Disney Wins ‘Moana' Copyright Trial, But $10B Sequel Suit Still Riding The Legal Waves, For Now
Buck Woodall's five-year battle with Disney over who really created Moana looks to have come to an end, with a Los Angeles jury on Monday finding for the House of Mouse in the animated franchise dispute, at least for now.
While the panel of six women and two men determined in just under three hours that Disney and primary Moana creators John Musker and Ron Clements never saw or even knew about Woodall's Bucky the Surfer Boy work while working on the 2016 animated hit, Woodall now has a separate copyright infringement action in the courts over blockbuster sequel Moana 2.
More from Deadline
Disney's Alan Bergman, Josh D'Amaro On World Building Across Film & Parks In High-Wattage Event With Surprise Appearance By Robert Downey Jr. - SXSW
Disney Layoffs To Impact Almost 200 Employees Across News Division And Entertainment Networks; Data Site 538 To Be Discontinued
Hulu's Bumpy Oscar Night: Streaming Experts Unpack The Glitches And Assess The Impact On Disney's Service
Right now, after a slew of internal communications and more sausage-making was revealed in documents for this trial, Disney is taking the win and leaving it at that.
'We are incredibly proud of the collective work that went into the making of Moana and are pleased that the jury found it had nothing to do with Plaintiff's works,' a spokesperson for the Bob Iger-run media giant told Deadline after the verdict was read out this afternoon in Judge Alka Sagar's courtroom at the Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Los Angeles.
Lawyers for Woodall were not so upbeat, obviously.
'We are obviously disappointed in the verdict,' attorney Gustavo D. Lage said Monday. 'At the present time, we are weighing our options to determine the best path forward regarding the legal remedies available to our client.'
With the question of whether Musker or Clements or any other principal had ever come in contact with Woodall's Bucky materials the primary question before the jury, any issue of similarity between the Hawaii setting and Polynesian demigods in Bucky and Moana was moot. 'They had no idea about Bucky,' Disney outside counsel Moez Kaba said of the Little Mermaid and Aladdin filmmakers in his closing argument Monday in the downtown L.A. courthouse. 'They had never seen it, never heard of it.'
Like in the first case, which was filed in 2020 and still may be appealed, I'm told, Woodall claims in the newer case that a distant relative helped him out. To that, beginning in 2004 Woodall says he handed Jenny Marchick his copyright-protected Bucky the Surfer Boy trailer storyboards, 'intellectual property and trade secrets' (including a 2011 finished script).
Marchich was then Mandeville Films' director of development and working out of the Mandeville offices on the Disney lot.
As was made clear in Disney documents unearthed in discovery and in the trial, work began on the Herman Melville-inspired Moana in 2011, a point Woodall's lawyers jumped on. Unburdened now of the time limitations placed on his initial Moana suit of 2020, the January-filed Moana 2 suit is seeking $10 billion from Disney, or around 2.5% of the gross from the 2024 sensation, which grossed more than $1 billion at the global box office.
In the end, because of statutes, Woodall wouldn't have been able to see any cash from the first Moana, but he may have a Hail Mary at some dough from the second toon, which returned Auli'i Cravalho and Dwayne Johnson to their starring roles.
'This case arises from a two-decade-long scheme masterminded by Marchick but ultimately joined in with malice and for profit by all Defendants pursuant to the aforementioned conspiracy described in this Complaint,' reads the complaint filed January 10, 2025 and seeking injunction relief and big bucks. 'The scheme started out as a plan by Marchick to support her thirst to gain success in her desired career in the movie industry, at all costs, by working with the Defendants to steal all the components of Plaintiffs Copyrighted Materials, as that term is defined in this Complaint.'
'This theft resulted in what would eventually become one of the most unique and profitable animated film franchises in motion picture history revolving around Plaintiffs Copyrighted Materials and directly resulting in the Disney franchise known as Moana,' the lawsuit adds.
For the record, Marchick was the sister-in-law of Woodall's brother. Professionally, after time at Fox and Sony, Marchick now holds the position of head of development for features at NBCUniversal-owned DreamWorks Animation.
In Marchick's long-ish stint testifying in the nearly two-long case, the exec stated that she had no memory of ever showing any of Woodall's Bucky the Surfer Boy material to anyone at Disney over the years even as her relative by marriage sent her material and updates. Correspondence brought up at trial also showed Marchick telling Woodall via email that she didn't think she could help him. Marchick did eventually secure Woodall a job interview with a Disney Channel staffer for an animating gig, but that didn't seem to result in much.
No trial date has been set for the Moana 2 copyright infringement case, However, watch that docket, because you can be sure Disney will be asking Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to toss out the whole thing sooner rather than later based on today's outcome.
Best of Deadline
The 25 Highest-Grossing Animated Films Of All Time At The Box Office
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Gen Z ditches traditional dating rules not to just ‘go through the motions'
Dating's latest trend? Total anarchy — and not in the punk rock way. A new report from the sex-positive app Feeld and educator Ruby Rare found that a growing number of Gen Zers are opting out of traditional relationship models and into something called 'relationship anarchy' — and one in five may be practicing it without even realizing. Coined in 2006 by Swedish writer Andie Nordgren, relationship anarchy — or RA — is a radical, anti-hierarchical, anti-capitalist take on love and connection. As Nordgren noted in her manifesto, it 'questions the idea that love is a limited resource that can only be real if restricted to a couple.' In other words, why should romance get top billing when your BFF, roommate or creative collaborator might fulfill your soul more than a spouse? 'It's a relationship style that is founded on politically anarchic principles. It takes being intentional,' Rare explained in the study. 'You have to examine the relationships you currently have in your life, and reflect and deep dive. Are you just going through the motions?' Feeld's findings show RA devotees report feeling less lonely and more supported — but it's not all communal bliss and pillow talk. Feeld's findings say RA fans feel less lonely and more backed up — but it's not all group hugs and sweet nothings. Alberto – 'It's challenging to figure out what your boundaries are,' Rare said. 'But I don't think relationship building should be about shying away from challenge.' Instead of prioritizing sexual exclusivity or 'Disney fairy-tale romance,' RA promotes mutual care across all connections — romantic or not. 'Everyone is taught the rules at a young age: One person in your life is meant to be your everything,' Sam, a 33-year-old gender-fluid music licensing administrator, told Wired in a recent interview. People would feel more fulfilled in their relationships 'if they were able to prioritize others based on what they actually wanted versus what they believe is expected of them.' Forget fairy tales — RA ditches monogamy for a mix-and-match lovefest built on mutual care, whether it's with a partner, pal or podcast co-host. Pixel-Shot – The goal? Freedom, not perfection. 'A lot of people will tell me, 'Oh, I wish I could be polyamorous or a relationship anarchist, but I just get too jealous,'' Lavvynder said. 'And it's like, well, I get jealous too… It's really f—king hard, actually.' Still, many say it's worth the mess. As Rare puts it: 'Human connection is inherently messy. The better we are at embracing that, the better we are at enjoying our lives.' And for a rising number of romantics, relationship anarchy might just be the escape route. Polyamory — and its close cousin, relationship anarchy — may not just be about love and liberation. It can also be practical.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘RHOM's Alexia Nepola & Marysol Patton On Tuning Out Opinions From Viewers & Why Filming Break Helped Some Of The Ladies In The Friend Group
Alexia Nepola and Marysol Patton are back on Bravo as The Real Housewives of Miami return to television. The reality series took an extended break between seasons to break from the yearly filming schedule and see the ladies during another phase of their lives. More from Deadline 'The Real Housewives Of Miami' Season 7 Cast Photos, Trailer & Premiere Date Set At Bravo Bravo's 'The Real Housewives': Every Single Cast Photo In Franchise History Brynn Whitfield Not Returning To 'Real Housewives Of New York City' After 2 Seasons As She Opts To "Walk Away From Reality TV" Season 7 of RHOM picks up after Nepola announces her separation from her husband Todd, with all the girls coming together to support her. Ahead of the season premiere, Deadline talked to Nepola and Patton about what viewers can expect in the new season and how it was returning to film after the extended break. 'I should actually have a body cam on myself [to] document everything in my life. I should really be filming all year round, but thank God I'm not, because… sometimes you do need a little break,' Nepola said. 'It makes sense because sometimes you do need to give some of the ladies in the friend group some months off to develop and have more things going on and whatnot.' Patton says that she wished 'every day' she had a camera on herself and Nepola when cameras were down, but ultimately noted that the extended break helped, saying, 'to have story lines [for] real things. Because the minute you jump into things too quickly, you don't have enough time to have new things going on in your life. Look what happened with Julia – we had a break and she adopted two children. It was [also] big changes in Alexia's life and changes in the friend group as well. Some people got closer, some people you would have expected to be close forever are no longer close. Time does a lot of miracles.' Alexia Nepola on tuning out opinions from viewers The premiere episode of RHOM shows the cast coming together to support Nepola as she announces her separation from her husband. However, things are much different now as Nepola and her husband have patched things up and worked things out. 'It's hard,' Nepola said of watching the episode showcasing a contrasting part of her life. 'But with that being said, I look back and that's the beauty of life, right? How I was going through so much pain and hurt a year ago, and today, I'm filled with hope, and I'm happy and I'm in a much better place.' She continued, 'I'm in a good place right now. But, if I wasn't, maybe the story would be different. As far as my relationship goes, like any other relationship, there's ebbs and flows, and highs and lows. It was very emotional for me.' Nepola is one of the few housewives who lives authentically in front of the cameras and doesn't make life choices based on how viewers might perceive her and says, 'I tune out.' 'I don't feel or think about the consequences, but it's kind of too late because you're in the moment and you're feeling it, and you're doing it,' Nepola adds. 'I've never done anything for camera. Maybe I should do less. Maybe that's my problem, that I say too much and I do too much, but that's how I am in my real life. The camera just documents it.' Why cast is different from the others The Real Housewives are known to have fiery conversations, but the Miami ladies keep it light and fun, and never seemingly go to a place where they can't come back from. 'I think for the most part, people can be shady, but they're not too nasty, except for one person. We've only got one person with a nasty problem. Other than that, that's a good quota for nine women. Just saying,' Patton says. Nepola adds, 'I feel like we're too nice. I feel like our friend group that we're too nice. I don't really watch any other Housewife show, but I watch clips, and I'm very friendly with many of the other women on the other shows, and I feel like they really go at each other.' Patton notes that she thinks the RHOM cast is different 'because we're all actually friends,' adding, 'When you're not friends with people, you don't care how you treat them, and a lot of these shows are cast with strangers just to fill a spot, and they're not really friends. We're all really friends.' 'And that's why it works for us, you can't lie to the camera,' Nepola says. 'You can really see that we're all friends, and we have so much history and we fight like sisters and we love like sisters, so I think that that's what the audience really loves about our show.' Alexia Nepola and Marysol Patton's take on the feud between Larsa Pippen and Lisa Hochstein The premiere episode of RHOM Season 7 sees a fallout between Larsa Pippen and Lisa Hochstein, which ends with Hochstein kicking Pippen out of her home. 'I'm very friendly with both of them, and I love and care for both of them. So as your friends, it was very hard to watch,' Nepola said about the feud. Patton adds, 'Eventually, we removed ourselves. We were like, 'You guys, have to figure it out. We can't do anymore. I don't want to hear you complain. I don't want to hear you complain. You two need to complain to each other and figure it out.'' If faced with a similar situation about being kicked out of someone's home, Patton says, 'Yo me muero.' ('I would die.') 'Yo me voy,' Nepola adds, saying she would have left. 'It was horrible. I was mortified. I felt terrible for Larsa because she was very upset about it and she was very sad. I mean, just the fact that she went, maybe I wouldn't have even gone to Lisa's house because they were already feeling a certain kind of way about each other. I knew that by seeing each other at some point during the night, that was going to happen.' Patton says she wouldn't have kicked anyone out of her home and says she has even had fellow co-star Adriana de Moura at her place, despite them not being friendly. 'I have had Adriana in my home over three times and handed her gifts, and I've never thought in a moment, how much I don't want you here, that I would actually throw you out of my house, because I would never throw anyone out,' she says. and the cast trips No one does it like The Real Housewives of Miami, and Nepola and Patton teased the trips the cast will be taking in Season 7. Patton teases that the cast trip to Sevilla in Spain was in honor of Alexia, adding, 'Alexia grew up in Spain in her teen years. She was in high school there and she loves it. It was beautiful.' 'It was our best trip. I feel like when we go on trips, you can't even invent the the shit [that] goes down. I don't know what it is, but the energy is different. Everyone's on 10,' Nepola says. 'You'll get to see laughter and you'll get to see tears. You get to see both, which is what makes us human and makes us real, and it makes us relatable because we're going through shit and you can see it, but we also have a lot of fun, and it's just beautiful. Sevilla is a beautiful setting.' Nepola also notes that the cast also goes on a cruise, which was thanks to Patton, who said, 'I might be friends with Richard Branson, so we go on this cruise, and it was great. We had a lot of fun.' Best of Deadline 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Disney, NBCUniversal sue AI creator Midjourney in copyright dispute
June 11 (UPI) -- Disney and NBCUniversal have joined legal teams in a lawsuit against AI image maker Midjourney over multiple claims of copyright infringement. The lawsuit filed Tuesday in California's U.S. central district claimed that Midjourney, a generative artificial intelligence startup, utilized and distributed proprietary AI-generated characters from NBCU and Disney productions such as the Simpsons, Star Wars, Toy Story, Shrek and others. It marked the first AI-related infringement lawsuit taken on by a Hollywood giant. "This is an extremely significant development," IP lawyer Chad Hummel told Wired. Meanwhile, Universal and Disney have petitioned for a jury trial and argue it risks upending "the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright law." The two plaintiffs claimed that Midjourney's own website displayed "hundreds, if not thousands, of images generated by its Image Service at the request of its subscribers" they believed infringed on their copyrighted works. "Midjourney's bootlegging business model and defiance of U.S copyright law are not only an attack on Disney, Universal, and the hard-working creative community that brings the magic of movies to life, but are also a broader threat to the American motion picture industry," the complaint continued. The joint suit further says that San Francisco-based Midjourney allegedly ignored prior legal requests to cease and desist and included dozens of examples in the complaint, calling Midjourney a "bottomless pit of plagiarism." In 2023, Midjourney reported more than $200 million in revenue and in 2024 took in an additional $100 million on top of it to beat the prior year. "Midjourney, which has attracted millions of subscribers and made $300 million last year alone, is focused on its own bottom line and ignored Plaintiffs' demands," according to court documents. The two movie studios seek an unspecified amount in monetary damages, and further requested injunctive relief in order to prevent Midjourney from any future copyright violations.