logo
Inside the ICE offices where morale is ‘miserable' and the deportation push has become ‘mission impossible'

Inside the ICE offices where morale is ‘miserable' and the deportation push has become ‘mission impossible'

Yahoo19-07-2025
Outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices, President Donald Trump showers 'heroic' agents with praise. Inside, that adoration is nowhere to be found.
Trump has hailed ICE agents as brave, determined and 'the toughest people you'll ever meet.' They are, after all, tasked with carrying out one of his key policy goals: mass deportations.
Campaigning for his second term, Trump promised to execute 'the largest deportation program of criminals in the history of America." Since taking office, the president has made it a goal to deport 1 million people per year. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, has demanded 3,000 arrests per day. ICE raids have since disrupted the country.
Despite Trump casting a bright light on the immigration enforcement agency, the reality inside ICE offices is very dark. With high expectations, shifting priorities and a heightened fear of losing their job, morale is low and the pressure is high, officials told The Atlantic.
'It's miserable,' a career ICE official told the magazine, characterizing the task as 'mission impossible.'
Another former investigative agent told the magazine: 'Morale is in the crapper.'
The ex-official added: 'Even those that are gung ho about the mission aren't happy with how they are asking to execute it—the quotas and the shift to the low-hanging fruit to make the numbers.'
Although the administration pledged to arrest 'the worst of the worst,' data last month shows ICE has arrested just a small fraction of those convicted of serious crimes, such as murder and sexual assault. For example, of the 13,000 undocumented immigrants in the U.S. who were convicted of murder, the agency had arrested just 752 of them from October 1 to May 31.
Instead, data suggests the agency has arrested a large portion of non-criminals since Trump took office. Of the arrests from Trump's inauguration through early May, 44 percent had a criminal conviction, 34 percent had pending charges and 23 percent had no criminal history, ABC News reported. After Memorial Day, the portion of non-criminal arrests spiked; 30 percent of those arrested had criminal convictions, 26 percent faced pending charges, while 44 percent had no criminal history.
Then there's the plain-clothes arrests, including of international students in the U.S. for college, that
There's a notable shift in priorities from trying to keep the nation safe to being quota-driven, some officials said. 'No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation,' a veteran agent told The Atlantic. 'It's infuriating.' The agent is considering quitting rather than having to continue 'arresting gardeners.'
Some have actually quit.
Adam Boyd, an attorney who resigned from the agency's legal department in June, said he left because of the change in mission. 'It became a contest of how many deportations could be reported to Stephen Miller by December,' Boyd told The Atlantic.
'I had to make a moral decision,' Boyd continued. 'We still need good attorneys at ICE. There are drug traffickers and national-security threats and human-rights violators in our country who need to be dealt with. But we are now focusing on numbers over all else.'
Others fear losing their jobs, seeing as there have been two major shakeups in the span of a few months. Two top officials were removed from their posts in February; two directors at the agency were ousted from their leadership roles in May. That same month, Miller imposed his 3,000-arrests-per-day quota. The staff shakeups combined with lofty goals have put agents on edge.
'No one is saying, 'This is not obtainable,'' one official told the magazine, referring to Miller's quota. 'The answer is just to keep banging the field'— an agency term for rank-and-file officers — 'and tell the field they suck. It's just not a good atmosphere.'
Still, the Trump administration has maintained that morale is sky-high.
'After four years of not being allowed to do their jobs, the brave men and women at ICE are excited to be able to do their jobs again,' Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for DHS, ICE's parent agency, told the outlet.
Last week, Congress passed Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' his sweeping legislation that includes a massive funding — $165 billion — for the Department of Homeland Security. It allocates $45 billion for immigration detention centers and roughly $30 billion to hire more agents.
'One of the most exciting parts of the 'ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT' is that it includes ALL of the Funding and Resources that ICE needs to carry out the Largest Mass Deportation Operation in History,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Our Brave ICE Officers, who are under daily violent assault, will finally have the tools and support that they need.'
The newly passed legislation also provides money for 'well-deserved bonuses,' a White House spokesperson told The Atlantic. That allegedly includes $10,000 annual bonuses for ICE personnel.
Working in the agency has always come with some amount of pressure, some officials told the magazine, but the Trump administration has brought new challenges.
John Sandweg, who served as acting ICE director for part of President Barack Obama's second term, told The Atlantic that employees voiced concerns common in most workplaces, such as getting paid for overtime work.
The concerns now are a bit different. ICE attracted people who 'like the mission of getting bad guys off the street,' Sandweg said. Now, the agency is'no longer about the quality of the apprehensions' but about quantity.
A former official during the Biden administration told The Atlantic that the agents were appreciated, which 'went a long way.'
'Giving people leave, recognizing them for small stuff, that kind of thing. It went a long way,' the ex-official said. 'Now I think you have an issue where the administration has come in very aggressive and people are really not happy, because of the perception that the administration doesn't give a shit about them.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom office dismisses crime fears, defends sanctuary policies amid surge in violence: 'Fake news'
Newsom office dismisses crime fears, defends sanctuary policies amid surge in violence: 'Fake news'

Fox News

timea few seconds ago

  • Fox News

Newsom office dismisses crime fears, defends sanctuary policies amid surge in violence: 'Fake news'

In the wake of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer being shot allegedly by two criminal illegal immigrants earlier this month, experts are calling attention to how sanctuary policies sheltering lawbreakers are directly responsible for rising crime and violence in Democratic-run jurisdictions. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office, however, pushed back against the notion that sanctuary policies are to blame, with a spokesperson calling it "fake news" and an attempt by the Trump administration to justify "their cruel and militaristic actions." This comes after two illegal immigrants – Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez and Cristian Aybar Berroa – were arrested in connection with an off-duty CBP officer being shot in the face in a New York City park. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), both illegals have long criminal histories and had ICE detainers against them that had been ignored by New York City officials. Last week, the Trump Justice Department announced it is suing New York City over its longstanding sanctuary policies, which DHS said enabled the shooting. The lawsuit, filed in a New York federal court, names New York City Mayor Eric Adams and several other city officials as defendants. The lawsuit claims the city has enacted policies with the intent of impeding the federal government's ability to enforce immigration laws. Joe Borelli, a former New York City Council member, told Fox News Digital that sanctuary policies have made many of America's major cities "demonstrably" less safe. "We have had about a decade of this 'sanctuary city' experiment in Democratic-run cities, and after all this time, we can now definitively say it's been a net loss. And that's being polite," said Borelli. "In truth, it has drained the coffers of American cities and states and has demonstrably made our neighborhoods less safe, especially those that are home to our legal immigrant communities," he added. Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge and policy expert at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Fox News Digital that the continued criminality of individuals like the two suspects in New York is "a direct result of the sanctuary policies." He said the suspects in the New York shooting had a "slew of prior arrests, any one of which could have resulted in their arrest by ICE and deportation from the United States." "But they didn't because they occurred largely in sanctuary jurisdictions where ICE didn't have cooperation from the local authorities," he explained. "The contention that is made is that those policies are necessary in order to protect the immigrant communities, but the only things that sanctuary policies actually protect are criminals," he said. "States and localities like California, Los Angeles, Denver, Boston, Massachusetts, New York and New York City that do have sanctuary jurisdictions make it much more likely that criminal aliens will be released onto the street to re-offend." Lora Ries, a border security and immigration expert at the Heritage Foundation, predicted that if the sanctuary policies continue, "there's going to be more preventable crime and more victims who shouldn't be victims." "It has not just been a national security threat, but a personal safety threat," she said, adding, "and we have already too many examples of preventable crimes because perpetrators shouldn't have been here. They either snuck across the border the first time, the second time, the third time, committed crimes previously and either weren't prosecuted or weren't detained or and or weren't turned over to ICE." Ries pointed out that, despite Democratic claims that Trump's immigration crackdown is unpopular, it is sanctuary policies – that allow criminal illegals to evade ICE - that the public is opposed to. Since 2015, a majority of Americans have generally favored the deportation of illegal immigrants. The latest Fox News survey, released on Monday, found roughly 8 in 10 Democrats, 6 in 10 independents, and 4 in 10 Republicans agree that at least illegal immigrants charged with crimes should be deported, while others should be offered a path to stay. Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., whose district includes portions of Denver, told Fox News Digital that sanctuary policies have made Colorado the second most dangerous state in the country. "It's an absolutely horrible impact on public safety. And that horrible impact is tied directly back to sanctuary state policies that handcuff cops and roll out the red carpet for criminal organizations like Tren de Aragua," he explained. "We're talking guns and drugs and human trafficking and child abuse," he continued. "And the predators and the criminals that are perpetuating these violent acts, peddling fentanyl in our community, literally killing Americans and Coloradans by the thousands, these are the people that have been festering in our society under the sanctuary state policies in Colorado." Evans added that besides inhibiting law enforcement from above, sanctuary policies also "sends a message to other outside groups that it's okay to go and interfere with and, at times, outright assault law enforcement officers." Tricia McLaughlin, Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary, placed the blame directly on Democratic politicians for the sanctuary policies. "When sanctuary politicians ignore ICE detainers, they are protecting criminal illegal aliens at the expense of American citizens," McLaughlin told Fox News Digital. "Make no mistake, Democrat politicians like Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Wu of Boston, Tim Walz, and Mayor Bass of Los Angeles are contributing to the surge in assaults of our ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE. From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi Gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale." "These reckless policies have deadly consequences," she added. However, Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom's office, pushed back. "Their assertions are fake news," said Crofts-Pelayo, adding, "This is the Trump team's attempt to justify their cruel and militaristic actions upon entire populations, including Americans, legal status holders and even U.S.-born citizens." She pointed to new data released by the California Department of Justice that indicated overall crime in the state decreased in most categories in 2024 compared to 2023. The report said that the violent crime rate in the state had decreased in 2024 by 6%. However, it said that violent crime was still up 10.8% compared to 2019. Newsom entered office in January 2019. Although the California homicide rate is up compared to 2019 (4.3% versus 4.2%), the spokesperson pointed out that it is still the "second lowest since at least 1966." Crofts-Pelayo said that California under Newsom "continues to lead the way out of the COVID-induced crime surge" and that the Trump administration's "extremist agenda is not about safety — it's about cruelty and quotas." "Trump is detaining U.S. citizens, ripping families apart, and disappearing parents and workers into inhumane federal detention centers to meet self-imposed massive arrest quotas," she said, adding, "Our federal leaders should protect the businesses and workers that support our communities and not build private prisons to warehouse the people who we rely on in this state and this country for our prosperity." Fox News Digital also reached out to New York City Mayor Eric Adams, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for comment.

Map Shows States Where IRS Tax Returns Could Change for 2026
Map Shows States Where IRS Tax Returns Could Change for 2026

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows States Where IRS Tax Returns Could Change for 2026

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Options for filing tax returns are likely to change in 2026 for taxpayers in 25 states. IRS Commissioner Billy Long, whom President Donald Trump appointed to head the federal tax agency last month, appeared to confirm that Direct File—which offers free tax filing directly with the IRS—won't be an option for the next filing season. On Monday, at the National Association of Enrolled Agents' tax summit, he said: "You've heard of Direct File. That's gone. Big beautiful Billy wiped that out." Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed by Congress and signed by the president earlier this month, the Treasury has been directed to form a task force to replace the program, which has been running for only two years. Newsweek has contacted the IRS for comment via email. What Is Direct File? Direct File is a web-based service that allows taxpayers to submit simple returns directly with the government agency free of charge, eliminating the need for a third-party tax preparation service. The IRS launched its Direct File pilot in 12 U.S. states in March 2024, expanding it to 25 states for the 2025 tax season. These are the states: Alaska Arizona California Connecticut Florida Idaho Illinois Kansas Maine Maryland Massachusetts Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina Oregon Pennsylvania South Dakota Tennessee Texas Washington state Wisconsin Wyoming The program, created under the Biden administration, served 141,000 taxpayers across the initial 12 states it was available for in 2024. The Economic Security Project has estimated that the program saved an average of $160 in tax preparation fees for its users. Republicans and private tax preparation companies have derided the program, saying free options already exist for filers and that it is a waste of taxpayer money. Is Direct File Finished? The IRS has not announced that the program is shutting down, but provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act show that the administration is looking for a replacement. Under the legislation, which Trump signed into law on July 4, the Treasury has 90 days from the law's passage to send Congress a report that includes the following: How much it would cost to expand or create public-private partnerships that offer free tax filing for up to 70 percent of taxpayers based on their income. These partnerships would take the place of any IRS-run free filing programs. What taxpayers think about using a free, government-run tax filing system versus one provided by private companies. Whether a new system is possible, how to make all filing options simple and consistent for users, and how to meet different taxpayer needs. The estimated cost of creating and managing a free IRS-run online tax filing system, including options for adjusting the system based on a person's income and how complex their tax return is. Is Direct File Still Open? Direct File remains open through October 15, 2025, for anyone who has yet to file a 2024 tax return. But it is looking unlikely it will be in place for 2026. Given that the administration is looking to replace it, it is also unlikely that it will be expanded to any further states if it remains active for the next tax season. What Other Free Filing Options Are There? The longer-standing Free File program appears to be unaffected. Under that program, companies participating in a public-private partnership with the IRS offer free tax preparation software. IRS Free File offers guided tax software to taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of $84,000 or less. For those who don't qualify, IRS Free File still provides fillable forms that any taxpayer, regardless of income, can use if they prefer to prepare their own return.

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Sinks to New Low
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Sinks to New Low

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Sinks to New Low

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump's public approval has dropped to its lowest level in months, according to newly released polling data. The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll shows that Trump's approval rating has dropped to 40 percent, with 56 percent disapproving, giving him a net approval rating of -16 points. Trump previously had a net approval rating of -16 in late June. But at that point, 41 percent approved and 57 percent disapproved, so the latest result marks his lowest approval rating of his second term. The latest YouGov/Economist poll also showed Trump's approval rating at its lowest level yet, with 40 percent approving and 55 percent disapproving. The polls are in line with other recent surveys which have also shown Trump's support drop to its lowest point so far. A recent Navigator Research put the president at 42 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval, bringing his net approval rating down to -12 points, while Gallup and The Bullfinch Group report even lower ratings, with net approval as low as -21. President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House on July 29, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House on July 29, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Trump's Approval Rating Stagnates The surveys also mirror recent polls, which show Trump's approval rating stagnating. The YouGov/Economist poll only showed a marginal change in Trump's approval rating from last week when 41 percent approved and 55 percent disapproved of his job performance. The president's approval rating has remained between 40 and 42 percent since mid -June, while his disapproval rating has remained between 53 and 55 percent. The Reuters/Ipsos poll showed slightly more movement, with Trump's approval rating decreasing by 1 point and his disapproval increasing by 2 points since last week. But like the YouGov/Economist polls, his approval rating has remained between 40 and 42 percent since mid-May, while his disapproval rating has sat between 52 and 56 percent. Similarly, McLaughlin & Associates, Quantus Insights, RMG Research, and Emerson College all show his approval holding steady between 46 and 52 percent in recent months, with little movement in net approval. According to Quantus pollster Jason Corley, that is because Trump is still overwhelmingly popular among Republicans, but his support has not seen much of a boost among key demographics such as women, young voters and independents. "For a president who thrives on momentum, the static nature of these numbers is a signal: the base is holding, but the middle isn't moving," Corley wrote in a blog post. The Reuters/Ipsos survey reflects this trend, showing a highly polarized electorate. According to the poll, 83 percent of Republicans back Trump, compared to just 3 percent of Democrats and about one-third of independents. That is largely unchanged from a month ago, when 84 percent of Republicans said they approve of Trump, as well as 4 percent of Democrats and 40 percent of independents. The latest YouGov/Economist poll also underscores the deep polarization that continues to define the American electorate, with support for Trump largely divided along partisan lines. However, support has only shifted marginally since June. Republican approval of Trump remains overwhelmingly high, though it dipped slightly from 89 percent in June to 86 percent in July. Among Democrats, approval rose modestly from 3 percent to 6 percent, while independents showed a slight decline, from 34 percent to 29 percent. And both polls showed only marginal changes in Trump's approval on issues like the economy, inflation and immigration—which were cornerstones of his campaign. The Economist/YouGov poll found that approval of Trump's handling of the economy—long seen as one of his strongest areas—dipped slightly from 43 percent in June to 40 percent in July, while disapproval remained at 51 percent. On inflation and prices, where voter concern remains especially high, approval declined from 35 percent to 34 percent, and disapproval stayed at 59 percent. Similarly, on immigration, a central pillar of Trump's platform, approval dropped from 47 percent to 44 percent, while disapproval remained at 50 percent. All of these movements fall within the poll's margin of error. Findings from the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll reinforce the overall stability of public opinion. That survey showed a modest increase in Trump's economic approval—from 35 percent in June to 38 percent in July—and a 2-point rise on immigration, from 41 percent to 43 percent. But like the Economist/YouGov data, these changes remain statistically insignificant. Trump's Approval Rating Shows Signs Of Recovery Some polls, however, show signs of recovery for the president. Newsweek's approval tracker shows Trump's net approval at -6 (45 percent approve, 51 percent disapprove), up from -7 at the end of last week and -10 earlier in the week. The latest Morning Consult survey showed Trump's approval rising to 47 percent, up 2 points from the previous week, while his disapproval dropped to 50 percent, down 2 points. His net approval rating improved from -7 points to -3 points. It comes as the U.S. economy has mostly avoided a feared downturn from Trump's tariffs introduced earlier this year, ABC News reported. Meanwhile, unemployment remains near historic lows, and while job growth has cooled, it is still strong. However, inflation hit 2.7 percent in June, up from 2.4 percent the previous month, according to the Consumer Price Index, but is still lower than when Trump took office. Overall, economists estimate the economy grew at a 2.3-percent annual rate from April to June, bouncing back from a -0.5-percent decline in the previous quarter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store