Taliban marks four years in power by luring young female influencers to boost tourism
Taliban forces captured the capital city of Kabul on Aug. 15, 2021, following the chaotic withdrawal of American troops under the Biden administration.
Deputy Minister of Tourism Qudratullah Jamal told The Associated Press (AP) recently that Afghanistan had nearly 9,000 foreign visitors last year — with 3,000 tourists in the first three months of this year.
"Tourism brings many benefits to a country," he said. "We have considered those benefits and aim for our nation to take full advantage of them."
United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization director-general Audrey Azoulay told Fox News Digital in a statement that the Taliban has wiped out any gains for Afghan women.
"This exclusion of women from public life in Afghanistan has disastrous consequences for the country's long-term development," she said.
"At a time when some are seeking to normalize relations with the Taliban, I call on the international community to remain more mobilized than ever to fully and unconditionally restore Afghan women's right to education."
"I expected to feel rather fearful."
One of the first Afghan female tour guides recently led a group through the National Museum of Afghanistan – and the group consisted of all women.
Suzanne Sandral, an Australian in the group, told AP she was surprised. "It's not what I expected at all. I expected to feel rather fearful. I expected to be given a lot of ... accusatory looks. Not at all."
She said, "Wherever you go in the streets, if you smile at someone and give them a little nod or say hello, you get a terrific response. So it's very different."
Another woman in the group posted videos of her recent trip in June on TikTok. She captioned a video, "Exploring the nuanced and complex lives of Afghan women in context, and exploring all this beautiful land has to offer."
The U.S. Department of State, however, is very clear.
It lists travel to Afghanistan as "Travel Advisory Level 4: Do Not Travel" — warning of civil unrest, crime, terrorism, risk of wrongful detention, kidnapping and limited health facilities.
"U.S. citizen travelers to Afghanistan have been wrongfully detained for months or even years," said a spokesperson. "We remind all U.S. citizen travelers that no adventure or vacation is worth the price of your freedom."
Other traveler influencers and regular tourists have shared their experiences on social media – with most showing the Taliban-run country in a positive light.
A travel photographer posted a recap of her trip, saying she was "one of the first tourists to visit the country after the Taliban takeover."
She added in a TikTok video that has been viewed over 56,000 times, "I was completely blown away by the incredible hospitality of the locals, amazing food and beautiful scenery."
"No adventure or vacation is worth the price of your freedom."
A popular solo traveler and social media creator posted a video of his trip to Afghanistan, writing, "I know a lot of people have mixed feelings about Afghanistan travel, but honestly, I had an amazing time there as a solo traveler."
Another TikTok video that amassed nearly half a million likes shows an Australian traveler shopping at a food market.
"Some of the best food I have had in all my travels was in Afghanistan," said the video's caption in part.
Manizha Bakhari, ambassador of Afghanistan to Austria, told Fox News Digital the Taliban's promotion of tourism is an attempt at "image management."
"As someone who has lived and worked in Afghanistan, I can say this: What these female influencers experience is not representative of women's lives in Afghanistan," said Bakhtari.
She added, "The Taliban treat foreign women differently, and often with exaggerated politeness, because they serve a purpose in the regime's public relations strategy."
The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) released its human rights report in May, pointing out that Afghan women are being denied the opportunity to join the workforce and are unable to access services without a male relative — while girls are still deprived of their right to education.
The State Department wrote in its 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices document that treatment of woman has become progressively worse.
The new report stated that there has been "further restricted access to education, employment, and freedom of movement for women and girls – effectively removing them from public spaces."
"By showcasing scenic landscapes and hospitality toward foreign visitors, especially influencers, they aim to create a narrative of stability and openness," said Bakhtari.
Bakhtari noted she's seen a growing disconnect in global travel culture when it comes to adventure tourism.
"The thrill of visiting the 'forbidden' or 'untouched' often outweighs concern for human rights … [It] becomes a form of voyeurism, one that prioritizes personal experience over the realities of those who live under oppression."
Kelley Currie, former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Economic and Social Council, discussed the danger of visiting Afghanistan, saying Americans should "buy travel insurance."
The United States is "unable to provide consular services if something happens, especially if they are kidnapped and sold or given to other extremist groups," Currie told Fox News Digital.
Adam Duckworth, Travelmation's president and founder, told Fox News Digital that travel companies take State Department advisories "very seriously."
"If you are considering travel to a location in the higher levels, then do your research to understand why those places are on those lists," said Duckworth.
Bakhtari said while Afghanistan is breathtakingly beautiful, "beauty should not blind us to injustice."
"Travel should open hearts, not close eyes."
The Associated Press contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though President Trump's recently signed tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in CBP facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The last frontier isn't as far away from San Francisco as you imagine
The wind was blowing in from the ocean, and even though it was winter, we were thinking of summer. We heard the call of the sea and the call of the wild. So the Sailor Girl, my companion in small adventures, signed us up for a cruise from San Francisco to Alaska and back. Eleven days at sea aboard a big white cruise ship. Adventure is where you find it: hull down on a schooner in the far Pacific, huge ocean swells off Cape Horn, an Atlantic crossing. It's an adventure just getting underway from the Sausalito dock in our own dream boat. So why not pay somebody else to provide a nice warm cabin, three meals a day, a balcony on the sea world, and a steward to make the bunk? It's easy to sail away if San Francisco is your home port. On a good day you can be aboard a ship and unpacking your stuff in less than an hour after leaving your doorstep. It's still light when the Farallones are abeam, wild, gray and windswept. Course northwesterly to Alaska. We were aboard the Ruby Princess, 16 decks of easy living, 951 feet long, 113,000 tons, so big you can hardly feel the ship move. But still, that's the North Pacific Ocean just over the rail, and for two days there is no land in sight. No ships, no birds either. A different world. On the third morning — Alaska. Even the name is something special. It makes you think of snowy mountains, ice, forests, bears, tundra, cold, the last frontier. Just thinking about Alaska makes you want to put on a warm sweater. Of course, passengers on cruise ships see only a small part of the largest American state, just the coast, but not the vast interior. It's something to dream about. Alaska can be frustrating and annoying — overcrowded, commercial, soggy, gray, a bit disappointing. But it's also full of wild stories, unexpected surprises and small towns. It's so beautiful it can take your breath away — something you notice on a sharp, cold day. Ketchikan is one of the rainiest small cities in the world — 149.54 inches a year. It was raining steadily when we got there, then rain turned to mist, then back to hard rain, then to damp. There were five big cruise ships there that morning. Thousands of tourists crowding the narrow sidewalks. The shops all open, selling diamonds, watches, T-shirts, totem poles, rain slickers. Juneau was next, a small city nearly drowning in cruise ships. This season Juneau has scheduled 600 cruise ship calls, well over a million visitors in a five-month season. There were five ships at Juneau the day the Ruby Princess was there, the next day six ships, the day after that seven. So there were lines for everything in Juneau. Despite that, Juneau has a kind of offbeat charm. It's the state capital, so the town has another life. Juneau is both a city and a borough, with about 30,000 people, spread out so much between the mountains and the water that the borough of Juneau is bigger than Delaware. Juneau has lots of cars and trucks and buses, but only 18 miles of roads, which lead, essentially, nowhere. Everything comes to town by plane or boat: cars, refrigerators, furniture, groceries, the hops to make Alaskan Amber beer, the whiskey they serve at the Red Dog Saloon. The Red Dog Saloon is a particularly raucous and noisy tourist trap. Fun, too. Juneau made national news a few days after we stopped there when an overflow lake that takes meltwater from the Mendenhall Glacier, about a dozen miles from downtown, spilled over the rim like a bathtub overflowing. The water roared down a small river and into the edge of town. Luckily, the city and borough had just built a levee of special sandbags, so a flood was averted. But it was a lesson: The power of nature is never very far away in Alaska. We saw that the next day when the Ruby Princess called at the small town of Haines, not far from Skagway. Haines has only 1,657 permanent residents, and the Ruby Princess was the only ship in town that summer Tuesday, so we felt more like visitors than tourists. Haines has had booms and busts, a fish cannery, an Army post, a paved road into Canada and good prospects. In season, the woods are full of bald eagles and the waterways full of salmon. We took a trip up the Chilkat River, a big, wide, fast stream on the edge of wilderness. In Ketchikan we saw the Loyal Order of Moose lodge on the main street. On the river we saw a moose. We saved best for nearly last — a long, slow voyage on the big ship up the Endicott Arm, a fjord that extends 30 miles from Holkham Bay east toward the Canadian ice fields. The water is deep and dark, sometimes cobalt blue and sometimes green. Small and occasionally larger pieces of ice float on the surface, small bergs and growlers, drifting down the water. The pieces of ice are brilliant white when the sun hits them. Sailing up Endicott Arm is like sailing up Yosemite Valley thousands of years ago in the ice age, when Yosemite was a deep lake fed by glaciers. The walls of Endicott Arm are steep sheer cliffs and rounded domes — 'Sublime Yosemite cliffs,' John Muir wrote of the place. He and the Rev. S. Hall Young were the first outsiders to see Endicott Arm in 1880. The native Tlingit people took them there. Muir explored nearby Tracy Arm and Glacier Bay in 1879 and 1880 at a time when much of Alaska was unknown to the outside world. At the end of Endicott Arm is the wall of the Dawes Glacier, 600 feet high and half a mile wide, a river of ice thousands of years old extending into Canada. The ship turned at the face of the glacier and moved slowly out; we passed another ship with room to spare. This time, facing south in the afternoon sun, it was possible to see up the canyons and dozens of waterfalls and cascades, some hundreds of feet high. The streams rise from high mountains and empty faraway valleys, not a house, not a sign humans were ever there. True wilderness. The Dawes Glacier and the Sawyer Glacier in nearby Tracy Arm have been melting, moving back. In Muir's time they were much larger; in 23 years ending in 2013, the bigger of the two receded by nearly 2 miles. Yet there is plenty of beauty left. Still, you can stand at the rail of a luxurious ship and look up past the face of the cliff, up a steep slope lined with trees and brush toward a high ridge and wonder what might be on the other side. Maybe an adventure. Three days after the Ruby Princess left Endicott Arm, a series of small earthquakes rattled the area. They triggered a massive rock slide in Tracy Arm just after dawn. It was huge, the biggest slide in 10 years. The slide went into the water and set off a wall of water 10 feet high. No one was hurt; because the country was nearly empty, no ships in either waterway. We sailed back, of course, stopping in Victoria, British Columbia, for a day, two days at sea and the Golden Gate on a foggy dawn. It was a Monday morning, and San Francisco was just waking. You could tell. The first sound from the city was the Pier 39 sea lions barking.
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ukraine tries to understand why Trump suddenly abandoned idea of cease-fire
Trump called on social media for a direct peace agreement without securing a cease-fire first, claiming that Zelenskyy and European leaders had agreed on the point. His statement was a stark shift from the 'principles' agreed upon earlier in the week by Trump, Zelenskyy and his European allies, which called for refusing to discuss peace terms until a cease-fire was in place. Advertisement Russia has long pushed for a direct peace deal that would address a broad range of issues and impose onerous demands on Ukraine, including territorial concessions. Avoiding a cease-fire would allow Russia to continue pressing its advantage on the battlefield in the meantime. Advertisement An official briefed on the call between Trump and Zelenskyy said the Ukrainian leader's trip to Washington would aim to seek clarity from Trump. Kyiv does not understand why the American president suddenly dropped the demand that a cease-fire precede negotiations. In a statement, Zelenskyy seemed to tread carefully, trying not to openly contradict Trump. 'We need to achieve a real peace that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions,' Zelenskyy said. But he added that 'the killings must stop as soon as possible, and the fire must cease both on the battlefield and in the air, as well as against our port infrastructure,' suggesting that he was still prioritizing a cease-fire. In statements of their own, European leaders made no mention of having agreed to abandon their demand for a cease-fire. At the same time, the fact that the statements did not include a demand for a cease-fire, as in previous remarks, suggests at the very least an attempt not to antagonize Trump. Trump's move to aim for a direct peace deal could bring to failure a week of frantic diplomacy in which Kyiv, with European support, had lobbied the U.S. administration to insist that a cease-fire should come first and that Ukraine should not be undercut in the negotiations. Trump's social media post caused a feeling of whiplash among some Ukrainians, who quickly reversed their early assessments of the Alaska summit. Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian parliament, had initially expressed some relief, saying that 'the situation could have been worse' if Trump and Putin had struck a deal behind Ukraine's back. Advertisement He said that a scenario in which 'Trump and Putin started together to pressure Ukraine into surrender' could not have been ruled out given Trump's history of deference to Putin. But after Trump's post on Truth Social, Merezhko changed his view. 'In fact, Putin and Trump are starting to force us into surrender,' he said. Trump also proposed security guarantees for Ukraine inspired by the collective defense agreement between NATO member countries, which states that any attack on a member is an attack against all, according to Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister. Under such guarantees, Ukraine's NATO allies would be 'ready to take action' if Russia attacked again. But Merezhko and other Ukrainian allies said such a formulation was too vague. 'Which countries will agree to consider an attack against Ukraine as an attack against themselves?' Merezhko asked. 'I'd like to believe that we will find such countries, but I'm not sure.' Trump, in an interview with Fox News after the meeting with Putin, also addressed the idea of territorial swaps, saying they were among the points 'that we largely have agreed on.' Trump had said several times over the past week that territorial concessions would be part of a peace agreement, drawing pushback from Zelenskyy. Zelensky, however, has not entirely ruled out possible land swaps, telling reporters this past week that this is 'a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine.' Merezhko, who like many Ukrainian officials was left on tenterhooks by the Alaska meeting, watched the post-meeting news conference live from Kyiv at around 2 a.m. local time. As both Trump and Putin offered only vague statements, Merezhko said it had become clear that no concrete deal had been reached. Advertisement He noted that Putin had again said that any end to the fighting must address the 'root causes' of the war, which is Kremlin parlance for a range of issues that include the existence of Ukraine as a fully independent and sovereign nation aligned with the West. 'I think it's a failure because Putin was again talking about security concerns and used his usual rhetoric,' Merezhko said as the press conference came to an end. 'I don't see any changes.' In Kyiv, some emerged Saturday morning from a sleepless night following the news with the sense that the war was likely to continue unabated. After the Alaska summit wrapped up, the Ukrainian air force said Russia had continued its assault on Ukraine, launching 85 drones and one ballistic missile overnight. These figures could not be independently verified. Tetiana Chamlai, a 66-year-old retiree in Kyiv, said the situation with the war would change only if Ukraine was given more military support, to push Russian forces back enough to force Moscow to the negotiating table. 'That's the only way everything will stop,' she said. 'I personally do not see any other way out.' But Vice President JD Vance made clear this past week that the United States was 'done' funding Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion. The Trump administration, however, is fine with Ukraine buying American weapons from U.S. companies, and Zelenskyy announced this past week that Kyiv had secured $1.5 billion in European funding to purchase U.S. arms. This article originally appeared in
