logo
Warsaw has reclaimed its position as a proud capital

Warsaw has reclaimed its position as a proud capital

Telegraph21-06-2025
Well-meaning outsiders sometimes warn visitors to Poland to stick to Kraków, overflowing with splendid historical buildings, and avoid Warsaw – 'another boring capital city', as one writer phrased it to me. Ignore them. Kraków is charming, in the way that reliquaries of the past tend to be. But Warsaw is a monument to Polish perseverance – a sprawling symbol of the indefatigability of Europe's most successful post-Cold War nation.
To appreciate Warsaw's 21st-century revival, consider what the city endured and overcame in the 20th. Months before he shot himself, Hitler ordered its total destruction. Even as Germany's fate was being sealed, the Führer's marauders executed his instruction to raze the Polish capital 'without trace' with murderous zeal. The city was dynamited block by block. Universities were blown up. Schools were torn down. Libraries were set on fire. Historical monuments were obliterated. Houses were pillaged. Survivors were crammed into trains and deported to concentration camps.
When it was over, Warsaw – the site of the most gallant uprising of the Second World War – was a pile of dust and debris. It would have been easier to relocate the capital, and the Moscow-backed government that seized Poland briefly moved its operations to Łódź. Varsovians, however, remained defiant.
In 1945, they organised an exhibition in their ruined city. 'Warsaw does not lament, it does not complain,' the event proclaimed, 'but before the tribunal of nations Warsaw Accuses'. General Eisenhower, one of the 43,000 visitors to the show, described the state of Warsaw as 'far more tragic than anything I have seen' in Europe.
Not for long.
Poles expelled from the city returned, cleared the rubble by hand, buried the dead, and began rebuilding Warsaw brick by brick. They compelled the government to support them by the sheer force of their example. Some buildings were resurrected as facsimiles of the destroyed originals. But the animating ideology of reconstruction was Soviet socialism, and, after a period of frenzied activity, Warsaw became stagnant.
A symbol of this slump was Hotel Bristol. Housed in a neo-Renaissance building that opened in 1901, it once numbered among the city's grandest buildings – and was one of the handful to survive the Nazi rampage of 1944. By the 1980s, it had become so derelict that it had to be boarded up and abandoned. Warsaw itself degenerated into a drab city whose centrepiece was a Stalinist tower bequeathed as a 'gift' from the Soviet Union.
The fall of communism stimulated a second revival. Varsovians seized the moment: they converted the Communist Party headquarters into the country's new stock exchange, and opened casinos inside the Stalinist behemoth. A cluster of glass-clad skyscrapers proliferated around them.
Despite the recent election of the social conservative Karol Nawrocki as Poland's next president, Warsaw remains a haven for minorities. 'I am of course very uncomfortable,' a gay student at Warsaw University told me a day after the result. 'But this is Warsaw, and we still feel safe in Warsaw.' 'This city', another dejected voter told me, 'gives us hope'.
Politics can conceal Poland's extraordinary achievement. Its GDP is rapidly approaching $1 trillion. The living standards of its people are the envy of Europeans. The Polish army is larger than the armed forces of Britain. Poles who emigrated abroad in search of opportunity at the start of the century are now drifting home. Some are running successful businesses – cocktail bars, breweries, restaurants – at home. Others are investing in the technologies of the future. A Canadian tourist was so impressed by the city that he was considering moving his business there. 'I have not seen a place with such work ethic,' he told me.
Warsaw, reduced to the ground within the lifetime of many of its elderly citizens, has reclaimed its position as the proud capital of a great country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police in legal threat after Sheku Bayoh judge refuses to quit despite row over bias
Police in legal threat after Sheku Bayoh judge refuses to quit despite row over bias

Daily Mail​

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Police in legal threat after Sheku Bayoh judge refuses to quit despite row over bias

An inquiry into the death of a man in custody amid claims of police brutality faces the threat of legal action after its chairman cleared himself of bias allegations. Lord Bracadale decided not to recuse himself as head of the Sheku Bayoh probe after ruling there was no possibility that he was biased – but it could be derailed by a judicial review. The Mail understands the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), which had called for the retired High Court judge to step down, is now considering going to court to press for him to go. It had claimed Lord Bracadale's decision to meet Mr Bayoh's relatives on five occasions raised questions over his impartiality – claims he has dismissed. The statutory probe into the death of Mr Bayoh has cost £25.6million, but the total cost to taxpayers - including the sums spent by bodies such as police and prosecutors - is more than £50million. Mr Bayoh, 31, originally from Sierra Leone in west Africa, died after he was restrained by around six police officers who were called to Hayfield Road in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on May 3, 2015. After considering the matter, Lord Bracadale said he had refused the application for his recusal. He said: 'Having reviewed the facts, the fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was no real possibility that I was biased.' Lord Bracadale said such an observer would note that 'although the meetings with the families of Sheku Bayoh were private, they were not kept secret'. A spokesman for the inquiry said: 'The inquiry held a procedure and conduct hearing on June 12. 'After careful consideration of written and oral submissions from core participants, Lord Bracadale has decided not to recuse himself or terminate the appointments of the assessors. 'Having regard to the relevant legal test, he has determined there is no apparent bias. 'Taking into account various considerations in respect of the handling of the inquiry, he has determined having meetings with the families was not unfair. 'There is much important work for the inquiry still to do, not least proceeding with closing submissions and moving towards the writing of the final report. 'The team is working at pace and will announce next steps in due course.' The inquiry has been examining the circumstances of Mr Bayoh's death, and whether race was a factor. Last night an SPF spokesman said: 'Any fair-minded observer would be concerned when it is revealed that there have been five meetings with a core participant family, without the knowledge of the other core participants. 'The inquiry's legal team asserted that no evidence was discussed at these meetings, it subsequently transpired that was not the case. 'Lord Bracadale has never asked for a meeting with former PC Nicole Short, who was assaulted in May 2015 in the line of duty and who has been unable to return to work as a result of her injuries. 'Police officers will continue to call for a fair and transparent hearing, based on the evidence alone.' It is understood SPF lawyers are looking at Lord Bracadale's judgment as they prepare for a possible judicial review of his decision. In a statement issued on behalf of the Bayoh family, lawyer Aamer Anwar said the decision was 'humiliating and devastating' for the SPF. Mr Anwar said Lord Bracadale 'has done nothing wrong - he is a judge with over 50 years' legal experience, respected for his impartiality and integrity'. He said: 'There is nothing wrong with the chair treating a bereaved family with compassion and respect.' The Mail revealed last month that police chiefs held three unminuted meetings with the family of Mr Bayoh, fuelling a row over alleged bias against the officers involved. Senior officers met relatives of the father-of-two - but no record was kept of what was discussed. The last of the meetings took place after Lord Bracadale's hearing into his suitability to continue in his role back in June. In June, the Mail revealed up to ten members of the Bayoh family had received compensation from Police Scotland - including a single award of more than £1million. Relatives of Mr Bayoh halted their attempt to sue the force in March after reaching an out-of-court settlement in relation to his death. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'The Scottish Government remains committed to establishing the facts surrounding the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh's death.'

Is the Trump-Putin meeting a 'listening exercise' or an attempt to secure an immediate ceasefire?
Is the Trump-Putin meeting a 'listening exercise' or an attempt to secure an immediate ceasefire?

Sky News

time40 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Is the Trump-Putin meeting a 'listening exercise' or an attempt to secure an immediate ceasefire?

The "if" was doing some heavy lifting. President Trump floated the idea of a second meeting, this one between Putin, Zelensky and possibly himself, "if" the Alaska summit goes well. Speaking to European leaders earlier, in a virtual call he rated at "10" and "very friendly", he'd shared his intention to try to broker a ceasefire on Friday. So, the strategy is crystallising - he will press for a trilateral meeting to discuss territory "if" he manages to secure a truce during the bilateral meeting. But that begs the obvious question: what if he can't? The US President is keeping his options open - rating the chance of a second meeting as "very good" but preparing the ground for failure too. "There may be no second meeting because if I feel that it is not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting," he said. Unusually, given how often he talks about his abilities, he conceded that he may not persuade Vladimir Putin to stop targeting civilians. 4:25 But without elaborating on what any sanctions might be, he warned that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it doesn't end the war. Even if he achieves the seemingly impossible - a halt to the fighting - there seems little chance of agreement on any swapping of territory. President Zelensky has told President Trump that Putin "is bluffing" and wants to "push forward along the whole front" not return land. In the space of a week, Donald Trump has gone from talking about a land-swapping deal, to a "listening exercise", to the potential for a ceasefire. His expectations appear changeable, an indication of how fluid back-room negotiations are in the run-up to his first face-to-face with Vladimir Putin in six years. He described Friday's summit as "setting the table for a second meeting", but that's presumptuous when the meal - or deal - isn't cooked yet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store