Best Stocks: An 'AI wolf in sheep's clothing' with a great entry point for investors
(This is The Best Stocks in the Market , brought to you by Josh Brown and Sean Russo of Ritholtz Wealth Management.) Josh here — There will always be an agriculture cycle and companies in the agriculture space will always be, to some extent, beholden to it. In fact, companies in most sectors of the economy must contend with one cycle or another — commodities, interest rates, housing, capex, etc. But in the digital age, companies have found ways to annuitize their businesses and transcend this cyclicality. Converting traditional transaction-based business models into subscription or annually recurring revenue (ARR) business models has been one of the keys to the stock market's relentless rise over the last ten years. When companies begin to generate earnings growth reliably, the multiple investors are willing to pay on those earnings re-rates higher. This is why the market's multiple has trended higher over the last 20 years. On average, we are paying more for stocks on a price-to-earnings basis because the companies these stocks represent have gotten better at building predictable, reliable cash flow streams. In our Best Stocks in the Market column, we have written about Spotify and Netflix recently, both of which are great examples of what I'm referring to. One used to buy CDs or DVDs, paying for each product at the time of use, with the purveyors of movies and music awaiting our next purchase. Now we pay subscriptions and have access to as many songs or movies or TV shows as we want. Consumers love it and Wall Street does too. Annually recurring revenue models are all the rage (and the market capitalization) these days, even in unexpected places — like tractors and farming equipment. Today, Sean is going to tell you about Deere (DE) , a 188-year-old American stalwart that has set a goal for itself of converting 10% of its revenue to an ARR model by the year 2030. In 2024, the ag equipment giant did $51.7 billion in sales. Assuming it can get to its own stated target, the company would have approximately $5 billion or more of consistent top line revenue which The Street would gladly pay a premium for, just as it does with other companies in other industries. This is yet another example of how corporations are adapting to the new age of technology and capitalism. Best Stocks spotlight: Deere (DE) On the list since: 5/9/2025 Sean — Deere is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment. The brand is synonymous with reliability, quality, and a deeply rooted connection to American industrialism. Its iconic green and yellow color scheme is recognized by many people, without having used or experienced their products at all. The company officially started using the iconic green and yellow color combination around 1910. The green and yellow colors serve a larger purpose than branding — the green helps machinery blend into agricultural fields, reducing the visual impact on the landscape and the yellow provides contrast for when operators are looking for their machinery. Every detail is thought about through the lens of the operator. DE is incredibly focused on innovation and quality. In 1837, John Deere (a blacksmith in Illinois) developed the first commercially successful steel plow. Deere's innovation dramatically increased farming efficiency and helped fuel agricultural expansion in the United States. In 2025, they're still pushing the boundaries of agriculture. Today, 50% of operating earnings come from Production and Precision Agriculture — their largest and most profitable segment, focused on transforming farming into a tech-focused, data-driven operation. AI of agriculture DE has a fleet of IoT devices and they are all connected to the John Deere Operations Center — a cloud-based farm management platform that optimizes operations through data-driven insights. DE is tracking data, gathering insights, and deploying machinery in a smarter and efficient way in real time, saving farmers time and money — it's the AI of agriculture. Via Quartr, tariffs are expected to have a pretax impact of over $500 million in fiscal 2025, with roughly $400 million of that falling in the second half, adding some headwinds to margins. However, the company is taking actions to mitigate these impacts through supply chain adjustments and targeted pricing adjustments for 2026 and beyond. As of their last earnings call, the U.S. represented 79% of its complete goods and 76% of its components. Tariffs will impact DE, but not in a meaningfully detrimental way. John Deere is an industrial company, but they've built a cloud-based, AI-capable software as a service platform within it. DEs Production and Precision segment is forecasting 15.5%-17% operating margins for 2025. The company is expecting 18% EPS growth in the next year. DE trades at a 25x trailing PE and a 23x forward PE. The company has a competent and experienced management team, an exciting growth story, a defensible moat, and a reasonable valuation. On a technical basis — DE is reflecting strength. Over the last 3 years, DE has touched its 200-week moving average once on a weekly closing basis: Looking at the 1-year chart earlier in the article, the rising 200-day moving average is serving as strong support. DE is an AI-wolf in sheep's clothing. At first glance, the tariff narrative may seem like a headwind for DE. But look a little deeper, and it's clear the company continues to innovate with the same spirit it had in the late 1800s. Risk management Josh — This one is simple to me. As you can see in the one-year chart above, DE buyers have respected the 200-day moving average since November. There was a false breakdown below it this April during the tariff announcement that was cleaned up relatively quickly. I would trail a position here with a rolling stop just below the 200-day. The stock has cooled off from its high in early May but the uptrend is intact and an RSI reading in the 50s is a better entry point than when the stock was making fresh highs and RSI was pushing 75. This is my kind of set-up. DISCLOSURES: (None) All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. INVESTING INVOLVES RISK. EXAMPLES OF ANALYSIS CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE ARE ONLY EXAMPLES. THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED ARE THOSE OF THE CONTRIBUTORS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL POLICY OR POSITION OF RITHOLTZ WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC. JOSH BROWN IS THE CEO OF RITHOLTZ WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND MAY MAINTAIN A SECURITY POSITION IN THE SECURITIES DISCUSSED. ASSUMPTIONS MADE WITHIN THE ANALYSIS ARE NOT REFLECTIVE OF THE POSITION OF RITHOLTZ WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC" TO THE END OF OR OUR DISCLOSURE. Click here for the full disclaimer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House tries to water down Russia sanctions
Donald Trump is pressuring a US senator to weaken a Bill that would impose sweeping sanctions on Russia. White House officials hoping to mend relations with Moscow have been quietly contacting senator Lindsey Graham's office urging him to water down his Bill, which aims to cripple Vladimir Putin with huge sanctions. The Bill, backed by nearly the entire Senate, would impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, which bankrolls Putin's war effort. Officials have been demanding the Bill include waivers that would allow Mr Trump to choose who or what was sanctioned, congressional aides told the Wall Street Journal. Other attempts to weaken the legislation include softening the language, replacing 'shall' with 'may' to avoid making the reprimands mandatory. Removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions would render the Bill effectively toothless and do little to hamper Putin's war machine, aides fear. 'We're moving ahead and the White House is included in our conversations,' Richard Blumenthal, senator and lead Democratic co-sponsor of the Bill, told the paper. Russia's war effort is funded by fossil-fuel exports. Moscow has adapted to existing sanctions with relative ease, turning to North Korea and China for support. Fearing the impact on pump prices, Joe Biden, former president, was unwilling to crack down on Russian energy exports. Mr Trump, has threatened to impose sanctions on Ukraine, as well as Russia, if the two sides fail to reach a peace agreement. 'Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy,' a White House official said. They added that the constitution 'vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations'. Speaking in the Oval Office alongside Friedrich Merz, German chancellor, on Thursday, the US president said that the Bill should not move forward without his express approval. 'They'll be guided by me. That's how it's supposed to be,' he told reporters. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do.' Last week, Mr Graham and Mr Blumenthal visited Ukraine where they applauded the country's drone attack that destroyed 40 aircraft deep inside Russian territory. However, they were ridiculed and accused of 'stirring up' the conflict by key allies of Mr Trump, including Steve Bannon. 'By trying to engage Putin – by being friendly and enticing – it's become painfully clear [Putin's] not interested in ending this war,' Mr Graham said earlier this week. '[Putin] needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' said Mr Blumenthal. Both said that failing to act now could pull the US deeper into the conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Mr Blumenthal said, Nato treaty obligations could compel US troops into battle. Earlier this week, Russian negotiators tabled a long memorandum, resembling a complete capitulation for Ukraine, in a second round of direct talks with Kyiv in Istanbul. They demanded Ukraine must withdraw its troops from four eastern regions that Russia only partially occupies and that international recognition of Russian sovereignty over them and Crimea must be granted. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs new executive orders intended to make flying cars a reality, slash flight times
President Donald Trump signed three new executive orders Friday aimed at accelerating American drone innovation and supersonic air travel, while also restoring security to American airspace. The three orders will be critical to American safety and security, White House officials involved in the drafting of the orders indicated, particularly in light of major worldwide events coming to the United States in the next few years, such as the World Cup and the Olympics. In addition to bolstering safety and security, the new orders will also spur greater innovation in the aerospace and drone sectors, something White House officials said has been stifled in recent years as a result of burdensome regulations. "Flying cars are not just for the Jetsons," Michael Kratsios, a lead tech policy advisor at the White House said. "Since the beginning of his first term, President Trump has recognized the incredible potential of drones to boost American productivity, create high-skilled jobs and meet national needs in areas like public safety, infrastructure, inspection, agriculture and more. But, for too long, red tape has hindered homegrown drone innovation, restricting commercial drone use and burdening their development." Duffy Contrasts Biden-era 'Drone Fiasco' With Trump Admin's 'Radical Transparency' After Faa Announces Testing Kratsios said the same about supersonic aviation, noting "Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours." Read On The Fox News App Besides promoting innovation, the orders seek to shore up American airspace sovereignty. This directive is aimed at not only addressing potentially criminal or terror-related threats. It also aims to increase penalties for and reduce the prevalence of drone misuse in American airspace. "The president week one wanted us to take this issue seriously because of the national fury over the events over New Jersey," Sebastian Gorka, senior director of counterterrorism on the Trump administration's National Security Council, said of the new executive orders signed Friday. "For far too many years, we have not had a requisite, necessary federal response — not only to the dominance of non-U.S. platforms in this field, but also protecting sensitive sites, military sites, critical infrastructure, but also just sporting events, mass events." Rebecca Grant: America Has A Drone Problem, And No One Is In Charge White House officials who advised the president on these new executive orders said there will be more protection for critical infrastructure for sporting venues as a result of the new directives, including the upcoming FIFA World Cup. They will also enable "routine beyond visual line of sight commercial operations," such as drone deliveries, infrastructure maintenance and emergency response to incidents like wildfires. The orders will also reduce the United States' reliance on foreign countries for drone and other aviation technology, officials added. "These executive orders will accelerate American innovation in drones, flying cars and supersonic aircraft and chart the future of America's skies for years to come," Kratsios said. "Our message is simple. American innovation belongs in American aerospace."Original article source: Trump signs new executive orders intended to make flying cars a reality, slash flight times
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Earlier this week, it looked like Elon Musk had delivered arch conservatives a gift when he trashed President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' On Tuesday, Musk called the legislation an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' It seemed like a boon for some of the fiscal conservatives in the Senate like Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin who criticized the fact the bill still blows up the deficit. Had Musk stopped there, he probably would have given fiscal conservatives additional leverage. House Speaker Mike Johnson had spent much of the first part of the year getting every faction of the House GOP on board with the bill despite fiscal conservative grumbling. But Johnson admitted during his weekly press conference that he had tried to call Musk with no response. Immediately, House Republicans and members of the Freedom Caucus — including its former chairman Scott Perry and Andy Ogles, who has tried to allow Trump to run for a third term — voiced their criticisms of the bill that they had when it was being deliberated. They could have voiced them at any moment but did not. It clearly showed that they had abandoned their fiscal conservative principles in fear of the pressure campaign from Trump. Had Musk kept his critiques strictly to the bill, the tech tycoon could have offered an effective counterweight to give conservatives leverage against leadership given his immense wealth and his wide reach as owner of X. But the world's richest man chose to blow that to smithereens when he turned the attacks personal. First, he said that Trump would not have won the presidency, Republicans would have lost the House and would have a smaller minority in the Senate had it not been for Musk's money, before huffing 'such ingratitude.' Then Musk lobbed the ultimate grenade when he said that Trump had not fully released the 'Epstein files' —information related to the late financier who parlayed his money into sex trafficking teenaged girls — because Trump was mentioned in them. The Tesla founder took it a step further by calling for Trump's impeachment. Not only did Musk's words permanently spike any chance for reconciliation, it killed any chances for budget reconciliation, the arcane process through which Republicans hope to pass the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who has spent much of the legislative process in the House trying to make the bill more conservative but ultimately voted for it, tried to split the difference. 'He's got concerns with the bill, he's a free American, and he can speak freely and and God bless him for what he's been doing to try to make improvements,' Roy told The Independent. 'Again, is it what Chip Roy would draft? Not even close. But did it move in the right direction to get to a place that I felt comfortable sending it to the Senate to see if they could make it better? Sure.' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has spent much of the new Congress trying to declassify information related to Epstein, said it was too early to tell about the Senate bill since text did not exist. 'I've always been a big fan of going back to pre-Covid spending levels,' Luna told The Independent, but understood it would require negotiation. Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, who ultimately voted 'present' on the bill last month, said he agreed. 'I still think his concerns about the deficit are real,' he said. But the damage might already be done. If Republican elected have learned anything in the past decade, they've learned that their voters are not so much devoted to conservative ideals; they're devoted to Trump. Deviation from Trump, even in the name of conservative principles like restraining spending and balanced budgets, amounts to heresy. Musk's decision to start talking about forming another political party further alienates him from the GOP. He is now no longer part of the Trump coalition or even the Republican coalition. That means that fiscal conservatives cannot depend on him to drop millions of dollars for people opposed to the reconciliation bill or if he does, that it will immediately be tainted as money coming from a heretic. This makes Senate and House leadership's job easier. It gives them a foil to oppose and allows critics of the bill to tied to Musk. And they've already seen that most Republicans' bluster about spending levels are just that given that they will ultimately fold. Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee spent much of the early parts of the reconciliation process intimating to reporters that he would not vote for the bill only to fold. As votes wrapped on Thursday, he did not seem worried about it all. 'It's just two biggest dogs in the pound, they're both gonna fight a little,' he said. Except now, Musk just defanged fiscal conservatives.
