The Rise And Decline Of The Craft Beer Trend
Search "craft beer" and "decline" together and you'll encounter page after page of doom-and-gloom articles declaring the industry dead and buried. The average American consumer, it would seem, has made like known craft beer naysayer Anthony Bourdain and moved on from artisanal stouts and independent IPAs. But the truth isn't quite so dramatic: Craft beer is a maturing industry like any other, experiencing some contraction after years of explosive growth. The numbers don't look great, but it's important to remember this isn't a dying industry, but a changing one. Unfortunately, for the time being, those changes are coming with some falling sales and closing breweries.
Data from the Brewers Association, the main promotion and lobbying organization for the craft beer industry, shows craft beer sales dropped by 2% in the first half of 2023. Circana, a market research firm tracking grocery, retail, and convenience stores, found craft beer sales fell 3.3%, or about $158 million, in 2024 in a study of its own. That year, according to the Brewers Association (BA), was the first in almost two decades that more breweries closed than opened -- at 399 out of around 9,700, it's a small percentage, but the comparison to the 335 openings is notable. In order to understand how we got here, it's important to look back at the history of American craft beer, which includes a relatively recent fever pitch that would have been virtually impossible to maintain.
Read more: 13 Popular Kirkland Liquors At Costco, Ranked By Online Reviews
The story of craft beer starts with homebrewing. The lingering effects of the Prohibition meant there were only around 100 breweries in the United States by the 1970s. Most people got their beer from a few behemoth producers like Anheuser-Busch and Coors. Those mass-produced lagers left many thirsty for variety, especially if they'd traveled to places like England, Germany, or Belgium and tried some of their nuanced ales and lagers. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter legalized homebrewing for the first time since before the Prohibition, and enthusiasts got to work. Many of these homebrewers began going pro, opening seminal breweries like Anchor Brewing Company, Sierra Nevada, and Samuel Adams, and introducing American drinkers to some of the best-known and best-loved beer styles. By 1990, there were nearly 200 breweries operating taprooms and brewpubs.
Over the decades, craft beer grew and evolved with different trends, like the soaring popularity of bitter West Coast IPAs during the early 2000s, followed by sweeter hazy IPAs in the 2010s. For many fans, craft beer became a lifestyle, with annual events like the Great American Beer Festival; beer-rating, -discussing, and -trading forums like BeerAdvocate, Untappd, and the now-defunct RateBeer; and, especially during the hazy boom, people waiting in hours-long lines to snag limited releases. By 2020, craft beer was everywhere: Nearly 8,300 breweries meant nearly every city had a few local taproom options, and supermarket shelves were lined with fruited sours and pastry stouts.
Perhaps the best reminder that the current struggles of the craft beer industry are par for the course when it comes to an industry of small, independent businesses is the fact that we previously saw a dip in the 1990s. Some of the best breweries in the United States opened their doors in this decade, like Allagash Brewing Company and Dogfish Head, both in 1995. But there was such a boom, in fact, that the industry became overly saturated. Consumers had gone from having no craft beer options and not much knowledge about beer styles, to -- depending on where they were in the country -- lots of choices to figure out. And in the rush to join this movement on the rise, many breweries launched and produced beer without much experience or know-how, or quality control measures in place. That meant mediocre and even bad beer entering the marketplace, which turned some imbibers off this whole "craft beer" thing.
Nearly 200 breweries closed during the late 1990s, which sounds like nothing in our current state of having thousands nationwide. But in 1990, as confirmed by data from the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Bureau (TTB), there were about 250 breweries, and in 1999, there were 1,991. That means two things: One, that 200 breweries was a pretty significant percentage of the entire industry at the time, and two, that the number still managed to keep growing, with closures not deterring hopeful owners and brewers. Thanks to them, American craft beer was revving into high gear.
If craft beer set out for a relatively smooth ride to success throughout the first couple of decades of the 21st century, what threw a wrench in the works? It was really a perfect storm of factors. First, breweries have been hammered by rising costs at every turn. What started as supply chain chokeholds during the early pandemic never really let up. Ingredients for everything from the beer itself to food a brewery might serve in the taproom are pricier, as are things like the tall aluminum cans craft breweries prefer. If tariffs go into effect this year, that aluminum could become even more cost-prohibitive. Plus, breweries' would-be customers are feeling the squeeze, too, cutting back on discretionary spending like pints out or four-packs in the face of inflation and the rising prices of necessities like groceries and gas.
Added to that is changing consumer behavior and preferences. People got used to staying home more during the pandemic, and an increasing emphasis on wellness ever since has motivated many to drink less alcohol. And when they do drink, they've got so many more options than they did even five years ago. Ready-to-drink cocktails and hard seltzers, teas, and juices now compete for the same shelf space as beer, and rather than geeking out over beer-style nuances, shoppers are driven by things like flavor, calories, sugar, alcohol, and prices, boosting cross-category imbibing and erasing category loyalty.
In 2025, craft breweries are facing a ton of obstacles, and having to compete with not only more fellow breweries than ever, but those aforementioned categories. While wine and spirits are struggling as well -- also due to factors including costs and people imbibing less -- many demographics are shifting and drinking less beer and more spirits, or instead seeking out things like cannabis beverages. Breweries, however, are showing resilience, flexibility, and that signature creativity that put craft beer on the map.
Some are reapproaching the lineups of what they brew, focusing on a thoughtfully curated lineup of flagship beers that people know, love, and can continue to rely on. Others are expanding into other categories they're passionate about or that are popular now, joining instead of trying to beat spirits, wine, cider, and more. Breweries are making some of the best canned cocktails out there, and meeting consumers where they're at with non-alcoholic beers, sparkling hop waters, and even hemp beverages. Breweries are also leaning toward being local gathering hubs rather than chasing lofty distribution goals, and are motivating people to go out with exciting events and experiences from book clubs to drag shows to bonsai-growing classes. While craft beer might look different today than it did five, 10, or 20 years ago, an industry built on innovation and determination can't be considered down for the count.
Read the original article on Tasting Table.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security problem
American workers anticipating the arrival of Social Security monthly paychecks when they retire often express concerns about whether the program's trust funds will be in sufficient supply to meet their financial expectations. Dave Ramsey, radio host and bestselling personal finance author, sounds an alarm about what is needed to keep those notions alive - and what exactly it is for which Americans should be planning. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter According to the 2025 Social Security Trustees' Report, if lawmakers fail to intervene, Social Security beneficiaries could see a large reduction in payments starting in 2034. This looming cut stems from the projection that the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted by then. Simply put, the program would be taking in less revenue than it needs to fully cover all scheduled benefits for both current and future recipients. Historically, Congress has stepped in with last-minute reforms to prevent such scenarios - while often shielding lower-income individuals from the brunt of the changes. In 1983, for example, legislators passed a set of measures designed to stabilize Social Security in the short term and extend its financial health for what they hoped would be about 75 years. These measures combined increased revenue - through higher payroll taxes, taxing benefits, and expanding coverage - with modest spending cuts such as adjusting the cost-of-living formula and gradually raising the retirement age. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security The latest annual trustees' report, published on June 18, estimates that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund may run dry by 2033 - unchanged from last year's forecast. After that, only about 77% of promised benefits would be payable unless corrective action is taken. However, one notable update is that the combined trust funds - which include both the OASI and Disability Insurance (DI) programs - are now projected to remain solvent through 2034, one year earlier than previously expected, unfortunately. At that point, around 81% of scheduled combined benefits would still be paid out. Ramsey discusses some basic math involved in why the Social Security system needs adjustments. "As more and more boomers retire, the number of Americans 65 and older is expected to jump from roughly 61 million today to about 77 million in 2035," Ramsey wrote. "At the same time, there will be fewer workers supporting more retirees, which puts even more of a strain on the system." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Ramsey emphasizes the fact that Americans should not view Social Security as a main source of income during retirement. Rather, it should be a small but helpful part of one's retirement income that includes investments in tools such as 401(k) plans and IRAs. "Any money you get from Social Security should be considered icing on the cake," Ramsey wrote. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare In a statement, the Social Security Board of Trustees made a few key observations. In 2024, the combined reserves of the OASI and DI trust funds saw a significant decline, dropping by $67 billion and bringing the total down to $2.72 trillion. This continued erosion of the funds is an indication of the program's mounting financial strain as benefit payments outpace income from dedicated payroll taxes and other sources. Looking ahead, the financial outlook remains challenging. Starting in 2025, Social Security's total annual expenditures are projected to exceed its total annual income for the foreseeable 75-year horizon. This imbalance isn't new - costs began surpassing income in 2021, and the gap has existed between costs and non-interest income even longer, stretching back to 2010. This growing disparity has contributed to the gradual depletion of trust fund reserves. The statement summarizes the key point for Americans discussed above: Without legislative action, projections show that by 2034 the combined trust fund reserves could be exhausted. If that happens, the program would not go bankrupt, but it would only have enough ongoing revenue to cover approximately 81% of scheduled benefits. This shortfall would significantly affect payments to retirees and other beneficiaries unless Congress enacts reforms to restore long-term solvency. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Super-rich Americans like Mark Zuckerberg and Jay-Z have taken out mortgages for homes — here's why
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. We adhere to strict standards of editorial integrity to help you make decisions with confidence. Some or all links contained within this article are paid links. For many people, the only way to afford a home is to finance it with a mortgage and pay off that loan over time. During the first quarter of 2025, the median U.S. home sale price was $503,800, according to Federal Reserve Economic Data. Given that median annual wages were just $61,984 during the last quarter of 2024, it's easy to see why the typical working American can barely afford a down payment on a home today, let alone the entire cost in one fell swoop. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) But uber-wealthy folks are in a different position. Those with billions of dollars to their name can buy a home outright rather than take out a loan. Yet celebrities like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and Jay-Z have all made headlines for taking out multimillion-dollar mortgages — not out of necessity but to reap a couple of key benefits. Someone with billions to their name might not worry about cash flow, but taking out a mortgage can be a strategic move to maintain liquidity and keep cash available for other investments, rather than tying it up in a relatively illiquid asset like real estate. Take Hollywood power couple Jay-Z and Beyoncé, for example. Despite their estimated combined net worth of $1.6 billion in 2017, they secured a $52.8 million mortgage to purchase an $88 million hillside estate in Los Angeles, according to the L.A. Times. There could be major benefits for Beyoncé and Jay-Z, depending on how their portfolio is allocated,' Robert Cohan, managing director at Carlyle Financial, told Business Insider. 'A mortgage gives them financial flexibility, and they have the ability to pay it off whenever they choose. You can still land an affordable mortgage rate even if you don't fall in the category of America's elite 1%. The key is to not accept the first offer on the table — and to shop around and get quotes from at least two-three lenders. According to a study conducted by LendingTree, 45% of homebuyers who received more than one quote got a lower rate than their initial one . If you purchased a house in the last couple of years at a fixed rate, chances are you might be able to refinance it at a lower rate right now. Mark Zuckerberg, the world's second richest man (according to the Forbes Real Time Billionaires list) did the same. Back in 2012, when Zuckerberg was #40 on the list with an estimated $15.6 billion net worth, he refinanced his home in Palo Alto, California, with a 30-year adjustable rate mortgage at 1.05%. While rates probably won't go down to that level any time soon, the Federal Reserve's rate cuts over the past few months have already had a noticeable impact. Median mortgage rates are currently hovering around 6.95% — down from 8% in October last year. With the Fed slated to lower the benchmark rates further in the upcoming months, it might be a good idea to start looking at your options. Ideally, you can land a lower rate by shopping around. According to a study from LendingTree, 56% of homebuyers shopped around when they refinanced their mortgage. What's more, 81% of those who chose to refinance, came away with a lower rate than what they started with. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — Even for accredited investors, purchasing additional properties for rental or investment income can be a hassle. Beyond ongoing maintenance and property taxes, there's also the added burden of managing tenants and the responsibilities that come with being a landlord. This is where First National Realty Partners (FNRP) comes in. Accredited investors can own a stake in grocery-anchored institutional-grade commercial real estate without having to do any of the legwork. FNRP's team of experts manages the entire life cycle of the investment — from due diligence of properties to acquisition and tenant management. The firm typically leases its properties to national brands selling essential goods, like Walmart, Whole Foods, CVS, and Kroger. FNRP also pays out any positive cash flows as dividends quarterly, helping you generate passive income without worrying about property and tenant management. Another option for investing in real estate is the U.S. home equity market, a vast $36 trillion industry that has long been reserved for large institutional players. Homeshares is transforming this space by giving accredited investors direct access to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in major U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning, or managing property. The fund focuses on homes with substantial equity, utilizing Home Equity Agreements (HEAs) to help homeowners access liquidity without incurring debt or additional interest payments. This approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in high-quality residential properties, plus the added benefit of diversification across various regional markets – with a minimum investment of $25,000. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, the U.S. Home Equity Fund could unlock lucrative real estate opportunities, offering accredited investors a low-maintenance alternative to traditional property ownership. Homeshares also gives accredited investors access to the $36 trillion U.S. home equity market, which has historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — without the headaches of buying, owning or managing property. With risk-adjusted internal returns ranging from 14% to 17%, this approach provides an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs Millions of Americans now sit on a stunning $35 trillion in home equity — here's 1 new way to invest in responsible US homeowners This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Could Strait of Hormuz Closure Impact Americans?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iranian lawmakers have voted to support closing the Strait of Hormuz—a vital route for global oil and gas shipments—in response to U.S. airstrikes on three of the country's nuclear sites on Saturday, a move that if agreed upon by the Supreme Leader, could disrupt energy markets and drive up prices worldwide and stateside. Why It Matters Following U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz, the world waits as Iran considers its response. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow, yet incredibly strategic waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. At its narrowest point, the strait is about 21 miles wide, with two shipping lanes that are 2 miles wide in each direction. Around 20 percent of global oil trade passes through the Strait, with any closure likely to spike global prices. What To Know In the first fiscal quarter of 2025, the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) noted that just under 15 million barrels of crude oil and condensate, and about 8 million barrels of petroleum products were transported through the Strait. There are very few alternative routes for the large volume of oil that passes through the chokepoint. The average 20 million barrels of oil products that pass through make up around 20 percent of the global consumption. The price of Brent crude oil was already climbing ahead of the U.S. strikes, increasing from $69 per barrel on June 12 to $74 per barrel on June 13. While the EIA estimates that a large majority, around 80 percent, of the oil-based product moving through the Strait go to Asian markets, around 2 million barrels a day end up in the U.S. Stena Impero being seized and detained between July 19 and July 21, 2019 in Bandar Abbas, Iran as it passed through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital regional shipping channel. Stena Impero being seized and detained between July 19 and July 21, 2019 in Bandar Abbas, Iran as it passed through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital regional shipping channel. Tasnim/Getty Images If the Iranian government following the lead of the parliament, decides to close the Strait, Asian markets are expected to be most hit, but American markets will be too. Despite influence over the Strait, Iran doesn't supply the most oil that transports through it, Saudi Arabia does. Some experts have said that if Iran were to cut off access to the Strait, it could spike oil prices by 30 to 50 percent immediately, with gas prices likewise rising. "Oil prices would likely double, to well above $100. The extent to which that price shock would be sustainable is unclear," Marko Papic, chief strategist at BCA Research, told Newsweek in an email Sunday. He also noted that due to the overwhelming pressure campaign the country would face over its closure "the price shock would be of limited duration." "However," he continued, "it could impact confidence domestically, impact capex [capital expenditure] intentions by corporates, and thus trickle into the animal spirits [psychological factors that influence economic behavior] that affects not just stocks, but also the labor market." Fears that Iran could attack U.S. oil infrastructure in the region and levy its power over the Straits of Hormuz could "combine to make prices and speculation rise about the security and dependability of supply," Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London, previously told Newsweek. "Lack of clarity of how long this condition will last will also lead to hoarding or preemptive purchasing by other nations, so there are competition supply fears that will drive up prices," he added. Iran has been reluctant to close to Strait, even during times of intense conflict during the heat of the Iran-Iraq war. Infographic with map of the Gulf showing maritime tanker traffic in September 2024 through the Strait of Hormuz. Infographic with map of the Gulf showing maritime tanker traffic in September 2024 through the Strait of Hormuz. NALINI LEPETIT-CHELLA,OMAR KAMAL/AFP via Getty Images) What People Are Saying Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London, told Newsweek: "This is not an act that just stays in the Gulf region, it has wider global strategic ripples." Spencer Hakimian, founder of Tolou Capital Management, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday: "There are close to 50 large oil tankers scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz right now. Looks like the oil industry is expecting the Strait to be blockaded in the coming days." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday evening: "ANY RETALIATION BY IRAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT. THANK YOU! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES." Brian Krassenstein, who has over 900,000 followers on X wrote on Sunday if the Strait is closed, people can expect: "U.S. Gas Prices likely Skyrocket. Potential $5–$7/gallon range depending on duration. Military Escalation Risk. U.S. Navy and allies likely to respond. Tanker delays affect oil, LNG, and related goods." What Happens Next? Any final decision on Iran's response, whether negotiation or closing the Strait or other, however, will largely rest with the country's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The parliament vote to close the Strait merely advises him of the option to pursue.