Super PAC coordination allegations heat up Boston's mayoral showdown
In a letter to the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance on Tuesday, 13 officers and members of Democratic ward committees from throughout Boston asked the agency to investigate Democratic City Hall hopeful Josh Kraft's campaign to determine whether it illegally coordinated with the super PAC Your City, Your Future.
The letter followed reporting by the Boston Globe and Commonwealth Beacon this week that two companies owned by local political consultant Jonathan Karush had been hired separately by the campaign and the PAC. The letter called the connections between the two 'flagrant and extensive.'
In a response on Wednesday, Kraft's campaign sent its own letter to OCPF, accusing Mayor Michelle Wu of the exact same thing during her 2021 run for office.
They also claimed she was misusing public funds during the current race, having City Hall staff perform campaign-related tasks during business hours.
'Her actions in the face of a serious and credible challenger are unprecedented and a slap in the face to the people of Boston,' Kraft Campaign Manager Brandon Scheutz wrote.
As the Globe first reported this week, Karush built a website for the Kraft campaign as president of Liberty Concepts Inc., which he founded in 2000. At the same time, CP Campaigns, a company Karush formed in March and which shares office space with Liberty Concepts, handles digital advertising for Your City, Your Future.
'Any claim that close business associates O'Connor, Keyser, and Karush have shared no communications about Josh Kraft and his campaign is implausible,' the Democratic ward committee members wrote in their letter Tuesday.
While individual donors can only contribute a maximum of $1,000 per year to a particular political candidate, there is no limit on the amount they can give to a super PAC.
But under state law, independent expenditure political action committees, commonly known as super PACs, are forbidden from coordinating with any candidate or other non-elected political committee.
The state regulations governing contribution limits say two political committees may be considered the same if they 'make contributions to one or more of the same candidates or political committees and if ... the committees are determined to have been established, financed, maintained or controlled by the same person (or persons) or entity (or entities).'
The examples listed as evidence that two entities are the same include shared personnel and office space, though this does not automatically mean that they would legally be considered the same.
Keyser Public Strategies, the firm advising Kraft's campaign, lists Karush as a member of its team on its website, though the firm told the Globe that he is not an employee.
Karush told the Globe that though he is the principal owner of CP Campaigns, he had not personally performed any work for the super PAC, and there is a 'firewall' between that work and what he does for the Kraft campaign, which a campaign spokesperson also confirmed to the newspaper.
'I personally have no contact with the PAC in accordance with the firewall ensuring there is no coordination,' Karush told the Globe.
Neither Karush nor Your City, Your Future immediately responded to requests for comment Wednesday morning. Rebecca St. Amand, the super PAC's chair, told Commonwealth Beacon that they had had 'no dealings with Jonathan Karush.'
According to OCPF records, Your City, Your Future has paid $425,000 to CP Campaigns since April. The PAC has spent more than $2.4 million on advertising since its formation, much of it on negative ads targeted at Wu.
The PAC has taken in major donations from New Balance Chairman Jim Davis and Fanatics CEO Michael Rubin, who each gave $1 million to support Kraft's campaign. Rubin and a number of other donors to the PAC are associates of the candidate's father, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft.
Read more: Out-of-town money floods Boston mayor's race
The Democratic ward committee members also took issue with Robert Kraft's campaign activities in their Tuesday letter, writing that the football team owner had seemingly solicited donations to both the campaign and the PAC.
'This race is unlike any we've seen in Boston's long history. More outside money—from Trump supporters and out-of-state billionaires—has already been raised and spent to attack Mayor Wu and support Josh Kraft than in any other mayoral campaign," they wrote. 'This unprecedented flood of coordinated money threatens our state's strong track record and demands action.'
Josh Kraft has previously acknowledged his father's likely requests for funds from friends, saying during an appearance on GBH's Boston Public Radio last month, 'He's a dad, right? ... I mean, I'd do that for my kid.'
In his letter Wednesday, Scheutz, Kraft's campaign manager, claimed that the campaign had 'received numerous reports' of city staff pitching campaign stories to the media and responding to campaign-related inquiries, collecting signatures to qualify the mayor for the ballot, drafting remarks for her April campaign launch, appearing at political events and 'calling non-profit leaders, community leaders, and business leaders ... to demand they support Mayor Wu's campaign and avoid appearing with, or meeting with Josh Kraft, and threatening to pull city grant funding if they don't comply.'
As evidence, he compared the size of Wu's campaign team—OCPF filings show just two employees and no campaign office—to that of Kraft, who has a campaign headquarters in Nubian Square and 29 paid staff and consultants.
Scheutz also claimed that Wu and her senior staff use secure messaging apps like Signal to communicate, 'for the sole reason that the messages are deleted regularly and can't be disclosed as part of public records requests.'
In addition, Scheutz wrote that in 2021, a pro-Wu super PAC, Boston Turnout Project, hired Sharon Durkan, now a City Councilor, who had previously worked as a fundraising consultant for the Wu campaign.
'Without question, Ms. Durkan would have been in possession of proprietary and non-public information that she had gained from the Wu Committee as to the identities and giving proclivities of and contact information for, the most well-heeled financial supporters of Wu,' he wrote, suggesting that this constituted coordination between the campaign and the super PAC.
Scheutz did not address the allegations against the Kraft campaign in his letter.
The Wu campaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday morning, but in a fundraising email sent to supporters Tuesday evening, they alluded to Your City, Your Future's activities, referring to the group as a 'dark-money Super PAC.'
'Kraft and his family connections are attempting to buy this race – but Boston is not for sale," they wrote.
Out-of-town money floods Boston mayor's race
Yes, immigration is a flash point in Boston's mayoral race. A debate confirmed it | Bay State Briefing
Mayor Wu slams rival Josh Kraft over big bucks infusion: 'Boston is not for sale'
Read the original article on MassLive.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats hear some criticism as redistricting talk picks up
Outside groups are raising concerns that Democrats risk violating the Voting Rights Act with redistricting plans, creating a new problem for the party as it seeks to answer GOP efforts to redistrict its way to more power. Democrats say they have to take action to draw new House districts in states they control in response to power plays by a Trump-driven GOP in Texas and other states. But the tit-for-tat has left groups leaving the door open to litigation. They also are making a moral case, arguing Democrats are thwarting the democratic process. 'This is dead wrong from a democracy perspective, I think it's very problematic for Democrats from a political strategic perspective,' explained Dan Vicuna, director of voting and fair representation at Common Cause. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is the only Democratic governor so far to signal he's considering several ways to counter the GOP's efforts in Texas. Speaking to reporters on Friday, Newsom said any move by California 'is predicated on Texas moving forward' with its own redistricting plan, which some have seen as a way for the Lone Star State to make it more likely to hold on to five House seats. Several other Democratic governors, including Govs. Kathy Hochul of New York, Phil Murphy of New Jersey and JB Pritzker of Illinois have left the door open to possibly changing their maps. The GOP may also not be done. The White House is reportedly pushing Missouri to consider redrawing its map. Civil rights and voting groups are worried actions by both parties could undermine or weaken the political power of historically marginalized minority communities. The issue is a thorny one for Democrats, who have positioned themselves as the prodemocracy party and championed racial justice initiatives. At the same time, Democratic states just like Republican states have been sued by civil rights groups over Voting Rights Act violations. Both Democrats and Republicans have also been found guilty of creating gerrymandered maps. 'We have sued both Democrats and Republicans on these issues,' said Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. 'So yes, we are concerned that when leaders of either party seek to take maximum advantage, partisan advantage of redistricting, they often neglect, if not ignore, the imperatives of the Voting Rights Act with respect to reliably Democratic voting groups.' Some groups are also frustrated given efforts by blue states to move beyond gerrymandering. 'Independent commissions like the gold standard in California were created specifically to avoid what's being considered here, which is voting maps drawn for the sole purpose of protecting incumbent politicians and political party interests to the exclusion of community needs and community feedback,' Vicuna said. California Common Cause was intimately involved in the creation of California's independent commission. It could be difficult for some Democratic-held states to answer Texas. Several would likely need to change their state constitution and work around their respective redistricting commissions. Should the Lone Star State craft new House lines, John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates, in a statement said they would be met 'with a wall of resistance and a wave of legal challenges.' His statement did not address Democratic-led states mulling their own midcycle redistricting. Democrats argue that if Republicans are headed down that road, nothing should be off the table for them as well. 'Republicans should be careful what they ask for,' Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), chair of the House Democrats' campaign arm, told The Hill in a statement. 'And if they go down this path? Absolutely folks are going to respond across the country. We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine the voices of the American people.' Democrats are also leaning into the issue of democracy, saying the longevity of the country is at stake if the party does not respond. Newsom painted the situation in grim terms, saying on Friday, 'I believe that the people of the state of California understand what's at stake. If we don't put a stake into the heart of this administration, there may not be an election in 2028.' 'We can sit back and act as if we have some moral superiority and watch this 249, almost 250-year experiment be washed away,' Newsom said. 'We are not going to allow that to happen. We have agency, we can shape the future.' Civil rights and voting-focused groups, however, are concerned about the ramifications midcycle redistricting could have moving forward, including the possibility of what was once considered a decennial process after each U.S. census turning into a cyclical issue. 'One of the concerns that we have is, even if blue states have power and have a majority in their legislature to redraw maps, our concern is that this could set a bad precedent, because those states could, at the same time, flip in the future,' said Jose Barrera Novoa, vice president of the far west for the League of United Latin American Citizens. 'And the same thing is going to happen where … other parties are going to look to redraw the map midcycle or even quarterly. Who knows?' he asked. 'It's all hypothetical, yet it's still very possible.' Not only could a potential redistricting tit-for-tat raise questions over whether this could be repeated in the future, experts also worry about the financial toll it could take on their resources and voters themselves. 'These are judges managing these cases, hearing these cases. Many of these people are paid out by state funds, and federal cases, of course, are also paid by voters directly,' explained Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, noting cases that use taxpayer funds. 'Do we really want to spend this time doing this highly unusual activity when we're all going to have to pay for it?' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis: ‘Appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida
Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said on Thursday it would be 'appropriate' to pursue redistricting in Florida in the middle of the decade due to population shifts and what he called 'defects' in the way congressional lines have been drawn. The governor's comments came after he scored a win last week when the Florida Supreme Court upheld a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of a majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. 'Just last week the Florida Supreme Court upheld the map that all of the naysayers were saying was somehow defective,' DeSantis told reporters at a press conference in Manatee County. 'I think if you look at that Florida Supreme Court analysis, there may be more defects that need to be remedied apart from what we've already done. I also think the way the population has shifted around Florida just since the census was done in 2020, I think the state was malapportioned. So I do think it would be appropriate to do a redistricting here in the middecade,' he said. DeSantis went on to say he believed that his state got a 'raw deal' in the census when Florida only gained one congressional district, arguing that the state should have garnered at least two seats due to population growth. The governor said he relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year. 'They said they were going to redo the count in time for 2026,' the governor said. 'They would have to do that relatively soon because you need time to draw maps and you need time to get that done.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in South Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel. Rep. Kathy Castor (D) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Republicans and Democrats in the states have been engaged in a tit-for-tat of sorts over redistricting in recent weeks. Texas Republicans are moving ahead with redrawing district lines, while speculation has mounted that Republicans in other states like Florida could follow suit. Democrats from California to New Jersey in turn have ramped up calls to redraw their maps in an effort to blunt the GOP's efforts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Search for answers after Texas' deadly floods brings lawmakers to devastated Hill Country
KERRVILLE, Texas (AP) — Texas lawmakers will take their search for answers following the deadly July 4 floods to the heart of the devastation in Kerr County, where local officials were expected to face questions over their response to the disaster that swept away homes and campers along the Guadalupe River. The hearing Thursday is the first time a panel of lawmakers is visiting the hard-hit Texas Hill Country since the floods, which killed at least 136 people. Most were in Kerr County, including 27 young campers and counselors at Camp Mystic, an all-girls summer camp. Among those invited to testify were local leaders who have defended their preparations and response to the fast-rising waters. Residents will also be given the chance to address lawmakers. The hearing comes as authorities have begun publicly releasing records and audio — including 911 calls — that have provided new glimpses into the escalating danger and chaos in the early hours of the July Fourth holiday. They include panicked and confused messages from residents caught in trees as well as families fleeing with children from homes with water creeping up to the knees. 'People are dying,' one woman tells a 911 operator in call logs released by nearby Kendall County. She says she had a young relative at a church camp in Kerr County who was stranded along with his classmates because of the high waters. 'I don't want them to get stuck in a low-water crossing. And what are they going to do? They have like 30 kids,' the woman says. Kerr County officials have denied several Texas Public of Information requests filed by The Associated Press for 911 calls and body-camera footage related to the floods. Lawmakers have had to address flood relief amid a busy 30-day legislative special session that has included a highly-partisan sprint by Republicans to redraw the state's maps to pick up five more seats in the U.S. House. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott added flood relief and disaster preparedness to the agenda items shortly after calling a special session in June. He also included redrawing the state's maps after receiving pressure from President Donald Trump, who has said he wants Texas Republicans to squeeze five additional seats. House Democrats have launched a series of protests that have involved fleeing the state to meet with Democratic governors to try and stop Republican redistricting. As the minority party in both chambers, the caucus has few options and lawmakers face up to $500 a day for walking out after they broke a quorum in 2021. Party leaders have said they will not engage in other legislative business until the legislature addresses flood relief. Lawmakers have filed bills to provide funding for early warning systems, improve emergency communications and strengthen flood infrastructure in flood-prone areas. Residents along the Guadalupe River have said they were caught off guard and had no warning when rainfall struck. Kerr County does not have a warning system along the river after several missed opportunities by state and local agencies to finance one. Abbott and Texas Republicans have signaled no appetite for assigning blame for the disaster or second-guessing decisions by local officials, who have described the scale of the disaster as one that no one could have saw coming. At the first hearing by Texas lawmakers this month, Texas' chief emergency management official called for better accreditation for county response officials. Democrats, meanwhile, have questioned if officials had done enough to provide sufficient infrastructure for flood-prone areas in rural counties. ___ Lathan is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.