logo
Government revenue from taxing fossil fuels expected to drop

Government revenue from taxing fossil fuels expected to drop

RTÉ News​6 days ago
New documents published by the Department of Finance have warned that the Government's revenue from taxing fossil fuels will drop as consumers move to using electric cars and heat pumps.
The Tax Strategy Group paper says as the reliance on fossil fuels declines for energy and transport, the revenue raised by environmental taxes will also reduce.
The paper takes into consideration Ireland's legally binding climate commitment to reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 51% by 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
It highlights that over the next six years (from 2025 to 2030), it is projected that the net carbon tax volume levels of mineral oils, solid fuels and natural gas usage will fall, and estimates indicate that net carbon tax energy related CO2 emissions will also decline.
In the longer term, this will mean revenues raised by environmental taxes, such as the Carbon Tax, derived mainly from home heating, petrol and diesel, will decrease and will need to be replaced by other revenue raising measures.
The group's paper notes that while taxation of energy products should incentivise consumers and industry to make better choices for the environment, policy consideration of any tax measure needs also to be cognisant of a range of factors.
These include the impact on the Exchequer, availability of viable alternatives, competitiveness impacts, potential regressive impacts and interaction with adjacent policy measures.
Budget options to raise money
The paper recommends budget options, including fiscal measures, to potentially raise money for the Exchequer and encourage behavioural change linked with reducing road transport emissions.
It suggests if a 1% VRT rate increase was considered across bands 11-20, such as hatchbacks and SUVs, which would only affect cars with above average emissions, then it is estimated to raise €28 million based on 2024 registrations.
While increasing the VRT Nitrogen Oxide surcharge by €5 per mg/km across all thresholds would raise €15.5 million (based on 2024 data).
It also examines emissions-based VRT for Category B vehicles or light commercial vans, suggesting an option for an increased rate of 15% for vehicles with emissions of 261g/km and over.
According to data from SIMI to year end in May, the market share for light commercial vehicles is 93.2% diesel and 4.4% electric.
However, there is growth in the EV market share compared to 2024 figures, although it also noted a year-on-year decline in light commercial vehicle registrations.
Based on Revenue data from 2024, the paper suggests the net impact of the introduction of a surcharge rate of 15%, taking into account the 8% rate effective from July, for vehicles with emissions of >260g CO2 per km is estimated at being in the region of €1 million.
It also outlines an option to reduce the Benefit in Kind (BIK) liability for zero emission vehicles to increase the uptake in the corporate fleet, and future options that may include the introduction of an emissions-based BIK rate for vans.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US calls off Sudan peace talks after post-war power dispute
US calls off Sudan peace talks after post-war power dispute

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US calls off Sudan peace talks after post-war power dispute

The US has postponed a meeting of foreign ministers to discuss the war in Sudan because of a dispute over the wording of a proposed joint statement, according to people familiar with the matter. US secretary of state Marco Rubio was scheduled to host the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt in Washington on Wednesday. The discussions by the so-called Quad of countries were aimed at advancing peace talks between two Sudanese generals who have been at war for two years. The failure to proceed with negotiations came after Egypt disagreed with the wording of a planned communique that stated neither the Sudanese Armed Forces nor the rival Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group should have a leading role in a postwar transitional government, said the people, who asked not to be identified as the information isn't public. Egypt historically has strong relations with Sudan's army-backed government, while the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been accused of backing the RSF – an allegation it denies. READ MORE Further talks by the Quad may be rescheduled for the United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York in September, one of the people said. The Egyptian foreign ministry and the US state department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Conflict erupted in Sudan in April 2023, when government forces failed to agree to a power-sharing accord with the RSF. The two sides jointly carried out a coup against a civilian-led government in 2021. At least 150,000 people have been killed since the start of the war, according to US estimates, while millions more have been forced to flee their homes in what the United Nations has called the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. Both sides have announced rival governments, raising concerns that the North African nation could split in two – similar to the situation in neighbouring Libya. Washington's involvement in the talks forms part of a wider push by US president Donald Trump's administration to promote peace in a string of conflicts including in Ukraine, Gaza and the Democratic Republic of Congo. While the US brokered a tentative deal in eastern Congo between its government and the M23 rebel group, it has been less successful in other arenas. Under president Joe Biden, the US failed to forge peace in Sudan through the so-called ALPS group that included Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, the African Union and the United Nations. The UAE has repeatedly called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in the North African nation, as well as the resumption of a political process that leads to a civilian government independent of military control. – Bloomberg

Full list of 11 banned essentials that will cost £200 to chuck in green bins under new rules
Full list of 11 banned essentials that will cost £200 to chuck in green bins under new rules

The Irish Sun

time8 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Full list of 11 banned essentials that will cost £200 to chuck in green bins under new rules

THE full list of 11 essential items banned from green bins has been revealed ahead of new rules coming into force next year. Households in England that flout the new "Simpler Recycling" rules could be hit with a penalty. 1 The Government is introducing the regulations as part of its drive to achieve net zero by 2050 That penalty could increase up to £200, according to one expert. The new laws are already in place for businesses. Those that do not comply with the new Simpler Recycling regulations could face hefty fines and civil sanctions. This ranges from £110 fixed penalty notice to a £5,000 fine or more for business owners. The switch, due to come into force for households next year, will force properties to use four distinct bins. read more in news The Government is introducing the regulations as part of its net-zero drive. This is the strategy that sets out policies and proposals for decarbonising all sectors of the UK economy to meet the target by 2050. The fresh rules are scheduled to begin from March 2026 . The new default requirement for most households and workplaces will be four containers for: Most read in The Sun Residual (non-recyclable) waste. Food waste (mixed with garden waste if appropriate). Paper and card. All other dry recyclable materials (plastic, metal and glass). The latter may be various container types, including bags, bins or stackable boxes. One expert has outlined the 11 essential items that if left in green bins could trigger the £200 penalty. Waste specialist James Ward from Wheeldon Brothers warned certain items cannot be recycled. He explained: "Common misconceptions about recycled items are animal waste, disposable nappies, glass cookware, ovenware, drinking glasses, ceramics and sticky tape. "Items like tissues, wet wipes, cotton buds, and cotton wool are also unsuitable for recycling. "They should be disposed of in waste bins to prevent contamination." He added: "Individuals need to be aware of what items are unsuitable for recycling, as ignoring this can lead to potential fines." Mr Ward said: "Despite being plastic-based, toothpaste tubes require specialised recycling methods not typically offered through kerbside collection. "Instead, consumers can explore take-back schemes facilitated by manufacturers and retailers, diverting toothpaste tubes from general recycling bins to designated recycling channels. "While your council may accept plastic bottles for recycling, other forms of plastic packaging like wrappers or containers might not cut it depending on the council. "These items, though recyclable, require specialised processing beyond what's available locally, adding to disposal costs. "It's a reminder to explore alternative disposal methods or utilise designated The Government has confirmed that a four-bin system will represent "the maximum default requirement and is not expected to increase in the future". A spokesperson for the Government said: "This is a sensible, pragmatic approach to the collection of materials for every household and business in England. "We will make recycling easier: citizens will be able to recycle the same materials across England whether at home, work or school, and will no longer need to check what is accepted for recycling in their local area. "A universal standard will ensure that everything that can be collected for household recycling is collected in every region." Simpler Recycling has been designed to address the unique challenges in England, drawing inspiration from the successful strategies already in place in Scotland and Wales. The 11 items that could trigger a £200 penalty Here is the full list of the everyday items that cannot be recycled: Toothpaste Disposable nappies Glass cookware Ovenware Drinking glasses Ceramics Sticky tape Tissues Wet wipes Cotton buds Cotton wool

Calls for more safeguards on deployment of Irish troops
Calls for more safeguards on deployment of Irish troops

RTÉ News​

time9 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Calls for more safeguards on deployment of Irish troops

A cross-party group of TDs and senators has recommended additional safeguards on the deployment of Irish troops abroad including a legal review by an independent body. The Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security has been conducting pre-legislative scrutiny of the Bill which would give effect to the removal of the Triple Lock which governs the deployment of defence forces personnel overseas. The Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 also proposes to increase the number of troops that can be deployed overseas without a Dáil vote from 12 to 50. In its report published today, the Oireachtas Committee makes 27 recommendations, however it does not issue a view on whether the Triple Lock should be removed or retained. Under existing rules, any foreign deployment of 12 or more Irish Defence Forces personnel can only take place when it has been approved by the Dáil, the Government and has received a United Nations mandate. The Government is seeking to remove the UN approval for an operation as it has argued that this means that the UN Security Council has a veto on Irish troop deployment. Most opposition parties have strongly opposed the move. The report also calls for an enhanced role for the Oireachtas and the Committee on Defence and National Security specifically in both the approval and scrutiny of Irish overseas deployments with international forces. This includes a regular renewal of mission mandates, requiring both Government and Dáil approval, as well as a formal annual review by the Committee on Defence and National Security of all Irish deployments with international forces. Committee chairperson Sinn Féin TD Rose Conway-Walsh said there was direct conflict between the opposition members of the Committee and Government members on the question of a link between the Triple Lock and Irish neutrality. "The Opposition were very concerned about the impact that removal of the Triple Lock on Irish neutrality while Government parties thought it wouldn't have any impact." She also criticised the amount of time allocated for pre-legislative scrutiny. The Bill will go to the Dáil and Seanad in the Autumn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store