Live at the Chicago Theatre: Francis Ford Coppola, ‘Megalopolis' and your questions
Hiding in plain sight, 'Megalopolis' is no longer streaming anywhere (it was available, briefly, as a digital download) and it's not on DVD. There's a reason. Its writer-director prefers that you experience his long-brewing, half-mad argument for democracy, aesthetics and a brighter future in a big way. Not a small, pauseable one.
In July, one of modern cinema's towering figures will embark on a multi-city tour of 'An Evening with Francis Ford Coppola and 'Megalopolis' Screening.' The film presentation will be followed by Coppola's discussion, built around questions from the audience, on the topic 'How to Change Our Future.'
The July 25 Chicago Theatre event follows engagements in Red Bank, New Jersey, and Port Chester, New York. After Chicago, Coppola and 'Megalopolis' move on to Denver, Dallas and San Francisco; Live Nation presents five of the six tour stops, with the Texas Theatre handling the Dallas engagement.
'This is the way 'Megalopolis' was meant to be seen, in a large venue, with a crowd and followed by intense interactive discussions about the future,' Coppola wrote in a statement for Live Nation.
Coppola has wrestled with 'Megalopolis' for nearly 50 years. Covering much of the $120 million production costs himself, with money from his celebrated winery, the filmmaker's latest premiered at last year's Cannes Film Festival to wildly mixed reactions.
After several months of searching for a distributor (Lionsgate, ultimately), 'Megalopolis' grossed $14 million in theaters, making it one of modern cinema's most brazen rolls of the dice.
The film stars Adam Driver as visionary architect and inventor Cesar Catilina. A few decades in the future, this idealistic savior vies for urban redevelopment and design control of the Manhattan-like city of New Rome with its weak, corrupt mayor (Giancarlo Esposito). Evoking a metropolis on the brink of total collapse, New Rome's scheming politicians and half-ruined architectural monuments also suggest ancient Rome, just before Nero started fiddling.
Catilina wants something better for the people, a utopian rebuke to mediocrity. His motto is unmistakably Coppola's as well: 'When we leap into the unknown, we prove we are free.'
Now 86, the director will forever be best known for his 'Godfather' trilogy, 'Apocalypse Now' and smaller-scaled masterworks such as 'The Conversation.' His latest film, he has said, may too pass the test of time, long after the memes and the financial reports have faded.
As Coppola posted on Instagram earlier this year, noting that director Jacques Tati risked all he had (or nearly) on his wondrous 1967 utopian/dystopian dream 'Play Time,' now considered a classic: 'Box-office is only about money, and like war, stupidity and politics (it) has no true place in our future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
‘Highest 2 Lowest' Review: Spike Lee's Back on Home Turf
The haves and have-nots face off in Spike Lee's 'Highest 2 Lowest,' a slippery thriller about money, conscience, accountability and what it means to be good and just. For David King, a wildly successful music giant played by Denzel Washington, talent has begot money has begot a patrician lifestyle. He and his family live in a Brooklyn high-rise overlooking an East River that here seems more like a moat. Art by Jean-Michel Basquiat and Kehinde Wiley adorns the family walls, but the home's most jaw-slackening feature is its panoramic view of Manhattan. At sunrise, the city glows like gold; at night, it sparkles like crown jewels, like plunder. Lee and his director of photography Matthew Libatique polish the city and David's life to a dazzling high gloss. Everything looks sleek and frictionless in David's world: his pad, his ride, his wife (Ilfenesh Hadera as Pam). It takes work to make a life gleam as brightly as this one does, though much of that labor remains offscreen. (One false note is that the only employee you ever see in the home is the chauffeur.) This world of surfaces draws you in as inexorably as Washington's magnetism does. When he smiles, it can feel like an invitation, which makes it easy to forget how quickly the actor's charm can turn into a steel trap. Kings fall, though, from wounds self-inflicted and otherwise. And for David, everything changes after he receives a phone call from a stranger who claims to have taken his son, the teenage Trey (Aubrey Joseph). In many movies, that would supply more than enough intrigue, tears and detective work to fill out a feature-length nail-biter. Here, though, what fires up the story isn't the crime or the princely ransom that the kidnapper demands. Instead, the movie's urgency comes from what happens after David learns that the kidnapping hasn't gone as planned, a twist that forces him toward a potentially life-shattering ethical reckoning. 'Highest 2 Lowest' is based on Akira Kurosawa's drama 'High and Low' (1963), a contemporary adaptation of Ed McBain's 1959 procedural novel 'King's Ransom.' The Kurosawa film stars Toshiro Mifune as a hard-bitten executive who's plotting to seize control of his company when a kidnapping disrupts his plans. Written by Alan Fox, Lee's version more or less sticks to the original film's outlines, its bipartite structure and protagonist's schemes. Washington's King has a plan to take back the label that he built, which has brought him riches and put him on the cover of print magazines — honors that suggest that his moment has long passed. The first half of 'Highest 2 Lowest' maps David's realm. He's on his balcony when the camera — after a series of swooping aerial views of the city set to 'Oh, What a Beautiful Mornin'' — drops down for a closer look at him. He's talking animatedly on his cell, his shirt glowing like a beacon in the early light. Once inside the apartment, things fall into place as Lee tours its sumptuous trappings, its enviable art, fine collectibles and Pam, who has the impeccable styling and personality of a boutique mannequin. Pam wants to write a hefty check for a good cause; David has other plans for what is clearly his money, not theirs. Lee gives this introductory first half of the movie an efficient pace that dovetails with David's insistent, at times hurried rhythms. The character is on a mission to get his deal settled, and the director has his own agenda. There's a lot to enjoy in this section, mostly David (mostly Washington), whose easygoing exchanges with others, especially other men, convey camaraderie but also an unyielding, dominating will. The casting is uneven, but there are enough solid supporting players throughout to keep the story's machinery greased and to convincingly play off Washington. He ups his game when Wendell Pierce, as one of David's business associates, briefly swings by for a master class in scene partnering. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein's next retrial could happen this fall
Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein faces sentencing and a possible retrial in his New York City sex crimes case. Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said that he could sentence Weinstein on 30 September, but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to decide. If there is a retrial, the judge wants it to happen this fall. Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison. At the same time, the same jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actress Jessica Mann in 2013. Manhattan prosecutors reiterated on Wednesday that they and Mann are ready for another trial on the rape charge. In this case, any conviction is punishable by up to four years in prison. Prosecutors requested a January trial date, but Farber proposed the fall. 'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, urging the judge to set the earliest possible date. If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final stage of his reelection bid. Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge related to Haley. Bragg has said Mann deserves a verdict on her part of the case. 'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors, and that's why we're prepared to go forward," Bragg said in June. Weinstein also stands convicted of sex crimes in California. He is appealing that verdict and continued to deny all of the allegations against him.
CNN
14 hours ago
- CNN
Harvey Weinstein could be sentenced next month, but only if there's no retrial on an unresolved rape charge
Harvey Weinstein faces sentencing and a possible retrial in his New York City sex crimes case, but when they'll happen – and whether he'll be back in front of another jury – is still up in the air. Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said Wednesday he could sentence Weinstein on Sept. 30 – but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to reach a verdict on. Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison. At the same time, the jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on another woman, one-time model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann in 2013. Manhattan prosecutors told Farber that they're ready to take Weinstein to trial for a third time on the rape charge, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. That's less time than Weinstein has already served. Mann is on board to testify again, they said. Prosecutors requested a January trial date, citing witness availability and their own caseload. Farber balked at that, saying a January date is too far away and conflicts with another, unrelated trial he's already scheduled. He proposed having the trial in the fall. 'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, telling Farber he'd prefer a trial at 'the earliest the court can accommodate us.' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said she would ask Mann and other witnesses about their availability for a trial in the fall. If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final throes of his reelection bid. Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge in the Haley assault and has been resolute in wanting the Oscar-winning studio boss retried on the Mann rape charge. 'The jury was not able to reach a conclusion as to Ms. Mann, and she deserves that,' Bragg said in June. 'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors and that's why we're prepared to go forward.' Aidala told reporters outside court that, in his view, it's on prosecutors to resolve the rape charge – either by dropping it and clearing the way for sentencing, or promptly taking it to trial again. Weinstein sat in court in a wheelchair while wearing a blue suit and black-rimmed glasses. The 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Shakespeare in Love' producer is committed to fighting the rape charge at another trial, Aidala said, though the lawyer didn't rule out the possibility of reaching a deal with prosecutors to end the case. For now, the trial date remains unresolved, leaving Weinstein's possible Sept. 30 sentencing in limbo. At Weinstein's first trial in 2020, jurors convicted him of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on production assistant and producer Haley. Then an appeals court overturned those convictions and sent the case back for retrial because of legal issues involving other women's testimony. This spring, a new jury convicted him again of sexually assaulting Haley and acquitted him of doing the same to another woman who wasn't part of the first trial. But amid fractious deliberations, the majority-female jury got stuck on the charge related to Mann. Mann has testified that she also had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein, but that she told him 'I don't want to do this' as he cornered her in the hotel room. She said he persevered with advances and demands until she 'just gave up.' Weinstein already stands convicted of sex crimes in California. He denies all of the allegations against him.
