranging crackdown on illegal immigration, the facility that CoreCivic now calls the Midwest Regional Reception Center is in demand again. It is located just 10 miles (16 kilometers) west of the Kansas City International Airport. As part of his crackdown, Trump has vowed to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from the budgeted 41,000 beds this year. Tennessee-based CoreCivic initially applied for a special use permit from the city in February but then withdrew that application the next month, arguing in court filings that it didn't need the permit and that the process would take too long. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court. The city sued CoreCivic, the lawsuit claiming that CoreCivic impeded the city police force's ability to investigate sexual assaults and other violent crimes. The lawsuit contended that the permitting process was needed to safeguard itself from future problems. 'Just follow our rules," an attorney for the city, Joe Hatley, said in court. 'Go get a permit.' The first version of the lawsuit, filed in March in federal court, was tossed out in May on technical grounds. But Bryant sided with Hatley in the case refiled the same month in state court, finding that the proper procedures weren't followed. Concannon Hausmann, CoreCivic's attorney, declined to comment as the crowd filtered out of the courtroom Wednesday. Norman Mallicoat held a sign reading, 'CoreCivic Doesn't Run Leavenworth' as he left. 'I see this as basically a large company trying to bully a small city into getting what it wants and not having to follow the rules and ordinances of the city,' Mallicoat said.


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
We gave $7B to California for a high-speed rail line and no track was ever laid: ‘Trains to nowhere'
The federal government handed $7 billion to California to build a high-speed rail line, but the Golden State never laid a single foot of track, according to a new report. This prompted Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to threaten that he may remove federal grants to the state's High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA). The 310-page report states that there were numerous missed deadlines and budget overruns. Duffy handed the authority a deadline of July 11 to respond or risk losing approximately $4 billion in grants. 'I promised the American people we would be good stewards of their hard-earned tax dollars,' Duffy said in a statement. 'This report exposes a cold, hard truth: CHSRA has no viable path to complete this project on time or on budget.' 'CHSRA is on notice — If they can't deliver on their end of the deal, it could soon be time for these funds to flow to other projects that can achieve President Trump 's vision of building great, big, beautiful things again,' he added. 'Our country deserves high-speed rail that makes us proud – not boondoogle [sic] trains to nowhere.' The rail line was passed as a ballot initiative in 2008 and was supposed to run for 800 miles, connecting Sacramento and San Diego. The budget was $33 billion and the work was supposed to have been completed by 2020. However, in 2019, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said there was nowhere to go after costs had reached $77.3 billion and the rail line had been restricted to run from Merced to Bakersfield. Subsequently, officials with the CHSRA applied for grants totaling $8 billion from the funds passed in former President Joe Biden 's infrastructure legislation to finish that shorter rail line. However, in a letter sent Wednesday, the Federal Railroad Administration's acting administrator, Drew Feeley, said that nine months after the first batch of funding was sent in September last year, the authority had crossed a deadline to buy rail cars. Feeley went through other procurement problems and tallied up as much as $1.6 billion in misspent funding because of changed orders. In the end, it's considered unlikely that the project will be finished by its new deadline of 2033. 'CHSRA relied on the false hope of an unending spigot of Federal taxpayer dollars,' Feeley wrote. 'In essence, CHSRA has conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time.' The California rail authority inspector general found in February that there was a budget shortfall of $7 billion. The federal government had handed the project $6.9 billion since 2010. Speaking to reporters last month, Newsom noted that a high-speed rail project connecting Dallas and Houston had been abandoned. 'You can see the progress we've actually made,' he said at the time. 'We're now on the other side of the environmental reviews; we're on the other side of the land acquisition.' But a spokesperson for the rail authority said the findings of the four-month review were 'misguided' and didn't reflect the project. 'The Authority will fully address and correct the record in our formal response,' a spokesperson said, according to The Los Angeles Times. 'We remain firmly committed to completing the nation's first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state.'