
Zelenskyy approves bill weakening anti-corruption bodies despite big protests
The move on Tuesday puts the president on a collision course with civil society activists and some of its veterans and is likely to dismay Ukraine's European partners.
Earlier on Tuesday Ukraine's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, passed a controversial bill that effectively removes the independence of the national anti-corruption bureau, known as Nabu, and the specialised anti-corruption prosecutors office.
It gives sweeping new powers to Ukraine's prosecutor general, and makes it easier for the government to control which cases are pursued. Critics say the legislation allows political interference and is a major step backwards in the fight against corruption.
Late on Tuesday Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, rejecting calls for him to use his presidential veto, according to reports. The decision has yet to be posted on the government's website.
View image in fullscreen
A woman chants while holding a banner that reads 'Corruption Applauds' during a protest against a law targeting anti-corruption institutions in central Kyiv on Tuesday. Photograph: Alex Babenko/AP
Hours earlier, about 1,500 protesters gathered next to Zelenskyy's presidential administration complex. They shouted slogans outside his window including 'Shame' and 'Veto the law' and waved homemade banners denouncing the bill.
They were protests in other large cities including Lviv, Dnipro and Odesa. 'If the bill goes ahead it will make it harder for Ukraine to join the European Union. We will go back to dictatorship,' Sasha Kazintseva said, speaking before Zelenskyy reportedly gave his approval.
She added: 'We don't want to be like Russia. Zelenskyy is still our president. But he does the wrong things we will say so.'
Her friend Tetiana Kukuruza held up a cardboard sign with the blunt slogan: 'Are you fucking crazy?' She explained: 'This is the first time since 2022 that we've taken to the streets. We know the names of the deputies who voted for this bill. I'm not saying they are corrupt. But they have interests.'
The protesters gathered in a park immediately below a rococo 19th-century government building, the House of Chimeras. The crowd was made up of students, young activists and army veterans, some of them draped in blue and yellow Ukrainian flags. Kyiv's mayor, Vitalii Klitschko, also took part, together with his brother Volodymyr.
Veronika Mol, an artist, said she worried Ukraine was sliding back to the era of Viktor Yanukovych, the corrupt pro-Russian president who fled to Moscow in 2014, following months of street protests. 'I'm surprised this has happened. It looks like some madness. I don't know what their motives are,' she said.
'People are the power in Ukraine. Not the president or government. It's terrible we still have to remind them,' Mol added.
There has been vocal condemnation of the bill from prominent soldiers, a celebrity chef and Ukraine's media. The writer Illia Ponomarenko said civil society was fighting 'the dark side of its own state' in parallel with the war against Russia.
He criticised 'corruption, abuse of power, lies, lack of transparency, nepotism, impunity, and attacks on democracy and freedom of speech – everything that keeps dragging us back toward the abyss, back into Russia's colonial criminal stable'.
Several of Ukraine's high-profile international supporters expressed concern. They included the former US ambassador to Moscow, Mike McFaul, and Estonian ex-president Toomas Hendrik Ilves. There was also recognition that protesters could freely voice anti-government opinions – unlike in Russia.
Ukraine's application to join the EU is dependent on the progress it makes in fighting corruption. Since 2022 EU countries have provided Kyiv with significant military and economic support running into billions of euros.
The European commissioner for enlargement, Marta Kos, criticised the bill's adoption. 'The dismantling of key safeguards protecting [anti-corruption bureau] NABU's independence is a serious step back,' Kos wrote on social media, saying that the two bodies were 'essential' for Ukraine's EU path.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Palestine Action can challenge terror ban, judge rules
A co-founder of Palestine Action (PA) has won the right to a High Court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori was granted permission on grounds that the proscription of PA was a 'disproportionate interference with freedom of expression and freedom of protest'. The challenge was also permitted on the basis that the Home Secretary should have consulted the group before announcing the ban. The Government's move to proscribe the organisation came after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Announcing the intention to ban the group on June 23, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The ban means membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence that is punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' The vandalism of the two planes caused an estimated £7m of damage.


Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Calls to ban cow fighting instigates France's latest culture war
Pitting cows against each other is a traditional spectator sport in the French and Swiss Alps, but fans are now locking horns with activists who want it banned on animal welfare grounds. A bill to make cow fighting illegal has been tabled in the National Assembly for the first time. Unlike bullfighting and cockfighting, which are banned in most of France, cow fighting is not a blood sport, according to enthusiasts. The two cows, with blunted horns, engage in a pushing contest until one backs away. The loser from each round is eliminated and taken out of the competition until only one is left and declared the overall winner. The contests, which aficionados call combats de reines, or queen fights, exploit cows' natural instinct to fight for dominance in a herd. Hérens cattle, an Alpine breed known for their combative temperament, are said to make the best fighters. Jean-François Coulomme, the left-wing MP from the Savoie region bordering Switzerland who introduced the bill, said the practice was barbaric. He claimed both cows and spectators risked injury. 'This form of entertainment was only imported into the French Alps less than 30 years ago and cannot claim to be a traditional practice,' Coulomme said. Fans, however, insist that it is an ancestral tradition dating back hundreds of years. Coulomme's private members' bill has been signed by 74 MPs from across the hard-left party France Unbowed, the Greens and President Macron's Renaissance party. Animal rights activists claim pregnant cows are often made to take part in the contests because they are thought to fight more intensely. 'These fights between 800kg animals can be very violent,' said Pauline Di Nicolantonio, the head of the Savoie Association for Animal Justice. 'Videos of the fights are shocking, and it's even more shocking that the cows have to be pregnant to fight better.' Fans of cow fighting, including farmers, residents of the French Alps and a number of local MPs, describe those opposing the practice as city-dwellers who are out of touch with countryside traditions and values. 'Those who are against queen fights are deepening urban-rural divisions because of a lack of understanding,' said Jérôme Garcin, a farmer from Les Houches, a village near Mont Blanc. 'In the high Chamonix valley, these natural contests have been organised for many generations,' Garcin added. 'I can understand that it is shocking for people from places where it hasn't been practised for centuries, but I encourage anyone to come and see how we pamper our cows and treat them like high-level sports contestants.' Xavier Roseren, a centre-right MP for the Mont Blanc area, also described cow fighting as 'part of our living cultural heritage' and said that participating cows were very rarely injured. Bullfighting and cockfighting are banned in France except in areas where there is 'an uninterrupted local tradition'. Cockfighting is therefore allowed in parts of northern France and several overseas territories in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean. Bullfighting is permitted in parts of southern France where it has been practised for centuries.


Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
How cabinet pressure drove Starmer towards recognising Palestine
In the end it felt inevitable. After weeks of pressure from backbenchers and members of the cabinet, Sir Keir Starmer announced that the UK would recognise Palestine at the UN general assembly. There were some caveats. The prime minister said the UK could back away from recognition if Israel reached a ceasefire, backed a two-state solution and agreed not to annex the West Bank. In reality, though, the ultimatum was rhetorical. Starmer knows that there is no chance that Israel will make such significant concessions. All this means that, come September, Britain will join France at the UN general assembly in recognising a Palestinian state. The prime minister hopes that the two nations will not be alone. He wants recognition to have the 'maximum impact', and plans a concerted diplomatic effort to encourage other countries to join them.