Trump's Qatari 747 may need fighter escorts to serve as Air Force One
WASHINGTON: A Boeing 747 jet offered to President Donald Trump by Qatar as a temporary flying White House might need fighter jet escorts and could be restricted to flying inside the U.S. unless significant costly security upgrades were made, aviation experts and industry sources said.
Even if numerous improvements to the plane's communications and defenses are made over the coming months once any deal is completed, the military escort and domestic restriction could remain in place, the experts and sources said.
As the commander-in-chief, however, Trump could waive any and all requirements like these, a former Air Force official noted.
Retrofitting the luxury plane offered by Qatar's royal family would require security upgrades, communications improvements to prevent spies from listening in and the ability to fend off incoming missiles, experts said. The costs were not known, but could be significant given Boeing's (BA.N) current effort to build two new Air Force One planes exceeds $5 billion.
The Air Force referred a request for comment to the White House, which did not have an immediate comment.
There are serious questions about whether any combination of fighter escorts and short-term upgrades would be enough to provide sufficient protection for the president.
'I don't think it's possible,' said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Defense and Security Department, referring to short timeline for the deep modifications.
'Air Force One is designed to be survivable in all kinds of environments, including a nuclear war,' he added, noting the jet's ability to tolerate the electromagnetic pulse from a nuclear blast is embedded in the jet's wiring and systems from the bottom up. 'That's not something you add on.'
Trump has dismissed criticism of his widely-reported plan to accept the 13-year-old airplane with a $400 million list price, saying it would be 'stupid' to turn down the offer.
Trump also called it a practical decision, and that he was disappointed Boeing had taken so long to deliver on already delayed contracts for the two new Air Force One planes that he renegotiated during his first term.
'If he wants it, and he says 'I'll accept any risk associated with not having all the stuff the real Air Force One has,' he can do that,' the former Air Force official said.
While Air Force One does not normally fly with fighter escorts, the new plane may need them to defend against missile threats, the former official added.
An escort could be necessary because the Qatari plane 'wouldn't have the electronic warfare and missile warning systems and whatever else you associate with survivability on Air Force One,' said Richard Aboulafia, managing director of consulting firm AeroDynamic Advisory.
He added international travel may be off-limits because 'you can't guarantee the level of security in international airspace or airports.'
Air Force One almost never requires fighter escorts because it is equipped with a range of advanced defensive systems including flares, electronic jammers and infrared detection systems that protect against missile strikes.
Escorts sometimes fly with the jet when it is overseas, or in moments of national security risk such as after the attacks of September 11, 2001.
The government has tapped L3Harris Technologies (LHX.N) to overhaul the 747 as it waits for delivery of the two delayed new Air Force One aircraft from Boeing.
Other upgrades could include a communications suite that can handle sensitive White House and aircraft crew functions, and changing the interior so it can support Trump, his staff, the Secret Service and the press, said Douglas Birkey, executive director of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.
Under any scenario, the U.S. military would need to install new security features and potentially new wiring before the plane was used to transport Trump, experts say.
DELAYS
First mooted a decade ago, the Air Force One program has faced chronic delays, with the delivery of two new 747-8s slated for 2027, three years behind the previous schedule.
Boeing in 2018 received a $3.9 billion contract to build the two planes for use as Air Force One and costs have since risen to at least $4.7 billion. Boeing has also posted $2.4 billion of charges from the project.
Those jets were themselves originally intended for a foreign airline, Russian carrier Transaero, which went bankrupt in 2015. Using existing airframes was meant to reduce costs but Boeing has since taken billions of dollars in charges because the costs to retrofit the plane have far exceeded the contract price.
In February, Trump toured a Boeing 747-8 built for Qatar to highlight the delays.
The White House said at the time that the visit allowed him to 'check out the new hardware/technology,' without elaborating.
The aircraft was originally operated by state-owned VIP airline Qatar Amiri flight, which performs private flights for members of the country's ruling family and other government officials, according to specialist databases.
It was reported sold in 2023 to Global Jet Isle of Man, a private charter firm that has declined to comment on the jet.
There are also questions over the $400 million value widely placed on the jet, based on new prices for the aircraft, which halted production in 2023.
Analysts Cirium said a second-hand 747-8 might fetch a quarter of that, while a trader in VIP jets said the bespoke interior would be worth much more than the plane itself.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Asian shares rise, currencies inch lower as US-China trade talks roll into second day
SINGAPORE/HONG KONG: Asian stocks climbed on Tuesday, while regional currencies edged lower against a firmer dollar as investors tracked the second day of high-stakes trade talks between Washington and Beijing. Representatives from China and the US met in London on Monday, just days after US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held their first post-inauguration call to address an escalating trade dispute. Trump said he had received "good reports" from officials engaged the talks, which are expected to extend into Tuesday. "The sentiment across Asian stock markets seems to be lifted by optimism around the US-China trade talks, which is seemingly going smoothly," said Poon Panichpibool, markets strategist at Krung Thai Bank. "Developments so far suggest that tensions may ease slightly and that there will be no further escalation into a tariff standoff from either side, which is good." MSCI's broadest index of Asia Pacific shares outside Japan rose as much as 0.8 per cent to its highest level since January 21, 2022. South Korean equities rose 0.6 per cent, and Indonesian shares gained 1.5 per cent. DBS analysts said the second day of trade talks might see the US relaxing restrictions on tech exports in exchange for China resuming rare-earths mineral shipments. The tech-heavy Taiwanese index closed up 2.1 per cent to over a two-month high, with chip giant TSMC jumping 4 per cent. Malaysian stocks added 0.2 per cent. Analysts at United Overseas Bank noted that the country's foreign portfolio inflows in May hit their highest level since March 2016 as signs of tariff de-escalation improved risk appetite. Regional currencies were largely unchanged. The absence of concrete outcomes from Monday's discussions between the world's two largest economies kept currency markets subdued, with traders hesitant to take big positions. "FX markets are largely in consolidation mood, with upticks in USD seen," said Christopher Wong, currency strategist at OCBC. The Malaysian ringgit, Singapore dollar each inched 0.1 per cent lower, while the Taiwanese dollar and Thai baht edged 0.1 per cent higher. The South Korean won fell 0.9 per cent. The US dollar index was up 0.4 per cent as investors awaited US inflation data, which is due on Wednesday. The inflation report is among the final key data points ahead of the US Federal Reserve's June 17-18 meeting, where it is widely expected to keep rates unchanged.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Asian stocks climb, FX steady as US-China trade talks set to continue
Stock markets in Asia climbed on Tuesday and regional currencies were little changed against a steady U.S. dollar, as investors monitored the second day of trade negotiations between the United States and China. Representatives from Beijing and Washington met in London on Monday, just days after U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held their first post-inauguration call to address an escalating trade dispute. Trump said he had received "good reports" from officials engaged in the talks, which are expected to extend into Tuesday. "The response in markets today, though, looks mixed," Maybank analysts said in a research note, adding that they would continue to monitor the situation. MSCI's broadest index of Asia Pacific shares outside Japan rose as much as 0.7% to its highest level since January 21, 2022. DBS analysts said that the second day of trade talks might see the U.S. relaxing restrictions on tech exports in exchange for China resuming rare-earths mineral shipments. The tech-heavy Taiwanese index jumped 2.1% to a two-week high, with chip giant TSMC surging 4%. South Korean equities rose 0.3% and Indonesian shares gained 1.2%. Malaysian stocks added 0.1%. Analysts at United Overseas Bank noted that the country's foreign portfolio inflows in May hit their highest level since March 2016 as signs of tariff de-escalation improved risk appetite. Regional currencies were largely unchanged. The absence of concrete outcomes from Monday's discussions between the world's two largest economies kept currency markets subdued, with traders hesitant to take on big positions. The Malaysian ringgit, Singapore dollar each inched 0.1% lower, while the Taiwanese dollar and Thai baht edged 0.1% higher. The South Korean won fell 0.5%. The U.S. dollar index was up 0.2% as investors awaited U.S. inflation data which is due on Wednesday. The inflation report is among the final key data points ahead of the U.S. Federal Reserve's June 17-18 meeting, where it is widely expected to keep rates unchanged. HIGHLIGHTS: ** Taiwan May exports hit record on AI demand and ahead of U.S. tariffs ** Investors eye Latin America as they diversify away from Wall Street ** India May inflation likely cooled to 3% as food price pressure eases - Reuters
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Repeated shocks risk global trade
DISCUSSION around the consequences of President Donald Trump's economic policies – most notably the increased tariffs on all countries, especially China – has centred on economic costs. These costs affect both businesses and consumers, manifesting as higher prices for traded goods, a shift in production to less efficient locations and reduced consumer choices when goods are no longer produced or traded. The focus on economic costs neglects a more impactful and troubling development: a shift in global trade governance and the exchange of goods under it. The US has gone from being the establisher and leader of international trade institutions to being the single greatest threat to their continuation. Multinational enterprises that have prospered under this system face unprecedented uncertainty and increasingly stark choices between upholding the system and being undercut by competitors forced to circumvent it. Businesses engaging in international trade and investment have long relied upon rules, principles and norms established under the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1948 and deepened under the stewardship of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) since 1995. The international system under GATT and WTO supports trade through the elimination of trade barriers including tariffs, quotas and subsidies, by establishing principles of equal treatment and by providing mechanisms to manage disputes between nations and companies. Continuing business faith in multilateral trade rules and liberalisation is increasingly at odds with the positions of nation-states. The global financial crisis in 2007 to 2008, China's rapid rise to dominant global manufacturer since joining WTO in 2001 and legitimate concerns with the distribution of trade benefits within countries have contributed to popular backlash against freer trade. The rise of powerful global corporations that pursue profits rather than sovereign interests has also played on the fears of nation-states that, through liberalisation, have ceded much regulatory autonomy. Against this backdrop is a world besieged by increasingly frequent major shocks – of human and natural origin. Businesses and nation-states are navigating trade wars, disease outbreaks, military conflicts and intensifying weather events – individually and in tandem. Discourse typically bundles these shocks together to paint an overall picture of instability, lower confidence and temporary disruption to economic activity. But to appreciate the sustained consequences for trade, the stepwise influence of each major shock deserves further examination. The first Trump administration's trade war from 2018 provided the first substantial and symbolic shift from trade liberalisation to restriction. It delivered an initial blow to the 'made in China, sold in America' model, prompting conversations in global boardrooms around the need to reduce dependence on production in China. However, investors were largely unwilling to forgo China's cost competitiveness with the re-export of goods via third countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, being the dominant response. Trade continued within the bounds of international governance. The Covid-19 pandemic from early 2020 created more substantive fractures between businesses and governments on trade governance. International institutions proved incapable of mobilising an effective and coordinated health and economic response, with business disruption amplified under diverging sovereign measures. China's draconian response delivered a goal for its reputation as a reliable production location. While economists and businesses marvelled at the adaptability of global supply chains, governments saw vulnerabilities requiring intervention on national security grounds. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 poured salt into the open wound, sharply highlighting the divergence between corporate interests and those of nation-states. US-led sanctions on trade with Russia sought to divide markets along geopolitical lines with little regard for business impacts. The ability of businesses from Russia, China, India and elsewhere to circumvent inadequately enforced sanctions exposed the limits of international and national governance to uphold trade restrictions. Companies from America, Europe and elsewhere had to choose between supporting sanctions and sustaining profits, with many becoming circumventers. That markets did a better job of navigating sanctions and war than governments did of implementing sanctions reinforced the pandemic fracture between businesses and governments, significantly eroding trust in international trade governance. It is in this context that Trump 2.0 must be seen as an existential threat to prospects for restoring faith in the system. The US is now the primary source of economic policy uncertainty and lead antagonist undermining international institutions, imposing and threatening smaller countries with tariffs and hollowing out WTO. Businesses conditioned by pandemic-induced disruptions and ineffectual sanctions face another choice between wearing tariff costs and being undercut by less scrupulous competitors. Maintaining support for formal, rules-based and ethical international trade means contending with an increasingly formidable global network of informal actors and activities that outmatch the enforcement efforts of trade regulators. After all, border processes that have been streamlined and deregulated over decades to encourage seamless and trusted trade cannot be instantly and effectively converted to a punitive enforcement stance. And neither Trump nor the countries he threatens appear willing to plough resources into tighter trade regulation or have a vision for what enforcement looks like. Arresting the decline of trade institutions may seem insurmountable in the current geopolitical environment but the alternative is trending towards a future in which governments everywhere cede control of effective trade regulation. In such a world, the ability of international institutions and nation-states to uphold product standardisation and safety, supply chain resilience and ethical practices is compromised. Government capacity to raise revenue and manage the macroeconomy is further weakened by growing informality while businesses and consumers pay for the additional risk embodied in less-regulated trade. The world sans the US must act quickly to reinforce the international system, strengthening international institutions, including WTO. Space for greater leadership from large emerging economies must be created to forge a collective governance approach for countries across the development spectrum. Tackling systemic destruction is far greater and more economically consequential than addressing the immediate impact of Trump tariffs. A world in which trade operates outside of good governance frameworks would leave everyone poorer. Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas). The views expressed in this article are solely those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of Ideas Malaysia.
