Zimbabwe: Can patriotism be legislated? – DW – 07/22/2025
Lawmakers from the ruling ZANU-PF party in Zimbabwe are moving a motion to further criminalize government critics. They're advocating for a comprehensive strategy to promote patriotism and national identity. Proposed measures include formalizing a national ideology, establishing a national institute of ideology and integrating "patriotic" education into the curriculum.
The motion comes on top of the contested Patriotic Act of 2023, which was seen to effectively closed the door on dissent In Zimbabwe. It makes provision for criticism issues such as provision of health care, basic services and accountability to be judged criminal.
The government dismissed criticism, saying the legislation was necessary to hold accountable individuals who threaten "national interests." It said the legislation was modeled on the Logan Act in the US, which bars citizens from engaging in certain unauthorized communications with foreign governments. In Zimbabwe, violations could result in life imprisonment and death, termination of citizenship, suspension from voting or holding public office.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In a recent parliamentary debate, ZANU-PF MP Ophious Murambiwa suggested that it should be criminal to speak "evil" about Zimbabwe.
"The most important issue is to love our country, let us praise our country in all circumstances, whether in good or bad times, during the night or day," Murambiwa said.
The motion has prompted opposition lawmakers and human rights groups to push back harder.
"Patriotism is not blind loyalty. It is not empty slogans. True patriots question injustice, challenge corruption and demand systems that serve people not a selected few," Prosper Mutseyami, an opposition MP, said.
"Our patriotism must ignite participation, ensuring that every Zimbabwean plays an active role in shaping the future."
Human rights activists say its another attempt to silence dissent.
"You cannot necessarily legislate patriotism," Nigel Nyamutumbu, the Media Alliance of Zimbabwe programs manager, told DW. "It is a concept that can naturally clamp down on the requisite freedoms. Patriotism is not a legal concept but rather a political nationalist ideology."
Activists have in the past been accused of treason and unpatriotic behavior for expressing concerns over human rights abuses, corruption, and governance in Zimbabwe.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Citizens have expressed concern over what they fear are attempts to enforce a one-party state. ZANU-PF, with its absolute majority in parliament, is seen to be abusing its authority and violating the constitution.
"As parliamentarians we are supposed to uphold the constitution," Gladys Hlatshwayo an opposition MP told DW. "Section 119 of the constitution demands that parliament protects the constitution and democratic governance."
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
In June 2025, Zimbabwe's High Court struck down sections of the Patriotic Act.The court ruled that the drastic penalties prescribed by the Patriotic Act infringed on various sections of the country's constitution.
Several civic organizations and a private citizens had petitioned the court, arguing that the legislation was overly broad and vague had high potential for abuse and misuse.
"The most patriotic people are those who hold their government to account. A government must not be seen as the most dangerous institution," Eric Chisora, a political analyst, told DW. "Whatever they [ZANU-PF lawmakers] are doing is unreasonable and irrational. Citizens' rights must be protected."
Political and civic rights activists are calling for the repeal of colonial legacy laws which they say are retrogressive. Laws such as the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act, with provisions have been used to incriminate government critics, date back to Zimbabwe's pre-independence era when they were used to suppress Black majority rule.
The activists are concerned over the shrinking of democratic space under Emmerson Mnangagwa, Zimbabwe's president since 2018.
"We are now living in a country where there is no freedom of expression due to the number of pieces of legislation being passed by the ZANU-PF regime," Blessing Vava, executive director of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition, told DW.
"When you see a government passing repressive laws, just know that it is not a popular government. Zimbabweans must fight to defend the constitution."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Iran executes two members of exiled militant group – DW – 07/27/2025
The alleged MEK operatives were convicted of manufacturing and using homemade projectiles to target homes, public buildings, and charitable institutions in Tehran. Iran executed two men accused of working for the dissident organization Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), according to the judiciary's official news outlet, Mizan on Sunday. Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani-Eslamloo were found guilty of carrying out attacks on civilian infrastructure on behalf of the exiled opposition group. They were convicted of manufacturing and using homemade projectiles to target homes, public buildings, and charitable institutions in Tehran. The judiciary said they operated from a safe house and filmed their activities for MEK-linked media. "The terrorists, in coordination with MEK leaders, had set up a team house in Tehran, where they built launchers and hand-held mortars in line with the group's goals, fired projectiles heedlessly at citizens, homes, service and administrative facilities, educational and charity centres, and also carried out propaganda and information-gathering activities in support of the MEK," the judiciary report said. Both were found guilty of waging war against God, armed rebellion, and plotting to undermine national security. The Supreme Court had upheld their death sentences. The MEK, a leftist-Islamist group, is designated as a terrorist organization by Iran. The US and the European Union had also labelled it as a terrorist organization until 2012. The MEK opposes the Islamic Republic in Iran, even as its leadership operates in exile. According to human rights groups, Iran ranks second in the world in enforcing capital punishment. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Sudan: RSF forms rival government, deepening fissure – DW – 07/27/2025
A power struggle between two rival generals has effectively split Sudan amid a 27-month civil war that has left some 150,000 people dead. Deepening the crisis in civil war-torn Sudan, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on Saturday announced the formation of a rival civilian-led government, raising fears of permanent division in the country. At a press conference in the RSF-controlled city of Nyala in South Darfur, the paramilitary announced a 15-member presidential council with RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, also known as Hemedti, as its president. Rebel leader Abdelaziz al-Hilu, head of the SPLM-N, was named vice president. Mohamed Hassan al-Taishi, a civilian politician, was appointed prime minister. He was a former member of Sudan's Transitional Sovereign Council from 2019 until the 2021 military coup. New regional governors, including one for Darfur, were also announced. The region now has rival governors from each side. The RSF move stoked fears of escalating Sudan's 27-month civil war as it directly challenges the internationally recognized army-led government, which was formed in May under former United Nations official Kamil Idris but remains incomplete with unfilled Cabinet positions. An agreement in February among paramilitary, rebel, and civilian groups paved the way for the new government looking to establish a secular "New Sudan," the RSF said. International legitimacy will also allow the faction to secure advanced arms imports. The Sudanese army, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, has not formally responded but had previously condemned any attempt to create a parallel administration. UN officials warned that the RSF's formation of a parallel government risks further fragmenting Sudan and undermining diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict. The conflict began in April 2023 as a power struggle between Burhan and Dagalo, once allies who ousted long-time ruler Omar al-Bashir in 2019 before turning on each other in a 2021 coup that derailed Sudan's transition to democracy. The country is now effectively split with the army controlling the north, east, and center, having recently retaken the capital Khartoum, while the RSF holds most of Darfur and parts of Kordofan, where fighting has surged. Meanwhile, Burhan is under US sanctions for the usage of chemical weapons in 2024 against the RSF. Since the war began up to 13 million people have been displaced and large parts of the population are on the brink of famine, according to UN data. Around 150,000 people are estimated to have been killed. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
21 hours ago
- DW
Taiwan: Voters reject bid to recall opposition lawmakers – DW – 07/26/2025
Taiwanese voters have rejected an attempt to oust around one-fifth of the parliament, all of whom are from the major opposition party. It was the island's largest-ever recall election. Voters in Taiwan on Saturday rejected an attempt to recall 24 opposition lawmakers, dealing a blow to President Lai Ching-te and his ruling party's chances of regaining a parliamentary majority. The results showed that the vote did not succeed in unseating any of the opposition Kuomintang (KMT) lawmakers, who are accused of being too close to China. "All Taiwanese people chose stability, chose that the government should focus on getting things done, rather than engaging in bitter political fighting," KMT chairman Eric Chu told reporters. "No one can lose an election and then engage in a vicious recall," he said, calling on Lai to "sincerely apologize" and "stop thinking about political infighting". The high-stakes referendum could have given Lai's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) control of the parliament, as it had lost its parliamentary majority in the 2024 elections, despite Lai's victory in the presidential race. This is the first mass recall in Taiwan's history, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing a second recall election in August. KMT, which has a total of 52 parliamentary seats, advocates for closer economic ties with China. Its critics accuse the KMT lawmakers of being pro-Communist and beholden to China. The KMT, which controls parliament with the help of the Taiwan People's Party (TPP), has slammed the unprecedented recall effort as a power grab. Following the results, DPP's Secretary-General Lin Yu-chang said the party "humbly" accepts the results, adding that the DPP would "reflect more prudently on the society's response." The KMT, together with the TPP, has obstructed Lai's agenda wherever possible. This includes slashing Taiwan's defense budget and freezing other defense funds at a time when the threat from China is growing. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video They have also pushed controversial reforms to expand parliament's powers. These led to brawls in the legislature and massive street protests — and spurred civic groups to launch the recall campaign. Under Taiwan's election laws, signatures from 10% of a district's registered voters are required to hold a recall vote. For a KMT lawmaker to lose their seat, the number of votes in favor of recalling them must exceed those against and turnout must exceed 25% of registered voters. The DPP needs recalls of at least 12 KMT lawmakers to gain temporary control of the parliament. China has loomed large over the recall vote. Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council warned earlier in the week of "visible evidence" China was trying to interfere in the election process. China claims that Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. Polls closed at 4 p.m. Taiwan time (0800 UTC/GMT). Taiwan's Central Election Commission is expected to announce the official results on August 1.
