OpenAI CEO Sam Altman mocks Musk over Trump split: ‘Elon busts up with everybody, that's what he does'
Altman and Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 but had a falling out in 2018. Disagreements over the company's direction — particularly whether it should remain non-profit — led Musk to depart and set off a long-running feud. The rivalry has since played out in legal filings and public jabs.
Once close allies, Musk and Trump have recently turned on each other following Musk's announcement of the 'America Party' — a third-party political movement that could complicate Trump's 2026 midterms. Trump reportedly called Musk a 'train wreck' after the split.
Altman, when asked whether he would support Musk's new political venture, didn't hold back.
'I don't know. I haven't had a chance to read about it,' he said, offering a veiled jab at the party and its chaotic rollout.
Despite previously donating $1 million to Trump's 2016 inauguration fund, Altman has largely stayed out of partisan politics — until now. In January, he appeared at the White House with Trump to promote the Stargate AI project, a $500 billion federal initiative focused on artificial intelligence and national infrastructure.
Trump and Musk's friendship began unraveling after Musk publicly rejected Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — a piece of legislation seen as a centerpiece of the President's economic revival agenda. Musk's rejection of the bill reportedly infuriated Trump, accelerating their rift.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
After targeting India, Donald Trump mulls tariffs on China over Russian oil purchases, no final decision yet
S President Donald Trump is considering imposing tariffs on China over its purchases of Russian oil, in a move similar to the one recently taken against India, according to Vice President JD Vance. Speaking to Fox News, Vance said no final decision has been made but confirmed that the idea is under discussion. Earlier this week, Trump announced tariffs on India, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. The discussions reflect growing concern within Trump's circle over Beijing's role in supporting Moscow's economy amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. The measure would aim to pressure China to reduce its energy trade with Russia. Vance emphasised that the idea remains under consideration and no formal policy has been set. China has significantly increased its imports of discounted Russian crude since the start of the Ukraine war in 2022, helping offset the impact of Western sanctions on Moscow. Washington has previously warned Beijing that such purchases undermine international efforts to isolate Russia economically. If enacted, new tariffs could mark an escalation in Trump's already tough trade stance toward China. The White House last week issued an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 percentage points in tariffs on all Indian goods, raising the total duty to 50%. The move, announced by Trump, targets India's continued imports of Russian oil, which the administration says undermine US foreign policy and national security interests. The new tariffs will take effect 21 days after the signing of the order, providing a brief window for India and Russia to potentially negotiate with Washington on the import taxes. White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro said India faced the steep hike due to its 'refusal' to halt purchases of Russian crude — a trade the US claims is helping fund Moscow's war in Ukraine. Since 2022, Russia's share of India's total oil imports has surged from 1.7% to 35.1%, making it India's largest oil supplier. The shift has been driven by discounted Russian crude, often capped at $60 per barrel, which India says is critical for its energy security. President Trump announced last week that the US would not engage in new trade negotiations with India until the tariff dispute is resolved. The Executive Order also allows for further expansion or reduction of tariffs depending on a country's alignment with US national security and foreign policy objectives. The penalty on India follows the administration's earlier trade actions against other countries but contrasts with a softer approach toward China. While Beijing currently faces a 30% tariff, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has suggested its August 12 deadline could be extended if trade talks progress. If implemented as planned, the 50% tariffs mark one of the harshest trade measures taken by Washington against a major economic partner in recent years, potentially escalating tensions between two of the world's largest democracies.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MEA to highlight bipartisan approach to India-U.S. relationship to Parliamentary Committee on External Affairs on Aug. 11
U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of additional tariffs on India is a result of 'flawed assumptions' and New Delhi is being dragged into a geopolitical tug of war in which it does not intend to participate, officials of the Ministry of External Affairs are poised to tell the Parliamentary Committee on External Affairs on Monday (August 11, 2025). The officials may also highlight the bipartisan nature of India-U.S. relationship and argue that ties prospered under 'both BJP and Congress-led governments'. The meeting of the Committee on External Affairs is being convened after the U.S. administration cited India's purchase of Russian oil as a trigger for additional 25% tariffs on top of the 25% 'reciprocal' tariffs announced before. In the meeting, the MEA team is expected to have a pragmatic approach to the latest challenges to the India-U.S. relationship and inform the Committee that despite the difficulties, India remains 'committed to engaging constructively' with the United States about the issues through 'dialogue and mutual respect'. 'Unilateral, punitive measures' It is learned that the Committee will be told that the U.S. decisions do not 'reflect the realities of global energy markets or India's sovereign choices' and that India considers the tariffs 'unilateral, punitive measures' that hurt global trade norms. The MEA team is expected to provide the Indian assessment of the motivation behind the actions of the U.S. President. The officials believe that the White House regards Russia's military campaign against Ukraine as an 'ongoing threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy' that requires 'strengthened measures'. Prior to the Executive Order signed by President Trump on August 6, 2025, India and the United States had been in negotiations for a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement'. The MEA team is expected to tell the MPs in the Parliamentary Committee about what is perceived as 'double standards' in U.S. policy regarding trade with Russia. The Committee will also receive a detailed presentation of the historical nature of India-U.S. relationship with an emphasis on 'shared democratic values, open societies, converging strategic and economic interests and robust people to people ties'. The officials are likely to provide an overview of the 'bipartisan' nature of the relationship and how under both BJP- and Congress-led governments, the relationship has been nurtured and 'deepened'. Similar consensus between the Republicans and the Democrats in the U.S. are also expected to be in focus during the discussion. The Committee members are also likely to hear about the support President Trump has provided to India's core concern of cross-border terrorism from Pakistan, especially after the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir. In this regard, President Trump's approval of extradition of 26/11 attack-linked Tahawwur Rana to India is also likely to be part of the presentation. A similar mention of the declaration of The Resistance Front (TRF) as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and (Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) is also expected during discussions at the Committee meeting.
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
US seeking Ukrainian conflict end on current frontlines, to end funding: US VP Vance
Ahead of the much-anticipated summit meeting between the US and Russian Presidents in Alaska, US Vice President J.D. Vance said that negotiations to end the Ukraine conflict "should be based on the existing battle lines", though admitting it will not make "anybody super happy". Vance, speaking to Fox News, described this strategy as "a realistic, if imperfect, foundation" for a negotiated peace between Russia and Ukraine, RT reported. He also credited President Donald Trump with securing a breakthrough that could bring Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to the table. "If you take where the current line of contact between Russia and Ukraine is, we're going to try to find some negotiated settlement that the Ukrainians and the Russians can live with… where the killing stops,"| Vance told Fox News, admitting that "it's not going to make anybody super happy". Trump had said earlier that the ideas under discussion include "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" sides, and Zelensky would need to find a way to approve such a deal under Ukrainian law. Zelensky has rejected any such agreement, claiming that 'nobody can or will' make concessions on the issue. 'The Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupiers,' he proclaimed. Vance also claimed President Trump had persuaded his Russian counterpart to reverse course on his refusal to meet Zelensky, and that scheduling talks between the three leaders was now under discussion. Asked if Putin and Zelensky should meet before involving Trump, he contended that he doesn't think "it would be that productive", and it must be Trump who is the one to 'bring these two together' for meaningful progress. In the interview published after he met several European and Ukrainian officials in London, including UK Foreign Minister David Lammy, ahead of the summit meeting between Presidents Putin and Trump, the US Vice President also said the US is not going to fund Ukraine anymore. Ukraine's European backers can buy the weapons from American producers if they want to continue supporting Kiev, and the US will be "okay with that", Vance added. He suggested that Kiev's European backers should play a bigger role in providing funding if they "care so much about this conflict.' "Americans, I think, are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars, to this particular conflict. But if the Europeans want to step up and buy the weapons from American producers, we're okay with that. But we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore," he said.
