'Best we could get': Brussels defends EU-US deal as criticism mounts
"This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Maroš Šefčovič, the European Commissioner for Trade, said at a press conference on Monday.
The announced deal foresees the introduction of an across-the-board 15% tariff for EU products bound for the US market. At the same time, the majority of US products bound for the EU market will benefit from a zero or virtually zero tariff. Sensitive agricultural goods, such as beef, poultry and sugar, were excluded from the agreement.
The 15% rate is lower than the 30% rate that Trump threatened to slap on the bloc in a letter sent to von der Leyen earlier this month. It is also below the 20% rate that he originally announced in April as part of his controversial "reciprocal tariffs".
However, it is significantly higher than the average 4.8% rate that EU exports faced upon entering US soil before Trump's return to the White House.
According to Šefčovič, who sat next to von der Leyen during Sunday's make-or-break meeting, Trump kicked off the negotiations by putting the 30% again on the table. This led to a back-and-forth between the two sides until they settled for the 15% mark, applicable as "all inclusive" to block the accumulation of additional duties.
Trump's 30% tariff, Šefčovič said, would have effectively halted transatlantic trade and created an "unbearable" situation with "much worse conditions" for the talks.
"It's quite obvious that the world which was there before 2 April is gone. And we simply need to adjust, we need to address the challenges which are coming from this new approach," the Commissioner said. "And I believe that the strategic cooperation with our strategic partner is a better outcome than an all-out trade war."
'Between the plague and cholera'
The Commission's version of events has so far failed to quell the simmering discontent.
The stark difference between the 15% rate imposed on most EU goods and the 0% rate enjoyed by most US goods has fuelled the impression of an asymmetrical arrangement that exclusively favours Trump's interests to the detriment of the bloc's.
The pledges to spend $700 billion in US energy and invest $600 billion in the US economy until the remainder of Trump's second term have only deepened the impression of a win-lose deal. (The pledges are indicative, not legally binding.)
Bernd Lange, a German MEP who chairs the European Parliament's trade committee and is in regular contact with Šefčovič, left no doubt as to his displeasure.
"My first assessment: not satisfactory. This is a lopsided deal. Concessions have clearly been made that are difficult to accept," Lange said on social media.
Kathleen Van Brempt, who serves as one of the committee's vice-chairs, was more scathing, warning the deal would make the bloc more "dependent" on American fuels and ultimately "backfire" against its stated goal of strategic autonomy.
"The fundamental problem remains that Trump's tariffs are illegal and violate virtually every existing trade rule," Van Brempt wrote in a statement. "Simply accepting that European products will be subject to a 15% import tariff (...) means that we are essentially agreeing to these illegal, coercive tariffs.
"Avoiding a heavier 30% tariff will undoubtedly be a relief," she added. "But this remains a choice between the plague and cholera."
Decrying a "heavy price" paid, Valérie Hayer, the president of the liberal Renew Europe group, said the agreed terms would lead to a "massive imbalance" between the two sides, and Terry Reintke, co-chair of the Greens, slammed the Commission for caving into "the bullying tactics and threats of President Trump".
"This is not the way to do business," Reintke said.
Even von der Leyen's party, the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), was unhappy with the outcome, calling the 15% a "blatant breach of WTO principles and a serious blow to European industrial competitiveness".
'A dark day'
EU leaders were noticeably lukewarm in their initial reactions, welcoming the deal as an anchor of "stability" but lamenting the continuation of the punitive duties.
"This is a moment of relief but not of celebration. Tariffs will increase in several areas, and some key questions remain unresolved," said Belgian Prime Minister Bart de Wever.
His Dutch counterpart, Dick Schoof, said that "no tariffs would have been better", while Ireland's Micheál Martin, whose country strongly relies on the US market, predicted trade would become "more expensive" and "more challenging".
Spain's Pedro Sánchez was visibly apathetic. "In any case, I support this trade agreement, but I do so without any kind of enthusiasm," he said.
In France, the prime minister described the agreement as a "dark day" of "submission".
The remarks expose the feeling of despondency and frustration that has gripped the EU since the start of Trump's second term. The Republican has single-handedly bulldozed over decades of transatlantic principles to promote his "America First" agenda, breaking with the Western consensus on trade, technology, climate and defence.
In his press conference, Šefčovič said geopolitics had played a role in the Commission's balancing act ahead of the face-to-face meeting in Scotland.
"It's not only about the trade. It's about security. It is about Ukraine. It is about current geopolitical volatility," he said. "I believe from now on, we can go only for the better."
Privately, Commission officials concede the 15% rate is "not great" and hope Washington will treat the tariff as a maximum ceiling to prevent escalation down the road. But Peter Chase, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, says Brussels should do better than take things for granted, given Trump's notoriously mercurial character.
"Unfortunately," Chase said, "President von der Leyen and others who believe the EU's concessions bought stability for European businesses may unfortunately find that the man who shredded US commitments under international law to create 'leverage' is very likely to rip up this agreement too."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
44 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
UK shopper spend in EU "soaring" due to tax-free shopping says retail body
AIR and 500 businesses, including those at all price levels from Burberry to Primark, are again calling for government ministers to reinstate tax-free shopping for international visitors and make the UK 'the shopping capital of the world'. AIR data shows that Britons spent £742 million on VAT-free shopping in the EU in 2024. That compares to £147 million in 2021, £527 million in 2022, and £646 million in 2023. And this fast growth is continuing in 2025 with spending in the first 22 weeks up 16% on the same period in 2024. Further AIR findings show that France has become the most popular EU destination for British VAT-free shoppers, attracting 35% of all spending, with Paris accounting for 75% of this. While the last government scrapped tax-free shopping for tourists in the UK at the start of 2021, it noted EU countries extended it to British shoppers for the first time. The figures suggest that 'as a consequence, Britons are increasingly shunning homegrown stores and travelling abroad to make significant purchases where they can reclaim sales tax', AIR said. It believes the findings 'will increase pressure on ministers to reintroduce tax rebates for all international visitors – both EU and non-EU – to put British businesses back on a level playing field'. Reversing the current policy would, according to AIR's analysis, mean the new market for EU consumers alone would supercharge the national economy by over £3.65 billion a year, create 73,000 new jobs across the country, boost regions of the UK by £1.8 billion a year and generate over £500 million in additional VAT alone for the Treasury. Derrick Hardman, chair of AIR, said: 'The disproportionate increase in British visitor numbers to the EU show that a new market in shopping-led tourism has emerged. 'It's sad to see British shoppers taking their business elsewhere. But they have worked out that the tax rebates they can get on the Continent more than outweigh the costs of hopping on the Eurostar or taking a cheap short-haul flight somewhere. 'It makes no sense for the UK to remain the only destination in Europe not offering tax-free shopping. Thanks to our position outside the EU, we now have a unique chance to reverse the policy of the last government and become the world's shopping capital – offering tax rebates for both EU and non-EU shoppers. 'All the evidence shows that reintroducing a tax-free shopping scheme would more than pay for itself thanks to all the spending stimulated not just in retailers but on hotels, restaurants, transport, tourist attractions and entertainment. 'This Government has promised to pull every lever available to promote growth – here is an obvious one.' Helen Brocklebank, CEO of luxury body Walpole, added: 'Every pound spent by British and international tourists in Europe instead of the UK threatens growth, denies the Exchequer revenue and undermines the competitiveness of our retailers, manufacturers, hospitality businesses and iconic brands. 'As the sector body representing Britain's high-value manufacturing and services industries, which export British excellence worldwide and support 450,000 jobs and £25.5 billion in tax revenues, we are calling for a simple reversal of the previous government's policy. This would allow the UK to share in future growth, keep our towns, cities and tourism hubs globally competitive, and ensure businesses of all sizes can trade on equal terms with their European counterparts.'
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
UK shopper spend in EU "soaring" due to tax-free shopping says retail body
AIR and 500 businesses, including those at all price levels from Burberry to Primark, are again calling for government ministers to reinstate tax-free shopping for international visitors and make the UK 'the shopping capital of the world'. AIR data shows that Britons spent £742 million on VAT-free shopping in the EU in 2024. That compares to £147 million in 2021, £527 million in 2022, and £646 million in 2023. And this fast growth is continuing in 2025 with spending in the first 22 weeks up 16% on the same period in 2024. Further AIR findings show that France has become the most popular EU destination for British VAT-free shoppers, attracting 35% of all spending, with Paris accounting for 75% of this. While the last government scrapped tax-free shopping for tourists in the UK at the start of 2021, it noted EU countries extended it to British shoppers for the first time. The figures suggest that 'as a consequence, Britons are increasingly shunning homegrown stores and travelling abroad to make significant purchases where they can reclaim sales tax', AIR said. It believes the findings 'will increase pressure on ministers to reintroduce tax rebates for all international visitors – both EU and non-EU – to put British businesses back on a level playing field'. Reversing the current policy would, according to AIR's analysis, mean the new market for EU consumers alone would supercharge the national economy by over £3.65 billion a year, create 73,000 new jobs across the country, boost regions of the UK by £1.8 billion a year and generate over £500 million in additional VAT alone for the Treasury. Derrick Hardman, chair of AIR, said: 'The disproportionate increase in British visitor numbers to the EU show that a new market in shopping-led tourism has emerged. 'It's sad to see British shoppers taking their business elsewhere. But they have worked out that the tax rebates they can get on the Continent more than outweigh the costs of hopping on the Eurostar or taking a cheap short-haul flight somewhere. 'It makes no sense for the UK to remain the only destination in Europe not offering tax-free shopping. Thanks to our position outside the EU, we now have a unique chance to reverse the policy of the last government and become the world's shopping capital – offering tax rebates for both EU and non-EU shoppers. 'All the evidence shows that reintroducing a tax-free shopping scheme would more than pay for itself thanks to all the spending stimulated not just in retailers but on hotels, restaurants, transport, tourist attractions and entertainment. 'This Government has promised to pull every lever available to promote growth – here is an obvious one.' Helen Brocklebank, CEO of luxury body Walpole, added: 'Every pound spent by British and international tourists in Europe instead of the UK threatens growth, denies the Exchequer revenue and undermines the competitiveness of our retailers, manufacturers, hospitality businesses and iconic brands. 'As the sector body representing Britain's high-value manufacturing and services industries, which export British excellence worldwide and support 450,000 jobs and £25.5 billion in tax revenues, we are calling for a simple reversal of the previous government's policy. This would allow the UK to share in future growth, keep our towns, cities and tourism hubs globally competitive, and ensure businesses of all sizes can trade on equal terms with their European counterparts.'
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US tariffs prompt Toyota profit warning
The world's largest automaker by vehicle sales now expects a net profit of 2.66 trillion yen ($18.06 billion), down from 3.1 trillion yen previously forecasted. "Due to the impact of US tariffs and other factors, actual results showed decreased operating income, and the forecast has been revised downward," the firm said in a statement. Its shares fell by as much as 2.4 percent in Tokyo afternoon trade before recovering off lows. The Trump administration in April imposed a 25 percent levy on Japanese cars imported into the United States, dealing a hefty blow to Japan and its crucial auto sector. Although Tokyo and Washington announced a trade deal in July, lowering that rate to 15 percent and providing a degree of relief for the industry, it's not yet clear when it will take effect. There is also confusion over whether the car tariff -- as well as other "reciprocal" levies -- will be capped at 15 percent, or if these would come on top of those in place before Trump's trade blitz. The auto industry had a pre-existing 2.5 percent tariff, meaning the levy currently stands at 27.5 percent. Toyota's revenues in the first quarter were up 3.5 percent, but net income plunged by 36.9 percent. Tariffs hit forecasts The results come after Honda said Wednesday its net profit had halved in the first quarter because of US tariffs, although it upgraded its annual profit forecast due to the deal with Washington. In the first three months of its fiscal year, which begins in April, net profit fell to 196.67 billion yen ($1.3 billion), a drop of 50.2 percent year-on-year, Honda said. Revenue dipped 1.2 percent to 5.34 trillion yen. Honda, Japan's second-biggest automaker after Toyota, has managed to withstand the pressure better than its Japanese competitors. More than 60 percent of the vehicles it sells in the United States are built there, the highest percentage of all major Japanese automakers, according to Bloomberg Intelligence auto analyst Tatsuo Yoshida. Struggling Japanese rival Nissan, whose mooted merger with Honda collapsed this year and which is slashing jobs and closing factories, in July posted a net loss of 116 billion yen ($784 million). German carmaker BMW stuck to its 2025 targets last month despite quarterly profits tumbling a third due partly to US tariffs, insisting its large American operations meant it could weather the storm. That stood in contrast to domestic rivals Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz, who cut their outlooks as they grapple with the fallout from Trump's hardball trade policies.
