
Venice urged to charge €100 tourist tax
'We're in a state of emergency – tourists no longer buy anything. I'd make them pay €100 a head,' said Setrak Tokatzian, the owner of a historic jewellery shop and the president of the association of businesses of St Mark's Square, in the heart of the World Heritage city.
Day-trippers are already charged between €5 and €10 per person to enter Venice under a controversial scheme introduced by the city council last year.
But Mr Tokatzian's proposal goes far beyond that. He takes issue, in particular, with budget holidaymakers who stay in campsites on the mainland and arrive in Venice on coaches and buses.
'Every day I see rivers of people who arrive in the city but have no real goal. They drift from one part of the city to another, led by tour guides, they go on gondolas, they take water taxis, they rush here and there, but no one buys anything,' he said.
'They arrive in the morning on coaches and they leave in the afternoon without having spent a euro. I hate to say it, but this kind of tourism is dreadful.'
High-end businesses are suffering from the preponderance of low spending 'hit-and-run' day-trippers, he added, saying: 'You don't see people walking past with handbags bought in designer shops, as used to happen in the past.'
When tourists do buy bags and belts, they buy cheap imitation goods from unauthorised hawkers, many of them Senegalese and Bangladeshi immigrants.
'I've seen families sharing a single dish in a restaurant. There are queues at the water fountains to get water because people don't even want to buy that. I ask myself, where are the beautiful people, those who are interested in the city, those who really bring something to the city?' said Mr Tokatzian.
He said day-trippers 'don't walk into shops but instead take selfies as they feed seeds to the pigeons [in St Mark's Square]. Legal business owners don't sell anything, but we have to watch the hawkers make hundreds of euros a day selling stuff illegally. Does that seem fair?'
But Roberto Panciera, the president of Confcommercio Venezia, another business association, said it was wrong to victimise tourists on a budget.
Venice is having a tough time economically because of other broader factors, from the wars in Gaza and Ukraine to inflation, the cost of living crisis and the tariff wars threatened by Donald Trump.
Retail businesses in Venice are also being hurt by online shopping. 'Tourists often photograph what they see in a shop window and then look for similar and less expensive products on the internet,' said Mr Panciera.
Venice city council, meanwhile, announced that the entrance fee initiative has come to an end for this year. More than 720,000 visitors paid between €5 and €10 to enter the city on the 54 peak days during which the levy was charged, the city said.
The fee, which applied to day-trippers and not to people spending at least one night in a hotel in Venice, brought in €5.4 million. Last year, when the entrance fee was introduced, it applied to 29 peak days and brought in €2.4 million to the city's coffers.
Critics of the project said the entrance fee had made no difference to limiting the number of tourists swamping Venice.
They claim that little by little, Venice is haemorrhaging inhabitants and becoming a cultural Disneyland – an issue highlighted by the high-profile wedding last month of Jeff Bezos, one of the world's richest men, to Lauren Sanchez, an American television journalist.
Campaigners accused the Amazon founder of treating Venice as a rich man's playground, a picturesque backdrop to a wedding believed to have cost tens of millions of dollars.
Venice's population decline has been precipitous, from more than 170,000 residents in the 1950s to around 48,000 now.
But the authorities insist the tourist entrance ticket was helping tackle the scourge of over-tourism.
Venice became the first city in the world to introduce a payment system for tourists when it adopted the scheme in April last year.
'The system has worked well in its second year, showing that we can reconcile the aim of regulating the flow of day-trippers with maintaining accessibility and transparency,' said Michele Zuin, of Venice city council.
'The aim of the system is not to make money – the funds received will be used for projects that will benefit Venice's residents.'
Simone Venturini, the council official in charge of tourism, said the data collected from the entrance fee scheme would be analysed and used to better manage tourist numbers.
Venice has adopted a number of measures in the last year to try to manage the impact of over-tourism, including limiting the size of tourist groups to 25. The council has also decreed that guides can no longer use loudspeakers because they are annoying and intrusive for other visitors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pension deals boost profits at Legal & General as employers look to offload defined benefit schemes
Britain's biggest money manager Legal & General saw profits jump as it cashed in on a boom in buyouts of UK pension funds. The buyouts, which are also known as pension risk transfers (PRTs), are when businesses pay financial firms to take over the running of legacy pension schemes. It is one of L&G's most lucrative divisions, with the FTSE 100 firm landing £3.4billion worth of PRT deals in the first six months of the year, up from £1.5billion in 2024. It helped the group, which manages over £1 trillion in assets, make a profit of £859million for the period, 6 per cent higher than last year. L&G boss Antonio Simoes said it planned to expand further into PRT, saying it was eyeing £42billion worth of deals. Employers are keen to offload defined benefit pension schemes, most of them long closed to current employees but which still incur costs. The surge in PRT deals also comes despite Chancellor Rachel Reeves introducing measures to try to encourage employers to keep running defined benefit schemes in the hope they will invest in areas that boost the UK economy. So lucrative is the pension transfer market it has attracted new rivals to L&G. In July, Athora, a European insurer owned by US private equity giant Apollo Global, snapped up Pension Insurance Corp, one of the UK's biggest players in PRT, for £5.7billion. And last week Canadian outfit Brookfield swooped on LSE-listed retirement saving specialist Just Group with a £2.4billion bid. But Simoes said L&G was 'firmly on track' to hit targets and reiterated plans to hand £5billion to its shareholders over three years. The shares dropped 2 per cent, or 5.3p, to 256.2p as analysts were disappointed that its solvency ratio, a key measure of financial strength, had dropped to 217 per cent from 223 per cent. L&G's push into the pensions market comes after Simoes warned Britons were not saving enough for retirement and called on the Government to lower the age of auto-enrolment in workplace schemes to 18, from 22. 'We really need to tackle how much we as individuals and employers are contributing,' he told the Daily Mail. Last month, the Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, announced a review of the state pension age alongside a wider probe into retirement savings.


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
China is being urged to explain 'secret basement' under its London 'mega-embassy'
has ordered China to explain why it has redacted blueprints for its 'mega-embassy' set to be built in London, amid fears the building's basement rooms could be converted into 'spy dungeons'. As Housing Secretary, Rayner has given Beijing two weeks to either provide unredacted plans, according to the FT. If China does not do this, the deputy prime minister has ordered it to 'identify precisely and comprehensively' the withheld parts and explain why the floorplan for the basement and other areas of the Royal Mint Court development have been 'greyed out'. According to Rayner's letter to the Chinese embassy, she highlighted that two suites of anonymous rooms and a tunnel were redacted 'for security reasons'. Other buildings on the plans were also partly greyed out, including the Cultural Exchange Building and Embassy House. It also highlights a Home Office request for a 'hard perimeter' around the embassy that may represent a 'material amendment to the application that would require further consultation'. The letter asked for further information in order for the Housing Secretary to make a 'lawful determination' on whether to allow the site to go up, adding that 'no view has been formed yet.' The new embassy, if built, would sit opposite the Tower of London in the former Royal Mint and would be China's largest in Europe. Critics fear the site will become the centre of increased espionage operations and may be used to harass Chinese dissidents. The US has already expressed 'deep concern' over the project, as it sits close to the City of London, home to some of the world's largest financial institutions. MPs in the Netherlands have also raised similar concerns. The site was sold to China by the UK government in 2018 for £255million. A full decision on whether the embassy will be allowed to be built will be made by September. It comes after diplomatic sources warned the Mail on Sunday that the new embassy will have on-site accommodation for more than 200 intelligence officers. A source said: 'There will effectively be a student-style campus for spies in the heart of the City. 'And those spy dungeons are so deep that the sensitive cables are virtually at head height.' The MoS can also reveal that the embassy plans exempt a 'cultural exchange' section from 'inspection and verification' by UK authorities. A US security source said 'cultural interests/exchange' is a 'euphemism for intelligence and security services', adding: 'It's where they often stuff their security and intelligence staff, among other diplomats. 'And if it's a "cultural" centre/space, why do they always declare it off limits in planning documents?' Ex-Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said: 'Everywhere there is a mega embassy... Chinese state-sponsored, trans-national repression of those who have fled the Chinese state or who criticise it grows dramatically. 'It's simple: a bigger embassy has more spies and more repression.' Shadow Levelling Up Secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Labour had been 'caught red-handed trying to ram through this sinister embassy' in a 'desperate attempt to woo the Chinese Communist Party to bail out their failing economic policies'. He added: 'It is shocking Labour want to sign a legal document that will ban British officials checking what is being built in the embassy building. This is yet another surrender document from a Labour Government that puts foreign interests over British interests.' 'The so-called cultural exchange will clearly be used by Chinese spies and communist bullies to further their political ends.'


The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Destination X airs shock double exit as three axed players return in show twist
DESTINATION X aired a shock double exit tonight - as three axed players returned in a major show twist. The BBC programme sees a group of strangers try to figure out where they are in Europe through a series of clues in a bid to win £100,000. 4 The second episode's destination was the Matterhorn, and tonight's edition saw the remaining players head off to one of the five countries that border Switzerland. At one point, the group took a train through a scenic forest, with a challenge allowing one team to get further clues as to where they were. They then returned to the bus and hit the road once again, failing to realise that they hadn't actually gained any ground until they found themselves back at the same train station the next day. Host Rob Brydon had a further surprise in store for them, by bringing out Ashvin, Claire and Chloe-Anne. Viewers will remember that the three players had failed to make it on to the bus in episode one, but had now returned for a second chance to join the adventure. Rob explained that the members of the losing team from the previous task would each join forces with one of the returning players and go head to head. These were James, Ben, Darren and Nick, but the winning team - Judith, Josh and Saskia - had the chance to save one of them outright, and they chose Darren. The remaining trio then picked their teams and working together, they all had to go through a box of items for a specific destination chosen by the announcer, and find pieces that had nothing to do with that location. After two rounds, James and Ashvin were the losing team, and they then had to go head-to-head for the final spot on the bus. In the end, Ashvin picked the right items, meaning James had to leave there and then. Fans stunned as THREE Destination X contestants are immediately axed in brutal opening twist The news left the rest of the team - in particular Saskia - shocked, and James was in tears as he said goodbye. But that wasn't the end of the departures, as the players still had to lock in where they thought this week's final destination was, with the person furthest away being sent packing as well. Having seen the clues, the winning team were convinced it was Munich in Germany, but had decided to try and throw the losing team off by suggesting it was Dortmund. After everyone had locked in their locations, Rob revealed the sad news that Ben had been the furthest from the destination - which was Munich - and that he would be leaving the bus immediately. Destination X continues tomorrow night at 9pm on BBC One. 4 4