Netflix's Stolen Heist of the Century mastermind identity and what happened to criminals
A new Netflix documentary looks into the case of what is often described as one of the most daring diamond heists that ever took place.
Stolen: Heist of the Century releases on the streaming platform from Friday (August 8). It comes from the same production company, RAW, who are behind other Netflix hits such as Don't F*** With Cats, American Nightmare and The Tindler Swindler.
According to the synopsis of this new feature length doc tells the story of the ultimate true-life crime caper. The Antwerp detectives who cracked the case along with the alleged criminal mastermind are gathered for the first time to give a blow-by-blow account of what really happened.
On the morning of February 17, 2003, detectives from Antwerp's infamous Diamond Squad were called to investigate the brazen night-time robbery of an allegedly impregnable vault in the middle of the City of Diamonds.
It is estimated that at least $100 million worth of diamonds were stolen. Now, after more than 20 years, the world will finally learn how they pulled it off.
One of the biggest questions viewers will have, is just who was the mastermind behind the heist and what happened to the criminals responsible? Be warned, below includes full spoilers for Stolen: Heist of the Century, so you should watch the film first if you want to go in without knowing anything.
Who was the mastermind behind the Antwerp diamond heist?
An ingenious gang of master thieves from Italy, known as The School of Turin were said to be behind the audacious heist. Despite his claims in the documentary, the individual said to be the mastermind behind this group was Leonardo Notarbartolo.
He was assisted by four other individuals who Notarbartolo referred to in interviews by their aliases. These were:
Speedy - a long-time friend of Notarbartolo and responsible for scattering the rubbish in the woods. Belgian police believe this to be Pietro Tavano.
The Monster - apparently an expert lock picker, electrician, mechanic and driver. Belgian police believe this to be Ferdinando Finotto.
The Genius - a specialist in alarm systems. Belgian police believe this to be Elio D'Onorio linked to series of robberies.
The King of Keys - described as one of the best key forgers in the world. His true identity is unknown.
What happened to the criminals responsible behind the diamond heist?
Notarbartolo was found guilty of orchestrating the heist. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison by the court of appeal of Antwerp in 2005, but was released on parole in 2009.
Tavano, D'Onorio, and Finotto each got five years in prison for their roles. The King of Keys was never identified.
In an interview with Wired magazine, Notarbartolo claimed the heist was a part of an insurance fraud scheme. However, this is heavily disputed as the vault itself was uninsured. In that same piece, he also claims an anonymous diamond dealer told him how the heist could be done.
According to Good To Know, Notarbartolo was found to be violating some terms of his parole, believed to be linked to paying back the value of stolen goods. As result he was arrested again in 2013 and made to serve the rest of his sentence.
He is thought to be living in Turin since his release in 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
4 hours ago
- Daily Record
What happened to Louise Kam's killers as Netflix airs Body in the Bin documentary
Body in the Bin: The Murder of Louise Kam tells the harrowing tale of a 71-year-old murdered woman whose body was found inside a wheelie bin A chilling new documentary delves into the horrifying murder of a woman whose body was shockingly found inside a wheelie bin, focusing on the brutal death of Louise Kam. The documentary, Body in the Bin: The Murder of Louise Kam, premiered on Netflix earlier this month and unravels the distressing story of the 71-year-old's savage death after she became the victim of a sickening scam. Louise, a prosperous businesswoman, was swindled out of millions before she was killed. She had been led to believe that she had been offered millions of pounds for properties by a man alleging to have a wealthy girlfriend, and that she could use the money to settle a mortgage and buy a property for her children. However, the man - a kebab shop worker - was not who he claimed to be. Below we delve into Louise's life and death, how her murderers were apprehended and what happened to them, as reported by Birmingham Live. Who was Louise Kam? Louise, from Potters Bar in Hertfordshire, was a successful businesswoman. She owned a property investment portfolio, including a £1.3 million house in Barnet and a shop with three flats in Willesden. Louise vanished in July 2021 and was later discovered discarded in a rubbish bin. Kusai Al-Jundi, 25, of Harrow, London, and Romanian Mohamed El-Abboud, 28, were convicted of her murder in 2023. The court was informed that Al-Jundi spent months befriending Louise, attempting to trick her into handing over control of two properties she owned in Willesden and East Barnet, as well as signing a Lasting Power of Attorney document, with the aim of gaining control over her finances. In the meantime, El-Abboud moved into her house in Barnet. How were Louise Kam's killers apprehended? CCTV footage showed Louise entering the property in Barnet on July 26 2021, but she was never seen alive again. She had been strangled with an electrical cord from a hairdryer, before her body was wrapped in a duvet and discarded in a rubbish bin. Al-Jundi later arranged for the bin to be collected and taken to his family home, hoping it would end up in landfill. He also sent messages from Louise's phone, telling her loved ones she had suddenly travelled to China. However, Louise's son found her disappearance so out of character that he reported her missing to the police. When officers searched the property, they discovered the discarded hairdryer in a hedge and found her body still in the wheelie bin concealed under turf at Al-Jundi's home. DNA and blood evidence then linked the two men to the murder. What happened to Louise Kam's killers? Both Al-Jundi and El-Abboud were found guilty by a jury following a trial at the Old Bailey in 2023. Judge Mark Lucraft KC sentenced each of them to life with a minimum of 35 years in prison each. Judge Lucraft KC stated during sentencing that if they were ever released, both would be liable for recall to prison for the rest of their lives. He said: "In relation to murder the only sentence that can be passed on you is one of life imprisonment,and that is the sentence I will pass. The issue for this Court is the minimum term that you will each serve before you are first considered for release. "When it comes to the minimum term that you will serve, I make it plain that I am not ordering that you are to be released at the end of it. "That will be a matter for the Parole Board. Only when the minimum term has been served can the Parole Board decide whether it is safe to release you. If the board does release you then you will remain on licence and liable to recall for the rest of your life." Body in the Bin: The Murder of Louise Kam is available to watch on Netflix.
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Strange detail in Amy Bradley case called out by Netflix fans
Her family are still hopeful she's alive (Image: Netflix) Amy Bradley embarked on what was supposed to be a joyous holiday with her family aboard the Royal Caribbean's cruise ship Rhapsody of the Seas in 1998. However, she mysteriously vanished from the vessel during the journey and has remained missing ever since. Speculation about her fate ranges from theories that she may have accidentally fallen overboard after consuming too much alcohol, to more sinister suggestions that she could have been trafficked off the ship. Despite the uncertainty, numerous reported sightings of Amy over the years have kept her family's hope alive that she might still be out there somewhere. In July, Netflix released a documentary titled Amy Bradley Is Missing, which delves into the perplexing circumstances surrounding the then-23-year-old's disappearance and the relentless search efforts to find her. Amy was 23 when she vanished (Image: Netflix) READ MORE: Netflix's terrifying Amy Bradley documentary has made me think twice about cruises READ MORE: What happened to Alister 'Yellow' Douglas after Amy Bradley's disappearance? The synopsis of the series states: "On March 23, 1998, 23-year-old Amy Bradley disappears without a trace from the cruise ship she and her family were vacationing on. Despite thorough searches of the ship, Amy is nowhere to be found and the cruise has already docked in their next port, Curaçao, opening the door for 2,400 passengers to explore the island and allowing Amy to potentially disappear into the crowd. "As the years pass by, possible sightings of Amy pop up in various locations from multiple people. Is it really her? Was this a tragic accident or a crime? - anything is possible. But for Amy's family - only one thing matters: bringing their daughter home alive." Netflix's documentary introduced the case to a completely fresh audience who have been examining the evidence and theories ever since, with Amy's family revealing they have received "thousands" of fresh leads. Amongst these is one that might provide a crucial breakthrough in the investigation, reports the Mirror US. Amy Bradley and her brother Brad were pictured together on the same cruise she disappeared on (Image: Netfllix) A police officer has allegedly stated he spotted Amy in 2016 which would mark the most recent sighting. The previous one was documented in 2005. Speaking to SWNS, Amy's brother Brad explained: "They are still talking to him... He's told verifiable truths with verifiable lies mixed in. Hopefully, something will come from it. I'd like to feel positive about it, but we've been told a bunch of c**p by a bunch of people." Meanwhile those who have watched the documentary have highlighted a "bizarre" detail in the case. Examining the family's response following Amy's disappearance, viewers have questioned why the family continued to coordinate their search from the US rather than where their daughter was last spotted. Viewers questioned why her family haven't relocated to the Caribbean (Image: Netflix) "It was bizarre to me that the parents had their war room in the US even after multiple sightings around the Caribbean that they felt were credible. What? Why did they not temporarily move to the island she was seen on and spend the next few years investigating it first hand themselves?" asked one armchair detective. "As a dad I'm not sitting in my a** in the US if I really think my daughter is on an island getting held hostage," penned another. Another Netflix viewer criticised the streaming service for not employing a private investigator, stating: "Netflix couldn't spring for a PI in Barbados? Such a lazy move. Best way to provide an ending for a doc is to at least try to find closure. Hope the family gets answers Netflix was too lazy to provide." Amy Bradley is Missing is now streaming on Netflix
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Anna Sorokin ‘horrified' after rabbits used for photoshoot dumped in New York park
After years of prison and conniving her way into luxury, Anna Sorokin has New York talking about her again. This time, it is not posing as a German heiress or being jailed for four years, instead the convicted fraudster has been left 'disturbed' and 'horrified' after three rabbits used in her photoshoot were found dumped in a nearby park. Sorokin, who also went by the name Anna Delvey and is the subject of Netflix's Inventing Anna, shot to infamy after a high-profile court case. The fraudster, who masqueraded as an heiress, swindled the wealthy in Manhattan with an invented trust fund. But this latest saga involves a photograph on her Instagram account, in which she is pictured outside a Tribeca subway station with a black ankle monitor – stipulated under the terms of her 2022 prison release – and holding two leashed rabbits. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Days after posing for the photographs, social media users were quick to link the abandoned bunnies with Sorokin after the animals were spotted in Prospect Park. 'I felt ashamed and embarrassed to be associated with it,' Sorokin said of the affair. The 34-year-old said she was not responsible for the rabbits and was 'horrified' to learn they had been dumped. The first bunny, a one-and-a-half-year-old Harlequin lop, was found in the bushes by Terry Chao, near a cardboard box used as part of Sorokin's photoshoot last week. On Thursday, another bunny was found near the same cardboard box, followed by a third on Sunday, near a black carrier bag, she told the New York Times. The man who photographed Sorokin, Jasper Egan Soloff, told the newspaper through a lawyer that it was not his shoot and claimed to have no knowledge of how the bunnies were obtained or handled. But another person involved in the shoot appears to have apologised and taken responsibility in a since-deleted Instagram post. 'When I realised the rabbits were being surrendered to me I panicked. At 19, with no experience caring for animals, no pet-friendly housing, and no knowledge of available resources, I felt overwhelmed and made the worst possible choice,' he reportedly wrote. 'Believing, mistakenly, that there were existing rabbits in that area, I released them there, thinking that was my best option.' He added that they were being fostered by someone in New York, while Sorokin said she offered to help rehome the rabbits when she learned they had been abandoned. People on social media have accused Sorokin of animal cruelty. Many commenters decried her use of the animals as props, and warned against photographing bunnies on leashes on their backs, a position known as trancing that can be harmful to the animals. 'I do not eat meat, and I had no involvement in the acquisition, transport, or return of these animals. I would never condone these actions,' Sorokin told the website Page Six. After being convicted in 2019 on multiple counts of larceny and theft, she was released after nearly four years in jail and a further 18 months in immigration detention for overstaying her visa, and was told to refrain from posting on social media.
