Tit-for-tat strikes expose Houthi defiance and Israel's limited options
The Israeli attack involved approximately 20 aircraft that launched a wave of strikes on Houthi-controlled ports, a power station and even a ship that the group captured in 2023. Israel dropped more than 50 munitions in the attack, according to its military. The operation came after the Iran -backed Houthis attacked the Liberia-flagged Magic Seas ship hours earlier, and then fired missiles and drones at targets in Israel.
'The attack on the Magic Seas is not a shift in the position of the Houthis. Before the ceasefire announced by the US President in May, and even after it, the position remained that targeting Israel and ships dealing with it will continue,' a Yemeni source in Sanaa told The National.
Two months ago, President Donald Trump announced that the US would stop attacking the Houthis after the rebels agreed to halt attacks on US forces and commercial vessels in the Red Sea. The Magic Seas strike is the first Houthi attack since that truce, and it comes after the Houthis vowed to resume attacks in the region following the US strikes on Iran.
'Every Israeli aggression against the Palestinian and Yemeni people will be met with direct strikes on Israel by the Houthis. This is the decision now, no matter the consequences,' added the Yemeni source.
The Houthis are part of the so-called Axis of Resistance, an Iran-led network that includes Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon and armed groups in Iraq, whose aim is to deter Israel from conducting military action and countering its influence in the region. Many of the groups have fought against Iran's enemies in their respective countries.
Heavy price
The groups launched attacks on Israel as part of a support campaign for Hamas and the Palestinian people after the Gaza war broke out on October 7, 2023. But months of fighting with Israel, which holds clear military dominance, have eroded the operational capacity of the axis considerably.
Hezbollah was once seen as Iran's frontline deterrent against Israel, but a string of Israeli strikes last year wiped out much of its leadership and crippled its arsenal. Now, the Houthis have emerged as Tehran's preferred strategic proxy.
After the recent Houthi attacks, the Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that 'the Houthis will continue to pay a heavy price for their actions' as his military announced it 'struck and destroyed terror infrastructure belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime'.
'Among the targets were the ports of Hodeida, Ras Isa, and As Salif,' it said. It was the Israeli army's first attack on Yemen in around a month. The Israeli strikes, which hit targets that have already been attacked several times, highlights the limits on what Israel alone can achieve against its distant enemy, which despite the weakening of Iran and the regional militant groups it backs, keeps up a steady pace of missile attacks against Israel.
Dr Yoel Guzansky, a senior researcher at the Israeli think tank INSS, told The National that he thought there is 'no delusion in Israel that the Houthis are about to stop targeting Israel'.
'I think the aim of these attacks is to punish and deter not necessarily the Houthis, but the surrounding neighbourhood enemies and to show that even if the attacks don't stop, there's no attack on Israel that it will not carry on retaliation. Israel will not be silent.'
Mr Katz directly warned Iran in his statement after the strikes, saying that 'what's true for Iran is true for Yemen'. 'Anyone who raises a hand against Israel will have it cut off,' he said.
Mr Guzansky said that the infrastructure targets attacked by Israel have been attacked 'over and over … meaning that the Houthis rebuild their stuff very fast'.
He added that the most 'meaningful attack on the Houthis was in June when Israel targeted the chief of staff of the Houthis [Muhammad Al Ghamari].'
Mr Al Ghamari's fate is unknown, but Mr Guzansky said the attack showed that 'Israel is gaining intelligence on the Houthis, something we didn't have before'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tahawul Tech
14 minutes ago
- Tahawul Tech
Trump threatens 100% tariff on chip imports
US President Donald Trump has expressed his intent to place an 100 per cent tariff on chip imports, but companies making or planning to make chips in America would be exempt. Bloomberg noted President Trump clarified the broad initial threat, saying if a company is building in the US or had committed to, 'there will be no charge'. The president did not provide details on how much local manufacturing is required to qualify for an exemption. Apple will be exempt after agreeing to invest another $100 billion to increase manufacturing in the US, as will the many chipmakers recently investing in domestic production. South Korea's trade envoy Yeo Han-koo told Reuters Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix would not be subject to the proposed 100 per cent tariffs. Samsung earmarked more than $40 billion to expand its chip manufacturing capabilities in the US state of Texas with government support of $4.6 billion, while SK Hynix scored $950 million in subsidies and loans for an AI silicon facility which adds to a planned investment of $3.8 billion in the state of Indiana. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, a contract chipmaker and major supplier for Apple and Nvidia, also invested heavily in the US and would also be exempt. Smaller Japanese chipmakers including Renesas Electronics and Sony's chip unit would likely be subject to any hike in duties. QF Research suggested on a post on X the likely outcome would be set semiconductor tariffs, possibly with grace periods, 'but nothing close to 100 per cent for critical components and countries'. Source: Mobile World Live Image Credit: Stock Image
Zawya
44 minutes ago
- Zawya
Could Trump tariffs become BRIC-building blocks? McGeever
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) ORLANDO, Florida - U.S. President Donald Trump has the so-called 'BRIC' group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing "anti-American" policies. Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire. The White House said on Wednesday that it will impose an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50%, among the highest rate faced by any U.S. trading partner. Brazil also faces 50% tariffs on many of its U.S.-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a "witch hunt" against his ally, Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022. This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favor. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the European Union. But hitting these 'BRICS' economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had. THE 50% CLUB The original BRIC nations - Brazil, Russia, India and China - held their first summit in 2009, eight years after former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the acronym for this group of emerging economies he said would challenge the G7 group of rich countries in the future. South Africa became the 'S' in BRICS two years later, and the club now comprises 11 countries including Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as a further nine 'partner' countries including Malaysia, Nigeria, and Thailand. It was always a disparate group - geographically, economically, culturally, and politically - meaning its cohesiveness has always been questionable. Its relations have sometimes been rocky, particularly among its largest members. That's why it was so notable when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday announced that he will visit China for the first time in over seven years. This could be a sign that rising tensions with Washington are helping to thaw frosty ties between New Delhi and Beijing. Also on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters that he plans to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to Trump's tariffs. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation ... so we can make a decision," Lula said. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have ten countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. UNITED FRONT While nothing unites like a common enemy, the differences between the BRICS countries could limit how solid that front can actually be. Stephen Jen, CEO and co-CIO of Eurizon SLJ Asset Management in London, posits that trade links between the five core BRICS nations - never mind the historical, political and cultural ties - are weak. Only 14% of their trade is with each other. Russia and Brazil may have higher levels of intra-BRICS trade, but only 9% of China's exports are BRICS-bound, significantly less than the 19% that goes to emerging Asia and 15% destined for the U.S. And in economic, political and military terms, China matters far more than the others on the global stage. "BRICS is more of an alliance on paper, not in reality," Jen says. But there are signs that intra-BRICS trade is strengthening. China-Russia trade was a record $244.8 billion last year, and China and India are the biggest two buyers of Russian oil. China is Brazil's largest trading partner, accounting for 28% of Brazil's exports and 24% of its imports. Roughly 70% of China's soybean imports are from Brazil. TENUOUS ALLIANCE Trump's tariffs could push BRICS countries closer together in the near term, in areas such as trade, investment, and currency usage. They may feel it's in their economic interests and, for some, in their political interests, to present a united front. How long that front can hold is anyone's guess. These countries, particularly India, may resist moving further under China's influence, and Russia's pariah status could limit further integration beyond commodity imports. In the meantime, however, Trump's tariff salvos are BRICS-bound. How these emerging economies respond could be an indication of whether we may truly be seeing a reshuffling of global alliances. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
Khaleej Times
44 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
'Do not forget Gaza': Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif leaves final message to world
When Al Jazeera's Anas Jamal Al Sharif stepped into Gaza's streets with a camera and microphone, he was not just reporting the news — he was documenting the life and death of his people in real time, often under fire. On Sunday (August 10), that mission came to an end when an Israeli airstrike killed him in Gaza City. The 28-year-old was among four Al Jazeera journalists and an assistant who died when a strike hit a tent near Shifa Hospital in eastern Gaza City, according to Gaza officials and the network. Two other people were also reported dead. Israel's military claimed Al Sharif was a Hamas cell leader, but rights advocates said Israel provided no evidence. Rights advocates, fellow journalists, and press freedom groups said he was targetted for his relentless frontline reporting, which made the war's devastation widely seen and deeply felt around the world. Fully aware of the dangers that came with his work, Al Sharif had prepared a final message — which he described as his 'final will' — to be published in the event of his death: a deeply personal and defiant message addressed to his family, his people, and the wider world. In his final message, which appeared on his social media after the airstrike, he said: "If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice. First, peace be upon you and Allah's mercy and blessings." "Allah knows I gave every effort and all my strength to be a support and a voice for my people, ever since I opened my eyes to life in the alleys and streets of the Jabalia refugee camp," he wrote. 'My hope was that Allah would extend my life' In his will, Al Sharif expressed his lifelong hope of returning with his family to his original hometown of occupied Asqalan (Al-Majdal), a dream he said had been cut short by God's will. "I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification — so that Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent, those who accepted our killing, those who choked our breath, and whose hearts were unmoved by the scattered remains of our children and women," he added. In the statement, he entrusted Palestine itself to the conscience of the world, urging people 'not to let chains silence you, nor borders restrain you' in the struggle for liberation. He also left intimate appeals for the care of his loved ones — his wife Bayan, their young daughter Sham, their son Salah, and his mother, whose prayers he called his 'fortress.' His final words — 'Do not forget Gaza, and do not forget me in your sincere prayers' — have since been shared widely, resonating far beyond the strip's borders. The post closed with: 'This is what our beloved Anas requested to be published upon his martyrdom.' Check out his full message below: This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice. First, peace be upon you and Allahâ��s mercy and blessings. — Ø£Ù�س اÙ�شرÙ�Ù� Anas Al-Sharif (@AnasAlSharif0) August 10, 2025 Tributes pouring His final message, which was also posted on Instagram, drew tributes from colleagues, friends, and strangers. Dr Omar Suleiman expressed deep grief and solidarity over the death of journalist Anas Al-Sharif, sharing the latter's final message. 'I've typed and deleted so many words to try to describe the pain, anger, and guilt. Just read his,' the American Islamic scholar and civil rights activist wrote, adding: 'We will miss you Anas. We bear witness to your sacrifice and against your murderer. May Allah have mercy on you and reunite you with all the pure souls before you.' Journalists killed in Israeli strikes Al Shariff's death adds to the growing list of Al Jazeera journalists who have died in Israeli strikes. In July 2024, Al Jazeera Arabic journalist Ismail al-Ghoul and his cameraman Rami al-Rifi were killed when an Israeli air attack struck their car in the Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City, according to initial reports. In December 2023, Al Jazeera Arabic journalist Samer Abudaqa was killed and his colleague, veteran correspondent Wael Dahdouh, was wounded in an Israeli attack in Khan Younis, southern Gaza. The pair had been reporting from Farhana school when they were hit by an Israeli strike. In May 2022, veteran correspondent Shireen Abu Akleh was shot dead while covering an Israeli military raid in the West Bank city of Jenin — her death prompting global outrage and calls for accountability.
