The 10 U.S. cities where retirees live on the highest annual incomes from Social Security and savings
In Carlsbad, California, retirees live on an average income of $85,442 a year from Social Security payments and withdrawals from savings and investments — the highest amount of any of the 344 largest U.S. cities, according to a recent SmartAsset analysis of Census Bureau data.
These two sources generally make up the majority of retirees' income. In fact, 58% of retirees say Social Security is a major source of their income, according to a 2024 Gallup poll. In 2025, eligible Americans will receive an average of just under $24,000 a year in retirement benefits, according to the Social Security Administration.
But because Social Security retirement benefits are partially tied to earnings, higher earners tend to get bigger checks when they start claiming, though there is a cap. The same group is also likely to save more for retirement during their working years, which is why the cities where retirement income is the highest also tend to have the largest average Social Security benefits.
In just 19 of the cities SmartAsset analyzed, Social Security checks make up more than half of retirees' total income, and those places are home to some of the lowest-earning retirees overall. In the 10 highest-earning cities, Social Security makes up roughly 30% to 40% of retirees' total income.
Further, Social Security payments don't seem to vary as widely as retirement account withdrawals, per SmartAsset's findings. Average annual Social Security benefits span from a low of $15,421 in Hartford, Connecticut, to a high of $31,752 in The Woodlands, Texas. In contrast, the lowest average retirement withdrawals come in at $16,282 a year in Allentown, Pennsylvania, compared with the highest in Carlsbad at $56,685.
Here's where retirees bring in the most each year, between Social Security payments and retirement account withdrawals.
The amount you'll receive from Social Security in retirement varies based on a number of factors, including how many years you worked, how much you contributed to Social Security taxes, your birth year and the age you start claiming benefits.
Your benefits may be reduced if you start collecting earlier than your full retirement age, which is 67 for Americans born in 1960 and later.
You have more control over the amount you're able to withdraw from tax-deferred retirement accounts like 401(k)s, although there are still some restrictions. You can start withdrawing money at age 59½, but once you turn 73, you generally must take out a set amount each year, known as required minimum distributions.
The amount of money you'll need each year in retirement can vary widely based on your location, if you plan to work at all and what kind of lifestyle you want.
A comfortable life — meaning your essential bills are covered and you have some extra funds for leisure or unexpected costs — could run you as little as $61,000 a year in Mississippi or over $129,000 a year in Hawaii, according to 2024 estimates from GOBankingRates.
A general rule of thumb for retirement planning is to aim to live on 4% of your savings your first year in retirement, then adjust that amount for inflation going forward. The idea is that making withdrawals of around 4% each year will allow you to live off your savings for roughly 30 years.
For reference, a retiree in Carlsbad would need over $1.4 million invested to be able to take out $56,685 in their first year following the 4% rule.
But you may need more or less, depending on the lifestyle you want. When deciding the total amount of savings to aim for, take into account factors such as where you plan live, how long you expect to be retired and how you plan to spend your time.
,
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations
Source: Cheng Xin / Getty In news surprising to absolutely no one, it turns out companies that have walked back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiative have suffered measurable reputational damage with consumers. According to a poll conducted by Axios, companies that maintained their DEI policies saw their reputational scores actually increase. The scores are based on metrics that measure 'trust, culture, ethics, citizenship, vision, growth, and products and services.' Of the 100 companies centered in the poll, there was an average reputation decline of 2.34 points. A common trait shared by the companies that received these declines is that they walked back their commitments to DEI initiatives. The majority of these withdrawals came as a result of the Trump administration's ongoing assault against anything it sees as DEI. Yet notably, companies such as Costco and Microsoft, which have held their ground on their DEI commitments, saw their reputations increase at an average of 1.5 points. These results come as a recent Pew Research poll shows that the majority of Americans still believe DEI initiatives are good for the workplace. As I said in the headline, this news really isn't that surprising if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention over the last several months. Target has really committed itself to being a corporate lolcow this year, as its steps to wind back its DEI initiatives have blown up spectacularly in its face. In fact, let's speed run through how bad this has gone for Target. Almost as soon as the company announced it would be rolling back its DEI initiatives, consumer boycotts began in earnest. Initially, there was anecdotal evidence of their effect as foot traffic had been noticeably down in Target stores in the weeks following the boycotts. The impact was so bad that the company reached out to Rev. Al Sharpton to help figure out how they could rebuild trust with the Black community. Source: picture alliance / Getty Target's 2025 woes were compounded during an earnings call in late May, where they revealed a 2.8 percent decrease in sales in the wake of the boycotts. This didn't help the continuous decline of Target's stock price, with shares dropping 3.5 percent after they revealed the sales dip. Target was one of the companies included in Axios' poll, and its reputation went down by five percentage points and was listed in the bottom 25 percent when it came to ethics. Meanwhile, Costco's been out here big stepping with that 'I ball too hard, my girl too bad, my money too tall'-type energy. Shareholders overwhelmingly voted to keep their current DEI measures intact, and consumers seem to have noticed. Last week, Costco revealed that its earnings and revenue increased eight percent over the last quarter. Just speaking for myself and my family, the money that we would usually spend on a Target run has instead been redirected to Big Kirkland, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was true of many Black households throughout the country. Target's ongoing woes have proved to be a warning sign for a significant number of American retailers. Companies such as Walmart and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings. The numbers don't lie; withdrawing from DEI initiatives has proven to be a bad business. Here's hoping American companies finally take the hint (they won't, though, let's be real). SEE ALSO: They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations was originally published on
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations
Source: Cheng Xin / Getty In news surprising to absolutely no one, it turns out companies that have walked back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiative have suffered measurable reputational damage with consumers. According to a poll conducted by Axios, companies that maintained their DEI policies saw their reputational scores actually increase. The scores are based on metrics that measure 'trust, culture, ethics, citizenship, vision, growth, and products and services.' Of the 100 companies centered in the poll, there was an average reputation decline of 2.34 points. A common trait shared by the companies that received these declines is that they walked back their commitments to DEI initiatives. The majority of these withdrawals came as a result of the Trump administration's ongoing assault against anything it sees as DEI. Yet notably, companies such as Costco and Microsoft, which have held their ground on their DEI commitments, saw their reputations increase at an average of 1.5 points. These results come as a recent Pew Research poll shows that the majority of Americans still believe DEI initiatives are good for the workplace. As I said in the headline, this news really isn't that surprising if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention over the last several months. Target has really committed itself to being a corporate lolcow this year, as its steps to wind back its DEI initiatives have blown up spectacularly in its face. In fact, let's speed run through how bad this has gone for Target. Almost as soon as the company announced it would be rolling back its DEI initiatives, consumer boycotts began in earnest. Initially, there was anecdotal evidence of their effect as foot traffic had been noticeably down in Target stores in the weeks following the boycotts. The impact was so bad that the company reached out to Rev. Al Sharpton to help figure out how they could rebuild trust with the Black community. Source: picture alliance / Getty Target's 2025 woes were compounded during an earnings call in late May, where they revealed a 2.8 percent decrease in sales in the wake of the boycotts. This didn't help the continuous decline of Target's stock price, with shares dropping 3.5 percent after they revealed the sales dip. Target was one of the companies included in Axios' poll, and its reputation went down by five percentage points and was listed in the bottom 25 percent when it came to ethics. Meanwhile, Costco's been out here big stepping with that 'I ball too hard, my girl too bad, my money too tall'-type energy. Shareholders overwhelmingly voted to keep their current DEI measures intact, and consumers seem to have noticed. Last week, Costco revealed that its earnings and revenue increased eight percent over the last quarter. Just speaking for myself and my family, the money that we would usually spend on a Target run has instead been redirected to Big Kirkland, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was true of many Black households throughout the country. Target's ongoing woes have proved to be a warning sign for a significant number of American retailers. Companies such as Walmart and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings. The numbers don't lie; withdrawing from DEI initiatives has proven to be a bad business. Here's hoping American companies finally take the hint (they won't, though, let's be real). SEE ALSO: They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown SEE ALSO Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Fed Chair Powell has closed door meeting at the White House on interest rate cuts
Federal Reserve Bank Chair Jerome Powell stayed the course after being summoned to an economic woodshed at the White House by President Trump, who has been vocal about demands that the Fed ax interest rates. The May 29 faceoff was Powell's first visit to the White House during Trump's second tour. In a statement, Powell's office said the meeting's agenda was to "to discuss economic developments, including for growth, employment, and inflation." Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Both sides said the meeting was at the invitation of the president, who told Powell in person what he's been saying and tweeting for months: the Fed's refusal to cut interest rates was a "mistake" damaging the economy. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System voted unanimously in early May to approve the establishment of the primary credit rate at the existing level of 4.5% – which means interest rates for lenders, consumers and the rest of Americans won't be budging in the near term, much to the dismay of the Trump administration. This stance "will be updated as appropriate to reflect decisions of the Federal Open Market Committee or the Board of Governors regarding details of the Federal Reserve's operational tools and approach to implement monetary policy," the central bank said in a statement. XinhuaTrump's repeated demands underscore the volatility of U.S. trade policy and provide another flash point for global worries about fiscal policy, which have sent bond yields sharply higher. The whiplashed tariffs, primarily those against China and the E.U., add to economic jitters, Related: Fed official sends strong message about interest-rate cuts Since April 2, or "Liberation Day," tariff threats and trade jitters have spooked buyers and sellers into a seemingly endless roller-coaster ride. Many market, economic, and financial experts have begun publicly warning of a recession within a few months, while others predict a nation stuck in a nasty stagflation. The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate to target low inflation and unemployment. The central bank can raise interest rates to slow inflation, which can cause unemployment. Or it can cut rates to boost job growth, but that can cause inflation. Monetary and stock market experts expect the Fed will lower interest rates by one quarter point in September. Trump told Powell in their meeting he wanted the cuts sooner. Related: Jamie Dimon sends terse message on stocks, economy The Fed's statement following the White House meeting said Powell "did not discuss his expectations for monetary policy, except to stress that the path of policy will depend entirely on incoming economic information and what that means for the outlook." A White House spokeswoman agreed with the statement, but added that the president pressed for immediate action to lower the rates. Powell also said in the Fed statement that he and his colleagues will set monetary policy "as required by law, to support maximum employment and stable prices and will make those decisions based solely on careful, objective, and non-political analysis." Powell will give the opening remarks June 2 at the Federal Reserve Board's International Finance (IF) Division 75th Anniversary Conference, Washington, D.C. The conference will feature a series of panel discussions focused on the division's history and people, as well as an academic panel and presentations by former IF economists. Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
