Ram boss sorry for ‘woke' pivot that killed gas-guzzling engine, brings back growling classic after backlash: ‘We got it wrong'
Ram admitted it screwed up by killing a legacy American-made engine known for its raw power — and is revved up to bring it back after facing major backlash.
The automaker had discontinued the beloved HEMI V-8 engine from its 2025 Ram trucks as part of a 'woke' pivot by the since-ousted CEO of parent company Stellantis Carlos Tavares,
But new Ram CEO Tim Kuniskis, who came out of retirement last last year, offered up a mea culpa over the decision to pull the plug on the engine that powered the top-selling truck for decades.
7 Ram Trucks CEO Tim Kuniskis appears in a new ad for the company in which he apologizes for ditching a beloved gas-powered engine.
Youtube/Ram Trucks
In a newly-released ad, Kuniskis publicly acknowledged the misstep and said Ram is reversing course by bringing back the gas-guzzling HEMI engine in 2026 models.
'We own it. We got it wrong. And we're fixing it,' Kuniskis announces in the commercial.
Ram ditched the HEMI as part of its broader push toward meeting stricter emissions regulations enacted by the Biden administration as well as its goal of improving fuel efficiency across its lineup.
President Trump administration has pushed to scrap many of Biden's green initiatives.
'When Ram made the decision to discontinue production of the iconic HEMI V-8, the internet erupted, and lifelong loyalists voiced their outrage across social media,' Lindsay Fifelski, head of Ram brand advertising, told Fast Company.
7 Kuniskis is seen in the ad getting behind the wheel of a Ram Truck as it speeds down a NASCAR runway.
Youtube/Ram Trucks
'We knew we couldn't market our way around this moment; we had to meet it head-on.'
The Ram ad also features screeching tires and Kuniskis narrating over the roar of engines as drives the Ram Truck on a NASCAR track.
'You hear that? That's our HEMI, and it's saying, 'I'm back,'' he bellows, as the truck blazes down the track.
A fan chimes in: 'Did he say what I think he said? That thing's got a HEMI!'
'Hell, yeah, it does!' another said.
7 The ad features screeching tires and Kuniskis narrating over the roar of engines as he is drifting, doing doughnuts and taking hot laps on a NASCAR track.
Youtube/Ram Trucks
Later, amid tire smoke and cheering crowds, Kuniskis leaned into the hype.
'You want more? Buckle up. Ram's coming back to NASCAR,' he said.
He offered up one last rallying cry — 'Let's f–king go!' — then ended the commercial with a promise: 'We're back in America's motorsport. The HEMI's back. And we ain't going anywhere.'
7 'You hear that? That's our HEMI, and it's saying, 'I'm back,'' he said, as the truck blazes down the track.
Youtube/Ram Trucks
Ram and its parent brand Dodge left NASCAR after the 2012 season.
The commercial, created by ad agency Argonaut, doubles as an apology and a reintroduction of the HEMI, which is named for the hemispherical shape of the engine's combustion chambers.
The HEMI is unique in that the shape of its chambers allows for better airflow, higher efficiency and greater power output. The engine delivers up to 717+ horsepower in supercharged variants and is prized for its durability, low-end torque and distinctive rumble.
7 The HEMI is unique in that the shape of its chambers allows for better airflow, higher efficiency and greater power output.
Frisco Dodge
The iconic engine was replaced by the new Hurricane lineup of more powerful and efficient 3.0-liter twin-turbo inline-six engines during the refresh of the fifth-generation Ram 1500 light-duty truck.
The move aligned with parent company Stellantis' global electrification and downsizing strategy, which emphasized smaller, more efficient powertrains like the Hurricane.
The company positioned the Hurricane as more powerful and fuel-efficient than the outgoing V8 — but the decision sparked backlash from loyalists who valued the HEMI's iconic rumble, durability, and cultural significance.
7 The engine delivers up to 717+ horsepower in supercharged variants.
RAM
Ram's overall sales dropped more than 18% year over year in 2024.
Kuniskis told CNBC that he expects the HEMI to account for 25% to 40% of Ram 1500 pickup truck sales in 2025.
The renewed interest suggests the company's about-face could deliver not just goodwill, but a needed boost at the dealership level.
7 Ram Trucks and its parent company Stellantis are joining other automakers in moving away from full electrification of their fleets.
Youtube/Ram Trucks
Stellantis, the fourth largest automaker in the world — whose portfolio of brands includes Ram, Dodge, Fiat, Chrysler, Peugeot and Jeep — is just the latest automaker to scale back the push toward electrifying its fleet of cars and trucks.
Several major car companies — including Ford, GM and Mercedes-Benz — have scaled back or delayed their electrification plans due to weaker-than-expected consumer demand, high production costs and charging infrastructure concerns.
Ford is pivoting toward hybrids and GM postponed several EV launches.
By late 2023, electric vehicle inventory was piling up on dealership lots, with EVs taking more than three times longer to sell than gas-powered cars, signaling a sharp slowdown in consumer demand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Cost To Live in the US Cities With the Best Quality of Life
While cost of living is an incredibly important factor to consider when making any kind of financial plans for your life, perhaps less tangible but no less important is 'quality of life' — the measure of overall safety, education, healthcare and even commute times in your local area. After all, these elements are crucial to enjoying daily life and feeling satisfied with what that life financially costs you. Check Out: Learn This: Recently, U.S. News & World Report (UNWR) curated a list of the American cities with the highest Quality of Life Index (a system measuring the satisfaction level of residents in various cities). Further, UNWR broke down the cost of living for such high-quality cities — specifically, the average housing prices and median household income for cities that topped their Quality of Life Index. Wondering whether you could afford to live in an American city with a higher quality of life than nearly any other? Planning to retire somewhere with an easy commute, low crime and excellent healthcare? Check out the list to find out whether one of the 20 American cities with the best quality of life fits into your financial plan. Median home value: $1,272,125 Median household income: $144,602 Livability score: 5.8 Find More: Read This: Median home value: $1,170,994 Median household income: $193,307 Livability score: 6.5 Also See: Median home value: $1,004,244 Median household income: $189,538 Livability score: 6.8 Median home value: $1,235,465 Median household income: $162,072 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $605,251 Median household income: $96,668 Livability score: 5.1 Enjoy This: Median home value: $560,849 Median household income: $98,605 Livability score: 6.2 Median home value: $985,214 Median household income: $130,052 Livability score: 5.7 Median home value: $990,492 Median household income: $127,516 Livability score: 6.3 Learn More: Median home value: $636,683 Median household income: $127,516 Livability score: 6.3 Median home value: $410,180 Median household income: $62,393 Livability score: 4.5 Median home value: $627,797 Median household income: $163,286 Livability score: 6.8 See More: Median home value: $830,848 Median household income: $141,140 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $584,446 Median household income: $96,149 Livability score: 6.0 Median home value: $287,909 Median household income: $65,648 Livability score: 5.6 Trending Now: Median home value: $276,828 Median household income: $63,944 Livability score: 5.5 Median home value: $2,764,855 Median household income: $223,951 Livability score: 6.1 Median home value: $660,984 Median household income: $180,103 Livability score: 6.2 Median home value: $399,216 Median household income: $93,832 Livability score: 6.1 Find Out: Median home value: $729,136 Median household income: $78,477 Livability score: 4.4 Median home value: $337,136 Median household income: $68,895 Livability score: 5.4 More From GOBankingRates 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's the Cost To Live in the US Cities With the Best Quality of Life
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Memo: Trump grapples with prospect of all-out Israel-Iran war
President Trump faces a volatile, fast-moving global crisis as Israel and Iran teeter on the brink of all-out war. The situation is shifting by the moment in the wake of Israel's attack on multiple sites in Iran in the early hours of Friday, local time. Iran launched a retaliatory barrage against Israel later on Friday. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said that Israel's initial attacks had killed 78 and injured more than 320. Iranian officials have said they regard Israel's actions as a declaration of war. There has been no such explicit declaration from the Israeli side, but clearly the two nations are in the middle of a grave clash that could easily spiral even further. Such a confrontation has the potential to scramble American politics, too. In some ways, it already has. The price of oil spiked as soon as the Israeli attack happened, rising by more than 8 percent at one point on Friday. An elevated oil price for any significant length of time could feed inflation and dampen economic growth. That unpleasant combination is one reason why the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by roughly 1.8 percent on Friday. The broader based S&P 500 declined by more than one percent. To be sure, a cooling of tensions between Israel and Iran could happen, calming oil prices and producing an instant rebound on the financial markets. But such a de-escalation is far from certain. The more negative scenario — military actions by two foreign nations causing economic trouble in the U.S. — would be an especially galling development for Trump. Then there are the intertwined issues of Trump's general attitude toward Israel, his pursuit of a fresh nuclear deal with Iran, and his broader skepticism of interventionist military policies overseas. Trump is on one level a fervent support of Israel. He often boasts to pro-Israel crowds about the actions he took in his first term, including moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and facilitating agreements to normalize relations between Israel and two Gulf nations, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. But Trump has had a checkered relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump reportedly took umbrage at Netanyahu accepting former President Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election. In a 2023 speech, Trump complained that Netanyahu had 'let us down' by backing out of what Trump said was a planned joint action to kill Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani. The U.S. went ahead and killed Soleimani. In Trump's second term, the president pressed Israel to agree to a ceasefire in the first couple of months of his term. But he also outraged Palestinians and their supporters by suggesting Gazans could be pushed out of the strip of land that is home — which Trump proposed could be redeveloped as a tourist destination. Similar complexities surround Trump's suggestion that there could be a new nuclear deal with Iran. He had excoriated the 2015 deal that was made during former President Obama's tenure, withdrawing the United States from it in 2018, during his first term. But he has recently been pursuing a new agreement, and at one point it was reported that the U.S. might be willing to countenance some element of uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. Trump has more recently said that is not the case. The latest round of talks involving Trump's negotiator Steve Witkoff and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, had been set for Sunday. Trump, on Thursday at the White House, responded to what were then rumors of an Israeli attack on Iran by saying, 'I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it.' When the attack went ahead, there was instant speculation that Netanyahu was seeking to vaporize any hope of a U.S.-Iran deal. This thesis was strengthened in the immediate wake of the attack when Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement emphasizing that 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran.' But that all changed by the next day. Trump, always sensitive to any suggestion that he has been outflanked or sidelined, seemed to take exception to a Wall Street Journal reporter's question about whether the U.S. had been given a 'heads-up' by Netanyahu, insisting that the White House knew all about the attack in advance. Some of his allies also advanced the idea that the earlier expression of misgivings had been a tactical sleight-of-hand intended to make the Iranians think an Israeli attack would not come. In any event, the Iranians have now pulled out of the talks. Trump, on Truth Social, posted that he had offered Iran the chance to reach a new deal in recent months 'but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' In the short term, it appears extremely unlikely that Iran would sign onto a deal on Trump's terms in the wake of an Israeli attack. Such a move would surely look to many in the Islamic Republic and the rest of the Middle East like a humiliation. Trump is also navigating between his instinctual backing of Israel and his more isolationist tendencies. Both impulses have their advocates in different parts of the Republican universe. Among office holders, the views expressed in recent days by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) were typical. Graham said that if Iran continued to balk at a nuclear deal, the U.S. should 'go all-in to help Israel finish the job.' Cruz said, 'Israel is acting to defend itself. I stand with Israel.' But in the broader MAGA universe, prominent figures including Tucker Carlson and Matt Walsh are exponentially more skeptical. Carlson inveighed against 'warmongers' who wanted 'direct US military involvement in a war with Iran,' on X on Friday. Walsh, on the same platform, wrote, 'Israel is its own country and perfectly capable of taking care of itself. We do not need to be involve in this and should not be.' While some dismiss Carlson and Walsh as mere media figures, they have a combined X following of roughly 20 million people. The political impact of the current crisis is impossible to predict at this point. It is certainly possible that it could rebound to Trump's advantage, especially if the intensity of the confrontation wanes quickly. In the very short term, Friday's escalating crisis in the Middle East saw a big story from the previous day that was to Democrats' advantage – the handcuffing of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) after he sought to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem – fade toward the margins. But there are dangerous waters churning, and any missteps by Trump could cost him dearly. The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump juggles China framework trade deal, LA's anti-ICE riots and Israel's Iran strike in 21st week in office
President Donald Trump had a whirlwind 21st week back in the Oval Office, including securing the framework for a trade deal with China, continued handling of anti-ICE riots spiraling in Los Angeles, and putting a heightened focus on Iran after Israel launched a sweeping strike on the nation. Here's what happened during his 21st week in office: Highly anticipated trade talks with China were held in London this week and led to a preliminary agreement between the world's two biggest economic powers. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump posted to Truth Social Wednesday of framework for a trade deal. The Trump administration had leveled tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese goods following the president's reciprocal tariff plans in April, when China retaliated against the U.S. with tariffs of its own. China and the U.S. reached a preliminary trade agreement in May, which Trump said China violated in a Truth Social post at the end of May. Trump spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping June 5 to discuss trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, before Trump's team of trade leaders — including Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and United States Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer — headed to London to speak with Chinese counterparts. Read On The Fox News App Donald Trump Details 'Most Exciting Part' Of China Trade Agreement "We made a great deal with China," Trump celebrated from a red carpet event at the Kennedy Center Wednesday. "We're very happy with it," Trump added. "We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are, too." Trump said the deal includes China supplying rare earth materials to the U.S., and that Trump will "work closely" with Xi "to open up China to American Trade." "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!" Trump said Wednesday. Trump's week started out largely focusing on the anti-ICE riots spiraling in Los Angeles, which also led to protests in other cities nationwide in rebuke of the administration's efforts to deport the millions of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation under President Joe Biden's White House tenure. Riots broke out in L.A. after federal law enforcement officials converged on the city to carry out immigration raids. Local leaders such as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom quickly denounced the raids in public statements while offering words of support for illegal immigrants in the state. Protests over the raids soon devolved into violence as rioters targeted federal law enforcement officials, including launching rocks at officials, looting, fires and shutting down roads and highways. Fresh Wave Of Anti-ice Protests Threatens Uncertainty, Volatility Before Trump's Massive Military Parade Trump announced June 7 that he was deploying 2,000 National Guard members to help quell the violence, and the administration deployed hundreds of Marines to respond to anti-immigration chaos Monday evening as the violence continued. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump posted to Truth Social Tuesday morning. California launched a lawsuit against the administration for activating the National Guard, which bypassed the governor who typically deploys the National Guard during a state of emergency. U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer sided with Newsom and his administration's lawsuit in a decision Thursday ordering Trump to return control of the Guard to the state "forthwith." A federal appeals court on Thursday, however, issued an administrative stay of the lower court's order, handing the Trump administration a temporary win. "The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe," Trump posted to Truth Social Friday. "If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!" Trump activated the National Guard as he and federal officials condemned rhetoric from local Democratic elected officials who publicly spoke out against federal law enforcement officials converging on Los Angeles to carry out immigration raids. Federal officials pinned blame for the violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a June 7 statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." Israel launched strikes on Iran Thursday evening, with Trump telling Fox News' Bret Baier that there were no surprises over the attacks and that he was aware they would unfold ahead of time. "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table," Trump said Thursday. "We will see. There are several people in leadership in Iran that will not be coming back." Trump Says Israel's Next Iran Attack Will Be Even More Brutal: 'Make A Deal' The strikes led to the deaths of top Iranian military officials, including: Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Hossein Salami, Chief of the Iranian Armed Forces Mohammad Hossein Bagheri and Commander of Iran's Emergency Command Gholam-Ali Rashid. Trump warned in a Truth Social message Friday that Israel's next round of strikes on Iran would be "even more brutal," encouraging Iran to make a nuclear deal amid ongoing talks with the U.S. "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Trump said. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE." Before Israel launched attacks on Iran, the U.S. and Iran were scheduled to hold another round of nuclear talks this weekend regarding whether Iran should have the capacity to enrich uranium. "The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come - And they know how to use it," Trump continued on Truth Social. "Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!" Trump held a meeting with his National Security Council Friday to discus the strikes. Trump's 21st week in office is slated to cap off with a military parade on the streets of Washington, D.C., in honor of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which also falls on Flag Day and Trump's 79th birthday. The patriotic event is anticipated to garner protests, as critics of the president slam him over the immigration raids in Los Angeles and elsewhere, and claim he is operating like a "king." "If there's any protest once they come out, they will be met with very big force," Trump told reporters Tuesday. "I haven't even heard about a protest. But people that hate our country … they will be met with very heavy force." Fox News Digital's Anders Hagstrom, Diana Stancy and Greg Norman contributed to this report. Original article source: Trump juggles China framework trade deal, LA's anti-ICE riots and Israel's Iran strike in 21st week in office
