Delhi HC restrains school from coercive action over fee hike
Justice Vikas Mahajan passed the order on Thursday in response to a petition filed by the Agrasen Parents Association, represented by advocate Anjani Kumar Mishra. The petition challenged the school's move to bar students from classes for non-payment of hiked fees for the current and upcoming academic years, alleging that the fee hike had not been approved by the DoE.
The parents' association submitted that the school was demanding increased fees for academic sessions 2023-24 and 2024-25 without clearance from the DoE, despite operating on government-allotted land. They claimed that all dues had been paid as per the DoE-approved structure until 2022-23.
In response, the school's counsel, advocate Pramod Gupta, argued that the school was not legally obligated to seek DoE approval for revising fees, regardless of whether it was situated on government land.
The DoE, represented by advocate Avani Singh, clarified that the department had approved fee hikes for the academic years 2019-20 through 2022-23 but had yet to review the structure for 2023-24 and beyond.
Taking this into account, justice Mahajan directed, 'Consequently, respondent no. 1/school shall not take any coercive action against the students subject to them clearing all dues up till academic session 2022-23 as per the approved fee structure decided by respondent no. 2/DoE and further, paying the fee as per the statement of fees submitted by respondent no. 1/school for academic sessions 2023-24 onwards, till the time DoE takes a decision on the same.'
In the 12-page judgement, the court clarified that existing law does not prohibit schools from charging revised fees for academic sessions under review—unless the DoE explicitly disapproves them for 'profiteering' or 'commercialisation.'
The ruling comes weeks after a coordinate bench of the high court, on June 5, criticised Delhi Public School, Dwarka, for using bouncers to stop students from entering over unpaid fees, calling the act 'reprehensible.'
'Public shaming/intimidation of a student on account of financial default, especially through force or coercive action, not only constitutes mental harassment but also undermines the psychological well-being and self-worth of a child,' the court said. 'The use of 'bouncers' fosters a climate of fear, humiliation, and exclusion that is incompatible with the fundamental ethos of a school.'
In April, Delhi education minister Ashish Sood announced that the government intended to bring in an ordinance to implement the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, to curb arbitrary fee hikes by private institutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Fee regulation bill triggers outrage from parents, others
New Delhi: Delhi govt's Fee Regulation Bill for private schools, slated for introduction in the upcoming assembly session beginning Aug 4, has triggered sharp criticism from education activists, parent groups and the opposition that alleges it entrenches bureaucratic overreach and disempowers parents. The bill proposes a multi-tiered structure comprising school-level committees, district appellate bodies, and a state revision committee to scrutinise, approve or reject school fee proposals. Critics argue that instead of ensuring transparency, the bill creates confusing and overlapping layers of control. Education activist Ashok Agarwal called the bill "totally confusing and unworkable," suggesting that "one effective fee committee headed by a retired high court judge, a chartered accountant, and a DoE representative would have sufficed." He warned that the bill, in its present form, will "lead to endless controversies and litigation." You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi A major concern is the requirement that at least 15% of parents must jointly file a complaint for it to be considered. "In a school with 3,000 students, getting signatures from 450 parents is near to impossible," said AAP Delhi state president Saurabh Bharadwaj. "This is a direct conspiracy to ensure no complaint can ever be filed." Bharadwaj also highlighted that the bill scraps audit provisions and removes prior approval clauses that applied to schools on govt land. "Despite earlier promises, govt has erased all audit mechanisms from the bill. Where are the audit reports that were promised in April?" he asked. Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said Bharadwaj had bypassed his own legislative party leader, making premature comments on the education bill for self-promotion. "It would have been better if Saurabh Bharadwaj had waited until the bill was tabled in the monsoon session before commenting on it," he said. The composition of school-level committees has drawn particular ire, as five out of ten members will represent the school, and parent representatives will be selected via a lottery conducted by the school itself. Critics allege this system gives school management disproportionate control. Educationist Mahesh Mishra echoed these concerns, saying the bill "validates parents' fears" and "legalises commercialisation of education under govt protection." He noted the absence of annual CAG audits and said the bill is "not just anti-parent, but a direct attack on the middle class." Refuting the allegations, Delhi education minister Ashish Sood said the criticism was politically motivated and ignored the policy's intent. "All these days critics were saying the bill hasn't been framed. Now that we have framed it, got it approved by the cabinet, and are introducing it well before the session, they are calling it undemocratic," Sood told TOI. "Those who could not regulate fee hikes for 27 years — under whom so many litigations occurred — are now raising questions about a policy that aims to curb malpractices?" On the charge of bureaucratic complexity, Sood said: "It is the first time that parents, teachers and non-teaching staff have been included as stakeholders. When they are part of the system, how will it create bureaucratic hurdles? Having different layers doesn't mean hierarchy. It means participation. We are putting a system in place that will demolish the 'Shiksha Kranti' narrative used to exploit parents." With widespread fee hikes, up to 82% in some schools, already implemented this April, opposition leaders questioned how the bill plans to roll them back. "This law protects the education mafia, not the parents," Bharadwaj said, demanding answers from the chief minister and education minister. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Govt. to table private school fee Bill in Monsoon Session: CM
Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Saturday said the Delhi government will table a Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools during the upcoming Monsoon Session of the Assembly, beginning August 4. Amid ongoing protests by parents, the Delhi government had earlier approved a draft of the Bill and proposed bringing an Ordinance, since the Assembly was not in session. Now, it has decided to table the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025. 'The Delhi government will table the Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools in the Monsoon Session of Assembly beginning from August 4,' Ms. Gupta said while addressing the media. The parents' groups, while pointing out issues in the Bill, said that they will send their detailed suggestions to the government on Sunday. Three-level checks A three-level verification will be implemented to regulate fee hikes, according to the Bill seen by The Hindu. First, schools will form an 11-member committee comprising the school management – a management representative and principal – three teachers, five parents from the parent-teacher association, selected by a draw of lots, and a nominee of the Directorate of Education (DoE). A District Fee Appellate Committee will hear appeals against the decisions taken by school-level committees. A similar procedure will be followed with a State-level revision committee, which will be the highest appellate authority. An aggrieved parents' group, which the Bill describes as 15% of the total strength of parents in an affected school, may appeal to the District Fee Appellate Committee within 30 days from the time the fees are approved, against the decisions of school-level committees. The Bill also specifies that if a school is found levying a fee that is not determined in the provisions of the Act, the DoE will direct the school to roll back the fee and refund the excess amount to the parents. The penalty for violators can range between ₹1 lakh and ₹10 lakh. Meanwhile, a fine of ₹50,000 will be levied on schools for harassing students over delayed payment of fees. The Bill also mentions the 10 factors that will determine the fee structure, including the location of the school, infrastructure made available, the education standardof schools, and a reasonable revenue surplus as may be prescribed. Divya Mattey, a parent of a student who studies in Delhi Public School, Dwarka, said, 'It will be difficult to get a minimum of 15% of the parent body to raise a question.' Mr. Mattey said that parents have noted that the penalties might not affect bigger schools, for whom '₹50,000 might be a small amount'. AAP, BJP at odds Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Delhi State president Saurabh Bharadwaj criticised the Bill, saying, 'Until now, even under the 1973 law, if a single parent felt that fees had been unfairly hiked, they could file a complaint with the DoE. Now, that has been scrapped. Under the new law, you'll need a minimum of 15% of parents to raise a complaint. In a school with 3,000 students, that means identifying 450 parents – a near-impossible task.' Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva said, 'It would have been better if Saurabh Bharadwaj had waited until the Bill was tabled in the upcoming session before commenting on it.'
The Print
14 hours ago
- The Print
Delhi govt to table bill to regulate private school fee hikes in monsoon session: CM Rekha Gupta
New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) The Delhi government will introduce a bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools in the upcoming Monsoon Session, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said on Saturday. According to the Cabinet-approved ordinance, passed on April 29, the bill imposes strict penalties on schools that hike fees arbitrarily. For a first offence, schools will face fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 5 lakh, with repeat violations attracting penalties between Rs 2 lakh and Rs 10 lakh. If the school fails to refund within the specified time, the fine doubles after 20 days, triples after 40 days, and continues to increase with every 20-day delay. Repeated violations may lead to a ban on holding official positions in the school management and loss of the right to propose future fee revisions.
